I gave gentle parenting a go and absolutely hated it
Walking home from school recently, my six-year-old son, Felix, started begging for a Magnum ice cream.
He was looking longingly in the shop window, practically drooling, but as he'd already had his after-school snack of a cereal bar and fruit, my mind was already made up.
'No,' I said firmly. And that was that.
Many parents might fear that such a steely response could result in a meltdown, complete with crying, flailing and stamping of feet. And while that would have been true a few years ago, nowadays my son knows the drill.
When I tell him 'no', I don't hear another pipsqueak from him because, no matter what anyone says, saying no to your child is a good thing.
In fact, that's exactly why I don't do the whole 'gentle parenting' thing. I find it completely toxic and think it's essentially setting your child up for failure, particularly when they get out into the big bad world and hear the word 'no.'
Gentle parenting isn't exactly a new technique – its core principles were established in the 1930s – but it has evolved in the last 20 years to become the approach we know it as today.
Essentially, this parenting style asks you as mum or dad to be calm and careful with your words and be acceptive of different behaviours or emotions. And that doesn't stop even if your little darling has just gone berserk because they can't watch another episode of Peppa Pig.
With more than 220,000 videos tagged on the subject on TikTok alone, it's clear that many parents have jumped on the trend, and, for a while, I was one of them.
When Felix was three, I decided to give it a go. I'd seen a couple of articles and thought it sounded like a calm, zen atmosphere, which would make the day flow smoothly.
Not to spoil the ending, but I lasted about half a day.
My great experiment unravelled when he refused to put his shoes on and wanted to leave the house with a ton of toys.
In theory, it was all simple enough: I just had to get down to his level and calmly explain why he had to put his shoes on and why it was impractical to bring all his toys with him while validating his feelings.
But as I did this, he tried to gouge my eyes out.
After 10 tries, I chucked the toys in the corner, shoved his shoes on and bolted out the door.
He was still wailing like it was the end of the world as I scuttled past my neighbour, feeling embarrassed and hoping they wouldn't notice. But as soon as we were walking, he began to relax in his pushchair and enjoy the sun.
Apparently, you're meant to breathe through the fury. I couldn't think of anything worse.
From that moment, I made a firm decision: In our household, there are rules, boundaries, consequences, respect and good manners.
Some would say that's authoritative, but I think it's setting him up with all the values he needs for life.
Despite my own disdain for the parenting approach, though, I've continued to encounter it 'in the wild' and, let me tell you, it doesn't look any better when you're on the outside looking in.
I've watched on in horror when, after a child smacked the birthday boy in the face at a party, instead of reprimanding him, the mum of the assailant cuddled her child and cooed: 'Let's talk about big feelings.'
I've seen mums promise their child a new toy when they've just smashed one in a rage, or quickly put Roblox on their phone and pass it over to their child when they've become hysterical.
I've even had a dad say, 'we have our own protocol on dealing with things' when I asked him if he could stop his child hitting my son.
It's important to note that Felix has Glanzmann's – a severe bleeding disorder – and I was worried this boy could give him a bleed if it continued. And, spoiler, this man's protocol was to do nothing.
Zero reprimanding, zero consequences.
I don't understand how, as a parent, you can just turn a blind eye to bad behaviour like that.
I understand that we want our kids to learn how to respond to stress in healthy ways, to be resilient and to treat others with kindness. But it is also our job to prepare them for the real world. More Trending
Coping with life requires toughness and understanding. They will all grow up and learn the challenges, failures and rejections of jobs or relationships one way or another, so what's wrong with starting them when they're young?
Yes, it's embarrassing when a 'no' elicits a tantrum, and we can feel we are not doing things right in that moment, but I'm certain your kids will thank you for it one day.
I know I can show Felix plenty of love, empathy, give him cuddles and still say no. And no, I don't think that makes me a bad mum.
