SNP ministers ditch plans for long-promised anti-women hatred law in major U-turn
NATS chiefs today ditched their long-promised anti-women hatred law and signalled they would introduce an offence covering prejudice against both sexes instead.
In a major u-turn after years of committing to a misogyny bill, SNP ministers confirmed it would be dropped in favour of expanding the controversial Hate Crime Act.
Advertisement
2
MSPs pinned part of the blame on the Supreme Court judgement that sex in equality law is defined by biological sex
Credit: EPA
The plans would see the 'protected characteristic' of sex - meaning women or men - added to legislation which has been fully in place for just over a year.
It paves the way for crimes of stirring up hatred against men and women to be prosecuted, as well as added a sex-based 'aggravation' - a bolt-on for other offences, triggering stiffer punishment.
Freedom of speech protections about misogyny will also be added to the bill, protecting 'discussion or criticism'.
Ministers claimed a misogyny bill - recommended in a major review for the government by Baroness Helena Kennedy - would be too complex to finish within the remaining year of this parly session.
Advertisement
A written statement to MSPs, released after the end of the parliamentary week, also pinned part of the blame on last month's landmark Supreme Court judgement that sex in equality law is defined by biological sex.
It said: 'This is a complex area of policy and law, and it would be necessary that any Bill which brought misogyny into criminal law contained clear and unambiguous provisions in regard to the circumstances in which they apply.
'This would include the implications of the recent Supreme Court Judgment.'
Last year the Scottish Government had insisted ministers would introduce a misogyny bill which would be 'the first of its kind in the world' to 'create a new focus on protecting women and girls to address criminal behaviour motivated purely by misogyny."
Advertisement
The u-turn flies in the face of recommendations by Labour peer and human rights lawyer Baroness Kennedy KC's review of misogyny law.
Her report in 2022 concluded adding sex to the Hate Crime Act would not work as 'misogyny is so deeply rooted in our patriarchal ecosystem that it requires a more fundamental set of responses."
Maggie Chapman saved from AXE by SNP after accusing Supreme Court of 'bigotry & hatred'
It added a hate law was needed "exclusively for women" because "this malign conduct does not happen to men in any comparable way'.
At the time, Nicola Sturgeon said the report from Baroness Kennedy was 'ground-breaking', 'bold', and 'far-reaching'.
Advertisement
The lawyer and peer said earlier this month that she was worried ministers would ditch her recommendations 'given the divisive nature of public debate around 'woke' issues.
She added: 'Protecting women and girls from abusive behaviour and threats of rape and violence, online and offline, is very important now.'
SNP ministers' latest position - adding a protected characteristic of 'sex' to current hate laws - is similar to the idea suggested by judge Lord Bracadale in his 2018 hare crime review for the Scottish Government. It floated an 'aggravation' in law based on 'gender hostility', rather than a specific protection for women.
