Trinity College can be named in case taken by student who apologised for plagiarism
The High Court has lifted an anonymity order allowing
Trinity College Dublin
and the
Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland
to be named in a legal case against them taken by a pharmaceutical student found to have plagiarised his colleague's work.
The third-level student has been granted
High Court
permission to pursue his legal action against the college, which twice made findings of plagiarism against him.
He claims he should not have been put before a fitness-to-practise committee.
The student, who retains his anonymity, took legal action against the Provost, Fellows and Scholars of the University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin and the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland, which regulates the country's pharmacists.
READ MORE
At the High Court on Monday, Mr Justice Garrett Simons said the anonymity order granted to the two respondents in December by Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty could be lifted.
Rosario Boyle SC, for the student, said there was no opposition to the naming of the college or the society, but applied for her client's anonymity to remain in place.
The application to lift the student's anonymity was brought by Patrick Leonard SC, for the respondents, who submitted that the student should be treated the same as any other person before the court.
Ms Boyle said the student, who is in his 20s, was two exams away from completing his qualification, and is challenging the internal proceedings at Trinity.
She said he was subject to professional and peer recommendations to work, which could be affected if his name was published.
Ms Boyle said there was an unfairness in her client being submitted to a fitness-to-practise review which was commonly a process used for professionals.
Her client had admitted making 'academic' errors and has references from pharmaceutical professionals that he would make a 'brilliant' pharmacist, she said.
'As of this minute, your client is not in good standing,' said Mr Justice Simons, who added that the student could be vindicated in the public domain by the court action taken if it was successful.
Mr Justice Simons adjourned the matter to October 20th and told Ms Boyle to find an analogy or case law to show him that graduated pharmacists have a right to anonymity based on potential damage to a livelihood due to allegations made against them.
In September 2023, the student attended a plagiarism investigation by the college. He told the investigators that he had attended an exam with a bundle of notes that also contained material provided by another student in his year.
The student asserted that he did not realise he had been transcribing directly from another student's notes in the exam, and apologised.
The investigating committee said that even if the plagiarism was unintended, it was still an offence.
The student's legal submissions claim that the university's policy outlines that cases of plagiarism should generally be dealt with under the disciplinary regulations, and not under the fitness-to-practise policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Police ombudsman investigating circumstances of Evan Fitzgerald's death
Officials from Fiosrú, the Police Ombudsman, are investigating the circumstances around the death of Evan Fitzgerald, who took his life in a Carlow shopping centre last month. Investigators from the ombudsman's office are in close contact with the Fitzgerald family and providing them with regular updates, sources said. The investigation is mandated under law as the 22-year-old from Wicklow had interactions with the gardaí around the time of his death, which occurred on June 1st in Fairgreen Shopping Centre. Mr Fitzgerald fired several shots into the air using a stolen shotgun before turning the gun on himself. However, Fiosrú also confirmed it is not investigating two other referrals relating to the actions gardaí took while investigating Mr Fitzgerald for possession of firearms last March. READ MORE Politicians have accused gardaí of attempting to 'entrap' the young man during the investigation and of misleading a judge. An Garda Síochána has strongly denied the accusations and said it used standard, internationally accepted tactics to protect the safety of the public. On Monday, Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan declined to comment on the matter until two linked court cases are completed. A spokesman for the Minister said he has been briefed by Garda Commissioner Drew Harris on the case 'both orally and in writing'. Speaking to The Irish Times on Monday, a spokeswoman for Fiosrú detailed its activity in relation to the case. She said on the day after Mr Fitzgerald's death, it received a referral from a Garda superintendent under section 203 (1) of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024. [ Carlow gunman Evan Fitzgerald had other weapons Opens in new window ] [ How 'controlled deliveries' are used in Garda sting operations Opens in new window ] This mandates that An Garda Síochána must refer any case to the Ombudsman where it appears 'that the act or omission of a member of garda personnel may have resulted in the death of, or serious harm to, a person'. Mr Fitzgerald took his life after armed gardaí arrived on the scene in response to reports of gunfire. Gardaí did not fire any rounds. Fiosrú confirmed it has appointed a senior officer to conduct the investigation. 'This matter remains open and under investigation. Fiosrú has and will continue to liaise with Evan Fitzgerald's family in this regard,' the spokeswoman said. Separately, she said the ombudsman received 'a notification of an incident of concern' on May 21st relating to the case. It is understood the referral related to allegations that gardaí had mislead a District Court judge during a previous bail hearing for Mr Fitzgerald. During the hearing, the judge was told gardaí were still investigating the source of the firearms Mr Fitzgerald had in his possession when he was stopped by members of the Emergency Response Unit in March. It later emerged that undercover gardaí sold him the two guns after being tipped off that Mr Fitzgerald was attempting to source weapons on the internet. Both weapons had been decommissioned by gardaí. One of them was a G3 assault rifle stolen by the IRA from Norwegian reserves in 1984 and recovered more than 20 years ago. Labour TD Alan Kelly and Independent senator Michael McDowell have characterised the operation as 'entrapment' of Mr Fitzgerald. Fiosrú said that on receiving the complaint it had requested further information from gardaí. After examining this, it opted not to open an investigation. Last Wednesday, Fiosrú received a further referral relating to An Garda Síochána action, this time from the commissioner. Mr Harris made the referral after politicians accused the force of misleading the court. Again, the ombudsman's office decided the matter did not warrant a full investigation. 