No longer a dream job: Why 75% of American graduates are walking away from Google, Meta and Big Tech ambitions
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
But in a profound and quietly escalating shift, today's graduates are choosing a different path. The once-unquestioned allure of Big Tech is losing its luster. A growing number of young Americans are bypassing Silicon Valley altogether, driven not by six-figure starting salaries but by something deeper: Stability, meaning, and purpose.
This generational recalibration is more than a fleeting trend; it's a redrawing of the professional map.
The cracks in the code: Disillusionment with Big Tech
What was once considered the pinnacle of professional aspiration is now viewed with caution. According to a study by the National Society of High School Scholars (NSHSS), reported by Forbes, a striking number of Gen Z graduates no longer regard tech companies as ideal employers. The reasons are layered but clear.
First, there's the widespread fear of automation, as artificial intelligence and machine learning threaten to displace entry- and mid-level roles, job security has become a casualty.
The same industry that promises innovation and progress is now synonymous with abrupt layoffs and a relentless pace of change. Once a beacon of long-term growth, the tech sector has increasingly become a symbol of instability.
Moreover, recent high-profile layoffs at companies that once prided themselves on employee perks and progressive work cultures have underscored the volatility of the industry. For many young job seekers, the message is unmistakable: The tech dream is no longer a guarantee of stability.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The rise of purpose-driven professions
If tech is no longer the dream, what is? Increasingly, the answer lies in healthcare, social services, and human-centered professions. In a survey by Network Trends, an overwhelming 76% of students ranked job stability as their top priority, surpassing salary, prestige, or even location.
This shift is not purely economic; it's deeply existential. The COVID-19 pandemic, rising mental health awareness, and the growing cultural emphasis on empathy and community have reframed the meaning of success.
Careers in medicine, nursing, public health, and therapy are now seen not just as 'safe bets,' but as moral and emotional callings. They offer what tech increasingly cannot: a tangible, human impact.
This isn't an American anomaly. In Spain, enrollment in healthcare and social service programmes has steadily increased between 2018 and 2024, underscoring a global trend toward care-centric careers in an era of demographic change and increasing life expectancy.
Big Tech's talent crisis: Can it regain relevance?
This talent migration presents a sobering dilemma for the tech industry. If the brightest minds of a generation no longer aspire to join its ranks, how will innovation sustain itself?
For Big Tech firms, a cosmetic overhaul won't suffice. It is no longer enough to offer game rooms, stock options, and gourmet cafeterias. Today's graduates are asking harder questions: What is the ethical impact of this work? Will my job still exist in five years? Am I building something that serves the public good, or just the bottom line?
To remain attractive, tech companies must undergo a deeper reckoning.
That means reorienting their missions beyond disruption and profit, investing in social responsibility, and crafting roles that promise not only advancement but meaning.
The future of work is being rewritten
What we are witnessing is not simply a rejection of one industry, but a redefinition of ambition itself. A job at Google no longer guarantees prestige; it may raise concerns about burnout, disposability, or ethical ambiguity. In contrast, a nursing degree or a role in public health may now symbolize courage, resilience, and social relevance.
This is not a story of one sector's decline, but of another's rise, a generational declaration that work should not just be profitable, but purposeful.
If the early 2000s were defined by the rise of the digital empire, the mid-2020s may be remembered as the era when young minds chose to heal, rather than hack.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and…
Home News Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… Even after having good bilateral relations with the United States, India has never purchased any fighter jet from the country. Here is the reason. Why doesn't India have US fighter jets? IAF uses fighter planes from Russia, France, and… In recent years, India has seen tremendous growth in the defence sector and has emerged as one of the leading weapon exporters. Simultaneously, the country has strengthened its armed forces with new and high-tech weapons. For instance, New Delhi purchased the mighty Rafale fighter jet from France and bought the S-400 air defence system from Russia. India also has good bilateral relations with the United States, but you will be surprised to know that the country does not have any 'Made in US' fighter jet. Notably, America tried to sell its fighter jets, even recently President Trump tried to sell the F-35 to India, yet New Delhi doesn't show interest in the American jets. Fighter jets from the US, such as the F-35, the F-16, are famous in the world, with several countries even using them, but India has never gone to America for fighter jets — not just today but since its independence. Let us tell you why. Which Countries' Fighter Jets Does India Have? India purchased fighter jets from many countries, and this diversity in aircraft meets the country's defence needs and strategies. Russia tops the list when it comes to purchasing fighter jets. The 'Made in Russia' fighter jets have been in service in India for a long time and have participated in many wars. Apart from Russia, India has fighter jets from France and Britain. It is to be noted that, India also has its own indigenous Tejas fighter jet. Why Does India Not Buy Fighter Jets From America? There are many reasons why India doesn't buy fighter jets from the US. Reasons vary from strategic, technical, to political. Notably, America has been a long-time defence partner of Pakistan and supplied several military weapons, including fighter jets like – F-16. In such a situation, India maintains a distance from American fighter jets so that it remains strong strategically. Russia Is Also A Factor India has been closer to Russia since its independence. While America has always stood with Pakistan in difficult times, Russia has stood with India. Russia has not only given India fighter jets but also technology. Some of them are also being produced here. Russia has supplied a large number of fighter jets, tanks, and missile systems to India. Buying defence weapons from Moscow has always been easy and economical for New Delhi, and technical support is also good. Transport Aircraft Have Been Purchased From America While India has not acquired US-made fighter jets, it has purchased military transport aircraft, including Lockheed C-130J-30 Super Hercules. But Why Made In America Helicopters? India's armed forces have acquired a significant number of US-made helicopters. These include 22 AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters for the Indian Air Force (procured in 2015), followed by a further six for the Indian Army (2020). Additionally, 15 CH-47F(I) Chinook heavy-lift helicopters were purchased for the Indian Air Force. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest World News on
