
A guide to greener banking: I divested my personal finances and you can too – here's how
What if your money was quietly fuelling the climate crisis – and you had no idea?
If you bank with one of the big four or have retirement savings in superannuation, there's a good chance it is. In Australia, many major banks and most default super funds continue to invest in fossil fuel companies and their coal, oil and gas projects, driving global warming.
That's where the global divestment movement comes in.
Divestment means shifting your money out of harmful industries and into more ethical, climate-positive alternatives. It's the opposite of investment – you simply pull your capital out of companies or funds that contribute to environmental or social harm.
Over the past few years, I've delved into divesting my personal finances and learned some key ways this shift can make a real difference.
If you only tackle one area of divestment, make it your super – it's often your largest pool of money beyond property, and too often it's channelled into fossil fuels.
The climate lobby group Market Forces estimates $150bn of Australians' retirement savings – roughly $6,200 per member account on average – could be tied up in 190 global companies driving the most climate damage. And such investment is growing, meaning our retirement savings are increasingly being used to create a more polluted world to retire into.
One way to find a better option is to use the Market Forces comparison tool. It profiles more than 70 fund options, pinpointing just seven that fully exclude fossil fuels and the so-called 'Climate Wreckers Index' of the world's worst polluters.
Using this type of information, I divested from a large Australian super fund which has known investments in fossil fuels and moved to a fund that excludes major polluters such as Woodside, Whitehaven Coal, Santos, Origin and AGL.
Justin Medcalf, co-founder of Ethical Advisers' Co-op and Unless Financial, says to beware the 'devil in the detail'. For example, some funds use a tiered threshold screening, which may allow investment in companies earning limited amounts of their revenue from coal mining.
'A lot of investors assume that having a screening process in place means zero exposure to fossil fuels. It can be a rude surprise to discover there is still exposure,' Medcalf says. 'Ultimately, there is no perfect portfolio. For now, it's 'how do we create the best version of something that isn't perfect?''
All four of Australia's big banks – ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, NAB and Westpac – pour billions into fossil fuel projects each year, as do many other major players.
In 2021, when searching for my first mortgage, I saw the chance to divest from a big four bank and switch to a more ethical option. I told my broker I wanted a home loan that was both competitive and backed by a bank that doesn't fund fossil fuels. We landed on one of the few with a cleaner track record.
To find out where your bank stands, use Market Forces' Compare Banks tool. It includes a 'tell them to stop' button, so you can quickly send a message and easily demand change. That's crucial, says Medcalf. 'A lot of people move their money but don't say anything, so the bank never knows why. A key part of the divestment movement is communicating,' he says.
And it works. Just last year, Commonwealth Bank broke ranks and announced it would stop financing fossil fuel companies that don't comply with Paris climate goals. 'That was quite a considerable win and a lot of that is attributed to the divestment movement,' Medcalf says.
If you're investing in shares, ETFs or managed funds, beware of greenwashing. Many mainstream investment products – even those labelled 'sustainable' or 'balanced' – still include major polluters.
Tools like the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia's certification and the Ethical Advisers' Co-op's Leaf rating can help you find investment products and services that meet high standards of environmental, social and ethical performance.
'We need a mindset shift,' Medcalf says. 'Rather than thinking 'what can I avoid?', think 'what can I actively invest in?' Yes, we want to avoid industries that aren't creating a positive future, but we can also get behind the industries of the future.'
And divesting doesn't have to mean missing out financially – it may even boost your returns. RIAA's 2024 Benchmarking Report shows responsible investment funds have outperformed mainstream ones by 3% over 10 years, and 1.5% over five years.
For long-term investors, especially those in their 30s and 40s, Medcalf says it makes sense to start factoring in environmental risk. Fossil fuel assets are increasingly seen as vulnerable, with tightening regulations and the growing risk of becoming 'stranded' and unprofitable.
If you want to go a step further, consider strategically buying into a polluting company along with fellow shareholder activists who then band together to demand change from the inside. You can get started with as little as $500 using the Sustainable Investment Exchange (SIX) platform.