So, unlike celebs like Meghan Markle – who don't believe in saying 'no' to children, and instead say 'not yet' – I'll keep using that word without hesitation. Just try and stop me.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: My mother's words as I fled my homeland ring in my ears
MORE: I watched 28 Years Later despite hating horror films – scaredy-cats should too
MORE: I went to Glastonbury and discovered it's just really overrated
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My selfish neighbour installed a satellite dish right outside my bedroom window
A woman was left fuming after her 'selfish' next door neighbour installed a satellite dish right outside her bedroom window blocking her view. Taking to TikTok, the upset woman, who appears to be from the UK, claimed her neighbour deliberately decided to place the dish in front of her window instead of his own. The clip, posted on @Seewara_xo, racked up more than 1.2 million views, with many viewers suggesting she may have grounds to take legal action against him. Words accompanying the video footage said: 'POV: Neighbour enters his selfish era and puts the satellite dish where you look out, not where he does.' The woman showed how her view of the garden was being partly blocked by the dish - in addition, her window could no longer open fully. The woman also provided a view from her garden, showing the proximity of the dish to her window. She then asked internet users if she was overreacting which sparked a debate online. In the caption she wrote: 'Is this normal or am I overreacting ?' One person wrote: 'If a neighbor attaches something to their house that extends over your property line without your permission, it's considered an encroachment.' Meanwhile, others suggested a more petty approach, saying she should try to block the signal. One person suggested: 'Ok, so here's what you'll do- put some tin foil on your window, across the whole pane. 'Then open it right across the satellite dish. He won't get any reception whatsoever, - then he can move it, his choice. This is level 1 petty. We have 52 stages remaining if needed….' Another added: 'The dishes don't work if they're just a few degrees out, say, if a window accidentally bumped into them... repeatedly... every week or so.' Someone else added: 'Placing a strong magnet near a satellite dish aerial can potentially interfere with its reception. 'The magnetic field created by the magnet can disrupt the delicate electromagnetic field used by the aerial to capture and transmit signals. 'Please DO NOT attach a strong magnet to your window and open it as this might affect your neighbour's viewing pleasure.' She then asked internet users if she was overreacting which sparked a debate online A fourth added: 'Can tell that's been really poorly installed. It will more than likely "fall off" during the night.' Meanwhile others suggested she should just speak to her neighbour and politely ask him to move it. One person wrote: 'Talk to them, ask them to move it, then proceed with the rest of your life' Another said: 'If there wasn't any consent have them move it, state 'property encroachment'.
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Secret meanings behind how Gen Z use punctuation: Dashes, full stops and commas now stand for something totally different - so, do YOU understand the new code?
Everyday punctuation marks from the simple full stop to the quotation mark now mean something totally different as Gen Z adapt them to form new meanings, experts have revealed. Recently it was revealed that the semicolon is at risk of dying out because its use is plummeting, and now younger generations are re-purposing the punctuation marks that endure so that they no longer mean what they used to. For instance, teenagers are more likely to use a full stop as a blunt gesture, rather than to simply signify the end of a sentence. Noël Wolf, a linguistic expert at Babbel, told MailOnline: 'We're seeing a real shift in how punctuation is being used in everyday communication, particularly among younger generations. 'Inverted commas, or quotation marks, have traditionally served a clear grammatical purpose: indicating direct speech or quoting another source. 'But in contemporary digital communication, especially on platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X, they're being repurposed.' It's also reflected in work by contemporary writers such as Sally Rooney who have done away with quotation marks in their novels, so that when you do see them, they're not there to indicate direct speech. Gen Z's take on punctuation... Quotation mark - Signals irony, sarcasm or emotional distance Dash - Used for emphasis, interjections or sudden tonal shifts Comma - Implemented to mimic speech patterns or pacing Exclamation mark - Used to add a friendly touch Full stop - Signals bluntness or finality Ellipses - Conveys hesitation, awkwardness or emotional nuance Source - Noël Wolf, linguistic and cultural expert at Babbel 'Gen Z is now frequently using quotation marks to signal irony, sarcasm or emotional distance - for example, writing I'm "fine" to imply the opposite of fine,' he explained. 