logo
'Disability benefits are our lifeline. Taking it away will end in tragedy'

'Disability benefits are our lifeline. Taking it away will end in tragedy'

Daily Mirrora day ago
Millions of people who depend on disability benefits were watching yesterday's Commons vote on welfare reform closely. Here six people talk give their verdict's on the government plans.
The Government's welfare reforms eventually got over the line after a tense day in the House of Commons yesterday. But dozens of Labour MPs refused to back the bill - a sign of the deep unease within the party about how the changes will affect disabled people and concerns about a 'two tier' benefits system.
Others watching the proceedings closely were those who depend on the state for support as they cope with serious illness and disabilities.

While the rebellion forced PM Keir Starmer to reverse some cuts to universal credit and protect current claimants of personal independence payment (Pip) from stricter eligibility rules, many disabled people are still fearful about the future. Here six of them give their verdicts...

Vie's story
Confidence coach and children's book author Vie Portland, 54, from Hampshire, needs a stick to walk and suffers from multiple conditions including Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) a group of rare genetic skin conditions causing extra fragile skin that blisters and tears easily; degenerative spinal disease and ADHD.
She receives PIP, which covers treatments outside the NHS, special underwear and clothes because of her fragile skin, dressings and transport.
She tells The Mirror: 'News that MPs aren't voting on PIP yet could be a victory for common sense, but I worry it could also be an attempt to put making a decision off and to distract us with something else. It does feel very messy.
"Everyone is so at risk from going from non-disabled to disabled, due to something like an accident or a cancer diagnosis, and I am concerned for new claimants.

'What about the young people that will now not qualify for PIP, so will not be able to afford to go to university because they won't have the PIP to cover the additional costs we, as disabled people, have to pay?
'I have been a Labour supporter all of my life, yet this current government disappoints and appalls me, so I will not be voting for them until their policies return to ones that are true Labour policies - ones that don't just support privileged people.'
Dena's story
Dena Britcliffe, 32, lives in Kent, with partner Max, 32, a full-time carer and their five children: Mia, 13, Teddy, 12, Harlow, 8, Franky, 5 and Hallie-Rose, 4.

Dena has functional neurological disorder (FND), fibromyalgia and suspected Ehlers Danlos syndromes, causing hypermobility and dislocations. Frankie has global development delay, autism and pathological demand avoidance (PDA) and is currently unable to cope with school.
Dena, who receives PIP and Universal Credit, says: 'Another u-turn makes it so much more confusing for the disabled and vulnerable. Surely they should pull the bill completely until it is a better thought out plan with real life people taken into consideration.

'PIP is my lifeline – I use the financial help to pay for aids and equipment including a wheelchair and walking frame and travel to hospital appointments in London. Life costs a lot more when you are disabled.
'The new points system worries me. Assessors are not doctors, they don't have medical training and the new points system will be harsher with even stricter targets because they want to keep the costs down. The Government has treated disabled families with contempt – they have no idea what it's like to be disabled. If I didn't have PIP I wouldn't be able to leave the house, I wouldn't able to pay for all our food.
'We need a whole Government overhaul. The Government is disregarding thousands of disabled people.'

Lianne's story
Lianne White, 46, from Hampshire, is blind and took four years to get PIP, finally being awarded it after a tribunal.
She says: ''What just happened in Parliament makes no sense. Their own MPs are telling them to pull the bill, yet they're still voting on it with none of the promised changes.The so-called concessions were an absolute joke.
'Lots of people use PIP to buy mobility aids so that they can stay in work – stripping PIP will do the opposite to what the government wants to achieve. It's going to screw up a lot of lives.

"When you are blind you rely on voice operated devices and specialist computers but these are all very expensive – even second hand they cost £2,000. I can't use buses on my own – I have to use taxis if I'm by myself and they are very expensive and PIP helps towards this cost.
"It's really hard to get PIP – I applied in 2021 and was declined – I appealed and it went to tribunal. I had to wait four years!

