EU Parliament confidence vote: Where parties stand on von der Leyen
After the debate held in the hemicycle on Monday, some of the eight groups of the Parliament clearly staked their position ahead of the vote, while others were more ambiguous, and not all MEPs align with their groups.
The European People's Party (EPP), Ursula von der Leyen's political force, is fully behind her. "We will vote unanimously against", said Manfred Weber, chair of the group.
The EPP has painted the vote as the emanating from far right MEPs friendly to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "With this motion of censure, we are wasting time: Putin will be happy of what his friends are doing here. I know the German AfD (Alternative for Germany) and the Romanian AUR (Alliance for Unity of Romanians) are the puppets of Putin. This motion of censure is against the security of the Europeans," Weber said during the debate.
Criticism of von der Leyen on display
Socialists and democrats (S&D), Renew Europe and Greens/EFA groups have also said they will not vote to censure, but that didn't stop their chairs criticising von der Leyen for treating with the right wing parties, ignoring important policy files and leading the Commission with an extremely centralised and opaque working style.
'This motion will not count with the vote in favour of my group. We will not give a single vote to those who want to destroy the European Union,' said S&D leader Iratxe García Pérez, describing the motion of censure as a "reactionary assault".
But García Pérez also blamed von der Leyen for backsliding on the Green Deal when she allied with conservatives to withdraw the Commission's controversial directive on green claims, which is meant to address greenwashing.
Besides, not supporting the motion does not necessarily equate to a pledge that the Socialists will vote against it. According to sources from the Parliament, the group's members could also abstain.
"We have not decided yet, we will discuss the issue in the next days before the vote," S&D Belgian MEP Estelle Ceulemans told Euronews after a group internal meeting.
Renew Europe also clearly stated that it opposed the motion of censure. "The motion itself shows the bad intentions of the signatories: a mishmash of allegations on Pfizer text messages, the spending of the Recovery Facility, defence plans and supposed election interference," a statement from the group read.
Renew Europe's president, Valérie Hayer, doubled down on this during her intervention, but she too took the opportunity to take a swipe at von der Leyen. "The Commission is too centralised, too fossilised", she said.
The Greens/EFA group is set to reject the motion of censure, with all its MEPs voting against, abstaining, or not showing up on the day of the vote, according to internal sources.
The leader of the group, Bas Eickhout called the motion 'one big political show of the far-right to undermine democracy.' But he also lashed out at recent tie ups over voting between the EPP and the far-right. 'You are feeding that beast, and at a certain moment the beast will eat you,' Eickhout said, directing his glance at EPP President Weber.
The Left's co-President Martin Schirdewa said his group opposes the motion of censure because it refuses "to be instrumentalised by right-wing extremists". But others within the group don't appear to be on the same page. The Italian Five Stars Movement, for example, will vote in favour: "Millions of citizens who believe in the EU, in democracy and in social justice are asking us today to send von der Leyen home", a statement from the party said. The Left's Irish MEPs are also set to vote in favour, according to Parliament sources.
Conservatives split on the vote, far right united
The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) illustrate this shaky group dynamic more clearly: some of its members proposed and actively promoted the vote of confidence, while others are set to defend the Commission.
Officially, the group will leave its lawmakers to follow their consciences with a free vote, and the largest national delegations are in opposite camps.
Romanians from ultra-nationalist party AUR and Polish from Law and Justice (PiS) are among the signatories of the motion of censure, consistently with a long tradition of hard criticism against von der Leyen and her college.
On the other side, the members of Brothers of Italy will not vote in favour of the motion, as this would entail the resignation of all Commissioners, including Italy's Raffaele Fitto, Commission Executive Vice-President for Cohesion and Reforms, who comes from the party's ranks.
"This motion is doomed to failure, not even getting close to the required threshold [to topple the Commission]. This is a gift to our political opponents," ECR co-chair Nicola Procaccini said during his intervention.
Patriots for Europe (PfE) and Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN), the two more radical right groups in the Parliament, will vote in favour of the motion, requesting the Commission to resign.
"The Pfizergate has been an abuse of power: you have acted alone, out of any democratic framework", Fabrice Leggeri, a French National Rally MEP, said during the debate, while ESN's leader René Aust from Alternative for Germany, said his group intended to send von der Leyen "to an undeserved retirement".
A symbolic vote
The vote of no-confidence has very little chance of being approved, as at least two-thirds of the votes cast representing a majority of all MEPs would need to back the motion of censure for it to be adopted.
But Monday's debate gave an indication of the level of distrust for Von der Leyen in the parliament, regardless of MEP's political affiliation.
