
UBS, Goldman refused bank accounts for US-backed Gaza aid foundation
LONDON : UBS declined a request by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to open a bank account in Switzerland while Goldman Sachs did not set up a Swiss account for GHF after initial talks, two people with knowledge of the discussions told Reuters.
GHF is a US and Israeli-backed organisation that began delivering humanitarian supplies to Palestinian civilians in Gaza in May, bypassing traditional aid channels including the United Nations.
GHF had sought to open a bank account for a unit based in Geneva to help facilitate donations from outside the US, two other people with knowledge of its plans said.
The foundation started talks with lawyers and banks including UBS and Goldman last autumn about the Swiss entity's structure, before deciding to withdraw from Switzerland in May, they said.
The two people declined to say which other banks GHF had engaged with and Reuters could not establish that information independently.
GHF did not respond to questions about whether it had spoken to other banks.
According to two of the people, the foundation's plans for a Geneva branch faced setbacks including a lack of donations and resignations of founding members, including GHF executive director Jake Wood, as well as difficulties opening a Swiss bank account.
A GHF spokesman told Reuters by email that the decision to withdraw from Switzerland was not because of any setbacks, adding: 'It was a strategic decision to be located in the US.'
One stumbling block in talks with banks was lack of transparency about where the foundation's funds would come from, one of the people with knowledge of the discussions told Reuters.
Before accepting clients, banks must conduct due diligence to establish their identities and ownership, the nature of their business activities and their sources of wealth.
GHF has not disclosed details of its finances.
A GHF spokesman said it has 'spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy'.
Reuters reported on June 24 that the US government would give US$30 million – its first known financial contribution – to GHF, now headed by Johnnie Moore, a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, after Wood quit in May.
UBS was approached in late 2024 and did not accept GHF as a client after conducting compliance, risk and reputational due diligence, one of the people with knowledge of the talks said.
A representative for UBS said the bank could not comment on matters related to potential, existing or former clients.
GHF did not respond to questions from Reuters about UBS.
The other person with knowledge of the discussions said GHF also held preliminary talks with Goldman Sachs about opening a bank account in Switzerland.
Without giving details, that person said Goldman did not open an account and has no banking relationship with GHF in the US either.
An undated and unsigned GHF briefing document that Reuters reported details of on May 8 said the foundation had 'a verbal commitment from Goldman Sachs to establish a bank account' for a Swiss-based affiliate it was setting up.
Reuters could not establish any details about Goldman's verbal commitment or why Goldman did not open an account for GHF.
A spokesman for Goldman Sachs declined to comment.
A GHF spokesman said the document was old and that it had decided not to commence operations in Switzerland and so 'walked away from discussions with banking entities there'.
'Our organisation is US-based and has multiple highly reputable banking partners,' the spokesman told Reuters, without giving details.
GHF was incorporated in 2025 in Delaware, filings show, and has a US bank account with JPMorgan, according to a separate person with knowledge of the situation.
A JPMorgan spokesman declined to comment.
Its briefing document reported by Reuters in May said it had 'secure banking and financial relationships' with JPMorgan and North Carolina-based Truist Bank.
A Truist Bank representative said it does not discuss or confirm client relationships.
Distribution
GHF's operations have been beset by violence and chaos, including deadly shootings. (AP pic)
GHF uses private US security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, where it has been operating since May under a distribution plan described by the United Nations as 'inherently unsafe'.
Its operations have been beset by violence and chaos including deadly shootings of scores of Palestinians near its food distribution sites guarded by Israeli forces, Reuters has reported.
The UN and other humanitarian groups have refused to work with GHF, questioning its neutrality and criticising the new distribution model as militarising aid and forcing displacement of Palestinians.
Wood resigned before GHF's May 26 launch, saying he could not abandon 'the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence'.
GHF has repeatedly said it has distributed aid from its sites without incident and has previously told Reuters it 'strictly adheres' to humanitarian principles.
'The Palestinian people of Gaza must be fed and GHF is the only organisation that has demonstrated ability to deliver food assistance,' a spokesman said.
Dissolution
According to Switzerland's federal supervisory authority for foundations (ESA), a foundation must hold capital in a Swiss bank account and at least one member of its board must be resident in Switzerland.
In filings dated February, seen by Reuters, GHF said its Swiss entity had an initial endowment.