"The Government is discriminating against disabled people. They are gaslighting and just trying to appease the rebel MPs. I think people will be driven to suicide if they lose PIP.'
Georgia's story
Georgia Bondy, 30, from East London is secretary of the Disabled People's Organisations (DPO) Forum England. She has Multiple Sclerosis and Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is often bedbound, but was refused PIP as her assessor didn't feel her condition was severe enough.

She says: 'It's already an incredibly hostile system for disabled people and the Government is proposing to make it even harsher. The narrative being pedalled out is that disabled people are asking for too much, are too greedy, don't want to work.. but it's really difficult to get PIP. When I applied for PIP I was bedbound and having to crawl to the bathroom, my joints were dislocating and I was passing out. But I was ruled not eligible.
'I have very little faith that any scheme in the future. People are saying the Government has done a u-turn but it's not a u-turn, it's just to calm the rebel MPs down so they are back on side. What the Government is proposing is to damn our children to a future where many of them will be unable to buy food or pay rent if they become disabled.'
Abrigail's story
University student Abigail Holly, 22, from Swansea was diagnosed with cancer in 2020 – aged 16.

She says PIP has been her lifeline, explaining: 'I was in my first year of college when I was diagnosed with a tumour in my finger. I had two lots of surgery to remove the tumour and had no movement in my hands for weeks. I was out of college for months.
'My life completely stopped. PIP allowed me to keep my head above the water – without it I'd have no money to get to the hospital for appointments, to buy food. It was the only thing allowing me to continue living, it was a complete lifeline.

'It's hard to fully comment right now on what the government's doing, as they're not discussing the PIP changes as such. But it's making me wonder, why aren't they? Is it a good thing or a bad thing? It's very strange and worrying at the same time.'
Jamie's story
Remedial therapist Jamie McCormack, 53, from Surrey, is deaf and uses a wheelchair after being hit by a car. He receives PIP, which helps with costs like hydrotherapy, an assisted trike and pain management.

He says: 'After a weekend of chaos & non concessions, I'm not surprised that Starmer was forced into an inevitable last minute climbdown. The concessions are chaotic and confusing.
'What happens if you lose PIP and you have to reapply? You shouldn't be at the mercy of a decision-making assessor.
'Why is the Government putting people through all this, rather than championing disabled lives? They could do so much better.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor
PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

South Wales Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since a threatened backbench revolt forced him to strip out a major part of his welfare reform plan, he acknowledged the past few days had been 'tough'. He said: 'Labour MPs are absolutely vested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right, and we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done.' But he insisted his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'. Sir Keir also gave his full support to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Ms Reeves's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons came amid speculation that her job was at risk after the welfare U-turn put an almost £5 billion hole in her spending plans. But the Prime Minister insisted her appearance had 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week' and was 'a personal matter'. Asked if she would remain in her post, he said: 'She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour Party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' On Thursday morning, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves would 'bounce back' as he praised her 'leadership' on the economy. He also dismissed a suggestion that Sir Keir himself could be at risk, telling Sky News: 'Keir Starmer has been consistently underestimated. 'I wonder when people will learn. They said he couldn't win the Labour leadership, but he did. They said he couldn't change the Labour Party, but he did. They said he couldn't take the Labour Party from its worst defeat since the 1930s to election victory last year, and he did. 'And now the cynics say he can't change the country, but he will.' But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Sir Mel appeared to distance himself from Robert Jenrick, who had earlier posted a video on social media describing Ms Reeves's career as 'dead'. But he added that Mr Jenrick was making a 'valid' point that the Government had 'lost control of the economy', laying the blame with the Chancellor and Sir Keir and warning of tax rises to come.

