Sotto slams Senate ruling on Sara Duterte impeachment
'The Senate Court's decision is flawed! A senator-judge cannot file a motion,' Sotto told reporters via text message. He emphasized that only defense or prosecution lawyers are allowed to make such motions, a point he said he learned from the late Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago during the 11th Congress.
Sotto was referring to Senator Alan Peter Cayetano's motion to send the impeachment case back to the House of Representatives. That motion, an amended version of Senator Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa's earlier motion to dismiss the case outright, passed with an 18-5 vote on June 10.
Pressed on how the Senate could remedy the situation, Sotto said they should move on but learn from the misstep. He also suggested senator-judges review their duties and consider changing their legal advisers.
'They should just leave that in the dustbin of history. Don't repeat the mistake. Senator-judges should review the role of a judge—and replace the lawyers around them,' he said.
He urged new senators to study past impeachment proceedings, particularly during the trial of President Joseph Estrada, where Santiago emphasized judicial conduct and procedures.
'Study first before speaking out,' Sotto added.
Meanwhile, the spokesperson for the Impeachment Court, lawyer Regie Tongol, defended the Senate's decision. He likened senator-judges to members of the Supreme Court, who have the inherent power to review complaints for legal sufficiency.
'It's normal in a collegial judicial body to assess documents. If a defect is raised, the court can ask the House to address it,' Tongol explained.
The court set two requirements for the House: a certification that the verified complaint doesn't violate the Constitution, and a reaffirmation that lawmakers intend to pursue the trial.
As of Friday morning, the court had yet to formally receive the House's certification. Tongol noted it was only released to the media so far.
When asked whether non-compliance by the House could lead to contempt, Tongol said it was unlikely, stressing that the Senate is trying to avoid a constitutional standoff.
'The Impeachment Court is doing everything it can to prevent a clash with the House or a potential constitutional crisis,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
8 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Romualdez Vows House Will Turn Marcos' SONA Vision Into Reality Through Legislation
House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez assured that the House of Representatives will work to turn President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s goals—laid out in his upcoming State of the Nation Address (SONA)—into tangible results through legislative action. Romualdez praised Marcos' leadership, citing achievements in economic recovery, infrastructure development, agriculture, education, and digital innovation. He emphasized that the SONA offers an opportunity to push further progress and address pressing concerns such as inflation, job creation, and access to healthcare and education. Calling the SONA a 'chance to build on what we've achieved,' Romualdez reaffirmed the House's commitment to support the administration's priorities. He said lawmakers are ready to pass laws that will ease the burdens faced by Filipino families and drive inclusive growth.
Filipino Times
13 hours ago
- Filipino Times
House to File Appeal After SC Voids VP Duterte Impeachment Articles
The House of Representatives is preparing to file a motion for reconsideration following the Supreme Court's (SC) unanimous decision declaring the impeachment articles against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional. According to House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante, Speaker Martin Romualdez confirmed the move, citing overlooked factual details in the SC's ruling—particularly the claim that the complaint never went through plenary, which the House says is contradicted by their official records. Abante stressed that these details were included in previous documents submitted to the SC. The motion seeks to give the House a chance to clarify these points and assert its constitutional role in initiating impeachment proceedings. The SC ruled 13-0 that the impeachment violated the one-year ban under the Constitution and lacked due process. However, Abante argued that the due process standard used by the Court is not part of existing laws or House rules. The House maintains that the impeachment process was valid and insists on defending its institutional independence. Abante said the prosecution panel will continue preparing the case while waiting on the outcome of their appeal. Meanwhile, Abante expressed hope that the Senate will fulfill its role in the impeachment process, despite the Supreme Court ruling. She added that the House is fully prepared for the opening of the 20th Congress on Monday, July 28, with all necessary precautions in place—including skipping the usual red carpet to focus on the President's State of the Nation Address.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Palace: Respect Supreme Court ruling on VP Duterte impeachment
Malacañang urged the public to respect the Supreme Court's decision declaring the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Presidential Communications Office Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro said the Palace has not yet fully reviewed the ruling but emphasized the importance of upholding the judiciary's independence. 'The impeachment process is a matter handled by the legislative and judicial branches, and we recognize their independence in carrying out their constitutional mandates,' she added. The Supreme Court earlier ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte violated the one-year bar rule unde Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution and infringed on her right to due process. The decision, penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, stated that the high court could not acquire jurisdiction over the proceedings due to the constitutional prohibition. Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa inhibited from the case, while Associate Justice Maria Filomena Singh was on leave. The case stemmed from the consolidated petition filed by Duterte, her counsel Atty. Israelito Torreon, and several others seeking to nullify the impeachment complaint filed by the House of Representatives. Supreme Court spokesperson Atty. Camille Ting clarified that while the high tribunal nullified the complaint, it is not clearing Duterte of the charges but added that 'any subsequent impeachment complaint' may only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
