logo
Getting to meet Dolly the ovine disrupter

Getting to meet Dolly the ovine disrupter

Sheep have always been important to my family.
Having a miserly Glaswegian father meant that with no electric heating or even fires during the winter, we bundled up in hand-knitted woolly jumpers. We devoured legs of lamb, hunks of hogget, shoulders of mutton and more.
We listened in avid silence to Dad as he recounted gory tales of working at Burnside freezing works, gasping and shuddering as he described sneaking home bloody packets of offal to consume later. All of this sounds rather macabre, I know, but we were a typical New Zealand family, well-acquainted with the brutalities of farm life and blue-collar jobs.
My first pet was a little lamb, aptly named Frisky. I loved him very much, as did all my brothers and sisters. Frisky was hilarious. I think he thought he was a human.
He jumped and capered about, sneaking into the house to play hide-and-seek with us, always leaping into our laps for a cuddle and a special treat.
When he died prematurely (of internal bleeding, after my father unwisely decided to tether him with a metal chain one night), we were absolutely devastated. I was seven-years-old and this was my first real encounter with death.
Over the years, my family has continued to foster lambs from local farmers, caring for the little beasts whose mothers have passed or unaccountably rejected them. We've had many fluffy little creatures join our family: Bunty (a ridiculously shy boy who hid in the bushes), Caspian (a fragile black lamb who needed extra love and attention) and Rupert (who grew to be enormous) to name a few.
I've also had the unique pleasure of meeting the world's most famous sheep — Dolly.
Of course, I never had the good fortune to meet Dolly while she was alive (she died in 2003), but I've met her taxidermied self in the National Museum of Scotland.
Dolly was born on July 5, 1996, in a concrete barn on the outskirts of Edinburgh. In all respects, Dolly looked like a perfectly ordinary sheep, but of course she was extraordinary.
Dolly did not arise from natural copulation between two woolly parents, nor even standard laboratory fertilisation. In fact, she arguably had three mothers: one provided the egg, another provided the DNA, and a surrogate third, who carried the cloned embryo to term.
Dolly was cloned by Dr Keith Campbell, Dr Ian Wilmut and colleagues at the Roslin Institute at the University of Edinburgh. The funding for this project was provided by PPL Therapeutics and the Ministry of Agriculture.
Dolly was the product of a process called "somatic cell nuclear transfer". Essentially, Dr Wilmut and his team carefully extracted the nucleus from a cell in the udder of a six-year-old Finn Dorset ewe. They then inserted this nucleus into an egg cell from a different sheep, whose own nucleus had been removed. This hybrid egg was then stimulated to spark cell division and implanted into a surrogate mother — a Scottish Blackface sheep.
One of the early clues that Dolly was a clone came from her white face; she would have had a black face had she inherited her genes from the surrogate mother.
What made Dolly so special?
Contrary to popular belief, she was not the first cloned animal, but she was the first cloned from an adult, fully specialised cell. Earlier cloning experiments used embryonic stem cells that were still flexible in function.
Dolly, in contrast, was created from a mammary gland cell, a type long thought to be permanently fixed in its role. Her creation proved that even a mature cell retains the entire genetic code necessary to generate a complete organism. Dolly's existence challenged decades of scientific assumption and showed that adult cells could be reprogrammed.
Regarding her name, Dr Wilmut explained, "Dolly is derived from a mammary gland cell and we couldn't think of a more impressive pair of glands than Dolly Parton's". I wonder what Dolly Parton thinks of that.
Dolly's existence was kept hidden until the Roslin Institute published its research paper on February 22 1997. A media frenzy was sparked and the world's press descended on Roslin to meet Dolly. I wonder what she made of all the flashing bulbs, microphones, and jostling camera crews.
Media coverage swung wildly from triumphalist predictions of cures for every disease to dystopian fears of designer babies and human clones. A placid Finn Dorset ewe had become an icon of late-20th century science.
Dolly spent her life living in a flock of sheep at the Roslin Institute, a quiet expanse on the outskirts of Edinburgh. I've been out there, for a job interview — which was unsuccessful, as it happens — and can attest to its serene, pastoral setting.
Dolly had six lambs (Bonny, Sally, Rosie, Lucy, Darcy, and Cotton) with a Welsh Mountain sheep named David. By the autumn of 2001, Dolly was beginning to show signs of arthritis, which fuelled the suspicion that cloned animals were destined to age prematurely.
Daily anti-inflammatory treatments helped, but ultimately Dolly had to be euthanised on February 14 2003 at the age of six after being diagnosed with progressive lung disease and severe arthritis. A CT scan had revealed tumours in her chest consistent with ovine pulmonary adenomatosis (OPA), an incurable lung cancer.
Dolly's death was due to a Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus, a common viral disease in sheep; there is no conclusive evidence that cloning itself caused her illness or shortened her life. Her body was donated to the National Museum of Scotland, where she remains one of its most popular exhibits.
Dolly became part of cultural folklore, immortalised in museums, children's books, bioethics debates and satirical cartoons. Meanwhile, cloning technology quietly advanced.
Since Dolly, scientists have successfully cloned a range of mammals, including pigs, deer, horses, bulls and endangered species like the mouflon and banteng. Efforts are under way to revive extinct animals like the woolly mammoth. Success rates in cloning have dramatically improved; early cloning was notoriously inefficient — Dolly being the sole success out of 277 attempts.
The cloning of primates was achieved in 2018 using the same method which produced Dolly. Gene-edited monkey clones soon followed.
Parallel to these developments, stem cell research has surged forward, allowing ordinary cells to be reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells capable of regenerating tissues, offering new hope for treating complex diseases. Reproductive human cloning remains globally prohibited or tightly restricted, although therapeutic cloning for research purposes is allowed in a few countries under strict ethical oversight.
Dolly had such a pleasant, good-natured face. In photographs, it almost looks like she is smiling placidly at the camera in a self-satisfied way.
She looks like an entirely ordinary sheep, one who grazed, gave birth, and dealt with illness. And she was, in some respects. But she was born from a question: can life be replicated?
And Dolly leaves us with a bigger question: what happens when life is replicated and what does it portend?
I quite like the fact that something as simple and humble as a mere sheep could disrupt centuries-old notions of life, soul, identity and the sacredness of origin.
• Jean Balchin is an ODT columnist who has started a new life in Edinburgh.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's Spending Bill Helps The Rich Buy Their Private Jets
How Trump's Spending Bill Helps The Rich Buy Their Private Jets