However, that capital contribution was never made, a spokesman for GHF said.
ESA told Reuters GHF had never provided information about a bank account in Switzerland or statutory initial capital.
ESA is taking steps to order the dissolution of GHF's Swiss branch, Reuters reported on July 2

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Shares steady, yen slides after US issues tariff letters
TOKYO: Global stocks were flat to marginally higher on Tuesday, as investors took in their stride the latest twist in US President Donald Trump's tariff roll-out, while the yen slid on 25 per cent duties facing Japanese goods. Trump sent letters to 14 countries on Monday, including top Asian trade partners such as Japan and South Korea, unveiling sharply higher tariffs on imports into the United States. However, market reaction has broadly been guarded, compared to the sharp declines witnessed in the aftermath of "Liberation Day" three months ago, on expectations that countries would strive to seal trade deals with the United States before the new August 1 deadline. Europe's STOXX 600 wavered near the unchanged mark and the euro firmed 0.4 per cent as sources said the monetary union will not be receiving a letter setting out higher tariffs and that the EU could reach a trade deal by Wednesday. "While a comprehensive trade deal is unlikely before the deadline, there is cautious optimism that a preliminary agreement can be reached to avert the immediate imposition of higher tariffs," Daniela Hathorn, a senior market analyst at said. "Such an agreement would provide a foundation for continued negotiations aimed at resolving the broader trade disputes between the EU and the US, improving risk appetite in European stocks and the euro." Across the Atlantic, futures tracking Wall Street's S&P 500 steadied after a knee-jerk selloff in the previous session. Goldman Sachs raised its return forecasts for the benchmark index, citing expectations of US interest rate cuts and continued fundamental strength of major large-cap stocks as key drivers of its positive outlook. Still, the lack of progress on the trade front has been looming over markets ever since Trump capped all of the so-called reciprocal tariffs with trading partners at 10 per cent for three months in April to allow for negotiations. However, only two agreements, with Britain and Vietnam, have been reached and in June, Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates, restoring a fragile truce in their trade war. Concerns are that Trump's erratic style of policymaking could put off business investment, stall global economic growth and stoke inflation pressures. This would also complicate the work of central banks such as the US Federal Reserve that have currently taken a wait-and-see approach on monetary policy. TARIFFS ON ASIA Southeast Asia's biggest economies are among those hit with the highest of US tariffs. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba called the 25 per cent hike deeply regrettable and said his nation would continue negotiations with the US Thailand's finance minister Pichai Chunhavajira said his country is preparing a back-up plan to deal with the 36 per cent tariff imposed on its exports. Hopes of trade deals buoyed risk appetites for regional assets on Tuesday. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rose 0.6 per cent, while Nikkei stock index reversed early declines and was last up 0.26 per cent. South Korean shares recorded their strongest daily gain in two weeks and the won firmed 0.6 per cent. Export-dependent Japan's yen was steady after hitting a two-week low against the dollar, but continued to weaken against a host of other currencies. Elsewhere, the Aussie dollar surged 0.8 per cent against the greenback after the Reserve Bank of Australia left policy rates unchanged, defying expectations for a cut. The RBA left its cash rate steady at 3.85 per cent, a shock for markets that had confidently priced in a cut, saying the majority of the board wanted to wait for more information to confirm inflation was slowing. In commodities, US crude dipped 0.6 per cent to US$67.5 a barrel after surging nearly 2 per cent on Monday. Traditional safe-haven assets such as gold prices and government bond yields in Europe and the US were broadly muted.


