Dutch citizens advised to keep cash on hand in case of emergency
Citizens should keep €70 per adult and €30 per child in cash as a precautionary measure, the bank warned this week.
The money should be enough to cover necessary expenses for 72 hours "such as for water, food, medicine, and transportation", it said.
"Think of a power failure, a technical disruption at your bank or the Wi-Fi going down. Then you might not be able to pay the way you are used to. But paying with cash is almost always possible," the DNB's advisory said.
The recommendation "was prompted by increased geopolitical tensions and cyber threats that could challenge our payment system", it added.
In addition to holding hard cash, the DNB said people should consider having a debit card and using contactless with their phone or smartwatch.
The bank's warning follows a massive power outage that hit Spain and Portugal on 28 April. The causes of the blackout are still being investigated.
Card payment systems went offline and ATMs were out of order, meaning that many people in the two countries had to rely on cash to buy water, food, torches and battery-powered radios to stay up-to-date with the news.
The European Commission released a preparedness plan in March that encouraged the public to maintain sufficient supplies for at least 72 hours in case of emergencies such as natural disasters or conflict.
The plan listed items including cash, medication, a power bank and a radio.
Representatives of Central Asian countries have come together to maximise the region's economic opportunities and make an effort to support Afghanistan, which is now signalling a business-oriented international outreach after years of isolation.
The Termez Dialogue on Connectivity Between Central and South Asia, which included leaders from Central Asian countries along with India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, was held in the southern Uzbek city of Termez.
The meeting was initiated by Uzbekistan, a strong supporter of the economic integration of its neighbour Afghanistan, which is now in the fifth year of the Taliban government.
The Central Asian countries have for years been pushing for what they call "acceptance of reality" in the region and engagement with Afghanistan.
In 2022 Uzbekistan President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, proposed a platform for Central and South Asian countries to collaborate, which was later reflected in a UN General Assembly resolution.
The meeting in Termez is an effort to turn the ideas presented in the resolution into a reality.
"The main goal of this dialogue is to create a permanent, functional platform within which the representatives of Central and South Asian countries can discuss a wide range of cooperation issues, from interconnectivity, trade and economic cooperation to humanitarian exchange," Eldor Aripov, Director of the Institute for Strategic and Regional Studies, said.
Most of the region's countries have already started their first infrastructure projects in Afghanistan.
There are now high-voltage power lines to Afghanistan running from both from Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Through them Afghanistan receives regular aid in the form of electricity.
Turkmenistan's deputy foreign minister Temirbek Erkinov pointed out a new road and a railway from his country to Afghanistan projects are in the planning for the route to be extended as far as the city of Mazar-i-Sharif.
The participants in the Termez talks repeatedly pointed out the cultural and historic ties between the countries in the region and were all clear about one thing.
Since they became independent from the Soviet Union, the landlocked countries of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, were cut off both from the nearest deep sea ports in Pakistan and from the vast markets of Pakistan and India due to ongoing conflict in Afghanistan.
No pipeline, road or railway line was viable through the vast swathes of Afghanistan that were deemed unsafe.
That situation has changed and Afghanistan now has a government which seems to be able to provide security for major projects. An opportunity not to be missed, in the opinion of Central Asian leaders.
"We want active engagement on a number of concrete infrastructure projects, first of all Afghan Trans Railway Corridor. You know that all the countries of the region are land-locked, Uzbekistan is double-land locked as we have to cross two borders to reach the nearest sea," explained Aripov.
"This is why the question of transport communication is the most important topic for all the central and south Asian countries. We are committed to the Trans Afghan corridor above all because it will connect Pakistani ports to the countries of Central Asia."
"Right now, trade between Central and South Asia is worth five billion dollars. That is nothing. It does not remotely reflect the potential that's there. Europe is much further away and our trade exchange with them is ten times higher," he added.
Afghanistan's deputy foreign minister Mohammad Naeem Wardak joined the summit to announce Kabul's intentions to get involved in trade, transit and stronger regional economic cooperation, to act what he called "a regional connector and a transit route."
"The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is making efforts to make Afghanistan the connectivity point in this region. Afghanistan's position is to the benefit of all the countries around us in the region," he said.
He insisted that Afghanistan is already providing security in the region by tackling drug trafficking, eradicating poppy fields and fighting organised crime and terrorism.
But his government is eager to engage more, economically, he said.
"Afghanistan is centrally located and is the bridge between Central and South Asia. As such, it represents a bridge. Unfortunately, we had 40 years of fighting and the opportunity did not exist. Now, thanks to Allah, with the return of the Islamic Emirate, the opportunities for development are in place," he told Euronews.
The city of Termez, situated on the border between Uzbekistan and Afghanistan on the bank of the Amu Darya river, has been a logistics hub for the caravans travelling between east and west along the ancient Silk Road.
During Soviet times it was reduced to a distant outpost and served as the Red Army's entry point to Afghanistan in 1979.
A project which envisions the city regaining some of its former glory and bringing the prosperity of a trade hub is under way.
On a patch of land on the border, Uzbekistan built a free trade zone in 2024 for Afghan companies and a logistics centre.
Afghan nationals can enter the zone as part of a 15-day visa-free regime.
Almost half a million Afghans have already made use of the opportunity, opening businesses thanks to a simplified registration procedure and enjoying duty free trade.
Around 100 shops are currently active there and a further 500 have been announced. A cargo centre within the zone is used to load more than 70 lorries, and a daily train transports goods to both sides of the border.
A modern hospital, opened last year, with 380 doctors working in 15 different areas has treated around 48,000 Afghan patients, paid for by the Uzbek government.
Around 300 complicated surgeries were performed that patients were unable to have in Afghanistan.
