logo
Inside the death of Hudson's Bay. Why former senior employees believe leader Richard Baker should take the blame

Inside the death of Hudson's Bay. Why former senior employees believe leader Richard Baker should take the blame

When Hudson's Bay employees joined a company-wide Zoom meeting on March 8, 2021, they found their chairman, Richard Baker, wearing a camouflage T-shirt and seated in what appeared to be a boat cabin, accompanied by two tiny dogs.
The unmistakable theme from 'Game of Thrones' played through the speakers as Baker unmuted himself. 'We are at war,' employees recall him saying. 'And we are going to win. We will crush the competition.'
Baker was boasting about a deal he had just struck at Hudson's Bay's sister company, Saks Fifth Avenue. He had spun off
Saks.com
into a separate company and sold a stake in it for $500 million — a 'war chest,' he said at the meeting, to fuel his push for dominance in U.S. luxury retail.
Five months later, Baker, head of U.S. private equity firm NRDC Equity Partners, which bought Hudson's Bay in 2008, sought to replicate the move in Canada, separating the 'TheBay.com' from its brick-and-mortar operations and pouring millions of dollars into online expansion.
But this time, no investors were interested.
The Bay's big shift to e-commerce — which some say came at the expense of the struggling physical stores — became the 355-year-old company's final gamble. In March of this year, the retailer, which is older than Canada, filed for creditor protection to explore restructuring avenues. Three months later, it shut its doors for good.
Hudson's Bay completed the liquidation of its more than 80 stores and closed its doors for good on June 1, after failing to find restructuring solutions to save any part of its remaining business.
Many department store chains have disappeared from Canada before Hudson's Bay — Simpsons, Eaton's, Sears Canada and Nordstrom Canada — so it's hard not to see the end of the Hudson's Bay chain as confirmation of a broader truth: that multi-storey department stores are relics of a bygone era, doomed to fail in the age of digital retail.
Two company executives agree, telling the Star the COVID-19 pandemic was a death knell for the retailer and that Baker did all he could to keep the company afloat in a difficult market. The blame, they stress, shouldn't fall on him, as decisions were made collectively by management and the board of directors.
But many others aren't convinced. A dozen former high-level employees, who are among the 20 people the Star interviewed for this story, believe Baker is responsible for the Canadian retail giant's loss of brand identity and its ultimate decline.
(The Star is not naming some of the employees because they are bound by exit agreements or face potential retaliation.)
Dean Melville, a planning manager who worked for Hudson's Bay for 15 years, said the influence of U.S.-based leadership eroded the company's ability to fine-tune its merchandising and pricing strategy, leading to shrinking margins and a steady decline from the early successes of the 2010s.
'We had to make business decisions day in and day out,' he said. 'But (Baker) ultimately was the one controlling the money, controlling where the authority was.'
Dean Melville, a planning manager who worked for Hudson's Bay for 15 years, watched the historic department store shift throughout the 2010s from a hub of fashionable labels to being viewed as a mid-tier to clearance-level department store.
While acknowledging the pandemic's heavy toll on brick-and-mortar retail, some former employees argue that Baker's missteps in managing real estate and store operations sealed the company's fate.
They say the collapse was already in motion before the pandemic hit. Baker was too focused on expanding his retail empire outside of Canada, the company's resources were stretched too thin, its brand identity was eroding and its ability to keep pace with an evolving retail landscape was steadily weakening.
(Baker and his current team would not make themselves available to be interviewed for this story and did not respond to detailed questions sent by email.)
Now the true scope of the crisis has been revealed to Canadians. It's still hard to believe that a company so deeply tied to the country's founding — rooted in the fur trade, and later a pillar of modern consumer life — is gone, and that the man who steered it there is walking away, seemingly unscathed.
'Did the Bay stores lose their uniqueness? Yes. Did they stop servicing the customer effectively? Yes,' said Evelyn Reynolds, who served as the senior vice-president of Hudson's Bay between 2009 and 2018.