The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
US tariffs, Myanmar crisis to dominate ASEAN discussions
KUALA LUMPUR: The ongoing crisis in Myanmar and the global impact of United States (US) tariffs are set to take centre stage at the 58th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM), which opens on Tuesday in Kuala Lumpur, as Southeast Asian nations navigate rising geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty. Amid the backdrop of the Israel-Gaza conflict, escalating tensions in the South China Sea and a surge in global protectionism, ASEAN faces growing pressure to present a united front and safeguard regional autonomy in the face of intensifying rivalry between major powers. 'Myanmar remains the most pressing issue. Despite the Five-Point Consensus and efforts to present a united front, the crisis continues to challenge ASEAN cohesion,' said Dr Rowena Abdul Razak, a historical consultant and an Associate with IMAN Research. She said Thailand's political situation may also affect the regional dynamic, particularly in its relations with Myanmar. The recent suspension of its Prime Minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, could alter Bangkok's engagement with Naypyidaw. Developments along the Thailand-Cambodia border have also drawn attention, following a reported incident near the Chong Bok area in late May, she noted. Rowena said external challenges are also expected to feature prominently, particularly ASEAN's dealings with the US and China. While the bloc has so far maintained a degree of neutrality, evolving US policies continue to raise concerns. 'American policies, especially regarding tariffs and the Middle East, have been chaotic and unpredictable. ASEAN may need to explore a framework to guard the region against instability caused by such shifts. 'Even though Malaysia played down the threat's economic impact, the situation caused regional concern. The AMM may want to discuss measures that protect key trade routes and airspace from future disruptions,' added Rowena, who specialises in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The US's tightening immigration stance and ongoing trade friction are also expected to be addressed during ASEAN's Dialogue Partner meetings held alongside the AMM. ASEAN member states will be closely watching how the US approaches its engagement with the region amid signs of increasing unilateralism. The bloc is also expected to compare perspectives with Dialogue Partners on broader global concerns, particularly climate change. 'Climate change may emerge as a key issue, especially for the European Union (EU), which is likely struggling to find common ground with a less engaged US,' she added. On the nuclear front, ASEAN is also likely to draw attention for its consistent stance as a nuclear-weapon-free zone -- a position that some analysts say could serve as a model in wider non-proliferation diplomacy. Rowena said the region's experience in managing regional nuclear arrangements offers a constructive example at a time when global nuclear stability is under strain. 'ASEAN provides a credible model of how regional and intergovernmental nuclear negotiations can be managed. Major powers, including the US, should be open to learning from this approach,' she said. The 58th AMM and related meetings, a key annual event in the ASEAN calendar, will be hosted by Malaysia under its 2025 ASEAN Chairmanship theme, 'Inclusivity and Sustainability'. The highly anticipated gathering will see one of the largest assemblies of foreign ministers and high-ranking diplomats from around the world to discuss pressing global and regional issues, foster cooperation and advance the agenda of security and sustainability in ASEAN. Over 40 foreign ministers and representatives from international organisations are scheduled to attend a series of ASEAN-led meetings at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre (KLCC) from July 8 to 11. All foreign ministers of ASEAN member states will be present, except for Myanmar, which will be represented by a senior official from its foreign ministry. The Foreign Minister from Timor-Leste will be participating as an observer. This is the fifth time Malaysia has held the ASEAN chairmanship throughout its history as a member of the regional bloc, having previously chaired it in 1977, 1997, 2005, and 2015.


New Straits Times
15 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Goldman Sachs lifts S&P 500 return forecasts on Fed outlook, large-cap stocks
SINGAPORE: Goldman Sachs has raised its three-, six- and 12-month return forecasts for the S&P 500, citing expectations of US interest rate cuts and continued fundamental strength of major large-cap stocks as key drivers of its positive outlook. The Wall Street bank has revised its S&P 500 return forecasts, projecting a 3 per cent gain over three months and an 11 per cent gain over 12 months, targeting index levels of 6,400 and 6,900, respectively. "Earlier and deeper Fed easing and lower bond yields than we previously expected, continued fundamental strength of the largest stocks, and investors' willingness to look through likely near-term earnings weakness support our revised S&P 500 forward P/E forecast of 22 times from 20.4 times," analysts said in a note late on Monday. For the index's six-month return, Goldman Sachs has raised its forecast to +6 per cent, projecting a year-end level of 6,600, and up from its previous estimate of 6,100. Wall Street closed at record highs last week, buoyed by signs of resilience in the country's labour market, which defied investor fears of a slowing economy. After a selloff in April following US President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements, stocks have rebounded as hopes for trade deals and potential Federal Reserve rate cuts eased investor uncertainty. "Recent inflation data and corporate surveys indicate less tariff pass-through so far than we expected," the analysts said. "However, we expect the digestion of tariffs to be a gradual process, and large-cap companies appear to have some buffer from inventories ahead of the increase in tariff rates." The analysts maintained their earnings-per-share growth forecasts for the S&P 500 at +7 per cent for both 2025 and 2026, but flagged that risks remain on both the upside and downside. They plan to reassess these estimates following the second-quarter earnings season.