‘Gun to the head': Somerville, Chelsea argue in court Trump is withholding federal grants over ‘sanctuary city' status
Oren Sellstrom, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said during oral arguments on Thursday that collaboration between local police and ICE would discourage residents from reporting crime, making Chelsea and Somerville less safe.
Sellstrom added that the Trump administration's 'truly unprecedented campaign' to pressure sanctuary cities has become increasingly aggressive and puts funding for infrastructure, homeless prevention, and meals for the elderly in jeopardy.
He pointed to a $4 million Department of Transportation contract to improve roadways in Somerville that he says is under threat. Following a series of executive orders, the Department of Transportation would only release the funds if Somerville agreed to 'bend to the president's will,' Sellstrom said.
US District Court Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton asked Sellstrom if any of the $4 million had yet been withheld. Gorton repeatedly pressed Sellstrom on how the Trump administration's harm to the cities was imminent and irreparable, criteria the judge must weigh in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction while the lawsuit plays out.
Advertisement
'This is not a case where the DOT is acting in a rogue capacity,' Sellstrom, litigation director of the advocacy organization Lawyers for Civil Rights, answered.
He added that the DOT is acting in line with Trump's orders for all of the federal government to withhold funds, which leaves city budgets 'thrown into chaos.'
Sellstrom emphasized that the preliminary injunction was necessary so city officials can properly plan their fiscal budgets, which rely in large part on federal funds. Somerville received close to $19.4 million in federal funds in the 2024 fiscal year, while Chelsea received $14.5 million, according to a release from Lawyers for Civil Rights.
He said multimillion-dollar shortfalls amount to 'immediate, ongoing, and escalating' harm and the Trump administration is putting a 'gun to the head' of local entities.
Elisabeth Neylan, the attorney for the US, argued that grant decisions have yet to be made, leaving the court nothing on which to render a decision.
She said the cities' argument regarding the Trump administration's all-agency pressure campaign on sanctuary cities did not hold water, as the executive orders only applied to the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice.
In May, the Department of Homeland Security placed Chelsea and Somerville on a published list titled 'Sanctuary Jurisdictions Defying Federal Immigration Law.' Neylan said the list was taken down shortly thereafter.
She added that Chelsea and Somerville's budgetary uncertainty do not constitute irreparable harm but are merely the 'regular course of business' when future revenue is unknown.
Advertisement
Gorton prompted Sellstrom to explain why the plaintiffs could not challenge the Trump administration once the funds are actually withheld.
Sellstrom said the government has hung a sword above the head of sanctuary cities with implications for funds beyond Somerville's $4 million roadway grant.
'That's the point of the preliminary injunction, to stop the harm from happening,' Sellstrom said.
'Speech is not the same as action,' Gorton replied.
The judge adjourned Thursday's hearing without ruling on a preliminary injunction, saying he would take the matter under advisement.
Outside the courthouse, lawyers for the cities gathered with Somerville Mayor Katjana Ballantyne and Chelsea City Manager Fidel Maltez to speak with reporters.
'Somerville follows the law,' Ballantyne said. 'The federal administration wants to coerce us into using our local police in mass deportation plans instead of allowing them to do local policing for which they have been trained.'
Somerville has been a sanctuary city since 1987, and
Jade Lozada can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
New FEMA grant program gives states $600M to build migrant detention centers
A new $608 million grant program from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will give states money to build detention centers for people suspected of being in the United States unlawfully. FEMA was already slated to cover some of the costs for Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' using a Biden-era program meant for helping asylum seekers. The new facility, quickly constructed in a remote part of the Florida Everglades, is expected to run a tab of about $450 million a year. The new FEMA grant program comes as the Trump administration has increasingly slashed FEMA's ability to assist disaster response, and as the president has mulled closing the agency altogether. CNN reported Friday that FEMA has proposed cutting nearly $1 billion in grant funding to help local first responders better prepare for disasters and to help bolster cybersecurity. A webpage for the program also said it would help reduce 'overcrowding' in facilities maintained by Customs and Border Patrol. A Human Rights Watch report released this week charged that three facilities run by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Florida faced 'extreme overcrowding,' and that many detainees were denied access to medical care. FEMA has come under scrutiny in the wake of deadly flash floods in Texas, including reports that the federal response was hamstrung by budget cuts or controls designed to limit large expenditures. Applications for the program are open through August 8. It's not clear if states beyond Florida are yet planning make pushes to build their own detention centers.
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
The Trump administration is telling immigrants 'Carry your papers.' Here's what to know.