'But many of those things were self-inflicted. They were not just a function of outside forces.'
***
On the morning of March 10, 2025, thousands of Hudson's Bay employees across Canada, who would lose their jobs without severance pay in the following months, were summoned to a hastily arranged town hall. Three days earlier, they had learned — through news headlines — that the company had filed for creditor protection.
Liz Rodbell, the retailer's president and CEO, appeared on screen from Toronto, her voice trembling as she explained the upcoming legal proceedings, a process that ultimately failed to save any of its more than 80 stores, despite a last-minute search for buyers and investors. No questions were asked by the shocked employees and the meeting ended quietly and abruptly after just five minutes.
As sudden as the news was, there were many warning signs in the five years leading up to the Bay's demise.
In 2020, after reporting losses in 12 of its last 15 quarters, Baker delisted Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) from the Toronto Stock Exchange. At the time, HBC was the parent company to not only its namesake retailer, but also U.S. luxury brand Saks Fifth Avenue and its off-price cousin, Saks Off 5th.
Last December, as Baker acquired long-coveted American department store Neiman Marcus and consolidated his U.S. holdings under a new entity, Saks Global, Hudson's Bay was cut loose to operate independently with a balance sheet of its own.
The chairman assured employees that the split would make the Canadian business leaner and more appealing to investors. But three months later, the company came to court with a different message: It had just $3 million in cash and more than $1 billion in debt, citing difficulties in securing financing due in part to U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war.
One undisputed fact is that the pandemic, which hit just a week after the company was taken private, delivered a blow that would hobble it for years to come. Across the country, more than 80 Hudson's Bay stores — responsible for 80 per cent of the company's revenue (20 per cent came from online sales) — were brought to a standstill.
The COVID-19 pandemic hit Hudson's Bay just a week after the company was taken private and brought its brick-and-mortar stores to a standstill. When their doors reopened, the landscape had shifted and the stores had shortened hours and a customer base that had vanished from the heart of the city as people shifted to working from home.
When their doors reopened, the landscape had shifted and the stores had shortened hours, sealed fitting rooms and a customer base that had vanished from the heart of the city as people shifted to working from home.
But some high-level employees say it was the decisions Baker made next that brought the company to its knees.
According to court filings, in 2021 and 2022, the company poured $130 million into e-commerce infrastructure, logistics and marketing, and hired more than 500 employees. The centrepiece of that investment was Marketplace, a new digital platform modelled after Amazon, where third-party suppliers could sell merchandise directly to customers.
While scaling up e-commerce amid plummeting in-store sales was a natural move, some former executives told the Star that they believe Baker went too far, as money flowed almost entirely into the online business, leaving its physical stores behind.
'The corporate strategy was that we could become the Amazon of Canada. The only problem with that strategy is that there actually is an Amazon in Canada,' said Patrick Dickinson, former senior vice-president of marketing, who left the company in 2019. He added that the goal was unrealistic because a truly competitive digital marketplace required far more funding than the company had.
'The survivors (in retail) never stop realizing that while everyone's online, your store base can actually differentiate you. So you need to make that like a showcase,' he said.
In hindsight, some former executives say they believe the pivotal misstep was Baker's decision in 2021 to spin off Hudson's Bay's e-commerce division into a separate company from its physical stores. They said the split drove up infrastructure and labour costs by requiring two leadership teams and separate supplier contracts, which undermined economies of scale.
'That was a completely stupid strategy whose only motivation appears to have been to raise cash. Of course, it failed. Then he smashed the two back together,' said Mark Cohen, former CEO of Sears Canada.
Meanwhile, rather than focusing on improving in-store sales, former employees say the company invested significant labour and money into pilot ventures that never came to fruition: a six-month trial of a laundry pickup and delivery service in the GTA, as well as a product line called 'Essentials,' aimed at competing with Walmart and Loblaw in the household goods market.
Elliot Grundmanis, chief financial officer of Hudson's Bay from 2020 to 2022, has a different perspective on the decision to split the company. He told the Star the leadership team spun off the digital business because during the pandemic no global investor would invest in it while it was still tied to the physical business.