The parties from the so-called "centrist majority" (EPP, S&D, Renew Europe) are split on the assessment of the Commission's track record so far.
While the EPP group fully endorses von der Leyen's political line (and is probably also behind it), Socialists and liberals are at odds with it, signalling that the coalition which saw von der Leyen voted in as President of the Commission one year back is on shaky ground.
In this respect, S&D's leader García Pérez addressed EPP President Weber at the end of her intervention: "This motion is the direct result of your strategy in the Parliament. You are asking for responsibility while you negotiate your policies with the far right. We cannot go on like this," she said.
The vote on the motion on Thursday 10 will probably testify to the level of discontent. A large number of abstentions might save the necks of the Commissioners, but also simultaneously inflict a political flesh wound on von der Leyen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
6 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU will keep €18 billion frozen for Hungary over rule of law concerns
Hungary is nowhere near unblocking the €18 billion in cohesion and recovery funds that Brussels keeps frozen due to persisting concerns about democratic backsliding, according to the new edition of the Rule of Law Report, released by the European Commission on Tuesday. It found that Hungary has made "no progress" on seven of the eight recommendations made last year, such as reforms on lobbying rules, the fight against high-level corruption and the editorial independence of public media. "It is deeply disappointing we're not in a position to report further progress on the recommendations that were made last year," Michael McGrath, the European Commissioner for Justice, said when presenting the report. "I wish it were otherwise and I wish that those funds could be made available and that the people of Hungary, who are very significantly pro-EU, would be in a position to benefit from those funds, but that requires compliance with the rule of law," he added. "We stand ready to engage and to make progress based on dialogue, but again, where that fails, we will continue to make use of all of the tools that we have." McGrath raised the alarm about the "deteriorating environment" and "legal uncertainty" for civil society organisations in Hungary, pointing at two recent controversial developments: the ban on the Pride parade, which organisers bypassed, and a draft law on transparency for foreign-funded NGOs, which was delayed after backlash. The money currently frozen combines around €8.4 billion in cohesion funds and €9.5 billion in COVID-19 recovery funds. Disbursements are subject to compliance with thematic conditions that require legislative changes. Some of these conditions overlap with the recommendations highlighted in the annual report. Hungary previously unblocked €10.2 billion after passing a reform meant to strengthen judicial independence and mitigate political interference in the courts. The Commission's decision to release the €10.2 billion in the lead-up to a high-stakes summit proved divisive and was met with a lawsuit from the European Parliament. The remaining €18 billion is still paralysed, with no sign of a breakthrough. The financial dispute has exacerbated the years-long showdown between Brussels and Budapest, with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán accusing the Commission of engaging in "financial blackmail" and interfering in internal affairs. At the same time, Orbán has refused to pay a fine imposed by the European Court of Justice over the country's "unprecedented" breach of migration law. The fine consists of €200 million as a lump sum and €1 million for every day the wrongdoing continues. The daily fine is periodically subtracted from Hungary's allocated share of the EU budget. "Compliance with ECJ judgements is not optional or discretionary. It is a binding obligation of EU member states. It is a core treaty obligation," McGrath said. "The primacy of EU law is absolute and must be respected at all times." Fundamental rights and democracy will feature prominently in the debate on the bloc's next multiannual budget (2028-2034), which President Ursula von der Leyen is expected to present before the summer break. Von der Leyen has promised to establish a closer link between payments of EU funds and compliance with the Rule of Law Report.