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor
PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

Sir Keir Starmer has taken responsibility for the U-turn on welfare reforms, saying his Government did not 'get the process right' as he gave his full backing to his Chancellor. Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since a threatened backbench revolt forced him to strip out a major part of his welfare reform plan, he acknowledged the past few days had been 'tough'. He said: 'Labour MPs are absolutely vested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right, and we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done.' But he insisted his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'. Sir Keir also gave his full support to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Ms Reeves's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons came amid speculation that her job was at risk after the welfare U-turn put an almost £5 billion hole in her spending plans. But the Prime Minister insisted her appearance had 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week' and was 'a personal matter'. Asked if she would remain in her post, he said: 'She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour Party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' On Thursday morning, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves would 'bounce back' as he praised her 'leadership' on the economy. He also dismissed a suggestion that Sir Keir himself could be at risk, telling Sky News: 'Keir Starmer has been consistently underestimated. 'I wonder when people will learn. They said he couldn't win the Labour leadership, but he did. They said he couldn't change the Labour Party, but he did. They said he couldn't take the Labour Party from its worst defeat since the 1930s to election victory last year, and he did. 'And now the cynics say he can't change the country, but he will.' But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Sir Mel appeared to distance himself from Robert Jenrick, who had earlier posted a video on social media describing Ms Reeves's career as 'dead'. But he added that Mr Jenrick was making a 'valid' point that the Government had 'lost control of the economy', laying the blame with the Chancellor and Sir Keir and warning of tax rises to come.

MP votes for benefits reform insisting Lanarkshire constituents won't receive less money
MP votes for benefits reform insisting Lanarkshire constituents won't receive less money

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

MP votes for benefits reform insisting Lanarkshire constituents won't receive less money

Only four Labour MPs out of 37 in Scotland voted against the watered-down Bill despite a revolt Pamela Nash MP backed Keir Starmer plans to cut benefits for people with disabilities and insisted that constituents in North Lanarkshire won't see any reduction in the amount they receive when the system is reformed. The MP for Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke had previously criticised the Tories when they were in power over cuts to disability support but voted in favour of her own party's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at the Second Reading, which she believes will create a fairer benefits system. ‌ A revolt in the party led to 49 Labour MPs voting against the motion but it had threatened to be many more as the government made a number of eleventh hour adjustments to gain support for the Bill. ‌ Only four Labour MPs out of 37 in Scotland voted against the watered-down Bill following a five-hour debate in the House of Commons. Brian Leishman MP for Alloa and Grangemouth was one of the four who voted against, he had labelled the Bill "shameful". He added: 'I did not come into politics to impoverish some of the most vulnerable people in society, and I did not join the Labour Party to make life even more difficult for the working class." Eligibility for new PIP (Personal Independence Payment) claimants will change from November 2026, but this won't apply to people in Scotland, as PIP here has been replaced by the Adult Disability Payment which has been protected by the Scottish Government and is delivered by Social Security Scotland. ‌ Pamela Nash MP cited her own experiences of being a benefits claimant, saying: 'I know what it is like to live on benefits, the unrelenting stress of trying to make ends meet while trying to find a job. Living with a health condition or disability brings additional pressures. 'It is important to me that these reforms do not add to this stress but alleviate it. 'Labour MPs have worked tirelessly together to make significant improvements to the bill, including making sure that no current claimants of PIP or Universal Credit will have their benefits cut, and bringing forward and increasing the support to provide genuine help for people to get the correct skills and find suitable work. ‌ 'This is a bill that takes action to improve our broken benefit system. But I know that there will be many who are worried as there has been much coverage in the media of this bill, and much misinformation spread too. 'Let's be crystal clear - no one currently in receipt of benefits in Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke will see any reduction in the amount they receive as a result of this bill. 'Changes to Universal Credit will only apply to new claimants from April 2026, those currently in receipt of Universal Credit will see no reduction to their income. ‌ 'Changes to PIP do not apply to people in Scotland, as we now have a different, equivalent benefit called the Adult Disability Payment (ADP).' However, the Lanarkshire MP highlighted that the Bill includes an above-inflation rise to Universal Credit and an investment of £2.2 billion over four years on health, skills and work support. ‌ She continued: 'Welfare exists to provide a safety net for all of us for the times when life does not go to plan, when we are out of work or unable to work. 'But over the last few years it has been failing to achieve this. Benefits paid to jobseekers are not enough to live on, and people who can work go on to disability benefits with fewer and fewer prospects of ever coming off them. 'The reforms to Universal Credit this Labour Government has put forward will take steps to fix this.' And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store