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan
By Andrea Shalal and David Lawder Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan WASHINGTON -The United States could reach a trade deal with India that would help American companies compete in the South Asian country and leave it facing far lower tariffs, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday, while casting doubt on a possible deal with Japan. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he believed India was ready to lower barriers for U.S. companies, which could pave the way for an agreement staving off the 26% rate he announced on April 2, before pausing it until July 9. "Right now, India doesn't accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, if they do that, we're going to have a deal for less, much less tariffs," he said. Earlier, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News that the U.S. and India are nearing a deal that would lower tariffs on American imports to the South Asian country and help India avoid levies from rising sharply next week. "We are very close with India," Bessent told Fox News in response to a question about progress on trade negotiations. Indian officials extended a visit to Washington last week through Monday to try to reach agreement on a trade deal with President Donald Trump's administration and address lingering concerns on both sides, Indian government sources told Reuters. A White House official familiar with the talks said the Trump administration plans to prioritize securing trade deals with countries including India ahead of Japan in the days leading up to the July 9 deadline. India is one of more than a dozen countries actively negotiating with the Trump administration to try to avoid a steep spike in tariff rates on July 9, when a 90-day tariff pause ends. India could see its new "reciprocal" tariff rate rise to 27% from the current 10%. The U.S.-India talks have hit roadblocks over disagreements on import duties for auto components, steel, and farm goods, ahead of Trump's deadline to impose reciprocal tariffs. "We are in the middle hopefully more than the middle of a very intricate trade negotiation," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told an event in New York on Monday. "Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion. I cannot guarantee it, because there's another party to that discussion," said Jaishankar, who is in the U.S. for a meeting of the China-focused Quad grouping. He added that there "will have to be give and take" and the two sides will have to find middle ground. TRUMP SUGGESTS HIGHER TARIFF FOR JAN Bessent told Fox News that different countries have different agendas for trade deals, including Japan, which Trump complained about on Monday and again on Tuesday. Trump said he was not thinking of extending the July 9 deadline and would simply send letters notifying countries of the tariff rate they would face. "We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from a trip to Florida. Trump suggested he could impose a tariff of 30% or 35% on imports from Japan - well above the 24% tariff rate he announced on April 2 and then paused until July 9. He said Japan was refusing to accept U.S.-grown rice, a demand made by Washington that he described as "an easy one," while selling millions of cars in the United States. "So what I'm going to do, is I'll write them a letter saying we thank you very much, and we know you can't do the kind of things that we need, and therefore you pay a 30%, 35% or whatever the numbers that we determine," he said. So far, only Britain has negotiated a limited trade deal with the Trump administration, accepting a 10% U.S. tariff on many goods, including autos, in exchange for special access for aircraft engines and British beef. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
What's inside Donald Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill': Tax cuts, medicaid & food aid slashed, no EV credits & more
Senate Republicans have passed on July 1 President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill after a voting marathon, clearing the way for a final showdown in the House before the July 4 deadline the president set to sign the legislation. Dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the nearly 900-page package would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, create new benefits for workers and businesses, roll back clean energy incentives, and impose cuts to safety net programs including Medicaid and food assistance. State and Local Tax Deduction: Temporarily raises the SALT cap to $40,000 through 2029, phasing out for incomes above $500,000. Some GOP holdouts, like Rep. Nick LaLota (R-NY), still oppose the provision, arguing it should be extended for at least a decade. No Tax on Tips and Overtime: Exempts up to $25,000 in annual tips and $12,500 in overtime pay per individual through 2028, with phase-outs starting at $150,000 in income. Child Tax Credit: Increases to $2,200 per child and permanently adjusts for inflation. Trump Child Accounts: Allows up to $5,000 a year in tax-deferred contributions for children. Newborns between 2025 and 2028 would get a $1,000 federal contribution. Auto Loan Deduction: Creates a new deduction up to $10,000 for auto loan interest on U.S.-assembled vehicles. Business Tax Breaks: Makes three corporate deductions permanent, including 100% bonus depreciation, a move likely to benefit manufacturers and banks. Semiconductors: Expands the chip investment credit from 25% to 35%. Medicaid: Nearly $1 trillion in cuts over a decade. The Congressional Budget Office estimates 11.8 million Americans could lose coverage. Work Requirements: New mandates for Medicaid recipients who aren't elderly, disabled, or caring for young children. Food Stamps: Expands work requirements up to age 65 and shifts some costs to states. Alaska and Hawaii won partial waivers to secure support from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK). Clean Energy: Accelerates phase-out of wind and solar tax credits, requiring projects to be operational by end of 2027. Also eliminates an excise tax targeting Chinese components. Electric Vehicles: Ends the $7,500 EV tax credit by September 30, 2025. Border Security: Allocates $92 billion for border infrastructure and migrant detention, including new funding for Trump's wall. Remittance Tax: Imposes a 1% fee on money sent abroad, down from 3.5% in the House version. Rural Hospitals: Creates a $50 billion fund to cushion Medicaid cuts in rural communities. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Slashes its funding cap nearly in half. Endowment Tax: Raises rates on wealthy universities, with a top rate of 8% on large endowments.
