How social media can 'trigger' eating disorders in young people
Research has shown the percentage of people worldwide who have had some kind of eating disorder during their lives rose from 3.5 percent in 2000 to 7.8 percent in 2018, a timeframe that captures the rise of social media.
For the professionals trying to help teenagers recover from these disorders, misinformation from influencers on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram is a huge problem.
"We no longer treat an eating disorder without also addressing social media use," French dietitian and nutritionist Carole Copti told AFP.
"It has become a trigger, definitely an accelerator and an obstacle to recovery," she added.
The causes of eating disorders are complex, with psychological, genetic, environmental and social factors all having the potential to make someone more susceptible.
Social media "is not the cause but the straw that may break the camel's back," said Nathalie Godart, a psychiatrist for children and adolescents at the Student Health Foundation of France.
By promoting thinness, strictly controlled diets and relentless exercise, social media weakens already vulnerable people and "amplifies the threat" to their health, she told AFP.
'Vicious cycle'
Just one recent example is the #skinnytok trend, a hashtag on TikTok full of dangerous and guilt-inducing advice encouraging people to drastically reduce how much food they eat.
For Charlyne Buigues, a French nurse specialising in eating disorders, social media serves as a gateway to these problems, which are "normalised" online.
She condemned videos showing young girls with anorexia exposing their malnourished bodies -- or others with bulimia demonstrating their "purges".
"Taking laxatives or vomiting are presented as a perfectly legitimate way to lose weight, when actually they increase the risk of cardiac arrest," Buigues said.
Eating disorders can damage the heart, cause infertility and other health problems, and have been linked to suicidal behaviour.
Anorexia has the highest rate of death of any psychiatric disease, research has found. Eating disorders are also the second leading cause of premature death among 15- to 24-year-olds in France, according to the country's health insurance agency.
Social media creates a "vicious cycle," Copti said.
"People suffering from eating disorders often have low self-esteem. But by exposing their thinness from having anorexia on social media, they gain followers, views, likes... and this will perpetuate their problems and prolong their denial," she added.
This can especially be the case when the content earns money.
Buigues spoke of a young woman who regularly records herself throwing up live on TikTok and who had "explained that she was paid by the platform and uses that money to buy groceries".
'Completely indoctrinated'
Social media also makes recovering from eating disorders "more difficult, more complicated and take longer", Copti said.
This is partly because young people tend to believe the misleading or fake diet advice that proliferates online.
Copti said consultations with her patients can feel like she is facing a trial.
"I have to constantly justify myself and fight to make them understand that no, it is not possible to have a healthy diet eating only 1,000 calories -- that is half what they need -- or that no, it is not normal to skip meals," she said.
"The patients are completely indoctrinated -- and my 45-minute weekly consultation is no match for spending hours every day on TikTok," she added.
Godart warned about the rise of people posing as "pseudo-coaches", sharing incorrect, "absurd" and potentially illegal nutrition advice.
"These influencers carry far more weight than institutions. We're constantly struggling to get simple messages across about nutrition," she said, pointing out that there are lifelines available for those in need.
Buigues takes it upon herself to regularly report problematic content on Instagram, but said it "serves no purpose".
"The content remains online and the accounts are rarely suspended -- it's very tiring," she said.
The nurse has even advised her patients to delete their social media accounts, particularly TikTok.