'It's become a kind of punctuation-based body language.' While people might be quick to assume that Gen Z are loosening society's grip on grammatical conventions, Noel argued the opposite. 'This isn't about grammar falling apart, but a creative adaptation of it. Punctuation is still valued, but its function is evolving. 'In an age where much communication happens via short-form text; such as messages, comments and captions, younger generations are using punctuation to convey tone, nuance and intent in the absence of voice or facial cues.' The expert explained that the adaptations have come into place as a consequence of the internet. He said, 'The internet, of course, is a driving force, with informal digital spaces encouraging experimentation. What might once have been seen as 'incorrect' punctuation is now part of a new, expressive way of interacting online. 'This doesn't mean rules are vanishing, they're just shifting. Interestingly, many young people still appreciate the power of punctuation when clarity matters; for example, in academic writing or professional contexts. So, rather than seeing punctuation as dying out, we should see it as diversifying. 'Its role in helping us communicate clearly, emotionally and effectively is arguably more important than ever, as we are constantly navigating multiple modes of communication, from texts and tweets to emails and essays.' The expert explained that it's not just quotation marks undergoing a change in meaning, but also exclamation marks and ellipses. 'Other punctuation marks are undergoing similar shifts,' he said, adding, 'Full stops, once essential for sentence clarity, are increasingly interpreted in messaging contexts as signalling bluntness or finality. 'A simple reply like 'Okay.' can be read as passive-aggressive or cold, depending on the social context, which is a sharp contrast to the more friendly 'Okay!' 'Linguistically, this shows how punctuation is now carrying emotional and social meaning, not just serving a grammatical function. 'Ellipses (...), once used to indicate omitted text or a trailing thought, now often convey hesitation, awkwardness or emotional nuance, for example, 'I guess… we'll see.' Wolf explained that even basic forms of grammar, such as the comma, are also developing to have different meanings. He said, 'Even the humble comma is being manipulated to mimic speech patterns or pacing. 'For example, 'So, um, that happened,' the comma creates rhythm and mimics the cadence of spoken language.' Elsewhere, Gen Z are embracing dashes and maximising their use, according to the expert. He said, 'Meanwhile, dashes (-) are thriving as versatile punctuation for emphasis, interjections or sudden tonal shifts: 'She said she was 'fine' - and then blocked me.' 'Their growing popularity may even be influenced by tools like ChatGPT, which frequently rely on em dashes to signal tone shifts, pauses or emphasis in text.' Wolf concluded, 'What we're witnessing is a form of punctuational code-switching. In formal contexts, most people, including Gen Z, revert to conventional usage. But in digital spaces, punctuation becomes part of a rich, multimodal communicative system. 'Tone, intent and identity are all being conveyed through tiny textual signals. The rise of informal, digital-first writing styles has certainly influenced this shift. 'On platforms like X, where brevity is key or in WhatsApp chats, punctuation often carries emotional weight as much as syntactic structure. 'In this sense, we're seeing the emergence of a functional punctuation dialect - one that's intuitive, adaptive and highly expressive. 'So, far from fading into obsolescence, punctuation is thriving, just in new and sometimes unexpected ways. As always, language adapts to fit the needs of its users.' Meanwhile, Gen Z are also changing the way they use the emojji. In an attempt to confuse the older generations, Gen Z are ditching 'mainstream' emoji in favour of bizarre alternatives. 'For the predominantly younger-skewing 'chronically online,' riding the wave of emerging trends helps forge identity and create distance from the 'out-of-touch' older generations,' explained Emojipedia. 'In a culture shaped by brainrot, post-irony, and existential dread, avoiding the mainstream is a badge of honor. 'Creating underground memes and micro-viral moments that distinguish an in-the-know in-group from outsiders can be mini-milestones in establishing a generation's internet identity, leaving others on the outside feeling confused and out of the loop, often intentionally so.'
