
Business leaders say they have a blueprint for economic success. They want federal candidates to listen
With the yo-yoing threat of U.S. tariffs dominating business headlines, a business conference in Saskatchewan — the landlocked province historically known as the breadbasket of the world and also boasting oil, uranium and potash resources — featured a strong undercurrent of dissatisfaction with hurdles to getting products to market.
"Saskatchewan has what the world needs," was a commonly expressed sentiment at the Global Food, Fuel and Farm Summit held in Regina this past week, an event hosted by the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce. CBC attended as part of its national effort to ask Canadians what matters most to them in the federal election.
"I think we have a tremendous opportunity for us as Canadians," said Prabha Ramaswamy, CEO for the chamber, pointing to a rise of patriotism in recent weeks.
"I think it's been a defining moment for us, where as Canadians we're asking ourselves what our values are, and I think we have to build on the momentum, come together as Canadians and look at how we can strengthen our domestic economy."
What issue matters the most to you this federal election, and why? Share your personal stories with us at ask@cbc.ca.
Prairie innovation was highlighted at the conference, with attendees pointing to Saskatchewan-based work like incorporating artificial intelligence into engineering projects or turning biomass-derived carbon into lithium batteries.
However, those at the conference said they see the same barriers to doing business continually crop up, making them top of mind as industries consider what matters most in the next federal election.
Karen Churchill is the president and CEO of Ag-West Bio, a not-for-profit that invests in ag start-ups, and said she is most concerned with regulatory barriers such as requirements for projects to have greenhouse gas assessments and mitigation, costs borne by industry. The other big weight on her mind was whether Canada is ready to make big investments in infrastructure.
"We need to get our products to market. We need to actually invest in all the institutions, whether they be research institutions or basic roads, railways … [and] pipelines."
She's concerned there's a divide between western provinces and decision-makers in Ottawa.
"Here in the west, I think we just don't feel heard in the east," she said. "When you talk about pipelines, that's a huge disconnect also with the barriers to innovation where you see policies developed in the east not being very friendly to the west."
Ramaswamy said the Canadian Chamber of Commerce has issued four calls of action to strengthen Canada's economy, including one about the long discussed but yet-to-be-realized east-west energy corridor.
The three other calls are to tear down internal trade barriers, boost domestic procurement and renegotiate free trade agreements with the U.S. and Mexico.
Politicians have long talked about west-to-east transportation and infrastructure, said Grant McLellan, a senior strategy advisor with Prairie Sky Strategy, but there's a gap between some of that talk and tangible action.
"The biggest pressure that we always hear is we need port expansion, we need rail line growth and construction of new rail lines. We need pipeline expansion to make sure that we have access across the country to resources that are developed right here in Canada," he said, adding that there can be opposition in provinces like Quebec that stall projects like pipelines.
Like Churchill, McLellan wants to see a streamlining of regulatory approvals to ensure business and industry projects can move forward.
"We really need a federal government that is prepared to make tough decisions that aren't necessarily going to be political, politically appeasing to certain parts of the country, but are good for nation building and are good for Canada's future and good for Canada removing itself from the reliance on markets like the United States."
While there might be a perception that oil and gas or other energy partners are opposed to environmental regulation, Ran Narayanasamy, president and CEO of the Petroleum Technology Research Centre, said that's not the case.
"Nobody's saying, 'Hey, I'm going to produce a product. We don't care about the environment,'" he said.
The problem is that federal environmental regulations are formed without consultation with industry partners, Narayanasamy said.
"We don't want the policies to curtail the development of the energy industry in Western Canada, especially in Saskatchewan."