"It may seem radical but until young people are better informed, the app is too dangerous," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
13 hours ago
- AFP
Misinformation about abortion safety spreads via US podcast
"Does having an abortion increase a woman's risk for getting breast cancer?" asks health influencer Bethany Cameron in a video clipped from her podcast and shared to her 1.5 million Instagram followers July 10, 2025. "Yes," says Seth Gruber, founder of The White Rose Resistance, a US advocacy group he describes as a "pro-life ministry." Image Screenshot of an Instagram post taken July 14, 2025 The exchange comes from a longer conversation on the July 9 episode of Cameron's "Digest This" podcast. The episode aired as legal and legislative battles over abortion play out across the United States following the Supreme Court decision to overturn the federal protection for the right to the procedure in 2022. It also comes as misinformation about the safety of abortion, which has been shown to influence public perception and policy making, continues to spread (archived here and here). Findings from leading health organizations show Gruber's comments about the risks associated with abortion are inaccurate. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Gynecologic Practice says there is "no causal relationship between induced abortion and a subsequent increase in breast cancer risk" (archived here). Breast cancer risk According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), several factors (archived here) contribute to innate greater risk of breast cancer. They include age, inherited genetic mutations, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, breast tissue density and whether the person started menstruation prior to the age of 12. Other variables a person can impact, such as their activity level, weight and consumption of alcohol. Reproductive history also plays a role. The National Cancer Institute says on its website: "Women who have their first full-term pregnancy at an early age have a decreased risk of developing breast cancer later in life" (archived here). The number of births makes a difference, with more children linked to a lower risk (archived here). Breastfeeding for a year or more is also associated with decreased risk (archived here and here). Some studies in the mid-1990s suggested induced abortion was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (archived here). However, ACOG and the American Cancer Society say the studies had important design limitations. "Higher-quality studies have generally found no link between abortions and breast cancer risk," the American Cancer Society's website says (archived here). Jo Freudenheim, professor at the University at Buffalo School of Public Health, explained two kinds of studies commonly used to examine the relationship between abortion and breast cancer to AFP in a July 15 email (archived here). Case control studies, which compare women with a new cancer diagnosis to those with no cancer history, may suffer from "recall bias," she said. Those recently diagnosed "will be thinking about their health history in a different way" and may recall more events than healthy women. Cohort studies have participants fill out questionnaires about their reproductive histories and then follow them to see who gets breast cancer, eliminating this bias. But in cohort studies, Freudenheim said follow-ups are essential to producing reliable results. In both study designs, confounding factors such as age at first pregnancy must be considered to see if the association is truly related to abortion. A study published in 2020 analyzed the combined results of six cohort studies and eight case-control studies and concluded that abortion is not associated with breast cancer risk in women who have never given birth to a child (archived here). Over the past 15 years, medication abortions have increased steadily in the United States (archived here), drawing attention to the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol which are used in the procedure. But Katharine O'Connell White, chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Boston Medical Center (archived here), and A Mariquit Rosete Lu, an obstetrics and gynecology specialist (archived here), told AFP: "There is no evidence that either drug leads to a higher risk of breast cancer." "In fact, mifepristone's anti-progesterone effect has been explored as a potential therapy for patients with progesterone-sensitive breast cancer," they said in a July 24 email. A comprehensive review from the National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) also said abortions were not found to increase the risk of breast cancer (archived here). Maternal mortality In the video with Cameron, Gruber also asserts that having an abortion is far more dangerous that giving birth. Experts AFP talked to and the NASEM's 2018 report show that childbirth is more dangerous than elective abortion (archived here and here). The United States is one of the more dangerous advanced-economy countries to give birth, with Black Americans dying at a rate three times higher than white people (archived here). The World Health Organization defines a maternal death as "deaths from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management (excluding accidental or incidental causes) during pregnancy and childbirth or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy" (archived here). Following this definition, the CDC reported the 2022 maternal mortality rate was 22.3 deaths per 100,000 live births (archived here). By contrast, the mortality rate from legal, induced abortion for the same year was 0.8 deaths per 100,000 abortions (archived here). A separate long-term analysis of mortality rates from 1998 to 2005 concluded: "The risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than that with abortion" (archived here). This statistic is disputed by groups that oppose abortion, who argue death certificates fail to document if the procedure led to a death by suicide or alcohol abuse. But White and Lu pointed to a five-year longitudinal study which compared outcomes for women who had abortions to those denied the procedure. It found no significantly higher risk of suicidal ideation, mental health problems or substance abuse in the abortion group (archived here). ACOG has also raised concerns about restrictions on abortion, saying on its website that where the procedure is illegal or highly restricted, women often resort to unsafe means (archived here). "Today, approximately 21 million women around the world obtain unsafe, illegal abortions each year, and complications from these unsafe procedures account for approximately 13 percent of all maternal deaths, nearly 50,000 annually," the organization says. More of AFP's reporting on false and misleading claims about abortion is available here.
Local France
3 days ago
- Local France
Why has the UK banned imports of French and Italian cheeses?