2
Nats chiefs today ditched their long-promised anti-women hatred law
Credit: Alamy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Scots blessed with abundant natural resources, are more than capable of creating an enlightened future for their country
Any reference to the Scottish Enlightenment must be an anathema to Jill Stephenson (Letters 25 July) as so many Scots of the past have shaped global thinking today, among them Black, Boswell, Burnett, Burns, Cullen, Ferguson, Hume, Hutcheson, Hutton, Playfair, Reid, Smith and Stewart. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Instead of expressing her gratitude for the high quality of the drinking water provided by Scottish Water and the relatively minimal impact of 'storm overflows' on our bathing waters in rivers and around our beaches, Ms Stephenson embarks on another misguided tirade of denigration of the Scottish Government and the SNP, with this time the performance of Scottish Water the source of her discontent. The facts (omitted by UK Environment Secretary, Steve Reed, in recent TV interviews) are that SEPA reports that 87 per cent of Scotland's rivers are in good health while only 15 per cent of England's rivers are rated at that level with The Rivers Trust reporting that not a single waterway in England is in overall good health. It is of course understood that with England being more densely populated there is a greater level of monitoring in England but most sensible people would rather be taking a shower, never mind drinking the water, in Glasgow or Edinburgh, rather than in London. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps Ms Stephenson should draw some positivity from Scottish history (as it seems that confidence in her fellow 'Scots' is not yet flowing through her veins) and recognise that the people of Scotland, blessed with Scotland's abundant natural resources, are more than capable of creating an enlightened future for their country. Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Tax tipping point The economy of the UK may have passed a tipping point where increased taxation results in reduced tax revenue and higher benefit payments. The result of the various increases in the cost of employing staff is becoming apparent. Many companies do not have the income to be able to retain so many semi-skilled staff. My suggestion is medium sized companies and charities together with those such as supermarkets that employ large numbers of semi-skilled staff have been forced to reduce head count by say 5%. Those no longer employed are no longer paying tax and newly draw benefits. Increasing the tax burden by whatever means will continue this avalanche effect reducing GDP progressively. Scotland may be able to avoid some of the effects of this economic deterioration. Firstly Scotland must stand up to the EU and the London Government by insisting on the same economics ties to the EU as northern Ireland has obtained. Shelve independence, this will eventually come anyway and concentrate on this objective with the grim determination needed to avoid an economic collapse. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Secondly encourage profitable companies to relocate to Scotland by building reasonably priced decent housing in areas with access to economically successful regions such as Glasgow and Edinburgh and offering this to key workers as has been done in the past. Reinforcing success will inevitably allow all areas to benefit from the overall rise in economic activity even if it is just concentrated in the central belt. Above all do not reinforce failure. I suggest governments must realise that they cannot continue to magic money out of thin air by endlessly increasing the tax burden on the people and companies which they represent. In the end they must spend within their means just as every member of our population is forced to. Ken Carew, Dumfries Trump Hypocrisy Gerald Edwards (Letters, 26 July) claims that, unlike Swinney and Starmer, Trump makes good on his election pledges. Ending the Ukraine War within 24 hours was pure hyperbole and failure to recognise that Putin was 'tapping me along' earlier was extremely bad judgement. Our leaders may be ailing but they are not arrogant and incompetent. As Trump landed in Scotland he may have reflected on his presbyterian upbringing from his Scottish mother. 'Blessed are the peacemakers..' (Matthew 5:9). Trump may believe he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize but his track record suggests otherwise. The Gaza War is so one sided the idea that Hamas could end it tomorrow as Mr Edwards claims, is without foundation, they are well beaten and have little influence. As your editorial states Trump is in a unique position to help Gaza by championing humanitarian aid. He could also end the war by withdrawing arms to Israel but allows Prime Minister Netanyahu to string him along with talk of ceasefires to save himself from facing trial for war crimes. Instead Trump is complicit in mass starvation and murder of innocent civilians at US/Israeli food points, some would argue ethnic cleansing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As for releasing the Epstein files Trump continues to act with rank hypocrisy as his MAGA base are starting to realise. It's unlikely, however, that our leaders will do anything other than play to Trump's ego given there's a trade deal to sign. Contrary to Mr Edwards view, Swinney should raise Gaza as he pledged to do, just don't mention the windmills John! Neil Anderson, Edinburgh Inquiring minds Stephen Jardine's negative views on public inquiries are spot on (Opinion, July 26). My only criticisms of them is that they are too mild and too measured. Remedying what has become a very expensive British disease is needed. To assuage politicians who need a mechanism to kick issues into touch, and to keep lawyers happy for years to come, I suggest a remedy. A Public Inquiry into public inquiries should be established. Hugh Pennington, Chair, Public Inquiry into the September 2005 Outbreak of O157 in South Wales, Aberdeen Write to The Scotsman
