Brit fugitive behind £300k illegal football streaming operation is jailed for 5 years as police issue stark warning
And police have issued a stark warning to anyone offering the same services.
2
2
Mark Brockley, 56, pocketed £300,000 for illegally streaming football games on the cheap, including Premier League, UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League matches.
He ran aFINITY IPTV for around five years, between 2014 and 2019, with premium sport, movies and TV for as little as £15 a month.
Brockley was arrested and later charged with fraud and copyright offences at Liverpool Crown Court in June 2021.
After being released on police bail, he failed to appear at multiple court hearings, and sentencing proceeded in his absence in May 2023.
He fled the country with his dog before being traced to an apartment block in Spain.
The illegal streaming fugitive was arrested in the city of Girona during a coordinated operation involving the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU), National Crime Agency (NCA), Europol, and Interpol in August 2024.
Brockley was released pending further investigation having appealed his extradition back to the UK, City of London Police said.
But he failed to show up at multiple court hearings in Spain and was eventually identified as wanted by Spanish authorities.
Brockley was finally arrested at Barcelona Airport while attempting to board a flight to the UK on June 20.
He was held in custody at Heathrow Airport and will now commence his five-year sentence.
Major Illegal Streaming Network Shut Down Across Europe
"This case is a clear example of how PIPCU, together with our national and international partners, will relentlessly pursue those seeking to profit from intellectual property crime," said Detective Constable Geoff Holbrook from the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit at City of London Police.
"Thanks to the joint efforts of the NCA, Europol and Interpol, Brockley has finally been brought to justice, despite his attempts to evade accountability."
Warning over 'jailbroken' Fire Sticks
Illegal streaming can be delivered by a number of devices by one of the most common are 'jailbroken' Fire Sticks, which means a third-party media server software has been installed on to it.
The software most commonly used is called Kodi.
It can grant users unrestricted access to new features and apps the normal version of the device wouldn't allow – but it is not legal to use in the UK.
But it becomes illegal when a box is used to stream subscription channels for free.
It is also illegal to buy or sell these modified devices which have become known as "fully-loaded" - a term that describes how the software has been altered to allow access to subscription-only channels.
'These devices are legal when used to watch legitimate, free to air, content,' the government said at the time.
'They become illegal once they are adapted to stream illicit content, for example TV programmes, films and subscription sports channels without paying the appropriate subscriptions.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dunn family raise concerns Foreign Office will try to ‘hide' final review report
The family of Harry Dunn have expressed concerns the Foreign Office will attempt to 'hide' the final report from a parliamentary review into the case following an eleventh hour invite to meet the Foreign Secretary. Harry's mother, Charlotte Charles, as well as other family members, are due to meet David Lammy on Wednesday following an invitation for him to 'hear the family's views and concerns'. The review is not set to scrutinise the role or actions of the US government, but will examine the support the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) offered the Dunn family after the teenager was killed by a former US state department employee in a road crash in 2019. The Dunn family spokesman Radd Seiger told FCDO officials they were concerned there was 'no explicit provision for the publication of the final report' in the review's proposed terms of reference. His words prompted an invitation to meet with Mr Lammy on Wednesday afternoon ahead of the review's official announcement, which is expected on Thursday. Mrs Charles said she was 'apprehensive' ahead of the meeting, adding: 'I won't accept anything less than a full, open and transparent process.' Mr Seiger told the PA news agency the family will 'have no part in any process that lacks transparency'. Anne Sacoolas, the American driver who killed Harry, had diplomatic immunity asserted on her behalf following the incident outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire before a senior Foreign Office official said the US government should 'feel able' to put her on the next flight home. Ahead of the meeting, Mr Seiger told PA: 'We are grateful to the Foreign Secretary for making time to meet us today. 'That said, it is not lost on us that the only reason we appear to have been called in is because we asked for only one basic and reasonable assurance – that Anne Owers' report will be published. 'That request appears to have put the cat amongst the pigeons ahead of the government formally announcing the inquiry tomorrow. 'The fact that it has prompted such an urgent response gives us real concern that publication of the report may not have been the Government's intention.' Mr Seiger continued: 'Although we will not get ahead of ourselves, if that proves to be the case, I can say categorically on behalf of the family that we will have no part in any process that lacks transparency. 'It would defeat the entire purpose of the inquiry and would represent a betrayal of everything Harry stood for and the brave fight the family put up on his behalf. 'We have always been grateful for David Lammy's support over the years. 'It must follow that Anne Owers' report, the first and only detailed look into those failures must be published. Without that, we cannot move forward. 'We owe it to Harry, to our public institutions, and to every future family who might find themselves in a similar nightmare.' Mrs Charles said any attempt by the Government to 'hide' the final report 'fills me with dread'. She told PA: 'I feel incredibly apprehensive going into this meeting. 'After everything we've been through, the idea that the Government might try to hide Anne Owers' report fills me with dread. 'We have never wanted anything more than the full truth and for lessons to be learned, not just for Harry, but to stop any other family from suffering like we have. 'I won't accept anything less than a full, open and transparent process.' In a statement, the FCDO said: 'The Foreign Secretary has always made clear his commitment to support Harry Dunn's family and learn lessons from this tragedy. 'It is right we brief the family first on any developments and will announce further details in due course.'