Bad news for UK residents who like iconic French cheeses such as artisan-produced brie, roquefort and reblochon or Italian classics such as pecorino ... these will no longer be available after the UK banned their imports from France or Italy. However if you are in those countries - or any other EU country - you can enjoy them to your heart's content. So what's going on? The UK's agriculture ministry Defra says that all imports of cheeses made in France or Italy with unpasturised milk are now banned. This affects any cheese made with raw milk or unpasturised milk - including some of France's most famous cheeses such as Vacherin, Roquefort, Mimolette and Tomme. Brie made by small artisan producers is likely to be unpasturised, although factory-produced brie can be made with pasturised milk. Advertisement It affects fewer Italian cheeses as the big names such as Parmesan are made with pasturised milk, but artisan-produced mozzarella is often made with raw milk, as is pecorino. You can find a full list of the affected cheeses here . Any cheeses produced before May 23rd are exempt, if the importer can produce the necessary paperwork - meaning that shortages will become apparent gradually, as some aged cheeses will continue to be imported over the next few months. The rules mostly affect commercial imports, but theoretically also apply to holidaymakers wanting to bring back a wheel of lovely, stinky European cheese. All of the above cheeses remain on sale throughout the EU. So why the UK ban? It's due to an outbreak of a cattle disease with the imaginative name of Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) which, you will be surprised to hear, causes lumps on the skin of affected cattle. In France the disease is known as dermatose nodulaire contagieuse (DNC). It is spread by the bites of flies and mosquitoes. Italy confirmed its first case in Sardinia on June 21st, 2025, leading the UK to revoke Italy's LSD-free status and suspend unpasturised imports. France reported its first LSD case near Chambéry on June 29th. Quarantine zones are in place in the affected areas with a vaccination programme for the cattle, but cheese sales have not been suspended. The UK's import ban also affects the import of live cattle. Can Lumpy Skin Disease be spread by eating cheese? No, there is no risk to humans from eating cheese that has been produced by a cow suffering from LSD, and in fact humans cannot get LSD under any circumstances. The UK government says that it is acting to prevent the spread of the virus among British cattle - hence the ban on live cattle imports. It says that the virus can survive in raw milk, including cheese made with raw milk. So if a British cow ate a brie sandwich then it could get Lumpy Skin Disease. That sounds like a small risk? Frustrated cheese sellers in the UK say that the ban is disproportionate. Cheese-mongers told The Grocer magazine that the ban is "costly, illogical and deeply frustrating", saying there is no risk to people from these cheeses. Advertisement Shane Holland, a cheese retailer based in London, told UK newspaper The Independent : "The bigger question is, what is the ban for? "We completely understand restricting the movement of live cattle. LSD is an infectious disease from cattle to cattle. But if we're talking about from cattle to milk, there's no cattle-to-human transmission at all. Even if there was the tiniest risk, it's not being consumed by cattle anyway." A Defra spokesperson stood by the ban, saying: 'This government will do whatever it takes to protect British farmers and their herds from disease,' adding that most Italian cheeses, such as Parmesan, Mozzarella and Gorgonzola, should be unaffected as they are largely pasteurised. However the UK is not the only country to impose a ban - Canada has also banned imports of unpasturised cheese from France, Italy and Switzerland. Advertisement Is this why Eurostar is telling me I can't take a ham sandwich on my journey from Paris to London? No, that's a different issue, it's because of an outbreak of foot and mouth disease in continental Europe. Germany detected an outbreak in January but has since been declared FMD-free, however subsequent outbreaks in Hungary and Slovakia have persisted. In response, the UK recently announced that it has banned imports of meat or dairy products from European countries where the virus has been detected, as well as Austria due to the outbreak in neighbouring Hungary. However travellers are being advised that meat and dairy products from all EU countries are banned, which is why you may have received an email from Eurostar or ferry companies if you have recently travelled from France to the UK. Foot and mouth disease does not affect humans but is highly contagious among cattle. A major outbreak in the UK in 2001 led to the culling of more than six million animals and cost the economy billions, devastating the livestock industry and tourism.
