Rough sleeping to be decriminalised in England and Wales
Ministers are planning to scrap the Vagrancy Act, which outlaws rough sleeping in England and Wales.
The law was introduced in 1824 to deal with rising homelessness, but Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has called it "cruel and outdated".
The government's plan includes new legislation which will target crimes such as organised begging by gangs and trespassing, a statement said.
Rayner, who is also housing secretary, said Labour was "drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society".
"No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again," she said.
The number of prosecutions and convictions under the 1824 act has declined over the past decade.
According to government statistics, there were a total of 79 prosecutions and 59 convictions for offences related to rough sleeping in 2023 - down from a peak of 1,050 and 810 respectively in 2011.
Repealing the Vagrancy Act was first announced in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. It had wanted to pass alternative legislation first, but this did not happen before the general election was called last year.
The party's Criminal Justice Bill would have allowed police to move on "nuisance" rough sleepers and fine them if they did not comply.
The Labour government said it plans to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that will "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe".
These measures, which will be introduced through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, will include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime.
Homeless charities have long called for the Vagrancy Act to be scrapped.
Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: "This is a landmark moment that will change lives and prevent thousands of people from being pushed into the shadows, away from safety."
He praised the government for having "shown such principled leadership in scrapping this pernicious Act".
He said: "We hope this signals a completely different approach to helping people forced onto the streets and clears the way for a positive agenda that is about supporting people who desperately want to move on in life and fulfil their potential."
People living on London's streets rises by 26%
Pressure grows over rough sleeping clampdown
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules, official tells FT
VIENNA (Reuters) -The European Commission will probably not impose a so-called excessive deficit procedure on Germany for breaching the EU's budget deficit cap this year, Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told the Financial Times. Germany's new conservative-led coalition government has said it does not expect a planned spending spree, including on defence, to be found in breach of European Union rules that cap budget deficits at 3% of gross domestic product. Berlin's budget deficit is expected to come in at 3.3% of GDP this year, but since defence spending fully accounts for the amount over 3%, Germany "is likely not to end up in (the) excessive deficit procedure", Dombrovskis was quoted as saying in the FT interview published on Sunday. An excessive deficit procedure involves the Commission and EU finance ministers setting a corrective course to bring a member state's deficit back within the 3% limit. A country's failure to do so can in principle eventually lead to a fine. "We have to see the execution, because it's close (but) if everything holds, then it should not be the case for this year's budget," Dombrovskis said, adding that a final assessment would take place in the spring when data for 2025 is available. Under the EU's new fiscal rules, which the previous, more fiscally conservative German government helped negotiate, member states can exclude some defence spending from their deficits.
Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Disruptive ‘scam' or legitimate protest? Here's why Pierre Poilievre's byelection ballot will have dozens of candidates
OTTAWA—One candidate is a 22-year-old university student living four hours north of Toronto. Another is a Montreal-area teacher and tour guide with a fondness for dinosaurs. A third lives in Nebraska, working in IT. And there are more than 175 people, just like them, on the ballot for a byelection in a sprawling riding sandwiched between Calgary and Edmonton. Battle River—Crowfoot is the Alberta riding vacated by Conservative MP Damien Kurek so his seatless leader, Pierre Poilievre, can run in a byelection and return to the House of Commons. It's also the sixth target for the Longest Ballot Committee, a protest group that swamps ballots with dozens of independent candidates to drum up attention about electoral reform. The idea is simple: when voters notice the colossal lists of contenders on their ballots, candidates and organizers use that opening to promote alternative electoral systems and their belief that politicians should not be in charge of shaping election rules that may benefit them. This week, the Conservative leader, whose former riding of Carleton was targeted during the last federal campaign, said he'd had enough. Poilievre penned a letter to Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon, calling the effort a 'blatant abuse' of Canada's democracy and elections integrity, and demanded the Liberals introduce reforms in the fall that would stifle 'the longest ballot scam.' In a statement to the Star, MacKinnon's office said the government shares Poilievre's concerns and was 'examining' the issue. But for those who believe the gargantuan ballots make an inexcusable mockery of Canada's electoral system, well, that's kind of the whole point. 