The strategy did bring capital to Saks businesses, but Hudson's Bay was 'a little late' to the game, he said, as valuations of publicly listed online retailers had already begun to decline.
'The structure was essentially recombined at the end of 2022, and any temporary disruption was well worth the risk we had to take at that time to try and help the business survive in what was a rapidly changing environment,' he said.
Despite major improvements to its e-commerce site, Hudson's Bay's online sales turned out to be less profitable than in-store sales and failed to offset a sharp drop in store traffic.
By 2023, corporate layoffs became routine, recurring every few months. A new ritual took shape: every week, senior executives and lawyers met with the company's chief financial officer to review the growing list of vendors owed payments that were months past due. Some had stopped shipping, others had filed lawsuits. These weekly meetings were convened to decide who to pay first.
In the summer of 2024, HBC made headlines on both sides of the border, but for strikingly different reasons.
South of the border, the company announced a blockbuster deal to acquire luxury retailer Neiman Marcus for more than $2.65 billion (U.S.). But back home in Canada, heat-stricken shoppers walked into their local Hudson's Bay store to find it just as stifling inside: elevators were out of service, air conditioning was broken, and staff were nowhere to be found.
One source, who has knowledge of the matter but is not authorized to speak publicly, said Saks extended loans to Hudson's Bay in Canada — $287 million in 2022 and another $140 million in 2024 — to help pay vendors and replenish inventory. In 2023, an additional $200 million was publicly injected by the company's landlord, Cadillac Fairview.
But several high-level employees told the Star they were baffled by where some outside funds — including more than $100 million from the 2024 sale of the Oakridge Centre lease in Vancouver — went, saying they saw no visible improvements in-store operations.
'We wouldn't be in this situation if there was an actual cash infusion of over $100 million late in the year. The speculation, but we're pretty good at this, is that this was used to close the Neiman Marcus deal,' said a former executive.
***
Born into a real estate dynasty, Baker reportedly studied cooking in Paris after graduating from Cornell University, before being steered by his father toward the family business, NRDC. It was there that he began forging lucrative deals, selling shopping centre properties to Walmart — an experience that may have revealed to him the immense value of the real estate underlying the retail sector.
In 2011, Baker demonstrated to the world exactly how he would unlock the latent value of Hudson's Bay when he sold off up to 220 Zellers leases to Target for a jaw-dropping $1.8 billion — $700 million more than the amount paid to acquire the whole department store just three years earlier.
He also freed up $650 million by selling HBC's Queen Street flagship store in Toronto to Cadillac Fairview and leasing it back in 2014. The year after, he placed 10 Hudson's Bay properties into a joint venture with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust — a deal that left the company paying higher rents to the newly formed entity, some executives told the Star.
Baker's ambitions went beyond Canada. After taking Hudson's Bay public, he bought Saks in 2013 for $2.9 billion (U.S.), less than what Saks's sprawling Manhattan flagship was later determined to be worth, and two years after that, he acquired Germany's Galeria Kaufhof and its real estate for €2.8 billion.
Being part of a crowded corporate family meant Hudson's Bay had to compete with its sibling brands for capital.
At the start of 2016, according to the Financial Post, HBC planned to allocate the majority of its $750- to $850-million capital investments budget to store renovations and new locations — including a major overhaul of the Saks Fifth Avenue flagship in New York, an expansion of Hudson's Bay stores in Europe, and the opening of dozens of new Saks stores. Just $60 million was set aside for building a new e-commerce distribution centre in Scarborough.
Richard Baker has embarked on a rapid string of acquisitions and real estate deals over the past 12 years, including the purchases of luxury retailer Saks, Germany's Galeria Kaufhof and U.S. department store Neiman Marcus.
Canadian retail expert Doug Stephens describes Baker not as a retailer, but as a real estate investor who 'simply stripped Hudson's Bay of its assets, made money on it, and took the oldest retailer in North America, completely ruined it, and walked away.'