Forbes

time4 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Trump's Spending Bill Helps The Rich Buy Their Private Jets

A little-discussed portion of the billionaire President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill" hands a lucrative break to ultrawealthy Americans in the form of a tax policy for private jet purchases. An under-the-radar provision of Trump's spending bill lands a massive potential tax advantage for ... More the ultrawealthy as part of a provision which would cost an estimated $378 billion. Patrick McMullan via Getty Images Part of the spending package that just passed the Senate is the permanent restoration of the 100% 'bonus depreciation' federal law, which allows businesses to write off the full amount of qualifying items in the year of purchase. Bonus depreciation was originally a part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, but phased down from the 100% level beginning in 2023 and was set to permanently expire by 2027, according to Thomson Reuters. The bonus depreciation policy applies to a slew of qualified, physical business expenses which depreciate over time, such as machinery and company cars, but the policy is often associated with big-ticket luxury items, such as private aircraft, and its institution last decade led to a boom in jet sales. That means that unlike standard business accounting procedures in which capital investments are spread across multiple years and are never fully written off, the full value of qualified property could be written off year one. A $10 million plane could now be a $10 million deduction in that same year, noted the aviation industry publication Flying magazine. 'For someone interested in buying a jet, whether new or used, this is a very big deal,' Matthew Bere, managing director of aviation at the Oklahoma-based bank BOK Financial, said this week, saying he expects the megabill's passage to 'spur a lot of activity in aircraft sales.' This is an 'example of oligarch friendly rules,' says Chuck Collins, director of the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies progressive think tank. Collins described the bonus depreciation provision as a 'massive tax break for billionaires and centi-millionaires' from the 'private jet lobby' in a Tuesday post. Big Number $378 billion. That's how much the permanent establishment of 100% bonus depreciation would cost taxpayers over 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. 'The all-at-once tax deduction could potentially reduce' jet buyers' taxable income by 'millions of dollars in a given year,' explained Bere. How The Senate Made This Deduction Permanent The version of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passed by the House in May only extended the 100% bonus depreciation through 2029, while the Senate made the deduction permanent. The private aviation industry celebrated the change, and charter plane provider FlyUSA described the legislation as 'a power-packed provision that could change the game for private aircraft acquisition.' Key Background The private jet friendly bonus depreciation provision adds to heavy criticism from Democrats and nonpartisan watchdogs who say the bill will disproportionately help the rich and hurt the poor. The bill will lower the lowest 20% of American earners' incomes by 2.9% while the top 1% of earners will get a 1.9% boost, according to the Yale University Budget Lab. 'This bill gives another tax break to the ultrawealthy — so they can buy another private jet,' Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said this week. Environmental groups frequently criticize private jet usage for its outsized emission, and U.S. departures account for 65% of private jet flights globally, according to the International Council on Clean Transportation. Kyle Khan-Mullins and Lily Ogburn contributed reporting. Further Reading Forbes Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Despite One Big Not-So-Beautiful Price Tag By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes How Trump's Spending Bill Impacts Student Loans—Including Higher Payments And More Restrictions By Alison Durkee