France 24
3 days ago
- France 24
Hungry and exhausted, AFP journalists document Gaza war
Palestinian text, photo and video journalists working for the international news agency said desperate hunger and lack of clean water is making them ill and exhausted. Some have even had to cut back on their coverage of the war, now in its 22nd month, with one journalist saying "we have no energy left due to hunger". The United Nations in June condemned what it claimed was Israel's "weaponisation of food" in Gaza and called it a war crime, as aid agencies urge action and warnings about malnutrition multiply. Israel says humanitarian aid is being allowed into Gaza and accuses Hamas of exploiting civilian suffering, including by stealing food handouts to sell at inflated prices or shooting at those awaiting aid. Witnesses and Gaza's civil defence agency, however, have repeatedly accused Israeli forces of firing on aid seekers, with the UN saying the military had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food since late May. 'We have no energy' Bashar Taleb, 35, is one of four AFP photographers in Gaza who were shortlisted for the prestigious Pulitzer Prize earlier this year. He lives in the bombed-out ruins of his home in Jabalia al-Nazla, in northern Gaza. "I've had to stop working multiple times just to search for food for my family and loved ones," he said. "I feel for the first time utterly defeated emotionally. "I've tried so much, knocked on many doors to save my family from starvation, constant displacement and persistent fear but so far to no avail." Another Pulitzer nominee, Omar al-Qattaa, 35, is staying in the remains of his wife's family's home after his own apartment was destroyed. "I'm exhausted from carrying heavy cameras on my shoulders and walking long distances," he said. "We can't even reach coverage sites because we have no energy left due to hunger and lack of food." Qattaa relies on painkillers for a back complaint, but said basic medicines were not available in pharmacies, and the lack of vitamins and nutritious food have added to his difficulties. The constant headaches and dizziness he has suffered due to lack of food and water have also afflicted AFP contributor Khadr Al-Zanoun, 45, in Gaza City, who said he has even collapsed because of it. "Since the war began, I've lost about 30 kilos (66 pounds) and become skeletal compared to how I looked before the war," he said. "I used to finish news reports and stories quickly. Now I barely manage to complete one report per day due to extreme physical and mental fatigue and near-delirium." Worse, though, was the effect on his family, he said. "They're barely hanging on," he added. 'Hunger has shaken my resolve' Eyad Baba, another photojournalist, was displaced from his home in Rafah, in the south, to a tent in Deir el-Balah, in central Gaza, where the Israeli military this week began ground operations for the first time. But he could not bear life in the sprawling camp, so he instead rented an apartment at an inflated price to try to at least provide his family some comfort. Baba, 47, has worked non-stop for 14 months, away from his family and friends, documenting the bloody aftermath of bullets and bombs, and the grief that comes with it. Hardest to deal with, though, is the lack of food, he said. "I can no longer bear the hunger. Hunger has reached my children and has shaken my resolve," he added. "We've psychologically endured every kind of death during our press coverage. Fear and the sense of looming death accompany us wherever we work or live." Working as a journalist in Gaza is to work "under the barrel of a gun", he explained, but added: "The pain of hunger is sharper than the fear of bombing. "Hunger robs you of focus, of the ability to think amid the horrors of war." 'Living the catastrophe' The director of Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza, Mohammed Abu Salmiya, warned on Tuesday that Gaza was heading towards "alarming numbers of deaths" due to lack of food, revealing that 21 children had died from malnutrition and starvation in the last three days. AFP text journalist Ahlam Afana, 30, said an exhausting "cash crisis" -- from exorbitant bank charges and sky-high prices for what food is available -- was adding to the issue. Cash withdrawals carry fees of up to 45 percent, said Zanoun, with high prices for fuel -- where it is available -- making getting around by car impossible, even if the streets were not blocked by rubble. "Prices are outrageous," said Afana. "A kilo of flour sells for 100–150 shekels ($30-45), beyond our ability to buy even one kilo a day. "Rice is 100 shekels, sugar is over 300 shekels, pasta is 80 shekels, a litre of oil is 85–100 shekels, tomatoes 70–100 shekels. Even seasonal fruits now -- grapes, figs -- cost 100 shekels per kilo. "We can't afford them. I don't even remember how they taste." Afana said she keeps working from a worn-out tent in intense heat that can reach more than 30C, but going days without food and only some water makes it a struggle. "I move slowly, unlike before," she said. "The danger isn't just the bombing. Hunger is slowly killing our bodies and threatening our ability to carry on. "Now, I'm not just reporting the news. I'm living the catastrophe and documenting it at the same time." 'I prefer death over this life' Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said on July 8 that more than 200 journalists had been killed in Gaza since Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which sparked the war. Video journalist Yousef Hassouna, 47, said the loss of colleagues, friends and family had tested him as a human being "in every possible way". But despite "a heavy emptiness", he said he carries on. "Every frame I capture might be the last trace of a life buried beneath the earth," he added. "In this war, life as we know it has become impossible." Zuheir Abu Atileh, 60, worked at AFP's Gaza office, and shared the experience of his journalist colleagues, calling the situation "catastrophic". "I prefer death over this life," he said. "We have no strength left; we're exhausted and collapsing. Enough is enough."