Grundmanis, defending Baker, said the chairman 'did not receive or take any money out of the business, except as a public shareholder entitled to the same dividends as everyone else.' He added that Hudson's Bay received more than its 'fair share of capital' based on the real estate deals that were done and the needs of the business.
But Baker's retail ventures fared far less successfully compared to real estate deals.
Lord & Taylor, the iconic American department store he acquired in 2006, along with flash-sale site Gilt and its retail chains in Europe, reported prolonged declines in comparable sales, a key metric for store performance, before Gilt was sold in 2018 and the other retail chains in 2019.
HBC's Canadian business experienced a period of strong growth under the five-year leadership of retail veteran Bonnie Brooks as president after 2008. But by 2018, its performance had noticeably deteriorated.
Dickinson, a former executive who worked for the company for 13 years, said he believes Baker wanted to run a viable business, but was a victim of his early successes with Hudson's Bay, convinced he could easily replicate them elsewhere, without fully grasping that 'old houses' are costly to maintain.
'They ended up using their operational successes to fund corporate failures again and again and again,' Dickinson said, adding the budget for Canadian operations had shrunk so much over the years that it 'starved the business.'
Under Brooks's leadership, Reynolds said Hudson's Bay offered a broad merchandise assortment across entry-level to mid-range to premium price points, but subsequent leaders brought varying market perspectives, causing the retailer to swing between heavy reliance on discounting and a more structured pricing architecture.
(Hudson's Bay has gone through six presidents since Baker promoted Brooks to vice-chair in 2013. Brooks left the company in 2016.)
'If you asked me to sum it all up in three words. I'd say they lost their way,' Reynolds said. 'It confused the customer. It started to lose its identity.'
Stephens said the retailer failed to invest enough in developing new strategies, attracting younger customers, and enhancing the shopping experience — and its pivot to e-commerce after 2020 came too late.
Hudson's Bay, facing mounting financial pressure, shut down several stores in the wake of the pandemic, including its downtown Winnipeg location and the iconic Bloor and Yonge store in Toronto.
According to two sources bound by exit agreements and not authorized to speak publicly, the company's executive committee had, over the past few years, recommended several proposals to close between 25 and 40 stores, which they hoped would help strengthen the company's financial position in the wake of the pandemic.
But once the proposals reached the board of directors, Baker shot them down, even refusing to reduce the number of stores by simply letting leases expire. 'He's a real estate guy. The answer for him was never to close doors or give up real estate,' one source said.
Grundmanis disagrees and said Baker and the board 'would have gladly approved' any initiative to drive profitability, but the company analysis at the time showed there was only potential to close or lease out space in three to five Hudson's Bay stores without incurring significant rental and other costs.
A separate source said the board pursued another strategy instead: in December 2024, at the same time as the acquisition of Neiman Marcus, the credit lines for the U.S. and Canadian businesses were split with the goal of bringing in new financing to stabilize Hudson's Bay operations. But the plan ultimately failed as two groups of lenders who were ready to offer financing in December and January backed off after Trump's tariff threats.
Grundmanis said the pandemic, along with Canada's ever-changing responses to it, was the biggest contributor to the company's challenging financial situation. Some retailers were deemed 'essential services' and were allowed to remain open during the pandemic, but Hudson's Bay was not among them.
'Businesses do not fail or succeed because of one person,' he said. 'If anything, Richard probably managed to help keep the company going far longer than it would have if he was not helping to lead the business.'
***
A few days before Hudson's Bay was set to close its doors on June 1, Melville, the planning manager who worked for Hudson's Bay for 15 years, visited a store near his home in Kitchener-Waterloo one last time.
The first floor resembled a flea market. On one side, brand signs hung precariously from the walls, while menswear had been moved downstairs and strewn across racks; on the other, shoppers wheeled carts filled with store fixtures, scavenging through what remained.