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
What a bonus if Starmer is forced to ape Corbyn and not Farage
Plus, as a member of the Labour Party he famously was never a team player. But with the current Labour Party under the disastrous Keir Starmer (two-child benefit cap, no caps for bankers' bonuses, the pensioner winter payment fiasco, turning on the Waspi women, the whole free suit/glasses nonsense and to cap it all, complicity in Gaza genocide), there is one thing Mr Corbyn's new venture could do. Instead of spending a huge amount of time, political energy and wasting precious political capital trying to out-Farage Farage, maybe Keir Starmer will even things out and attempt to out-Corbyn Corbyn. Amanda Baker, Edinburgh. Reform will be the winner The chaotic launch of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's new left-wing party may seem farcical on the surface, but it poses a very real and immediate threat to Labour and its allies. Polling shows this group could draw around 10% of the national vote – an amount that, while not enough to win, could be catastrophic for Labour's electoral prospects. The greatest beneficiary? Not the Tories, but Reform. Keir Starmer's grip on power is already under strain amid public disillusionment with his leadership style, spiralling public spending, the highest taxes in 70 years and an utterly nonsensical approach to illegal immigration which has not addressed the 'pull factor' one jot. The addition of a new hard-left alternative risks fracturing the left-wing vote beyond repair. More dangerously still, murmurs of discontent among sitting Labour MPs – especially those with slim majorities – raise the spectre of defections. If even a handful break ranks and shift to this new movement, the optics for the PM will be devastating. He will no longer be seen as the unifying force that won power, but the man who presided over the disintegration of Labour as we know it today. Clearly, a Labour-Green split in the face of this insurgent leftist bloc could be the difference between a fragile minority government and a total collapse by 2029. Keir Starmer may believe the hard left has been banished, but their return – however muddled – is a warning. Ignore it, and he may not last another four years, let alone win a second term. Small wonder support for Reform is surging. Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. Read more letters A broad church for indy needed I note Neil Mackay's thoughtful piece ("Corbyn's new party does not just threaten Labour, it will wound SNP too", [[The Herald]], July 26) on the potential of Jeremy Corbyn's new party to disrupt not only the Scottish Labour Party but the [[SNP]] vote too. My first thought was, is there a "wheesht for Labour" thing going? Perhaps not by Neil but there is by some. Secondly, I'm a socialist-leaning SNP supporter. Would this potential opportunity affect my vote? On reflection no. My red line is independence, I strongly believe that Scotland would thrive, economically, politically and socially as an independent nation state. A good neighbour to England but not ruled by her. My ongoing "fight" will be for independence just as it is for over 50% of the population. However after Independence Day I will then fight for a constitution that best frames my political vision, as of course will other Scots. The SNP needs to run a centre course, to be a broad church, to lead us to that independent future. Although a bit more "leading" would certainly help. Dr Jacqui Jensen, Perth. Mhairi Black was no trailblazer You describe former SNP MP Mairi Black as a 'trailblazer' ("Trailblazing former SNP MP Mhairi Black quits the party", The Herald, July 15), but what exactly did she achieve in nine years picking up her wages at the taxpayers' expense? She got elected age 20, with no work experience. Her party's propaganda/spin machine got behind her to give her a profile, and apparently, she made a speech which did well on the internet and made her in to a minor celebrity in the political bubble. It is difficult to believe that 10 million people viewed that video. Maybe Nicola Sturgeon had her finger on the 'Watch Again' button for several weeks, or some bots helped her with the numbers. If 10 million people really watched it, then they need to give themselves a good shake. But what did she actually do? There are no achievements that are apparent at all. She did not front up any piece of legislation, initiate any high-level campaigns or leave any legacy projects in her own constituency. She did jump on various bandwagons, but anyone can do that, and none of those bandwagons really went anywhere. Apparently, she did not like her job, which is not surprising in someone so young. She defended her seat when the SNP had the political wind at the backs, but then jumped ship in 2024 before her constituents had the opportunity to oust her. Ms Black has been the poster girl of the very shallow and superficial politics we have seen in Scotland over the last 10-15 years. What she does or does not believe in is neither here nor there. She had an opportunity to do things to help people in their everyday lives, but did not do anything of note in the time she had. Now, it is apparently the fault of everyone else. We need politicians who can do things in Scotland, not these minor wannabe celebrities. 