Euronews
15 minutes ago
- Euronews
Brussels launches sixth ‘omnibus' to ease chemical rules – but not everyone is reassured
The European Commission presented on Tuesday its sixth 'omnibus' simplification package since the start of Ursula von der Leyen's mandate. This time, the target is the EU's chemical sector, a cornerstone of European industry, according to Commission Vice-President for Industrial Strategy, Stéphane Séjourné, but one that he says is 'increasingly under threat'. The reform package, officially titled the Action Plan for the Chemical Industry, combines new support measures for Europe's ailing producers with a set of rule changes designed to ease red tape and cut costs. The Commission claims it will save the industry over €360 million annually by simplifying how hazardous chemicals, cosmetics and fertilisers are labelled, regulated and authorised. But not everyone is convinced the latest push to modernise EU law is entirely harmless. Green lawmakers warn the simplification could undermine years of progress on health and environmental protection, accusing the Commission of siding with big industry at the expense of consumers. Speaking in Strasbourg, Stéphane Séjourné defended the plan as an 'industrial package above all', not merely a chemicals policy. 'We're talking about a sector that has seen its global market share nearly halved in the last 20 years,' he said, warning that Europe was risking the loss of its production base if it didn't act swiftly. He pointed to the closure of around twenty large chemical sites in recent years, and described steam crackers - essential, high-emission chemical plants - as ageing and in need of major investment. Séjourné said the aim was to keep these strategic assets in Europe while using the green transition to modernise them and improve competitiveness. 'We fully stand by our decarbonisation strategy,' he added, 'but it must also support our industrial resilience.' The action plan promises to lower energy costs through extended state aid rules and speed up investment in green technologies like hydrogen and chemical recycling. It also outlines the creation of a Critical Chemicals Alliance to identify vulnerable supply chains and reduce Europe's dependence on imports for key substances used in sectors like automotive, defence and healthcare. Alongside these broader industrial goals, the Commission's Chemicals Omnibus introduces a raft of changes to EU rules, including simpler formats for chemical labelling and lighter procedures for cosmetics and fertilising products. These changes, the Commission insists, will not compromise safety. 'This is about reducing the administrative burden, not the level of protection,' said Jessika Roswall, Commissioner for Environment and Circular Economy. 'We know that Europeans care deeply about chemical safety, and we believe that strong environmental standards can go hand in hand with strong business.' Roswall highlighted public concerns over harmful substances, particularly PFAS, also known as the 'forever chemicals', which have been found in the blood of nearly the entire Dutch population, according to recent research. The Commission said it is preparing a wide ban on PFAS in consumer goods, and plans to allow their continued use only in strategic sectors like health and defence, under strict conditions. But the Green group in the European Parliament is warning of a dangerous shift in priorities. 'Health protection is thrown overboard to increase the profits of the chemical industry,' said Greens/EFA co-president Bas Eickhout in a statement on Tuesday. He accused the Commission of weakening legislation, particularly on cosmetics, by allowing the continued use of substances previously banned due to cancer or reproductive toxicity risks. The Greens also criticised the move to undo some of the labelling rules introduced just last year, arguing it punishes companies that already made costly investments to comply, while rewarding those that lagged behind. While the Commission insists the reforms are part of a wider industrial strategy, the new chemicals package adds to a growing list of sector-specific 'omnibus' packages adopted in recent months, covering everything from farming to defence.
Euronews
26 minutes ago
- Euronews
Russia expands recruitment, allowing foreigners to serve in army
Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree Monday allowing foreigners to serve in the Russian army not only during a state of emergency or martial law, but also during the period of mobilisation. In an effort to expand Moscow's military recruitment efforts, the Kremlin will also now allow qualified specialists who have reached the age limit to sign contracts with Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), Federal Security Service (FSB), or other state security agencies. Until Monday, foreigners were allowed to serve in the Russian army only during states of emergency or under martial law, which Moscow has not declared despite its full-scale invasion of Ukraine three and a half years ago. Putin's partial mobilisation decree from September 2022, which triggered the exodus of over 261,000 Russians, remains in force. As Moscow has recently intensified its summer offensive against Ukraine, allowing foreigners to serve in the army would strengthen the recruitment process in Russia while avoiding formal conscription. At the end of March, the Kremlin announced its traditional spring conscription of 160,000 men — the largest call-up in 14 years. Foreigners in Russian army In April the UK Ministry of Defence reported that Russia has recruited more than 1,500 foreign nationals to fight against Ukraine between April 2023 and May 2024. According to the British intelligence update, the majority of foreign recruits came from South and East Asia, accounting for 771 individuals. They were followed by citizens from former Soviet republics (523) and African countries (72). The UK Ministry of Defence suggested that the main factors motivating foreigners to sign military contracts are financial incentives and the possibility of obtaining Russian citizenship. 'Many foreign citizens are almost certainly recruited specifically through Moscow due to higher signing bonuses and the city's relative international accessibility,' it said. The intelligence update in April further indicated that Moscow was likely to continue enlisting foreign citizens over the medium term. This strategy is intended to offset battlefield losses without triggering a second wave of mobilisation. According to the latest update from Ukraine's General Staff, Russia has lost 1,028,610 troops in Ukraine — either killed or wounded — since the beginning of its full-scale invasion on 24 February 2022. Kyiv's daily updates indicate an average daily rate of around 1,000 casualties among Russian troops. UK Defence Ministry analysts noted that while foreign recruitment by Moscow will persist, it is unlikely to significantly alter the composition of Russia's military forces, given the scale of domestic enlistment efforts.