Narayanasamy said he wants to hear federal leaders express pride in what Canada has to offer, whether that's oil, potash or canola.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
6 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Canada drowning in a sea of red ink, says Fraser Institute report
Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox An image of Canadian $100 bills being printed. (Illustration) Canada's combined federal and provincial government debt almost doubled between 2007 and 2024, rising from $1.21 trillion to $2.3 trillion in inflation-adjusted dollars, according to a new report by the Fraser Institute. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The study, 'The Growing Debt Burden for Canadians 2025 Edition,' by the fiscally conservative think tank warns this rapid accumulation of public debt has serious negative consequences for the Canadian economy, given that the money must be paid back, with interest, eventually. 'The debt burden for families across Canada has been growing substantially,' the study warns. 'As was the case in the 1970s to mid-1990s, deficit spending and debt accumulation have become the norm for the federal and many provincial governments … 'Rising government debt has severe consequences for Canadians as more and more resources are directed toward interest payments and away from programs that help families or improve Canada's economic competitiveness.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. From 2019 to 2024, the study, authored by Jake Fuss, Tegan Hill and William Dunstan, says Ottawa and the provinces accumulated $493.2 billion in total net debt, an increase of 27.4%. While some of this increased spending was the result of the pandemic which began in 2020, the report says that five years later, the federal government and most of the provinces have yet to develop any meaningful plans to address the growing problem of total government debt. Recommended video The study concluded Canadians living in Newfoundland and Labrador face the highest combined federal and provincial net debt per person, at $68,861. That's followed in descending order by those living in Quebec ($60,491); Ontario ($60,408); Manitoba ($57,143); Nova Scotia ($52,478); P.E.I. ($50,623); B.C. ($49,369); New Brunswick ($48,631); Saskatchewan ($47,227) and Alberta ($40,939). This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In addition, the study warned, 'interest payments (on government debt) are a major consequence of debt accumulation. 'Governments must make interest payments on their debt similar to households that must pay interest on borrowing related to mortgages, vehicles or credit card spending. Revenues directed towards interest payments mean that in the future there will be less money available for tax cuts, or government programs such as health care, education and social services.' A study by Fraser Institute last year estimated that Canadians were paying $81.8 billion annually in interest on $2.2 trillion of federal and provincial government debt. That amount — which doesn't lower the debt but merely pays the interest on it — could have covered the entire cost of funding the Canada Pension Plan and the Quebec Pension Plan that year ($79.7 billion) the study said, or, alternatively, could have funded the $81.5 billion Canada's provinces spent on public education, from kindergarten to Grade 12. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. At the federal level, Prime Minister Mark Carney's campaign platform, released in April, called for $130 billion in new spending over the next four years, dramatically increasing the federal deficits that had been projected by the previous Justin Trudeau government in its fall economic statement last December. Carney said he planned to run a deficit of $62.3 billion in the current fiscal year, which started on April 1 and ends on March 31, 2026, compared to $42.2 billion by the previous Trudeau government. In the 2026-27 fiscal year, Carney's projected deficit was $59.9 billion, compared to Trudeau's $31 billion; in 2027-28, $54.8 billion, compared to $30.4 billion; and in 2028-29, $47.8 billion, compared to $27.8 billion. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In total, Carney was projecting deficit spending of $224.8 billion over the next four years, compared to $131.4 billion projected by the Trudeau government — an increase of 71%. While the prime minister has called on federal departments to cut spending by 15% over the next three years, he's also announced plans for Canada to hit its long-neglected NATO target of earmarking 2% of GDP on national defence this year, rising to 5% by 2035, along with increased spending on 'nation-building' projects in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war. The C.D. Howe Institute projects that could cause Canada's deficit to soar to $92 billion this year, and average more than $77 billion annually over the next four. That would inevitably lead to more government spending to pay interest on the federal debt, which is already costing Canadian taxpayers about $1 billion per week to finance. Sports Golf Canada Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls


Cision Canada
6 minutes ago
- Cision Canada
Canada's combined federal-provincial government debt estimated to reach $2.3 trillion in 2025/26
VANCOUVER, BC, July 24, 2025 /CNW/ - Combined federal and provincial government debt in Canada has nearly doubled from $1.21 trillion in 2007/08 (the year before the 2008 financial crisis) to a projected $2.30 trillion in 2025/26, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank. "Government debt—federally and in most provinces—has grown substantially over the past 17 years, since just before the 2008 financial crisis, creating serious fiscal challenges for Ottawa and provincial governments in the years ahead," said Jake Fuss, director of fiscal studies at the Fraser Institute and co-author of The Growing Debt Burden for Canadians: 2025 Edition. The study specifically measures net debt, which is a measure of the total debt of the federal and provincial governments minus financial assets held by the governments. It is a common measure of indebtedness. The study finds that not only has Canada's projected combined government debt (the federal debt and the provincial debt of all 10 provinces) nearly doubled since 2007/08, the year before the 2008 financial crisis, but the combined debt now equals 74.8 per cent of the Canadian economy (GDP). For perspective, debt represented 53.2 per cent of GDP in 2007/08. Newfoundland and Labrador has the highest provincial-only debt as a share of the economy (GDP) among the provinces at 44.9 per cent in 2024/25. At the same time, Alberta recorded the largest increase in its provincial government debt as a share of the economy—specifically, between 2007/08 (-13.4 per cent of GDP) and 2024/25 (7.8 per cent)—an increase of 21.2 percentage points. However, Alberta's provincial debt as a share of the economy in 2024/25 remains the lowest in the country. Quebec, which was the longstanding most indebted province, now has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 38.6 per cent, ranking it second highest amongst the provinces. On a per person basis, the combined debt (including provincial debt plus a portion of the federal debt) this year ranges from a low of $40,939 in Alberta to a high of $68,861 in Newfoundland & Labrador. Quebec has the second-highest combined debt per person ($60,491) in 2024/25. "It's important for Canadians to understand the magnitude of the country's combined government debt because deficits and debt today mean higher taxes in the future," said Fuss. The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Halifax and Montreal and ties to a global network of think-tanks in 87 countries. Its mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. To protect the Institute's independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit


CBC
7 minutes ago
- CBC
8-year-old Islander jammed up this summer as business takes off
One young P.E.I. resident is making the most of his summer vacation. Finnegan Chandler launched a jam business a few years ago, and now he's working hard just to keep up with demand. CBC's Connor Lamont has the story.