'Trailblazing' is completely the wrong word for Ms Black. It is certainly not the kind of trail we want anyone else to follow. Victor Clements, Aberfeldy. SNP ranks will be thinner I have championed Mhairi Black from her early university days and believe she is a strong voice for Scotland, an impressive orator and I wish she had not left the SNP. What I do think will happen to the SNP now will be a thinning of the ranks from those who are members who joined for the referendum with their own agendas and saw independence as an avenue to secure their personal aims; when their aims were not met what was left was their own agenda, showing that their commitment to the SNP and independence was never their main goal. Those who remain in the SNP are in the majority around the centre ground, committed to independence, who recognise it as a long game and continue to be a voice for an Independent Scotland from within the SNP. The opportunity arose in 2014 to secure an independent Scotland and over half of Scotland said no, the people spoke and democracy means we respect the vote and continue to work towards independence. The SNP is and always has been the means to secure Independence, when the people of Scotland unite, decide they have enough then we will be an Independent country. Christine Smith, Troon. Mhairi Black has left the SNP (Image: Newsquest) Immigration conundrum The UK Government is planning an end to housing immigrants in hotels. The main political parties all have plans to end illegal immigration by stopping the rubber boat crossings from France. The Prime Minister says he will wage war on the people-smuggling gangs. He also has some kind of botched-together deal with President Macron of France. Up until September of last year there were 810,400 economically inactive people in Scotland. Crime has risen among immigrants in Britain and Scotland has a housing shortage. John Swinney wants more immigrants in Scotland which if organised properly could benefit the country. If a person arrives with qualifications and is willing to contribute that shouldn't be a problem. Immigrants who come here to sponge off the taxpayer and become involved in crime should get nowhere near our border. But who's going to decide who comes in and who doesn't? Ian Balloch, Grangemouth.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
John Swinney hints at rescue package to save Alexander Dennis jobs
The Scottish Government has today confirmed it is looking at a rescue package it thinks could save jobs at Alexander Dennis – but said details were being kept under wraps due to 'commercial sensitivity'. The firm has threatened to end its manufacturing operations in Scotland by closing its sites in Larbert and Falkirk, putting 400 jobs on the line. It is planning to centralise its operations in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. In a statement, Swinney indicated that a package of new work to keep jobs in Scotland was being explored. READ MORE: Protesters to slam SNP's £180,000 cash award to Donald Trump golf course He said: 'Scottish Ministers place the utmost importance on the presence of Alexander Dennis in Scotland and the retention of its highly skilled manufacturing workers. 'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring any and all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain its skilled employees and manufacturing and production facilities. 'While I cannot provide details due to commercial sensitivity at this time, I hope this update provides the workforce and local community with further assurance that the Scottish Government remains wholly committed to supporting the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland. 'We will undertake this work in tandem with every other short, medium and long-term opportunity we continue to explore in close collaboration with the company, Unite, GMB, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is meeting unions GMB and Unite to discuss the proposal while [[Transport]] Secretary Fiona Hyslop attends a meeting of the UK Bus Manufacturing Expert Panel in London focusing on the future pipeline of zero-emission bus orders. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' It was reported earlier this month that a consultation with the workforce on job losses would be extended for another fortnight to explore ways of keeping jobs in Scotland. There have also been proposals to put staff on a furlough scheme to retain jobs in Scotland before work on new orders came in. Unite's regional secretary for Scotland Derek Thomson previously told a Holyrood committee that the closure of Alexander Dennis's Scottish operations would be "catastrophic" for the local area. The threat of closure has already spilled into the Scottish economy, with Greenfold Systems Ltd, based in Dunfermline, Fife, closing because a major proportion of its operations were involved with the troubled bus firm. A total of 81 jobs were lost after the "loss of a major contract", administrators said. The threatened closure has become a major political issue, with Scottish Labour accusing the SNP of failing to do enough to support the firm. Anas Sarwar has repeatedly criticised John Swinney of having done "nothing" to save jobs, pointing out that the [[SNP]] were ordering "buses from China, instead of from Scotland". But it later emerged that in Labour-run Edinburgh, where the buses are municipally owned by the council, had not bought buses from Alexander Dennis in the last three years.