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jury sworn in to hear airport police assault case
A jury has been sworn in to hear the trial of two brothers accused of assaulting police officers at Manchester Airport. Footage of the disturbance at the Terminal 2 building on July 23 last year was widely shared online at the time. On Wednesday, jurors were selected at Liverpool Crown Court and then sent home until Thursday afternoon when it is hoped the prosecution will outline its case. Judge Neil Flewitt KC told jurors: 'I told you on Monday that yesterday I would be dealing with some legal issues that have to be resolved before this trial may start. 'Unfortunately we were unable to deal with all those issues yesterday and will deal with them this afternoon and tomorrow morning. 'When you return tomorrow afternoon, the leading counsel for the prosecution will open the case and tell you what it's all about.' Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, is alleged to have assaulted Pc Zachary Marsden and Pc Lydia Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of emergency worker Pc Ellie Cook in the same incident at the terminal's car park pay station, and the earlier assault of Abdulkareem Ismaeil, a member of the public, at a nearby Starbucks cafe. Muhammad Amaad, 26, also from Rochdale, is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. Both deny the allegations. Judge Flewitt reminded the jury not to look on the internet for information about the case or to carry out their own research. He repeated that it was of 'the utmost importance' that they do not allow themselves to be influenced by news reports of the case or any comments made on social media. The judge said: 'Your task will be to assess the evidence that is presented to you over the next few days and weeks, and then applying the law to reach verdicts based on that evidence. ' The trial is scheduled to last up to four weeks.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man jailed for 15 months after ‘burn hotels' social media post during riots
An engineer who posted 'burn any hotels with those scruffy bastards in it' on social media during last summer's riots has been jailed for 15 months. Joseph Haythorne, 26, posted the comment on X, formerly Twitter, at lunchtime on August 4 2024, just as violence erupted outside a hotel housing asylum seekers near Rotherham, South Yorkshire. More than 60 officers were injured in the violence that afternoon as hundreds of people bombarded police and the hotel with missiles. At one point rioters set fire to a bin against a fire door of the hotel, which had 240 asylum seekers inside as well as more than 20 staff. Sheffield Crown Court heard that Haythorne's post from an anonymised account, which was viewed by 1,100 people in 17 minutes before he deleted it, included a link to a now-deleted post by activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, also known as Tommy Robinson. The defendant's full post read: 'Go on Rotherham. Burn any hotels with them scruffy bastards in it.' Prosecutors said the case had some similarities with the case of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed last year for 31 months after she posted on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' Bianca Brasoveanu, defending Haythorne, said he 'made a wrongful connection between the Southport events and immigration in general' after reading a 'poisonous' post online. She told the court the case was different to that of Connolly, whose post was live for hours and an investigation into her social media 'revealed other posts including further racist remarks'. 'None of this was present within Mr Haythorne's social media. The defendant is more interested in football than anything else,' Ms Brasoveanu said. She said Haythorne, who is from Ashford in Surrey, had 'displayed a very different way of behaviour' by deleting the post after 17 minutes and handing himself in at a police station. The barrister said the defendant has problems around depression which would make him vulnerable in prison as his symptoms could worsen. Judge Jeremy Richardson KC called the defendant's post 'vile'. The judge said Haythorne had been distressed by comments online about the 'dreadful events in Southport', adding that there had been 'an awful lot of malicious and malignant nonsense on the internet'. He reduced the sentence after considering the defendant's clinical depression, his guilty plea at the earliest opportunity and personal mitigation. But Judge Richardson was sure that immediate custody was necessary due to the seriousness of the offence and he jailed Haythorne for 15 months. He said: 'It gives me no pleasure whatsoever in sending someone like you to prison because you have many positive attributes in life. 'But unfortunately, in that whole episode in August of last year, whilst there were some very bad people conducting themselves very badly, there were also a number of otherwise perfectly good people who did something very bad, and you are in that category.' Earlier on Wednesday, before adjourning to consider his sentence, the judge said Haythorne 'took leave of his senses' after being 'inflamed by malignant comments on social media' and made the post 'just as the incident at Rotherham was taking off in a very unpleasant fashion'. He read the defendant's post about burning hotels and told him: 'Within one and a half to two hours, that is exactly what happened.' Haythorne had been due to be sentenced last week but his original conviction was quashed when it emerged that the offence he was charged with – publishing material intended to stir up racial hatred – requires permission from the Attorney General before charges can be brought, and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had not sought permission due to an 'oversight'. His case was sent back to magistrates' court, where he pleaded guilty to the charge for a second time.
