logo
Editorial: Suburban mayoral campaigns shouldn't cost this much

Editorial: Suburban mayoral campaigns shouldn't cost this much

Yahoo3 days ago
Inflation was perhaps the most pivotal issue on the ballot in November 2024, as we all know.
But it wasn't just the cost of everyday goods that was rising. Local politics got awfully expensive in our most recent campaign cycle, culminating with April 1 general municipal elections.
Wanna run for mayor of a Chicago suburb? If this year's consolidated election is our guide for the future, the tab in many cases will run well into the six figures for the most high-profile suburban races.
And that's striking when you consider what the top elected official in a suburb actually does. Mayors — or village presidents, as they're called in many suburbs — oversee local services, manage the budget, and serve as a community representative at ribbon cuttings, among other duties.
Local mayoral races aren't traditionally supposed to resemble high-stakes congressional battles — but judging by the last election cycle, they increasingly do.
We knew the village president race in Orland Park was hotly contested, but we were still stunned to see what those campaigns spent in the first quarter of 2024: over $580,000.
For a village president race. In a town of 57,000.
Orland Park Mayor Jim Dodge ran as part of a slate of candidates called 'Orland Park for All.' Dodge and his associated committees spent about $190,000 in the months leading up to the April 1, 2024, election, according to State Board of Elections data.
Dodge's opponent, former Mayor Keith Pekau, had a slate of his own called People Over Politics. Pekau and his associated committees filed reports showing nearly $400,000 in spending in the first quarter of the year, and pulled in donations from many local individuals. Notably, People Over Politics also recorded a nearly $15,000 donation from conservative megadonor Richard Uihlein of Lake Forest.
But what did all of this money get the people of Orland Park? A bitter, ugly local election that saw former neighbors become bitter political enemies.
And that's the problem we fear is taking shape: Municipal races aren't supposed to be referendums on the hot-button issues animating Washington.
Local politics should be different. These candidates are running to serve their neighbors. That closeness, both to one another and to the people they hope to represent, has traditionally encouraged a higher level of civility and respect.
Additionally, when it's expensive to run for office, fewer people do it even if they may be a good candidate. That's bad for local democracy.
The need for so much cash also heightens the risk of business interests like developers gaining more influence over local officials.
Orland Park's wasn't the only big-bucks local race. Skokie's mayoral election was costly, too, with candidates spending hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to a Tribune analysis of election filings.
And in Evanston, Mayor Daniel Biss — who now is running for Congress — and his opponent, Jeff Boarini, spent nearly $200,000 in the months leading up to the April 1 election, according to reporting from the Evanston Roundtable.
As people close to state and local politics have told us, one of the drivers behind the growing cost of running for local office is that increasingly politics — even practiced at the local level — is a business. Twenty years ago, say, a friend might have volunteered as an unpaid campaign manager and handled every aspect of a race. Good old-fashioned door-knocking is free. Today, it's more common, even in small campaigns, to hire paid staff and invest in media buys, mailings or other professional services.
'The nature of campaigns nowadays is you are competing with everything, and there is a lot of competition for people's attention,' Dodge said. 'You have to have enough communication to get through all of that.'
That's fair. But it's still a shame that it's led to the kind of polarized and high-cost local politics we're seeing more and more today. The cottage industry developing around local politics doesn't seem to be doing much to improve the quality of community discourse, even if it does help candidates get the word out — and it could be deterring good candidates from running for office.
Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration
This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration

Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images Donald Trump has completely transformed the Oval Office into his own gaudy, gold fantasy land. Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images It's A LOT. Andrew Harnik / Getty Images You've got the gold crown molding. Bloomberg / Bloomberg via Getty Images The fireplace is cluttered with gold statues. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images He's got gold coasters. SAUL LOEB / AFP via Getty Images And then there's a TON of these gold squiggly things all over the picture from the White House really shows how many gold accents have been added to the Oval Office. This is how it looked last year: michellelprice/Twitter: @michellelprice From this: To this: Look at all that gold!!! Well, since then, Trump has SOMEHOW managed to add even more gold. @JoeMyGod posted this "then and now" picture that is going super viral: From this: To this: "It's like the Dollar Tree version of Versailles," one person joked. "Which one seems more fiscally responsible...." another person asked. And this person said, "I hope that lovely fireplace can be restored with no damage." Thoughts on the renovations?! Solve the daily Crossword

Bipartisan Outrage Over Epstein Is Just What America Needs
Bipartisan Outrage Over Epstein Is Just What America Needs

Bloomberg

time23 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bipartisan Outrage Over Epstein Is Just What America Needs

The controversy over the mysterious ' Epstein Files,' which President Donald Trump's administration first pledged to release and then decided not to, has Democrats back in touch with one of America's great political traditions: anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Not only is this good for the party, it is also — dare I say it — healthy for US politics. Theories of this type differ from the more extreme Russiagate allegations against Trump (or Trump's infamous charges that Barack Obama was secretly born in Kenya) in that they are not narrowly partisan. As such, they are especially appealing to the kinds of people who are disengaged from politics and alienated from mainstream institutions. In other words, just the kinds of people who've flocked to Trump's banner over the past decade.