Metro
3 days ago
- Metro
Why radio is still the ultimate survival tool in war and emergencies
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Disaster films almost always start the same way. A crowded supermarket, ping after ping as shoppers' phones go off, screams. An asteroid, a tsunami, an earthquake, World War III. Something – or someone – is about to upend the world. But whatever the impending disaster is, experts tell Metro it won't be mobile phones that people will rely on to survive. It'll be something a little more old-school. 'Crises can take many forms,' Dr Colin Alexander, a senior lecturer in political communications at Nottingham Trent University, says. 'However, radio remains the go-to medium of communication in these moments.' As the Israel–Iran ceasefire shows signs of breaking, and the Russia-Ukraine war raging without signs of a deal, people are beginning to contemplate how they would survive if World War III breaks out. Radio isn't just for listening to easy-listening jazz and Top 20 pop tracks. Human-made catastrophes see radio play a central role. In April, Spain and Portugal were hit by a major power outage, which led to planes being grounded, deaths, metros and trains being stopped and people's phone signal and internet not working. TikTok accounts are flogging radios for users to buy in case of the outbreak of another world war. According to influencers, a radio is the most important thing to have in your survival bag. They say if the 'grid went down' people could miss crucial shelter-in-place' messages and other orders from the government if they don't have a radio. Over in Ukraine, when Kyiv's TV tower was flattened and signals were jammed by Moscow forces during the Russia-Ukraine war, Ukrainians in occupied territories were left in an information blackout. As one Ukrainian journalist recalled to the BBC, Ukrainians huddled around crank radios to learn of escape routes through coded messages. 'Listening to the radio, they feel that this country and these people have a tomorrow,' said Liudmyla Tiahnyriadno, a host on Ukrainian Radio. People living in the Gaza Strip amid the Israel-Hamas war know the radio all too well. The coastal enclave, where health officials say Israel has killed at least 50,5000, has endured repeated 'near-total' information blackouts as Israeli offensives target telecommunication services. Without the internet or phone signal, Palestinians had little choice but to use the radio to know when the next bombs would fall. 'As we don't have electricity, we are unable to watch the news and see what's going on around us, but at least we listen to Al-Jazeera through the radio,' Osama Humaed told The New Arab in 2023. 'We know what's going on, but we don't see anything.' People listen for the truth, too. Radio Fresh, broadcasting from Syria's northern Idlib province, was handed a top media award in 2019 for its part in exposing the corruption of the Assad regime, which tightly controlled the press. Government officials strongly urge that all households keep a wind-up or battery radio to hand in case of blackouts. People should write a list of frequencies for any radio station they listen to in case TV and internet services drop. Just weeks before the blackout in Spain, the European Union told its almost 450million citizens to prepare for war or natural disaster by assembling '72 hour survival kits'. Food, water, torches, ID papers, medicine, and shortwave radios were among the items citizens were told they needed to stock. Whizzing around you as you read these are radio waves, among the longest waves in the electromagnetic spectrum. You can't surf on these waves, Chris Scott, a professor of space and atmospheric physics at the University of Reading's Department of Meteorology, tells Metro. 'Radio waves are a form of light. They are generated when electric charge-carrying particles called electrons are accelerated,' he says. 'By causing electrons in an electric circuit to oscillate, radio waves can be generated and, by coding information into either the amplitude ( amplitude modulation, or AM) or frequency (frequency modulation, or FM) of these waves, they can be used to transmit this information.' You can turn sound into ones and zeroes, blast them as waves for a radio receiver to convert into sound played from a speaker, Scott adds. Shortwave radio – waves less than 100m in length – is used by aircraft staff and rescue teams as it is 'simple, low-cost' tech for reaching people over large distances. It is what it is today thanks to English physicist Edward Appleton. His experiments proved the existence of the ionosphere – a region in the upper atmosphere – by, in part, bouncing shortwave radio signals off it. 'One hundred years on from Appleton's pioneering experiments,' Scott adds, 'radio communication remains as important as ever.' In 2005, Pakistan was shaken by one of the most devastating earthquakes in the country's history, a 7.8-magnitude tremor that killed 87,000 people. The quake ripped through cities and far-flung villages in the North-West Frontier Province, injuring 38,000 people and flattening thousands of homes, shops, schools and hospitals. More than 3,500,000 people were also left without any access to information, researchers said. People twisting their FM dials proved invaluable as stations were set up to tell victims about rehabilitation and reconstruction plans. During the coronavirus pandemic, not only was radio used by officials to broadcast crucial policy updates and facts into homes, but the sounds of people's voices broke the solitude that countless faced. 