Whether you divest, reinvest or become an activist shareholder, the point is the same: your money is powerful and you can actively choose whether it props up harmful industries or helps build a better future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Thousands of Australian uni students will now receive $331 a week for practical placements. But not everyone's happy
Thousands of university and Tafe students will receive financial support to complete mandatory placements for the first time from Tuesday, in a major win for stakeholders who have spent years pushing the commonwealth to address 'placement poverty'. But not all students are eligible for the payments, and others say the federal government hasn't gone far enough to address a cost-of-living crisis facing young people. Here's what you need to know. From 1 July, eligible domestic students completing teaching, nursery, midwifery and social work degrees will be able to access $331.65 per week during mandatory practical placements, benchmarked to the single Austudy rate. It's equivalent to about $60 per day, or $8 an hour. The education minister, Jason Clare, said the payment would 'give people who have signed up to do some of the most important jobs in this country a bit of extra help to get the qualifications they need'. The federal government estimated about 68,000 higher education students and around 5,000 VET students would be able to access the means-tested support each year. Students would have to prove they weren't earning more than $1,500 per week and had worked more than 15 hours in a job outside of university prior to starting the placement to access the payments. International students have also been excluded. The payments were a recommendation of the Universities Accord, handed down to the commonwealth last year. The blueprint for the future of higher education found providing financial support for placements was 'essential' to ensure students could complete their degrees 'without falling into poverty', and to stem high dropout rates. Clare said he had met students who told him 'they can afford to go to uni, but they can't afford to do the prac'. 'Placement poverty is a real thing,' he said. 'Some students say prac means they have to give up their part-time job, and that they don't have the money to pay the bills.' The accord recommended the government provide support for 'key industries' including nursing, care and teaching. Clare said that was why these three areas were the focus of initial reform. The announcement has received widespread attention. When the prime minister took to TikTok in mid-June to tout paid practical placements, it was his most watched video since joining the platform, raking in 1.3m views. But his audience was split: some praised the PM for taking a 'step in the right direction'; others questioned why their courses had missed out. The Greens, Students Against Placement Poverty (SAPP) and the Australian Medical Students Association (AMSA) have urged the federal government to expand the eligibility to all students completing placements, and to increase the payments to at least the minimum wage. A range of degrees that also require hundreds of hours of mandatory placements – including veterinary science, medicine, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, paramedicine and psychology – have been excluded from the payments. Deputy leader for the Greens and higher education spokesperson, Mehreen Faruqi, called the policy 'overly complex, poorly targeted and far too stingy to make a real difference'. Siena Hopper, a spokesperson for SAPP, accused 'a package initially envisioned to provide a living wage to students undertaking tertiary placement' of being 'largely reduced to another bureaucratic hurdle'. 'The absurdity of means testing is clear in comparison to longstanding trade apprenticeship arrangements,' she said. 'No student should have to prove they are worthy of payment for their labour.' AMSA said in a statement it was 'disheartening' that medical students, who are required to complete 2,000 hours of full-time placements, had been left out, adding the 'intense' study requirements were causing burnout and university dropouts. 'Like all placement students, medical students are a part of the workforce,' AMSA said. 'Nothing exemplifies this more than the recent NSW doctor strikes which saw medical students actively called upon to fill the shoes of junior doctors.' The reforms come off the back of a series of changes to higher education, including wiping $3bn in student debt, the establishment of a student ombudsman and fee-free Tafe places. Clare said he would remain 'directly focused' on students in Labor's current term of government. 'The next step in the reform program, big structural change, is around fixing the funding of our universities. You'll see that roll out next year, including demand-driven funding for equity students and a real needs-based funding approach to universities.' The new Australian Tertiary Education Commission, beginning its work from Tuesday, will be tasked with looking at funding arrangements, including tackling the widely critiqued jobs ready graduate scheme, which increased fees for some courses, including humanities, to fund cuts incentivising students to study teaching, nursing, maths, science and engineering. Around five years since its introduction, arts degrees are now $50,000.


Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I sold my family home for £400,000 in a raffle so we could move to Australia - it was the biggest risk of my life and I'll NEVER do it again
A mother-of-three who sold off her family home in a raffle to facilitate a dream move to Australia has revealed how she achieved the feat - and made £90,000 in profit. Natalie Rowcroft, 38, set out to sell her semi-detached home in Salford, Greater Manchester, in 2021 to pursue a better life for her family down under - but when the UK entered the Covid lockdown, it seemed an 'impossible' task. So instead of keeping her £290,000 house listed with estate agents and waiting for prospective buyers to make an offer, she took matters into her own hands and decided to offer the four-bedroom property up as a raffle prize. Natalie jumped on a trend growing in popularity in the UK with the help of competitions run by organisations like Omaze - the charity which offers luxury houses in dreamy locations around the country to lucky raffle winners. In recent years the UK has seen an explosion in property raffles after homeowners found their properties languishing on estate agent portfolios owing to Covid 19 and its subsequent lockdown. With tickets selling for as little as £1 in some cases, thousands of people around the UK take a punt on winning a home for the price of a packet of crisps - but while Natalie and her family managed to make money on their family home, she has revealed it's not something she'll do again in a hurry. Property raffles sell like hot cakes for the likes of Omaze, Raffle House, Elite Competitions and Raffall - the latter a platform that helped Natalie Rowcroft raffle her home off in a little over a month. The teaching assistant told MailOnline that when Covid struck she thought the 'world was going to end' and along with it, her dreams of selling up and emigrating to Australia. 'The lockdown made it impossible to sell our home, estate agents couldn't even bring anyone around [to view it]' said Natalie. And so she took the wild plunge to sell her family home in a raffle. After doing a little web research, she and her reluctant husband Bradley, also 38, put their home up for a £2 raffle at legal raffling company, Raffall. To sweeten the deal they threw in the family's BMW. In 45 days they sold £360,000 worth of tickets and waved goodbye to their home. But Natalie insists the process wasn't nearly as smooth as it reads. It all began with a 'crazy idea' she told MailOnline. 'I literally set it up online. Within the first day we sold 10,000 tickets. 'From then it just went absolutely crazy... it sort of blew up from then'. But Bradley wasn't convinced by his wife's plan, and told Natalie she had 'lost the plot' for wanting to sell their beloved family home in this way. Natalie admitted she too had some initial reservations as she had never raffled something worth hundreds of thousands of pounds before. But at a time when most people were left with nothing to do than watch TV and trawl the internet, Natalie saw a golden opportunity and reached out to strangers urging them to buy raffle tickets. In a matter of days she became a one-woman PR machine, employing her family of five - including three kids Bradley, 19, Aiden, 17 and Rhys, 12 - to plug tickets in a series of fun social media videos. Local media caught wind first before the Rowcrofts became a national internet sensation. 'The Manchester Evening News contacted us and then we had friends that were helping us share [our story]. We weren't that great with social media [back then] so a couple of friends helped us set up our Facebook page. 'I just needed to get it [the raffle] out there. We were in a pandemic, in a lockdown - we needed to get it out as far as we can'. The campaign snowballed and their faces were soon plastered across the BBC, ITV and even social media funnyman Tiny Tim wanted a piece of the action. Though grateful for the growing spotlight, Natalie said she couldn't keep up and lamented how a plan to sell their family home somehow became a 'full time job'. 'We did Facebook challenges, lives, TikTok videos... I was going through my Instagram inboxing every single person' she recalled. 'It was a full time job times two. It was literally from 4 o'clock in the morning 'til gone midnight. During those hours I was still answering messages. I just couldn't sleep because I was like 'I need to succeed'.' 'It was the school holidays so I was lucky that I was off during that period. I wouldn't have been able to work [otherwise]... it would've been impossible'. She fondly remembered sometimes selling up to 4,000 raffle tickets per live video thanks to the Rowcrofts' growing tight-knit online community: 'We were like the face of the raffle. People were invested in buying raffles because they wanted to see us succeed'. 'But it's a lot harder than you would ever imagine,' she continued. 'After four days in it was literally so much hard work and full on. People think "oh you're going to sell tickets instantly or it's a no brainer". 'If I was to rewind or if I knew how much work I would have to put into it I may have not have done it. But we had no option or choice'. Natalie can't put a price on the physical and mental strain the project caused her - but she can on the PR campaign, which she estimated to be a whopping £6,000. 'It costs you a lot of money to promote... it cost us a lot of money to boost posts on Facebook, all the printing, spending hours driving around' she explained. When she put up their home for a 90-day raffle, she expected to sell enough tickets to cover the cost of their home, solicitors fees and the mandatory 10 per cent owed to Raffall. But nothing more. But when she crunched the numbers, Natalie was pleasantly surprised to realise she had reached her goal within half the time frame, and still took home £90,000 in profit. She reflected on how brave she was to transform the idea into reality, particularly when her partner was unsure if it was the right thing to do. 