Melville had spent most of his career at the Toronto flagship on Queen Street, where, in 2010, Hudson's Bay was still a destination for high-end fashion. Shoppers flocked to the store for its dazzling tapestry of brands, he said, many taking the escalator to the third floor's newly launched women's fashion hall, The Room, or to the fifth floor's West End Shop, an upscale boutique for menswear.
Spanning 21,500 square feet, The Room was marketed as a destination for style insiders and the city's fashion elite. Balmain, Victoria Beckham, Bruno Frisoni, Azzedine Alaïa — labels once reserved for the runways of Paris and London, now hung with quiet elegance in the heart of downtown Toronto.
That was a testament to Baker's commitment as the new owner: investing millions to support then-president Brooks in her vision to reposition the department store as a more upscale brand. Downtown flagships across the country underwent dramatic renovations, the fashion assortment was reimagined, and sales surged — enough to take Hudson's Bay public in 2012.
In 2012, Baker named Brooks president of both Lord & Taylor and Hudson's Bay. A year later, Rodbell, who was serving at the U.S. company at the time, took over the job.
This leadership reshuffle marked the beginning of an organizational integration between the two retailers, which operated in distinct markets. Operations across some key functions were merged, with some Canadian teams reporting directly to the leadership at Lord & Taylor — and vice versa.
Melville, who was serving as a divisional manager of Hudson's Bay at the time, recalled that in 2013, he travelled to Fifth Avenue in Manhattan every month to meet with his supervisor — the vice-president of luggage and kidswear at Lord & Taylor — who would often instruct him to 'do things their way.'
The U.S. business, which had a margin in the low 20s, compared to Hudson's Bay's margin in the high 30s to 40s, relied on discount-driven sales and invested heavily in inventory, he explained.
'They brought some of that business model thinking to us, which really started to drag down our regular-price sales and margins,' Melville said, adding that customers were gradually 'trained' to shop only during sales, while high-end fashion brands and luxury customers drifted away.
Melville said he also saw Hudson's Bay's former service model, where sales associates received brand training to provide personalized service to customers, disappear amid staff reductions during the integration.
In mid-2017, the operations of Hudson's Bay and Lord & Taylor were separated, but the damage had already been done. A year later, the Canadian company ended its streak of 31 consecutive quarters of same-store sales growth — and it never recovered.
The Christmas window displays at Hudson's Bay's Queen Street flagship store were a cherished part of many people's childhood memories. For Dean Melville, the department store's long-standing legacy — and a piece of Canada's national identity — is gone for good.
In Melville's view, and the view of many other Canadians, Hudson's Bay died, at least in part, because it was taken over by an American real estate tycoon who didn't understand Canadian customers.
In June of this year, Hudson's Bay sold all of its intellectual property rights to Canadian Tire for $30 million, preserving a faint hope that Canadians might still see products bearing the iconic multicoloured stripes on store shelves.
But for Melville, the department store's long-standing legacy — and a piece of Canada's national identity — is gone for good.
