logo
Australians have soundly rejected Trump-style culture wars. Now Albanese must act with courage and vision

Australians have soundly rejected Trump-style culture wars. Now Albanese must act with courage and vision

The Guardian04-05-2025
Thank you, Donald Trump.
Australians are much better at defining who they are by identifying what they are not, rather than by making lofty statements. And they have now said unequivocally that they are not angry little Americans, cultural warriors or self-interested libertarians.
We always knew that there was a decency at the heart of this nation, but it took the bullying, showbiz bravado of the US president to crystallise it. First as thousands of people cancelled trips to America and then, decidedly, in the privacy of millions of cardboard voting booths.
Even the prime minister, who in his first victory speech in 2022 struggled to get beyond the 'greatest country' cliche when talking about Australia, found the words on election night to begin to capture what makes this country unique and full of possibility. With practice and confidence he will get better. It might even translate into transformative action and not be left to die in the graveyard of empty words.
Culture is almost always ahead of politics, so the signs have been there for a while. The notion of being unAustralian, which burst into the discourse in 2005 when Sam Kekovich berated vegetarians, hippies, dissenters of all sorts, was jettisoned nearly two decades later. The iconic Australia Day lamb ad turned itself upside down in 2023 embracing (shock horror) diversity. 'Guess we are all a bit unAustralian, that's what makes us Australian.'
That's a start.
And when Australian leaders recognise that the ability to embrace the best of what is on offer, to not be afraid of innovation, to combine courage with compassion, remarkable things can happen.
It's been done before. True, this is usually in a dance of two steps forward one step back, but over time the two steps forward set the new direction.
It was striking that the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, described his party's victory as the greatest achievement since federation. Who ever talks about federation? But it was remarkable. It took a decade of debate and two votes in every colony and then protracted negotiations in London to create. A nation was formed that for the next 15 years was a global model of democratic and social innovation.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
We tend to focus – rightly, and in a very Australian way – on the negatives, on the harshness of the white Australia policy, on the forced deportation of South Sea Islanders, on the exclusion and attempted extermination of the First Peoples.
But the rest of the world saw innovation, economic success with a compassionate heart and the birth of an Australian model. Australians were literate, positive and enjoyed one of the highest standards of living in the world. There were abundant possibilities.
The devastation of the losses in the first world war and being beholden to British imperialism during the great depression sapped this confidence. But even before the second world war ended plans for reconstruction, the lessons of the previous decades were developed and implemented. This set the scene for modern Australia, which reached its peak when the Whitlam government swept to power in 1972 and implemented policies that had been gestating for decades.
In the 1980s, when the old protectionist economic model imploded, Australia again led the world with a model of neoliberalism with a human face. It was not perfect, but it was copied around the world and celebrated for time as a 'third way'. It was much better than allowing the market to hold the whip hand and privatise everything.
Then in the global financial crisis Australian politicians and policymakers were poised to respond, intervening to prevent the catastrophe that occurred in many other countries.
These models should provide confidence that there is an Australian way, that even in the face of existential crises innovation is possible, that there is no need to be unduly dependent on what great powers might be doing. That courage and compassion are not incompatible.
We have lost the habit of innovation and reform. Its memory needs to be revived and acted on. The crises we currently face – the climate catastrophe, a crumbling post war global order, an unreliable great power, the new digital imperialism and intergenerational inequity – need vision and courage.
Strikingly this election showed that the Australian people recognise we can no longer rely on the rest of the world to provide the lead – the future is ours to make, fixing the foundations and imagining the future. As Rose Scott, one of the participants in the federation debates about the new nation, presciently observed: 'Be bold, be bold, be bold. Reform is hard, but worth it.'
Julianne Schultz is the author of The Idea of Australia
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

Sky News

time37 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

Donald Trump has said he is considering "taking away" the US citizenship of actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits a government from doing so. In a post on Truth Social on Saturday, the US president said: "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship." He also labelled O'Donnell, who has moved to Ireland, as a "threat to humanity" and said she should "remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her". O'Donnell responded on Instagram by posting a photograph of Mr Trump with Jeffrey Epstein. "You are everything that is wrong with America and I'm everything you hate about what's still right with it," she wrote in the caption. "I'm not yours to silence. I never was." O'Donnell moved to Ireland with her 12-year-old son in January after Mr Trump had secured a second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage and that she would only return to the US "when it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America". O'Donnell and the US president have criticised each other publicly for years, in an often-bitter back-and-forth that predates Mr Trump's move into politics. 2:46 This is just the latest threat by the president to revoke the citizenship of someone he has disagreed with, most recently his former ally Elon Musk. But the two situations are different as while Musk was born in South Africa, O'Donnell was born in the US and has a constitutional right to American citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, said the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the fourteen amendment of the constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. "The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born US citizen," he added. "In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people."