A business school for medium and small enterprises was also opened and teaches some 500 shop owners how to run and develop their business.
"We have seen the surge of trade contracts in the last year. Last year the increase was 160%, and they are now worth $560 million (€494 million)," said the governor of the Surkhandarya region, Ulugbek Kosimov.
He also hopes that the development of trade routes from Russia in the north to India in the south and from Iran in the west and China in the east, with all the countries along the road, will see his province prosper in what he called a "new renaissance."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
EU seeks to triple entry fee for short-term visa-exempt visitors
The European Commission has proposed bumping the fee for visa-exempt travellers arriving in the bloc for short stays from €7 to €20, a senior EU official has confirmed. Visa exempt travel is set to be available from the last quarter of 2026 through the 'European Travel Information and Authorisation System' (ETIAS) to 30 European countries—namely, all EU member states except Ireland, plus Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland. An ETIAS authorisation is required for short-term stays (up to 90 days) in these countries by nationals of visa-exempt states such as the UK, US, Canada, Brazil, and Australia. The new ETIAS fee system will be assigned to the EU budget. Currently, the cost for visa exempt arrival is set at €7 for applicants, with exemptions for those under 18 or over 70 years old at the time of application. However, the European Commission now wants to triple the fee to €20 in order to raise additional funds. The proposal accompanies the presentation of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the EU's long-term budget for the period 2028–2034, which foresees a significant increase in revenues generated through so-called 'own resources'—that is, taxes collected at EU level. In addition to five new own resources proposals pitched by the Commission last week, plans to raise the ETIAS fee are set to generate an additional €300 million per year. The Commission has submitted the proposal to the Council and the European Parliament, which have to endorse it, the senior official said. Unlike other own resources, the increase in the ETIAS fee does not require unanimous approval by all EU member states.
LeMonde
3 days ago
- LeMonde
EU increases pressure on Russia with 18th sanctions package
After six weeks of debate, the 27 EU member states reached agreement on Friday, July 18, on an 18 th package of sanctions against Russia for its war in Ukraine, targeting both the energy sector and the Russian banking system. This move increased pressure on Russia just days after Donald Trump announced on Tuesday, July 15, the sale of weapons to NATO countries for Ukraine and gave Vladimir Putin a 50-day ultimatum, threatening further sanctions. "The EU just approved one of its strongest sanctions package against Russia to date," said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas on Friday morning. "We will keep raising the costs, so stopping the aggression becomes the only path forward for Moscow," she added. "We are striking at the heart of Russia's war machine," emphasized Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, who noted, when presenting the sanctions proposals, that Russian oil continued to generate substantial revenue for the country. "Done! This morning, we Europeans have adopted unprecedented sanctions against Russia and against the countries providing their support. France has played a key role in this decision. Together with the United States, we will compel Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire," said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot on X. French diplomats said they were behind half the measures adopted by the 27 member states. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also welcomed the new European sanctions against Moscow, which he described as "essential and timely."
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Will the EU budget turn cohesion policy into regional 'Hunger Games'?
The EU's proposed budget for 2028 until 2034 runs the risk of turning its cohesion policy into a competition for funding, as it would merge it with other major spending areas. There are now concerns over reduced local control and lack of support for disadvantaged regions. For decades, cohesion funds have helped reduce regional disparities across the EU, supporting everything from road construction and hospital upgrades to unemployment, training programmes and green initiatives. As one of the EU's most tangible policy tools, cohesion funding has delivered visible results in citizens' daily lives — but that may be about to change. This week, the European Commission unveiled its proposed EU long-term budget — the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028–2034 — which could fundamentally reshape how cohesion policy works, while also potentially marking the end of the system as we know it. Under the new proposal, cohesion policy would be absorbed into a single mega-fund, combining it with other major spending areas such as agriculture, rural development, migration and border control. The stated aim? Simplification. But critics warn this approach could ignite intense competition among regions, sectors and interest groups. 'Putting agriculture, migration, border control, and cohesion policy into one container will turn it into a 'Hunger Games',' said Kata Tüttő, President of the European Committee of the Regions, in an interview with Euronews. She warned that the new structure risks pitting farmers against city mayors, and those in need of agricultural support with those seeking unemployment support, for example. Fears of fragmentation and lost priorities Out of the total proposed €2 trillion budget, €865 billion would be allocated to this consolidated fund, which merges long-standing programs like the EU's Common Agricultural Policy, cohesion funds (accounting for two-thirds of the current EU budget) and the European Social Fund, which supports employment and education. The competition between different lines in the single fund has raised alarm bells among regional leaders, who fear cohesion funding may be deprioritised in the budget negotiations. According to the Commission, €450 billion of the merged fund would still go toward regional development, fisheries and rural areas. Additionally, the proposal includes a minimum allocation of €218 billion specifically earmarked for less developed regions, one of the three traditional pillars of cohesion funding — with the others being developing and developed regions. While this minimum allocation offers a safeguard for the EU's most disadvantaged areas, the remaining categories could face fluctuating support, as they are not ringfenced under the new plan. Centralisation vs. local engagement Beyond the battle for funding, critics have also voiced concerns regarding governance. The proposed delivery model marks a shift away from the EU's tradition of shared management with local and regional authorities. Tüttő sees the move as a clear case of centralisation: 'We will be kicked out from the design, the management and the creation parts of the policy. We will just become implementers, fighting for money,' she said. With many aspects of the proposal still unclear, the coming months will be critical. Local governments across the EU are calling for more involvement in the process — and potentially a rethinking of the proposal before the budget is finalised. 'This is a proposal from the European Commission — it is not the final step, but a starting point,' said Raffaele Fitto, Executive Vice-President for cohesion, while presenting the budget. He added, however, that the EU budget needs more flexibility to respond to evolving challenges.
