
Households with robins in the garden are urged never to do one thing
Robins are a beloved British bird, characterised by a bright orange-red breast, a brown back, and a dumpy shape. They are commonly found perched on a garden fence and are known as the garden birds that sing throughout the year to proclaim their environment.
While their appearance may be cute, they are highly territorial and can exhibit aggressive tendencies, often driving away unwanted guests. Therefore, robins are often best appreciated from a distance. These birds are renowned for nesting almost anywhere. From flower pots to post boxes, there's really nowhere that a robin can't nest.
They are one of the earliest birds to start building their nests, usually beginning in March to commence their breeding season, laying eggs around mid-April. If you see robins beginning to pile up materials like leaves and moss, chances are they are preparing to build a nest.
While it might seem like a fun idea to keep an eye out for these nests during this season, households are advised not to. Robins are known to abandon their nests if they feel humans have discovered it or if they sense the nest is no longer safe.
Despite being a popular garden bird, Robins are incredibly cautious of human activity. If they sense a potential predator, they will abandon the nest entirely to protect the eggs and their young.
However, if gardens are considered a nest, it's best to wait a few days before approaching as they tend to return. Additionally, robins can have multiple broods each season, returning to the same nest for every brood unless something makes it feel unsafe.
Brits are also reminded that, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, all birds, along with their nests and eggs, are protected by law. Causing any disruption to these is a criminal offence.
However, for Brits wanting to welcome these little birds into their backyard, it's important to invest in the correct bird box. Gardening expert James Ewens told Ideal Homes: 'Robins won't go near the classic bird boxes with the tiny round holes, they are great for smaller birds like blue tits. What you need is an open-fronted bird box, with a wide entrance, and a clear view.'
He notes that robins tend to keep a close eye on their surroundings, as they often nest lower to the ground, making them more susceptible to predators than other birds. It's also important to consider what material your birdbox is made of.
Robins are attracted to natural wood because it mimics the habitats they would naturally settle in, such as log piles or tree hollows. So, this nesting season, be prepared to welcome some robins, but be sure to keep your distance

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Family says Brit kids who drowned on ‘dream' Spain holiday went swimming every day
'Deeply loved' siblings Ameiya, 13, and Ricardo Junior Parris, 11, died on a 'dream' holiday in Spain after being caught in strong currents while swimming on the beach Two siblings who tragically drowned on a 'dream' holiday were 'water babies' who went swimming every day, a close relative has said. Ameiya, 13, and Ricardo Junior Parris, 11, were pulled from the water at Llarga Beach in Salou, Spain on Tuesday evening after getting into difficulty in strong currents. The brother and sister were pronounced dead a short time later. Their father, 31-year-old Ricardo Parris, 31, was also rushed to hospital after swimming out to try and save his children. He was rescued from the water unconscious, and has since been discharged from hospital after suffering a concussion. The two children from Birmingham - known to family and friends as 'Maya' and 'Jubs' - had been on holiday with their parents and four other siblings. Now, their auntie Kayla Delbrocco has told of how the kids had spent "every day" of the holiday in the sea, and had always been good at swimming. She said to The Sun: "It was supposed to be a special day - the kids love the beach, they go every day. "They've always been water babies - they'd been in every day. We had gone on holiday together there six years ago, so they were excited to go back and knew what to expect." Dad Ricardo had taken the siblings for one final swim while Shanice, a full-time mother and former teaching assistant, took the rest of the children back to Hotel Best Negresco, where they were staying. A hotel worker spotted the children struggling in the water from reception and had called for help. When Shanice returned to the beach, the ambulances and police cars were already there, and Junior was taken away in a helicopter. Family members flew out on Wednesday to comfort Ricardo and Shanice. The younger siblings - Cassius, six, Cleopatra, five, Asher, three, and Exodus, almost one - have been told. A GoFundMe page set up to support the family and help repatriate Ameiya and Ricardo's bodies has now raised over £43,000. In a tribute to the "beautiful, bright, and deeply loved" children, cousin Holly Marquis-Johnson wrote: "Maya was intelligent, thoughtful, and growing into a strong young woman. Ricardo Junior was playful, kind, and always smiling. "They brought so much love, laughter, and energy into the lives of everyone around them. Their absence has left an unbearable silence not just for their parents, but for their whole family, who were incredibly close and shared an unbreakable bond." A Foreign Office spokesperson said: "We are supporting the family of two British children who have died in Spain and are in contact with the local authorities."