EU will be reeling over how to tackle trade talks after Trump's 30% tariff threat
EU will be reeling over how to tackle trade talks after Trump's 30% tariff threat

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

EU will be reeling over how to tackle trade talks after Trump's 30% tariff threat

Second-guessing Donald Trump is a fool's errand. But Saturday's shock threat to impose tariffs of 30% on the EU is a blow to the bloc's confidence, which had already secretly capitulated during negotiations with diplomats revealing they had to sacrifice trade for the wider prize of security and defence of the continent. It is worth pausing to consider what happened in the last three weeks in the EU. Up to the middle of June, Brussels had brandished its economic power in negotiations with €1.4bn (£1.2bn) at stake for one of the US's most important trading partners. Officials and diplomats were openly critical of the position Keir Starmer had taken in the UK, saying they would never sign up to a deal as thin as that involving just cars, beef, plane parts and ethanol. One questioned whether Westminster's deal was even 'legally implementable'. Another vowed: 'We will never do a deal like Starmer.' Another characterised the deal they wanted to land as 'somewhere between rollover UK and retaliatory China'. 'If the EU doesn't stand up to Trump or demand the rigours of rules, the question will be: what is left of the international rules-based system?' one diplomat told the Guardian, speaking of the risk to employment rights, free speech, social welfare and public care. The tough talk even extended to threats of tax on services including X, Google and Microsoft alongside trade war stables such as cars and alcohol. But by last week, the position had changed. The EU was going for a bare bones deal just like the UK, hoping for relief from the 27.5% tax on car exports, the 50% import duties on steel in exchange for a 10% tariff for most imports. The deal was put on Trump's table and since Wednesday the EU has waited. Why the change? One word: Russia. As one diplomat conceded last week the Nato summit in mid-June had some hard truths – the EU could take five to 10 years to build up aircraft, missiles and intelligence capacity in the air and on the ground to defend itself from a military attack. Some protested at the obsequiousness shown towards the US president with the Nato chief even referring to him as 'Daddy', but as one diplomat said last week: 'We got what we wanted – Trump is continuing to supply weapons for Ukraine.' Another said the EU could never have continued to hardball like Japan. 'It doesn't depend on the US for defence.' Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion When asked about the negotiation pivot, one diplomat in Brussels said on Thursday: 'This has been extremely tough. I think it is difficult to look at these negotiations in isolation. They affect the whole spectrum of EU-US relations, including security and the defence of Ukraine. 'There is also a short-term perspective and a long-term perspective. And in an institution [EU] like this, we are negotiating to find the balance between the pain you inflict on yourself in the short term and the pain you might inflict for the long term.' Diplomats conceded the deal they had hoped for was already a big concession. But the tables have been turned again, this time by Trump. A 30% tariff will almost certainly trigger a trade war, even a 15% tariff will be difficult to 'eat' (the now widely used term for absorbing tariffs). Trade ministers meet in Brussels on Monday, just hours before midnight when the current pause on their own retaliatory tariffs against the US expires. There will almost certainly be calls from France and others to change tack back to hardballing.

Trump rips MAGA ‘boys' and ‘gals' in epic Epstein-gate rant: ‘Let Pam Bondi do her job'
Trump rips MAGA ‘boys' and ‘gals' in epic Epstein-gate rant: ‘Let Pam Bondi do her job'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Trump rips MAGA ‘boys' and ‘gals' in epic Epstein-gate rant: ‘Let Pam Bondi do her job'

President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Saturday evening to defend his Attorney General Pam Bondi after major figures within the MAGA movement attacked her following the decision not to release the Epstein files. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'' Trump wrote on his social media platform. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' The president went on to urge his supporters to unify, saying he doesn't 'like what's happening.' and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' said Trump. Both FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have reportedly considered leaving the administration over the Epstein files. Trump asked Saturday why any publicity would be given to what he claimed was files authored by former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State and his 2016 rival Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, and 'the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration, who conned the World with the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, 51 'Intelligence' Agents, 'THE LAPTOP FROM HELL,' and more?' The president claimed that 'they created the Epstein files' as well as the 'FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier.' 'Now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store