Khandallah murder crime scene 'very confronting', says detective
Julia DeLuney in the High Court
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
Warning: This story contains graphic details.
The jury in the DeLuney murder trial has been shown pictures of the broken-off tip of a fake nail - bright orange - next to the body of 79-year-old Helen Gregory.
Her daughter Julia DeLuney is on trial, accused of her murder, after she was found dead at her Khandallah home in January 2024.
This week, detectives gave evidence about the bloody crime scene, clumps of hair and scalp on the floor in the hall and by the body, and about how they
began to treat the death as suspicious
, rather than an accident.
The Crown says DeLuney murdered her mother in a violent attack, before staging it to look like a fall from the attic.
But the defence says another person caused those fatal injuries, in the 90-minute window in which DeLuney says she left her mother - at this point only minorly injured from a fall from the attic - on the floor of a bedroom, to fetch her husband from Kāpiti to help.
A detective giving evidence said it was when she saw clumps of hair amongst the blood around the body that her mind shifted from thinking of the death as "unexplained" to "suspicious".
Also found beside the body was the tip of an orange false nail.
Other pictures show bloody handprints and streak marks along the walls of the hallway and the entrance to the attic, as well as on the wall at the back of that cupboard, and on various items around the house - the bed in the bedroom where Gregory was found, a mug in the kitchen, and bloody footprints on the kitchen floor.
Detective Constable Kristina O'Connor said on the stand, the gravity of the situation was not lost on her.
"Naturally, it's a very confronting view," she said. "I guess in my profession, you're matter-of-fact, and as you're doing it, you do it, it's very much a job, but it doesn't pass me, the gravity of - and especially looking back - the gravity of what I was standing there looking at."
Forensic experts were yet to weigh in on the evidence, but the trial was set down for another three weeks at least.
The house was checked top to bottom - every magazine page, every cup in every cupboard, every object itemised.
O'Connor said she discovered Gregory - like many older people - kept plastic bags inside more plastic bags in the kitchen, and everything in her house was very neat and ordered.
Meanwhile, the defence was also building its case around the possibility another person was involved.
Lawyer Quentin Duff, cross-examining Detective Sergeant Guilia Boffa, put to her that the police never really considered someone else for the crime.
The court had already heard a neighbour reported a doorknock with nobody there on the night of Gregory's death, around the same time that evening.
He said there had also been a suspicious male reported by an off-duty officer at a nearby park the following day.
But Boffa said their task at that point was to figure out what happened in that house, with manslaughter in mind.
"We're suspecting that that's what's occurred, and we are using emergency powers to gather information to support a charge to be laid," she said.
"And would you agree with me that, to the best of your knowledge, the investigation didn't ever seriously contemplate the idea that there might have been a burglar that had killed Mrs Gregory?" she was asked.
"That is absolutely incorrect," Boffa replied.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ōtara Kāinga Ora tenant evicted after repeatedly abusing agency staff
By Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter of An Ōtara Kāinga Ora tenant has been evicted after the agency told him to remove his dogs from the property. Photo: Supplied / NZME A Kāinga Ora tenant has been evicted from his home after repeatedly becoming aggressive and yelling "f*** you" at staff when he was told to remove his dogs from the property. The agency applied to end Vena Funaki's period tenancy at the Ōtara house, arguing that he swore at staff, and was aggressive and intimidating. But to have Funaki's tenancy terminated by the Tenancy Tribunal, Kāinga Ora had to show three incidents of anti-social behaviour had occurred in three months. According to the tribunal's recent decision, it was able to do so. The first incident occurred in a Kāinga Ora office in September last year when Funaki met to discuss his dog allegedly attacking a tradesperson, as well as the condition of the property. As the meeting was coming to an end, Funaki yelled "f*** you" at two staff members and continued to use explicit language in the foyer as he left the building. Two weeks later, two Kāinga Ora staff visited the Bairds Road home to check the dogs had been removed, as discussed at the earlier meeting. The decision stated Funaki was aggressive when he answered the door and during the conversation, became agitated. He told the pair to "f*** off", the decision noted, describing Funaki as yelling and being aggressive and intimidating. A month later, on 31 October, two senior housing support managers visited the property after reports the dogs were still there, and again to discuss the condition of the house. Funaki told the pair he had the dogs and would challenge Kāinga Ora in court. The decision stated that as the pair left the property, Funaki used "unacceptable language", including yelling at them to "f*** off" and waving his arms. Funaki denied receiving two of three notices Kāinga Ora said it had fixed to his front door, as well as leaving a copy in his letterbox after each incident. The tribunal found Kāinga Ora had provided Funaki with the necessary written notice after each incident and hadn't acted in a retaliatory way. It ordered the tenancy to be terminated and for Funaki to be evicted. When approached by NZME about the case, Kāinga Ora said it did not comment on Tenancy Tribunal decisions but referred to information relating to disruptive behaviour on its website. That information stated that as of July last year, the agency had changed its approach to disruptive behaviour by its tenants. It noted this included working to understand what's driving the behaviour and referring tenants to specialist social and health services to address underlying issues if needed. However, if behaviour did not change, it would end tenancies and not offer the tenant another home, it stated. Data on its website showed that in the current financial year, 63 tenancies have been terminated without offering a tenant another home, compared to 12 in the year before. -This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Justice Minister proposes higher penalties for assaults against first responders
The proposed legislation was promised in National's coalition agreement with New Zealand First. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has proposed the introduction of higher penalties for people who assault first responders. Goldsmith's proposal would expand the current assault against police to also cover prison officers and all first responders. The new offence of assaulting a first responder with intent to injure would mean up to five years in prison - two years higher than the standard offence. Actually injuring them would carry a sentence of up to seven years and counts against the three strikes regime, which can impose mandatory minimum sentences. The proposed legislation was promised in National's coalition agreement with New Zealand First. More to come ... Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sentencing reforms introduced cap potential discounts and bring new aggravating factors
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says the sentencing reforms were about restoring real consequences for crime. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: ACT MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." ACT MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes , and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to ACT's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Labour spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb said tougher sentences were just one option. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