'As the matters concerned were the same in substance as those outlined in the previous notification of 21st of May 2025, there was nothing further to be considered by Fiosrú,' the spokeswoman said, adding that it cannot, by law, make any further comment for the moment. Speaking last week, the commissioner defended An Garda Síochána's actions in the case and raised the recent school shooting 'by a lone gunman' in Austria, which left 11 people dead. 'This is sadly a more frequent occurrence,' he said. 'There is very insidious material on the internet which seeks to radicalise young people. We have to look at the individual and the threat to the general public and deal with that appropriately. 'I have to say, this was a very successful operation in that we made sure a threat to the public did not arise from the circumstances we were dealing with.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nikita Hand faces cross-examination by Conor McGregor's lawyers in civil rape trial appeal
Nikita Hand is facing cross-examination by lawyers for Conor McGregor as part of his appeal against a High Court civil jury finding in favour of Ms Hand, who alleged the mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter raped her in a Dublin hotel in 2018. Ms Hand is expected to be in the Court of Appeal on Tuesday when the appeal opens before the three-judge court, comprising Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Michael MacGrath. The appeal hearing is listed for up to three days. Mr McGregor has appealed against a High Court civil jury's finding last November that he assaulted Ms Hand in the Beacon Hotel, Sandyford, Dublin, on December 9th, 2018. The jury awarded Ms Hand almost €250,000 damages. READ MORE In evidence to the High Court, Ms Hand, a 36-year-old mother-of-one, said Mr McGregor raped her when she and a friend went with Mr McGregor and a friend of his, James Lawrence, to the hotel. She said she told Mr McGregor she did not want to have intercourse with him, she felt uncomfortable, but he 'would not take no for an answer'. She was wearing a tampon at the time and would not have sex during her period, she said. Mr McGregor denied rape and said he and Ms Hand had 'fully consensual', 'vigorous', 'athletic' sex. He said he was shocked when later shown photos of bruising on Ms Hand, that he had not caused them and that there was no tampon present. When charging the jury, Mr Justice Alexander Owens told them, if a person proves they were subject by another person to non-consensual sexual activity, that is the tort – a civil wrong causing harm or loss leading to legal liability – of assault. The jury found Mr McGregor had assaulted Ms Hand. It found Mr Lawrence (35), of Rafter's Road, Drimnagh, had not assaulted her. She had alleged he assaulted her by having sex with her without her consent in the hotel. Mr McGregor's grounds of appeal are wide-ranging, including claims over the conduct of the 12-day hearing by Mr Justice Owens. Some grounds focus on whether the trial judge erred in directing that the jury be asked to answer whether or not Mr McGregor 'assaulted' Ms Hand rather than 'sexually assaulted' her. As part of his appeal, Mr McGregor has provided affidavits by Samantha O'Reilly and her partner Steven Cummins, former neighbours of Ms Hand when she lived in Drimnagh. Ms Hand, in a replying affidavit, has described as 'lies' claims by Ms O'Reilly that bruising on her body, which she alleges was caused by Mr McGregor in the hotel on December 9th, 2018, may have been caused during an alleged row between Ms Hand and her then partner in their home hours later. [ Conor McGregor claims Nikita Hand's bruising may have been caused by alleged row with partner Opens in new window ] In her affidavit, Ms Hand said her then partner, Stephen Redmond, did not assault her on the night of December 9th/10th 2018, 'and never assaulted me in the course of our relationship, or since'. She and Mr Redmond had had a verbal argument downstairs in their house that night, a recording of which was played during the High Court case, but that was not so loud that Ms O'Reilly could have heard it, she also said. The appeal court will decide, during the full hearing of the appeal, whether the affidavits from Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins, sworn last January, are admissible. It will also decide whether an affidavit from a former Northern Ireland state pathologist, Dr Jack Crane, is admissible for the appeal. Mr McGregor claims that a report from Dr Crane, who was asked by the McGregor side to review material from the trial, is supportive of the credibility of the claims made by Ms O'Reilly and Mr Cummins. Michael Staines, solicitor for Mr McGregor, will give evidence concerning the circumstances in which those two witnesses, whose affidavits were sworn last January, came forward. Ms O'Reilly has alleged that, on the night of December 9th/10th, 2018, she had observed from the upstairs window of her house a row between Ms Hand and Mr Redmond. Ms O'Reilly said she inferred, from movements of Ms Hand's body, that Mr Redmond had assaulted her on the ground, and that this explained the bruising on her body seen the next day. The MMA fighter had persistently denied he assaulted Ms Hand and claims the new material came into his possession after the High Court case and provides a 'plausible' explanation for bruising on Ms Hand's body. The extensive bruising seen on Ms Hand's body when examined by a doctor in the Rotunda hospital in Dublin the day after her encounter with Mr McGregor was significant evidence in the High Court case. Gardaí took photos of the bruising on Tuesday, December 11th, 2018. An appeal by Mr Lawrence against the trial judge's refusal to order Ms Hand to pay his legal costs of the trial will be heard alongside Mr McGregor's appeal. The jury was told by Mr McGregor that he had paid his friend's costs for the High Court hearing.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
How do I approach Revenue about modest tax debt stretching back many years?