CNN Poll: Americans largely oppose Trump's ramp-up of deportations
CNN Poll: Americans largely oppose Trump's ramp-up of deportations

CNN

time23 minutes ago

  • CNN

CNN Poll: Americans largely oppose Trump's ramp-up of deportations

Americans largely oppose recent efforts by Donald Trump's administration to scale up its deportation program, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS finds, with a rising majority saying the president has gone too far in carrying out deportations. In the latest survey, 55% say the president has gone too far when it comes to deporting immigrants living in the US illegally, up 10 points since February. Opposition among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents has risen in that time from widespread to nearly universal: Ninety percent of Democratic-aligned adults now say that Trump's deportation policy has gone too far, while just 15% of Republican-aligned adults say the same. A 57% majority also say they oppose plans to build new detention facilities capable of holding up to 100,000 undocumented immigrants, while 53% oppose increasing the budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement by billions of dollars — two White House priorities reflected in the sweeping policy bill that Trump recently signed into law. Nearly 6 in 10 oppose efforts to end birthright citizenship, another Trump priority. The courts are reviewing the president's executive order seeking to bar birthright citizenship for children born on American soil to parents who were in the country unlawfully or who were there lawfully but temporarily. Overall, just shy of half, 46%, say Trump's immigration policies have made the country safer, and 42% say the federal government has been careful about following the law in carrying out deportations. Both figures are largely unchanged since April. The president's approval ratings are around 40% for his handling both of immigration in general and deportations specifically In CNN's poll, 59% of Americans oppose arresting and detaining undocumented immigrants who have resided in the United States for years with no criminal record. That echoes a theme seen in much immigration polling this year — support for immigration enforcement tends to erode when pollsters specify that people without criminal records or longtime residents will be among those affected. A CNN review of government data found that most immigrants taken into ICE custody between last October and May had no serious criminal convictions. While only about one-quarter of Republicans and Republican-leaners are opposed to arrests aimed at this group, just shy of half — 47% — offer outright support, far below the 83% who approve of his handling of deportations overall. 'The most important issue is how ICE is focusing on immigrants with no criminal history,' wrote one California woman polled, who stood among the minority of Republicans who thought Trump had gone too far with his deportation campaign. 'They should research on immigrants that pose a huge threat the country.' Even as views of Trump's second-term immigration platform have soured, support for specific policies can vary depending on how they're described. In CNN's poll, 16% of Americans who said they were opposed to increasing the budget for ICE also said, in a separate question, that they viewed the increase in spending on 'border security, enforcement of immigration laws and detention of those charged with entering the country illegally' as a reason to support Trump's recently passed spending bill. There's also relatively muted opposition to punitive ideas Trump has advanced against those who do have criminal records regardless of their current citizenship status. Americans are closely split on whether they'd favor or oppose Trump carrying out threats to send US citizens convicted of violent crimes to detention in a foreign country (37% would support this, with 39% opposed and the rest offering neither opinion). And there's narrow support, 43% to 35%, for efforts to prioritize revoking US citizenship from naturalized citizens convicted of certain crimes — the only positive reading on any policy tested. By contrast, Americans overwhelmingly say, 71% to 12%, they'd oppose Trump acting on his threats to deport high-profile critics of the administration's policies, even if they live in the US legally and have not been convicted of any crimes. Asked in the same survey to name the issue they consider most important, 20% of Americans mention immigration, ranking it second only to economic concerns. While that's similar overall to January, the partisan dynamics of the issue have shifted somewhat. At the start of the year, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents were 26 points likelier than those aligned with the Democratic Party to mention immigration. Now, while it's still a more potent issue among Republicans than Democrats, that gap has narrowed to 10 points amid the rising Democratic opposition to Trump's deportation policies. The poll also finds more support than backlash for protests against the Trump administration's deportation policies. Americans say, 55% to 45%, that the protests of the Trump administration's deportation policies have been mostly justified. And by a 9-point margin, 47% to 38%, they say they're more concerned that the government will go too far in cracking down on protests rather than fearing that the protests themselves will get out of hand. There's particularly strong backing for the protests among Democratic-aligned adults (78% of whom call them justified), adults younger than 35 (63%), and people of color (59%). Most Americans, 59%, say they oppose Trump using National Guard troops, who are typically controlled by state governors, in response to immigration protests even if a state's governor does not support the use of those troops. The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS from July 10-13 among a random national sample of 1,057 US adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among all adults have a margin of sampling error of ±3.5 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store