'I get emails, I get Facebook messages saying, 'Why is a person from Ontario running in an Alberta riding?' And this is exactly why I do want to see a residency requirement. I don't think somebody from Ontario should be able to run in Alberta,' said Dillon Anderson, the 22-year-old university student from Callander, Ont. 'I'm hoping that this is the last time we'll do the longest ballot and that we get some changes, some actual meaningful changes, that don't restrict Canadians' rights to run, but gives us more of a local-focused approach,' said Anderson, who is one of several protest candidates who believe other rules, like residency requirements, ought to be changed. For Nicola Zoghbi, the Montreal teacher, the initiative is 'one of the most efficient ways' to point out flaws in Canada's electoral system, which he says include its use of the first-past-the-post system, where the candidate with the most votes wins — even if most voters actually voted for other contenders. What's unique about this byelection, said Zoghbi, whose campaign platform is almost entirely about dinosaurs , is how Poilievre is able to take advantage of some rules while trying to ban others. 'There's this loophole that Poilievre and other politicians are using, so regular people like me could use it, too,' he said of the residency requirement, which politicians have historically used to run in ridings far away from where they actually live. Jason Buzzell, the Nebraska IT expert, joined the movement in part because of his personal ties to the riding. Buzzell was raised in Battle River—Crowfoot, and started his family there before work took him across the border. He wonders if a proportional voting system would have seen Poilievre re-elected in Carleton last spring. 'If we had had electoral reform … we wouldn't even have to do this byelection,' Buzzell suggested. The question election experts are now wrestling with is whether the whole scheme is fair game, or whether the integrity of races is being compromised. There are indications that the latter has not occurred, said Dennis Pilon, a professor and chair of the politics department at York University. One is a lack of reports that electors have felt too confused by affected ballots to vote properly. Another is no indication that the number of spoiled ballots has unduly increased. A third is that voters ultimately still have the agency to choose the candidate who they want to represent them. But if the strategy isn't harming voters, could it harm candidates from established parties? 'Maybe it ends up denying one of the candidates the win. That's the whole point of the protest,' said Pilon. So far, all ridings targeted by the movement have been won by a Liberal, Conservative or Bloc Québécois candidate. But ' everything that's happening is legal, and it's allowed to be done,' said Laura Stephenson, a professor and chair of the department of political science at the University of Western Ontario. Poilievre has asked the government to consider three changes: to require that candidates have more than the current minimum of 100 voter signatures needed to get on the ballot; that those signatures be exclusive to each candidate; and that each candidate needs their own official agent (the person who manages campaign finances). The Longest Ballot Committee has the same official agent for each of its candidates, and goes to the same voters to obtain physical signatures for nomination packages. Stephenson said some of the proposals could, in theory, 'tighten things up while still maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.' 'The key is that this shouldn't be seen as a political step. If these kinds of rules were being brought forward by Elections Canada … it doesn't have any political tint to it,' she said of the timing of Poilievre's demands. The one issue on which everyone seems to agree is that the protest has sidelined independent candidates not tied to the movement who are running serious campaigns. Bonnie Critchley, an independent candidate in Battle River—Crowfoot, has been frustrated by the protest drawing voter attention away from her campaign. 'This is a little bit sad for them. I'm very sorry for that,' said Sébastien CoRhino, one of the Longest Ballot Committee's organizers. 'But at the same time, it is impossible with the current political system to have independent candidates win an election,' he said. Michael MacKenzie, the Jarislowsky Chair in Trust and Political Leadership at Vancouver Island University, says opposing the protest runs counter to Poilievre's stated focus on ensuring political elites have no say in the decisions of Canadians. But he questions whether the original purpose of the movement — to reopen a national discussion about electoral reform that the Liberals have abandoned — is being lost in all the noise. 'It's not generating a lot of focused discussion on the complexities of electoral reform,' MacKenzie said. 'Most discussions are about the disruptions and the difficulties and confusions associated with this initiative, and there's been very little discussion about the benefits or drawbacks of the electoral reform itself.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall
The top end of London's property market usually eases into the year, but 2025 has got off to an unusually subdued start. The capital recorded just 34 sales of more than $10m during the first quarter of this year – about a third fewer than the same period in 2024, according to Knight Frank's latest Global Super-Prime Intelligence report. The slowdown stands in stark contrast to a global market that is gaining momentum. Worldwide, 527 super-prime properties changed hands in the first quarter, a six per cent year-on-year increase. By now, we all know what's behind the discrepancy. Labour's heavy-handed taxation of high earners has come at a time when there are more attractive alternatives than ever before. The Dubai lifestyle, light-touch tax in Italy, and the rising stock of true luxury homes in Paris and Madrid are all prompting high-net-worth individuals to hedge their bets on London. Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the Financial Times that more than 70,000 people have applied for Donald Trump's new 'gold card' visa, which grants long-term residency to foreign investors willing to spend and stay in the US. It turns out that the small group of very wealthy individuals living in Britain are flightier than the Treasury expected, and the taxpayer will now have to foot the bill. The government has already lost more than £400m in stamp duty on sales above £5m – overwhelmingly in London's 'golden postcodes' such as SW1 and W1, including prime locations like Mayfair, Chelsea, St John's Wood and South Kensington – since the first non-dom reforms were announced by the previous government, according to analysis by Knight Frank UK research head Tom Bill. The real cost is likely to be much, much higher. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is coming around to that idea. A combination of reforms to the non-dom regime, first introduced under Jeremy Hunt in March 2024 and then expanded by Labour in October, were expected to raise £13.1bn from 10,000 individuals by 2027/28. Capital gains tax reforms were supposed to deliver another £2.5bn by the end of the decade. However, the behavioural assumptions underpinning those numbers haven't held. 'Higher earners' behavioural responses to tax changes are more uncertain and potentially higher than assumed,' the OBR conceded on July 8. 'A growing reliance on this small and mobile group of taxpayers therefore represents a fiscal risk.' The OBR isn't the first to issue that warning – yet, it's not clear whether the penny has dropped for those in Downing Street. Despite rumblings that Chancellor Rachel Reeves was considering reversing parts of her non-dom crackdown to stem departures of high net worth individuals, nothing has materialised so far. Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock also recently called for a two per cent wealth tax on assets above £10m, which may not have been endorsed, but it wasn't ruled out either. Even this kind of speculation is damaging – confidence is fragile, and the message from policymakers matters. Successive governments have treated high-net worth individuals as a dependable source of revenue, but trust has now been eroded. It will take years of predictable, measured policymaking to rebuild it. The silver lining is that many of the highest earners appear to be holding onto their London homes while they weigh up their options. Bill's analysis showed that the number of new sales instructions in the first six months of the year in prime central London (PCL) was 32 per cent higher than the five-year average (excluding 2020). Above £5m, there was an equivalent increase of 14 per cent and above £2m, there was a rise of 22 per cent. In other words, property listings in the first half of 2025 were skewed towards the lower price brackets. Crucially, lenders are playing their part – banks are working on very tight margins and taking a proactive approach to help borrowers reach decisions that work for them. London remains one of the world's most desirable cities, but desirability isn't destiny. The government can't afford to keep learning the same lesson: that you cannot bank on a mobile, globally-minded minority to fund massive imbalances in taxing and spending. What happens next will depend not just on rates and rules, but on tone. The sooner the government steadies the narrative, the faster London can reassert its position as Europe's foremost hub for private wealth. Simon Gammon is a managing partner at Knight Frank Finance