Immigrants have long been required to carry ID proving they're in the US legally, but the rule was not enforced. Until now. Amid the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration, the nation's immigration service is warning immigrants to carry their green card or visa at all times. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services posted the reminder July 23 on social media: "Always carry your alien registration documentation. Not having these when stopped by federal law enforcement can lead to a misdemeanor and fines." Here's what immigrants – and American citizens – need to know. 'Carry your papers' law isn't new The law requiring lawful immigrants and foreign visitors to carry their immigration documents has been on the books for decades, dating to the 1950s. The Immigration and Nationality Act states: "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him." But the law had rarely been imposed before the Trump administration announced earlier this year that it would strictly enforce it. The "carry your papers" portion fell out of use for cultural and historical reasons, said Michelle Lapointe, legal director of the nonprofit American Immigration Council. In contrast to the Soviet bloc at the time the requirement was written, "We have never been a country where you have to produce evidence of citizenship on demand from law enforcement." In a "Know Your Rights" presentation, the ACLU cautions immigrants over age 18 to follow the law and "carry your papers with you at all times." "If you don't have them," the ACLU says, "tell the officer that you want to remain silent, or that you want to consult a lawyer before answering any questions." A 'precious' document at risk Many immigrants preferred to hold their green card or visa in safe-keeping, because, like a passport, they are expensive and difficult to obtain. Historically, it was "a little risky for people to carry these precious documents such as green card, because there is a hefty fee to replace it and they are at risk of not having proof of status – a precarious position to be in," Lapointe said. But as immigration enforcement has ramped up, the risks of not carrying legal documents have grown. Failure to comply with the law can result in a $100 fine, or imprisonment of up to 30 days. Immigration enforcement and 'racial profiling' U.S. citizens aren't required to carry documents that prove their citizenship. But in an environment of increasing immigration enforcement, Fernando Garcia, executive director of the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights in El Paso, Texas, said he worries about U.S. citizens being targeted. "With massive raids and mass deportation, this takes a new dimension," he said. "How rapidly are we transitioning into a 'show me your papers' state?" "The problem is there are a lot of people – Mexicans, or Central Americans – who are U.S. citizens who don't have to carry anything, but they have the burden of proof based on racial profiling," he said. "There are examples of U.S. citizens being arrested already, based on their appearance and their race." Not just immigrants: Why some Native American citizens worry about getting caught in ICE's net American citizens targeted by ICE The Trump administration's widening immigration crackdown has already netted American citizens. In July, 18-year-old Kenny Laynez, an American citizen, was detained for six hours by Florida Highway Patrol and Border Patrol agents. He was later released. Federal agents also detained a California man, Angel Pina, despite his U.S. citizenship in July. He was later released. Elzon Limus, a 23-year-old U.S. citizen from Long Island, New York, decried his arrest by ICE agents in June, after he was released. In a video of the arrest, immigration agents demand Limus show ID, with one explaining he "looks like somebody we are looking for." In updated guidance, attorneys at the firm of Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, which has offices in Chicago, Detroit and Los Angeles, advise U.S. who are concerned about being stopped and questioned "to carry a U.S. passport card or a copy of their U.S. passport as evidence of U.S. citizenship." Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Academic with history of incendiary remarks to lead US Institute of Peace
'We look forward to seeing him advance President Trump's America First agenda in this new role,' the statement said. USIP has been in turmoil in recent months as the administration and its Department of Government Efficiency sought to close the organization and withhold funding. The State Department said the institute has in recent decades 'slipped in its mission' to provide research, analysis and training in diplomacy. In February, several dozen Democratic House members signed a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio opposing Beattie's appointment to his current role. They cited his 'white nationalist loyalties and public glorification of our adversaries' authoritarian systems,' which included praise of the Chinese Communist Party and dismissal of its campaign against the largely Muslim Uyghurs. Beattie also drew widespread condemnation for a 2024 social media post on X in which he wrote 'competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work.' Beattie, who previously served as a visiting instructor at Duke University, has since been at the forefront of the Trump administration's efforts to overhaul the State Department's Fulbright Program and shutter its Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub. Trump signed an executive order firing USIP President George Moose and most of USIP's board in February. The remaining board members, including Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, subsequently installed Department of Government Efficiency staffer Kenneth Jackson, as acting president. DOGE staffer Nate Cavanaugh later took over as acting president. The Trump administration laid off most of the embattled institute's staff in March following a tense standoff between USIP staffers and DOGE employees at the institute's headquarters. A federal judge subsequently blocked the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the organization, which was founded in 1984.