I am writing to you on behalf of an elderly neighbour who confided to me that he is worried about unpaid taxes over a period of two decades. This man returned to Ireland approximately 20 years ago and initially paid tax as a PAYE worker. He later worked ad hoc as a consultant, engaging a local accountancy firm to do his tax returns. It subsequently transpired that the money he paid to the accountant to pay Revenue had not been paid. He has no pension pot or assets and has basically fallen on hard times after complying, he says, with all tax requirements throughout his working life. I gather that instead of contacting Revenue to find a solution, he buried his head in the sand and somehow fell through the tax net. READ MORE His only other employment was a number of casual cash-in-hand jobs until he reached pension age, which he did well over a decade ago. He has paid no tax on his Irish pension or on his UK pension. He wants to rectify the situation, but is not in a position to pay back the unpaid tax and any additional fines. He has no assets aside from modest savings, which he wants to be used for his funeral. Someone told him that his family in England will have to pay the taxes. He is deeply worried that he will face public shame, prosecution and imprisonment. [ Long delays in UK pension buyback programme leave people worrying they could miss out Opens in new window ] Any suggestions on how he can approach Revenue and how they might handle the situation would be much appreciated. Ms P.S. Your neighbour has found himself in a very unfortunate position which, inadvertently or not, he has actually made worse. However, it is important that he realise there will be no shaming, no imprisonment and, as long as he approaches them – rather than waiting to see if they will catch him – no prosecution. And no one is going to be chasing his family in the UK. If he dies with all this balance outstanding, Revenue could demand payment from his estate. If there were not enough to meet the full bill, that would be Revenue's loss at that stage, not an issue for his family – although there clearly might be no inheritance. You can certainly see how it happens. A compliant taxpayer finds himself in Revenue debt through absolutely no fault of his own but, given limited means, chooses to hunker down rather than engage. Almost always, the intention is to 'get around to doing something about it', but weeks become months, months become years, and making that call just seems to get more difficult. Passage of time makes the taxpayer feel almost complicit in the crime and the non-payment. From what you say, the initial 'problem' concerned a period of a little over a year and, given what you say about the issue being the failure of his accountant to pass on funds handed over to meet tax liabilities, rather than any active omission, he would have been assured of a very sympathetic hearing. Yes, the legal onus for meeting tax liabilities is his, not his accountant's, but in the circumstances outlined, an accommodating payment plan would have been easy to arrange. His failure to do so then, or at any time since, has created the potential to exacerbate the issue. Firstly, Revenue will want to know what he did after that time. From the timeline you provide, there would not have been much time between his accountant's fraud against him and his reaching retirement age, but even so, they'll be curious. Then there is the pension income. You don't indicate how much this is, but he apparently has pensions from both Ireland and Britain, so may well be over the tax exemption limit of €18,000 – even if he is not on a full pension from either state. [ Why are some people paying income tax at almost 70%? Their pension pot is too big Opens in new window ] It's important not to exaggerate the issue. At all times, he appears to have been living fairly modestly with little spare cash or savings – so much so that he never felt able to even agree a repayment plan with Revenue. In terms of shame and fear, I have no doubt he is feeling far worse now than he ever would if this had been resolved. As his tax debt is very unlikely to be beyond €50,000, he needs to know that he will not appear in any tax defaulters' list, never mind face imprisonment. If only for the sake of his own mental health, he really does need to sort all this out. The good news for him is that there is help out there. My strong advice is that he go initially to the Money Advice and Budgeting Service (Mabs). This State-funded network specialises in dealing with people who are struggling with debt. It is free of charge and totally confidential. Mabs are contactable by phone and also have a network of offices across the State, providing face-to-face meetings which, I would suggest, would make more sense for this gentleman. You can find his local office here , together with their phone numbers, to arrange an appointment. Otherwise, he can call their national helpline on 0818 07 2000 or email helpline@ . That helpline is open from 9am to 8pm. He should first gather any relevant documents he has and a list of the relevant dates. If some paperwork is missing or the dates are fuzzy, no worries – don't let that put him off meeting Mabs. The service can help him with contacting the Revenue. Once that is done, there are various approaches available under personal insolvency legislation. These include a debt relief notice, a voluntary arrangement, a debt settlement arrangement, or a personal insolvency arrangement. If your neighbour's means are as limited as he tells you, he may in fact not end up paying anything but, even if his means do allow repayment of some of the debt over time, the arrangements under the personal insolvency legislation are designed to ensure he has sufficient money for his personal needs. These arrangements were not in place when your neighbour's woes began, but they offer him a structured and dignified way to put all this behind him and not live with the stress that currently has him living in fear. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