What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end
What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end

The massive tax and spending cut bill that Congress passed Thursday ends federal tax incentives for electric vehicles. Buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on EVs before they are terminated. But experts say there are still strong financial reasons to consider buying the vehicles even without those incentives. Before the bill passed, new electric vehicles came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, and used EVs included up to $4,000. Those incentives were originally designed to help make the vehicles more affordable. According to the latest data from Kelley Blue Book, the average purchase price of a new EV is roughly $9,000 higher in the United States than the average new gas-powered car. Used EVs on average cost $2,000 more than comparable gas cars. Those credits, paired with other incentives in many states, helped bridge that price gap. Without them, Senior Policy Director Ingrid Malmgren of the nonprofit advocacy group Plug In America said they will become unaffordable to many lower- and middle-income Americans. 'That's really disappointing because ... they're just a really great way to reduce transportation energy cost burden," Malmgren said. The up-front cost of an electric vehicle might be higher, but for those who can afford to consider the lifetime fuel and maintenance savings, Malmgren said the EV is still a good financial and environmental move in every state. EVs are typically still cheaper to own long-term That is because electric vehicles might not be cheaper to buy, but they are cheaper to drive. Malmgren said that even without the federal tax credits, an electric vehicle owner would still come out ahead. 'Quickly you'll end up paying less than a gas car because it costs much less to fuel, and it needs almost nothing for maintenance,' Malmgren said. Malmgren said the point at which an EV driver's savings on fuel and maintenance outweigh the higher initial price varies. It depends on the kind of car and how often they are driven, as well as the cost of gasoline and electricity in an area. She said EV owners pay less in upkeep because the cars typically have fewer moving parts to maintain and require less frequent servicing. There are multiplecalculators online that pinpoint that moment based on some of those criteria. A 2020 study in the academic journal Joule found that the average EV in the U.S. charged with a typical mix of public and private chargers saves the driver $7,700 in fuel costs over a 15-year life span, compared to filling a car with gas. Savings vary by state. The study found that someone charging a car at home during off-peak hours, deemed as a best-case scenario, could save more than $14,000 over 15 years in Washington, where electricity is relatively affordable. The study said that an EV driver in any state exhibiting typical driving and charging behavior would save money on fuel costs. The study did not account for the car's purchase price, its maintenance cost or associated tax credits. EVs are still cleaner, even when they charge on coal power Manufacturing an electric vehicle typically creates more pollution than making a traditional gas-powered one. But experts say that driving an EV over the long-term is still less polluting than a gas car. Once they both drive about 15,000 miles (24,000 km) — slightly more than the average American drives in a year — the total pollution that has gone into making and driving each type of car has evened out, said Peter Slowik, U.S. Passenger Vehicles Lead for the International Council on Clean Transportation. Every mile after that widens the gap between the cleaner electric car and the more pollutive gas car. By the end of the car's life, emissions caused by the average EV are roughly half the average gas car, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. So unless you buy a new car each year, the EV is the cleaner choice, he said. 'They are a no-brainer,' Slowik said. 'Electric vehicles are already inherently so much more efficient.' A 2023 analysis by Yale Climate Connections found that electric vehicles are responsible for less carbon dioxide pollution even in areas where the electricity used to charge them comes from coal. An EV in West Virginia, which is one of the most coal-reliant states, still pollutes 31% less than an equivalent gas-powered car, according to the analysis. Slowik said that is because electric cars are better at translating energy into forward motion. For example, the most popular EVs in the US, the Tesla Model Y and the Tesla Model 3, can drive more than 100 miles (161 km) on energy equivalent to what is provided by a gallon of gasoline. 'If you compare that to a 25-mpg gasoline vehicle, that's already four to five times more efficient,' Slowik said. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Crews tackle lorry fire on new build estate in Worksop
Crews tackle lorry fire on new build estate in Worksop

BBC News

time4 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Crews tackle lorry fire on new build estate in Worksop

Firefighters were called to tackle a blaze involving a lorry on a new build estate in Fire and Rescue Service said four fire engines were initially sent to Red Lane in Worksop at 17:00 BST on crews were called to the scene after the blaze spread to multiple outbuildings and a number of trees. At about 19:45, group manager Leigh Holmes said the fire was under control but added crews had "a considerable amount of damping down to do". He said: "We expect to be scaling down the incident in a couple of hours and will provide further updates as appropriate."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store