'We've had so many messages from listeners who say that just hearing a familiar voice and a welcome distraction from the horror ride of 24-hour rolling news helped get them through the pandemic,' says Andy Bush, a presenter at Absolute Radio. Some 44,000 radio stations are broadcasting to billions of people in the world as you read this, a spokesperson for the UN's International Telecommunication Union (ITU) tells Metro. Given that the agency dates back to 1865, it knows what it's talking about when it says that radio is 'unparalleled', even in the age of yapping artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots. 'Unlike internet-based media, radio does not require any expensive digital devices, subscription requirements or high-speed Internet connection to function,' the spokesperson explains. After all, the World Wide Web is made of tiny code that travels through razor-thin wires that line the ocean floor; people can easily be left without internet or mobile service during crises when the infrastructure is dented. Emergency radios, also known as disaster radios or crank radios, are designed with this in mind. Many don't need to be plugged in, instead relying on being hand-cranked or soaking up solar power, so downed power lines won't be a problem. 'In times of crises, radios are not just economical but essential to ensure disaster preparedness and response,' the ITU says, especially in rural communities. The spokesperson says that DAB+, an improved form of digital radio, is 'indispensable' as radio broadcasters work with the government and NGOs. 'Additionally, international collaborative efforts, exemplified by the International Radio for Disaster Relief (IRDR) initiative, allocate specific shortwave frequencies for emergency use, ensuring the capacity for long-range communication when local infrastructure is unavailable,' they add. 'In parallel, amateur radio services can also be essential for sustaining communications and responding to emergencies.' Doug Goodison is behind the amateur radio club, G4HMS. The shack has been vibrating with radio waves from the HMS Belfast moored along the River Thames since 1973. 'News is only as good as the information supplied through the announcer,' Goodison, a former operations manager with TfL, says. 'In most cases, the important, embarrassing items are left out by the news and the truth on many occasions is used sparingly or not at all.' 'Media news is only as good as the source.' Indeed, Dr Alexander says that during war, radio can become 'weaponised to meet the ambitions of the powerful'. As much as radios were used to boost morale during World War Two, the Nazi Party used the new-ish technology as a propaganda tool. Or take Iva Toguri D'Aquino, a Japanese-American whose voice was known to millions of American troops during World War Two after she became stranded in Japan following Pearl Harbour. Forced to renounce her US citizenship, she was asked to host a Japanese radio propaganda programme, Zero Hour. As much as powerful nations enjoy wheeling out supersonic jets and nuclear weapons, the humble radio is integral to the military today, explains Neil Fraser, who served 26 years in the British Army, leading the Ministry of Defence's global satellite and radio communication programmes. A soldier's most important weapon may wind up being a walkie-talkie-style radio or backpack satellite terminals, Fraser says. Mobile and Wi-Fi networks can become 'overwhelmed' in wartime, meaning military officials mix-and-match radio. 'The military is used to working where there is limited communications infrastructure, and the best solution is to have different systems to deliver options, meaning they can switch between 'combat radio', mobile phone networks (where they have a signal) and satellite connections,' the director of defence and space programmes at the satellite communication provider NSSLGlobal tells Metro. 'When one connection fails, another kicks in.' 'The war in Ukraine, with its heavy use of drones, sensors and dispersed, relatively small teams of soldiers, has reinforced the lesson that having easily accessible diverse connectivity and the ability to use satellites is vital,' he adds. For years, over 340 broadcasts, D'Aquino's sinister, seductive and demoralising voice told soldiers that the war was lost. D'Aquino, known to her listeners as 'Tokyo Rose', was convicted of treason in 1949. Radio is so often used to spit out disinformation because, as the ITU and Dr Alexander stress, it is considered more trustworthy than other media. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), an alliance of broadcasters, found this was the case in 24 of the 37 countries surveyed. 'Television and other visual media are more associated with entertainment,' continues Dr Alexander. 'In short, you have to listen attentively to the radio, but with television, you mainly watch the images and let the narrative wash over you without as much attention.' 'Whether radio saves lives or encourages more death is open to debate. There is nothing about radio that is inherently peaceful,' he says. More Trending But for people like Bush, whose voice has been on the radio waves for some 20 years, radio is something more simple than that. 'Doing a radio show is a privilege as people welcome you into their lives in a way that Netflix or TikTok cannot touch,' he says. 'It's a personal conversation and pep talk that gets more and more crucial as daily life gets increasingly stressful.' A version of this article was previously published on April 29, 2025 Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Map shows safest countries to be in if global conflict breaks out MORE: The secret choice Starmer has already made to save the UK from nuclear war MORE: Six places which could be safe if World War Three erupts – including two in UK