'You've lost the plot,' he told her when she called him at work to propose her plan. Luckily a friend she consulted at the time reassured her it was worth a go and it all paid off. Natalie spoke on the 'crazy' number of people who constantly drove past the couple's home and wanted to confirm it wasn't a 'scam'. 'For the people that were saying it was too good to be true - I would send my address and say come to my house,' said Natalie. Natalie speaks to MailOnline from her new home in Brisbane, Australia where the family has lived happily for the last four years. She acknowledged that the move is a dream come true but remained adamant that anyone inspired to follow suit should get clued up on the weight of the task. 'It was a massive risk and never in a million years would I do it again. The amount of work it took. My life was on hold for 45 days. 'It was probably the biggest risk I've ever taken in my life, there was so much pressure on me because I had taken it on and had decided to do this. 'If we didn't meet the amount of ticket sales to sell our property we get to keep the property but we'd lose our time and the money we spent on our marketing. The winner would get a cash prize instead of our house but then we would get nothing.' As a mother of three, Natalie vividly remembers fearing for the safety of her family after having to welcome strangers into their lives in order to sell raffle tickets. The work of matriarch, businesswoman and PR machine at times became too much to bear. She said: 'I had to stay up and get back to everyone and message everyone and reply back. If I didn't people would say it's a scam.... it was scary. We gave our address to everyone. 'If one person calls me a scammer... with anything like that once you put your name to something and it gets that big you will get trolls and haters'. Speaking about why she'll never repeat the experience, she said: 'You get worried because you're putting your family out there and people know where your address is. Just all of that and the no sleep'. For anyone else who wants to raffle off their homes, Natalie's advice is to remain dedicated. Ultimately, one has to 'live and breathe' the raffle if they want it to be a success, she said. 'People started setting up their raffle accounts and contacting me saying "oh well we've not even sold any tickets". They were like "well how did you do it?" 'I'm like, 'scroll through my Facebook page',' she joked. 'I'm like for us it was literally day and night - you've got to breathe it. You've got to be fun, you've got to be active. 'If you've got a full time job and you're not on it [the property raffle] all the time tickets aren't going to sell. 'You have to physically put it out there and make people buy your tickets - they're not going to buy it just by putting a link online. It's not going to happen'.


Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Deborah Knight set to make TV comeback with a Nine daytime news gig after 'quitting 2GB role'
Deborah Knight is tipped to return to television after reportedly stepping away from her role on 2GB's Money News. The seasoned journalist, who boasts a media career spanning three decades, is rumoured to be making a move back to TV to front Nine's daytime news bulletin. It comes after the 52-year-old is believed to be wrapping up her tenure at 2GB, where she had been hosting Money News. Knight has kept tight-lipped on her next move, and neither she nor Channel Nine responded to The Sunday Telegraph 's request for comment over the weekend. However, TV insiders say Knight is among several well-known names being trialled for the role of permanent host of Nine's daytime news. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. Should she take on the position, it would mark a full-circle return to the network where she previously co-hosted the Today show before being axed in 2020. Her exit from 2GB will also leave the Sydney station without any female presenters during the weekday daytime lineup. Knight first joined 2GB's afternoon program in 2020, reportedly on a $600,000 salary, before being moved off the role in late 2023 due to disappointing ratings. At the time, the broadcaster was said to be 'shattered' by the decision. Despite the shake-up, Knight quickly bounced back, taking over Money News in November 2023 in a revamped 7pm-8pm slot. And it didn't take long for her to prove the doubters wrong. Knight helped drive Money News to a 13.3 per cent share in the latest ratings survey -ranking her number one in the country for the timeslot, and more than doubling the show's audience in Queensland, where it's also broadcast on Brisbane's 4BC. The program also recorded a 0.6 point increase in the latest survey, contributing to 2GB's strongest ratings result of the year. Should she take on the position, it would mark a full-circle return to the network, where she previously co-hosted the Today show before being axed in 2020. Pictured with Karl Stefanovic Taking to social media following the win, Knight paid tribute to her loyal listeners and executive producer Tom Storey. 'Heartfelt thanks to Money News listeners! Another strong survey result around the country,' she posted. 'Huge shout out to my EP Tom Storey for pulling together the little show that could.' Knight's strong run on Money News came after a difficult few years that saw her unceremoniously dumped from the Today show in 2020. She later took over Afternoons on 2GB, starting strong with an 11.4 per cent share, only to plummet to a record-low 6 per cent share in 2023 before being replaced. At the time, Knight framed her new Money News role as a step forward, telling listeners: 'I am stepping back as host of Afternoons. I am not, however, leaving 2GB. In fact, I'm taking on a new broader network role.'