Scotsman
6 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why the Sycamore Gap tree provoked such strong emotional reactions
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In September 2023, so many people were shocked when the famous Sycamore Gap tree, thriving in a dip along Hadrian's Wall, was deliberately cut down overnight. For many, the tree symbolised British resilience, heritage and an enduring history. The public response was swift and intense, with widespread outrage and grief over the loss of this cultural landmark. The two men convicted of felling the Sycamore Gap tree have been sentenced to four years and three months in prison. Meanwhile, the tree lives on thanks to an AI-generated alternate world in the film 28 Years Later. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a psychologist, I'm interested in what inspired such a strong reaction to the destruction of a single tree. One psychological explanation, known as 'terror management theory', suggests that the emotional response reflects deeper anxieties about death – and not just about this tree. The sycamore tree was one of the UK's most photographed and appeared in the 1991 Kevin Costner film Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Belief systems Terror management theory, developed by psychologists Sheldon Solomon, Jeff Greenberg and Tom Pyszczynski, builds on the work of cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker, author of the Pulitzer prize-winning The Denial of Death (1973). This book's central idea is simple yet profound. In it, Becker proposes that our awareness of mortality creates the potential for considerable existential anxiety. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To manage this, we rely on cultural worldviews. These are our belief systems. These worldviews can be religious, secular, political or national. They all share a promise that life is meaningful and offer prescriptions for how we should live. When we live in accordance with our cultural values and standards – whether by being a good parent, a loyal citizen or following religious texts – we gain a sense of self-esteem and feel we are contributing to something enduring and significant. These worldviews also offer the promise of immortality. Some do so literally, as in religious faiths that promise life beyond death. Others offer symbolic immortality, through lasting achievements, family bloodlines, or the continuation of one's nation. By embedding ourselves in these worldviews, we gain a sense that some part of us will continue after we die. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cultural symbols such as flags, religious icons, or even a tree can embody our core values and collective identity and are therefore treated with deep reverence. Throughout history, people have waged wars and shown intense emotional reactions to the desecration of such symbols (burning the American flag or the Qur'an, for example). The famous Sycamore Gap tree before it was cut down in a wanton act of vandalism (Picture: English Heritage/Heritage Images) | Getty Images The Sycamore Gap tree carried similar significance. As a centuries-old landmark, it came to represent Britain's heritage, strength and continuity. From the perspective of terror management theory, its felling may have stirred strong reactions because it reminded people that even the symbols we rely on for a sense of permanence can be suddenly lost. This sense of cultural loss is also echoed by other recent events, such as Brexit and the immigration crisis. A collective fear over the erosion of British values and traditions place questions about the loss of British identity at the centre of public consciousness. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Rooted in mortality Decades of psychological research support this theory's claims. One common method (a technique called 'mortality salience') involves making participants subtly aware of their mortality (control participants are not reminded of death). In studies carried out in the 1990s, researchers found that when the solution to a task required desecrating a cultural symbol, such as using an American flag to separate ink from a jar of sand, participants reminded of death took longer to complete the task and experienced greater apprehension. Hundreds of studies also show how being reminded of death can increase anger and hostility towards people who threaten or violate one's cultural values. One line of research examining reactions to those who commit moral transgressions may be particularly appropriate to this case. For instance, in one study, participants reminded of their own death were more likely to support harsher punishments for those who committed moral transgressions such as someone who destroyed an irreplaceable artefact (much like the cutting down of a tree). Other research has shown similar effects: participants (including judges!) when reminded of death gave out harsher penalties or sentencing for those who have committed a crime. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad You might question whether these effects truly reflect death anxiety or if they could be explained without invoking a desire for immortality. Research may provide compelling evidence. One study found that reminders of death increased support for harsher punishments for moral transgressors (replicating the study mentioned earlier). The afterlife effect However, when participants were first presented with evidence of an afterlife, the effect of death increasing harsher punishments disappeared. In other words, the promise that death is not the end appeared to provide a buffer from the anxiety that death arouses. The fall of the Sycamore Gap tree was more than a loss of natural beauty. It was, for many, a symbolic attack on permanence, on meaning, and on shared identity. Yet while such losses can stir outrage and calls for punishment, research also shows that when people endorse prosocial values like empathy, reminders of death can actually foster forgiveness towards those who commit moral transgressions. According to terror management theory, these responses are not just about anger, but about what it means to be human in the face of inevitable death. In this light, the tree's felling uprooted something sacred: a collective continuity that gives meaning to our brief lives. As we grieve its loss, perhaps we're also mourning something more elusive – the comforting illusion that some things might last forever. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad


Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'My neighbours made a petition to get rid of my dogs so kids can play in my garden'
A man has shared his disbelief after his neighbour demanded he get rid of his two dogs, who had been living with his parents, because her child got poo on his hands When house hunting, you'll likely have a checklist of must-haves, nice-to-haves, and negotiables. However, one aspect you might overlook until it's too late is the neighbours. A couple were left rather taken aback by their new neighbours, who initially offered friendly greetings but later began dictating what they could and couldn't do on their own property. A 36-year-old man took to Reddit to share how he and his wife had recently purchased their first home, specifically chosen for its "huge back garden". Initially, their new neighbours politely asked if their children could continue using the expansive back garden, but then things took an unexpected turn. It comes after Brits are told to never put one banned item in garden bins as you could face punishment. The man explained: "The previous owners of our place were an elderly childless couple who were well known in the area for basically being grandparents to everyone and the husband had built multiple tree houses and bridges in the trees for kids to play in. The property is fully fenced but has three swinging gates into it. "When we first moved in we were approached by the next-door neighbour who very politely asked if her kids could keep using the backyard to play in. We agreed that it was OK so long as she understood that if her kids got hurt it wasn't our problem and we wouldn't be supervising kids playing or anything. "She was fine with that and seemed very appreciative and brought over biscuits and juice when she came over to watch her kids. Word went around and eventually we had around a dozen kids coming by each week, some supervised, some in groups of two or three, but everyone was polite and tidy so we didn't really care." However, after Christmas, things took a turn when the man's parents moved into a retirement home and could no longer look after their two dogs - an 11-year-old Belgian shepherd and a 12-year-old German shepherd cross Belgian. The man decided to adopt the dogs, which were adored by the children, until one day an irate neighbour stormed over to complain about them - insisting they get rid of them. He continued: "The problem started when a lady we didn't know showed up at our house and started screaming at my wife, apparently her six-year-old had come home with his friends and they had dog poo smeared all over their hands. She basically told my wife that if she didn't get rid of the dogs then her kids wouldn't come over anymore and she'd press charges for endangerment. "My wife basically told her to eff off and that it wouldn't have happened if she'd been supervising her child. The woman left and came back with a petition and around six signatures for us to get rid of the dogs. We told her to do one and that kids were now no longer welcome. We locked the gates and put signs up explaining and left it at that. "Several of the nice neighbours have come by to beg us to change our minds but we don't want to risk it and we don't have the time to supervise the kids so the gates stay locked. We are now arguing with a couple of people who feel it's unfair that the entire neighbourhood is tarred because of one person's actions." Nevertheless, the man was left questioning whether he'd been too harsh by shutting off the garden completely. "There is something seriously wrong with people who think it's OK to sign a petition telling other people to get rid of their well-behaved, confined, senior dogs. Like beyond simple entitlement wrong", someone raged. "I would just explain to your good neighbours that it's a decision you had to make to protect yourselves and your dogs and it would cause way too much trouble if you let some children in and not others. Honestly just telling the parents you aren't liable if their kids hurt themselves may not be enough to protect you, if you do choose to allow children in again, [I recommend] talking to an attorney first." Another fumed: "I would choose my dogs over any human - especially children. I'm child-free and love dogs more than anything. Make sure to tell them which lady it was".