'There's nothing like it and never will be,' he said. 'And that's a big thing to lose.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Carney will huddle with premiers in Muskoka to talk trade, Donald Trump and crime
Mark Carney will huddle with premiers in Muskoka to talk trade, Donald Trump and crime

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Mark Carney will huddle with premiers in Muskoka to talk trade, Donald Trump and crime

A bucolic resort in Muskoka is the political centre of Canada this week. Canada's premiers are gathering in cottage country to meet with Indigenous leaders Monday afternoon and Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday morning before the official start of their Council of the Federation meeting later that day. In an unusual move, Premier Doug Ford, who is hosting the summit at Huntsville's Deerhurst Resort on Peninsula Lake, invited Carney to attend the provincial and territorial leaders' conference because of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war against Canada. 'It's never been a more important time to welcome my fellow premiers to Ontario to continue the work we've done over the past year to protect Canada and our economy,' Ford said Thursday in Toronto. Tariffs and treaty rights are on the agenda as the country's premiers arrive in Ontario's cottage country for a three-day meeting that comes at a pivotal time for both Canada-U.S. and domestic relations. (July 20, 2025) 'This meeting will be an opportunity to work together on how to respond to President Trump's latest threat and how we can unleash the full potential of Canada's economy,' added the Progressive Conservative premier, a close political ally of the Liberal prime minister . Carney was quick to accept Ford's invitation and emphasized he has other things to discuss with the premiers, including 'bail reform, particularly with respect to repeat offenders,' among other criminal justice matters. 'We have commitments on that. We're working with the provinces on those issues,' the prime minister said Wednesday in Hamilton. 'I'll be meeting with the premiers next week. I'm sure that's one of the elements that we will discuss, and you can expect legislation from this government in the fall,' he said. That's music to Ford's ears — for years he has been urging Ottawa to toughen up bail laws to prevent 'weak-kneed judges' from releasing recidivists. But the primary focus of the Muskoka meetings will be the economy — especially in light of Carney's admission last week that any future deal with Trump would likely mean tariffs on Canadian goods exported stateside. 'There's not a lot of evidence right now from the deals, agreements and negotiations with the Americans, for any country or any jurisdiction, to have a deal without tariffs,' the prime minister conceded last Tuesday. Monday's session with the premiers and Indigenous leaders is expected to be dominated by many First Nations' opposition to Ford's Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, and Carney's Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act. The federal and provincial laws, which are designed to speed up major infrastructure projects like pipelines and rail corridors as well as mines, have raised questions about traditional treaty rights and the environmental impact of fast-tracking development. Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak has warned that 'our rights cannot be implemented or respected without us, in substance and in process.' Still, Carney insisted at a Gatineau meeting Thursday with First Nations leaders — where fears about Bill C-5 were expressed — that 'in many respects, this is the first federal legislation to put Indigenous economic growth at its core.' Ford, meanwhile, is devoting some of his summer to allaying Indigenous communities' concerns over Bill 5, which he hopes will speed up development of the Ring of Fire mining project. But legal challenges against both bills are being launched by nine Ontario First Nations, arguing the laws are unconstitutional. They are seeking a court injunction that would prevent Ottawa and Queen's Park from moving so quickly. One aspect of Bill C-5 that is less contentious is the removal of most federal barriers to interprovincial trade. Because Trump's actions are forcing Canadian leaders to scramble to diversify trade, there has been a push to eliminate internal barriers that could cost the Canadian economy as much as $200 billion annually. Ontario has so far inked deals with all provinces except Quebec, British Columbia and Newfoundland and Labrador to curb hurdles to free trade within Canada. Sources, speaking confidentially in order to discuss internal deliberations, say an accord with B.C. will be signed in Huntsville, putting more pressure on Quebec's François Legault and Newfoundland and Labrador's John Hogan to reach agreements with Ford. B.C. New Democratic Premier David Eby told reporters Thursday in Victoria that his province will be 'seizing new opportunities' to reduce its reliance on trade with the U.S. Officials say Ford is also expected to sign memorandums of understanding with the territorial premiers of Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut. The three-day meeting is being held about 40 minutes drive from the premier's family cottage .

Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones
Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, has an NFL nemesis hell bent on keeping him from reclaiming the glory of the 1990s. That man is Jerry Jones, de facto general manager of the Dallas Cowboys. To be clear, Jones' talent evaluation and trust in his scouts remain top notch. The Cowboys continue to generate elite homegrown talent on a semi-regular basis. Draft-n-Play Jerry Jones? That guy is an asset. But once those guys get near the end of those rookie contracts, Contract Extension Jerry Jones comes out. And while Contract Extension Jerry is great for his stars' checking accounts, it's actively hindering the roster around them. None of that is new. Jones' propensity to drag his feet early in negotiations has often led to more expensive deals down the line for players Dallas cannot afford to see leave. What could have been a five year, $262.5 million extension for Dak Prescott in 2023 (using Justin Herbert's deal as a comparison) eventually became a four year, $240 million deal in 2024, paying him $5 million more annually than any other NFL player ($231 million of that is guaranteed). CeeDee Lamb was always set to reset the wide receiver market. Doing so at the eve of the 2024 season lined him up for $34 million per year instead of around $30 million had he signed the offseason prior ($100 million of that is guaranteed). That creates salary cap bottlenecks down the line for a team that's perpetually high on star power and often low on depth. Jones' hesitation has logic behind it; he's waiting to see if a young player's production wanes before making a massive commitment. At the same time, that keeps said young player on a less expensive salary, which allows some breathing room to pay off the other massive extensions looming around the corner. However, that strategy keeps costing him money while antagonizing the players on which he relies. And Monday's comments about Micah Parsons, whose upcoming extension gets pricier each month? Fairly antagonistic! "Even if" is a bold way to address your team's desire to keep a 26-year-old with 52.5 sacks and four Pro Bowl honors in four seasons as a pro. Yet, here is Jones, quietly negging a player who has only missed four games due to injury in his career to date (a fifth game, in Week 18 vs. the Eagles in 2021, was due to COVID-19). Jones also added 'I am not the least concerned about having any dangling participles out here on a contract,' which is a folksy, homespun way of suggesting that, yep, this approach will once again cost Dallas extra money as a luxury tax for an owner/manager who lives for the escalation of contract negotiations but still seems to lose the big ones more often than he wins. Parsons, by the way, took notice. How could he not? So why is Jones waiting? He offered a couple rationalizations. The first, naturally, was the fleeting nature of mortality and rising tide of reckless drivers. The second, more sensible option was that he'd been burned before and had some regrets. And Jerry Jones, because he is Jerry Jones and you do not have to speak diplomatically when you own a superyacht, named names beyond Prescott and his nine missed games in 2024. Trevon Diggs was an All-Pro his second season in the league and a Pro Bowler the third. He signed a five year, $97 million contract to become one of the league's five highest paid cornerbacks, then missed 15 games due to injury in 2023 and six games in 2024 while providing good-not-great coverage. Steele signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract in 2023 after ascending to a starting role at right tackle, which made him the ninth-highest paid offensive tackle in the NFL. He hasn't missed a game since then, but his play hasn't lived up to the salary even though he'll only be the league's 25th-highest paid tackle in 2025. Jones paid market value for a boom-or-bust cornerback and a rising young tackle. One of them was derailed by injury and the other has struggled, but there's room for both players to revert to form (Steele is the oldest of the two and only 28 years old). Jones isn't in the hope business, however, he's looking for results. And these results align more closely with his wait-and-see philosophy than the fact Lamb was an All-Pro for the third straight season last fall. Thus, the Cowboys will likely be stuck with the privilege of paying Parsons a record-setting amount in the late stages of the 2025 preseason. A deal to beat out the $41 million in annual salary to TJ Watt -- resetting the market last offseason probably would have clocked in closer to $36 million per year -- could leave the franchise committed to something like $137 million in annual average salary to three players. That's not unmanageable, but it's a problem. Dallas has been so strapped for cap space in recent years that its top free agent additions the last few seasons have been: All the while, players like Connor McGovern, Dalton Schultz, Dorance Armstrong, Tyler Biadasz, Jourdan Lewis and Demarcus Lawrence left for cash elsewhere. That's not why the Cowboys have one playoff win since 2019, but it certainly doesn't help. Monday's comments were a refreshing display of honesty. Not about Micah Parsons, of course, but about how Jones views his roster management. The sunk cost of paying a player who might get injured or fall off far outweighs the opportunity savings of paying young, proven players what they're worth before it gets damagingly expensive. Jones is content to lose leverage and give up more in guarantees than he would have years earlier if he can find data that rewards his wait-and-see approach. That's not anything we didn't already know, but it's something else to hear Jones go out and effectively admit it. It's an approach that keeps the Cowboys from turning its stars into a constellation. And while it means guys like Prescott, Lamb and, eventually, Parsons all get truly lucrative contracts down the line, it also means they won't have the support to maximize the talent for which Jones is paying so much.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store