logo
What would a Great Dismal Swamp National Heritage Area look like?

What would a Great Dismal Swamp National Heritage Area look like?

Yahoo31-03-2025
The Great Dismal Swamp is home to one of Virginia's highest concentrations of black bears, according to the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources (Photo courtesy of Rob Wood and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
The National Park Service is asking members of the public to share their thoughts about a potential National Heritage Area designation in the region of the Great Dismal Swamp, a massive swath of ancient, forested wetlands stretching from Southeastern Virginia to the uppermost parts of North Carolina.
National Heritage Areas are 'lived-in landscapes' that are 'representative of the national experience through the physical features that remain and the traditions that have evolved in them,' as defined by the Park Service.
The Great Dismal Swamp is an environmental and cultural treasure, home to dozens of species of animals and, at one time, groups of Native Americans and formerly enslaved people who used it as a pathway to freedom.
The important details of where the conceptual boundary of the Great Dismal Swamp's National Heritage Area would lie and who would manage any conservation, recreation and education opportunities remain unanswered questions at the moment.
Sometime in 2026, the Park Service plans to submit a feasibility study to Congress that will answer those questions. Congress will have the final say on whether the region is suited for the federal designation.
There are currently 62 designated National Heritage Areas in 36 states and territories. The unique federal designation does not result in any land transfers, local zoning changes or easements.
The entire state of Tennessee is a designated National Heritage Area, and the rights of landowners are not affected by the designation.
'A lot of people fear government overreach…' said John Warren, Communications Specialist at the National Park Service Northeast Region.
'There's no such federal footprint in a National Heritage Area. It is entirely something that the local community takes on and runs itself.'
Any federal funding for the proposed National Heritage Area would come by way of congressional appropriation.
'A lot of those National Heritage Areas may receive up to $1 million annually, but others get a lot less,' said Warren. National Heritage Areas must receive matching funds from non-federal sources as well.
The role of the National Park Service is to be a partner and advisor to the actual manager of the Heritage Area, called the 'local coordinating entity,' an organization within the community chosen to interpret the history and traditions of the area and manage the conservation, recreation and education goals laid out by the project.
During virtual meetings held last week, members of the public shared their ideas on the Great Dismal Swamp National Heritage Area's potential location, its coordinating entity, and the natural, cultural and historic resources the region has to offer.
The public was also asked if opportunities exist for improving the quality of those resources through conservation, recreation and education. Comments are encouraged to be submitted in writing online, by mail or over the phone until May 19.
The public comments are not meant to be a vote, said Warren, but 'a way to collect information.'
'The study has 10 criteria, and the answer to all of these has got to be 'yes' for us to be able to give a favorable conclusion that, yes, this qualifies as a National Heritage Area,' said Warren. 'So it's a high bar.'
Warren said that anecdotally, over the last ten years only about half of the National Heritage Areas that were applied for ended up receiving the designation from Congress.
As part of the study, the National Park Service staff has also spoken with potential state and local partners as well as possible coordinating entities. Chesapeake City Council has voiced interest in assuming the managing role, said Julie Bell, cultural resource project manager for the Park Service.
Nonprofits, universities, and state and local governments are some examples of coordinating entities that were chosen to manage other Heritage Areas around the nation. Any entity outside of the federal government is allowed to assume the role, including Indigenous tribes, said Bell.
The Great Dismal Swamp National Heritage Area will involve coordination across state lines since the Virginia-North Carolina border slices directly through the swamp.
In 2003, the Northern Neck National Heritage Area was established along with six others around the nation. The designation was Virginia's third National Heritage Area to date.
Two other possible National Heritage Areas have completed their feasibility studies and are currently awaiting a decision from Congress: the Finger Lakes Region in New York and the Kentucky Wildlands.
The National Park Service is developing themes that are present in the Great Dismal Swamp region to tell a nationally distinctive heritage story. One theme is 'a place of refuge' and another is 'a field of conflict.'
Based on artifacts found in the Great Dismal Swamp dating back over 5,000 years, the Nansemond, Meherrin, Yeopim and Lumbee people were likely stewards of the swamp long before European colonists arrived, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
After colonization, the role of the swamp for local communities changed. About 50,000 self-emancipated African Americans, called maroons, along with free Blacks, Indigenous people and Europeans lived in the swamp in search of refuge.
Some used it as a pause point on their journeys north, making the swamp an official water-based rest stop on the Underground Railroad, but others settled permanent communities there up until the end of the Civil War.
Today, the Great Dismal Swamp is protected by a 113,000 acre National Wildlife Refuge managed by the Fish and Wildlife Service. What is now a vast, uninhabited landscape is actually just a remnant of its former self.
The once enormous swamp covered over 1 million acres, roughly the size of Delaware, but was drained over the years, first by a young George Washington in 1763.
Washington and other investors initially aimed to create land in the swamp that could be sold for profit, then to dig a canal to transport goods across the swamp. Enslaved people were forced to provide the labor for these early economic ventures.
One of the most successful business opportunities in the swamp turned out to be logging. The now globally rare Atlantic white cedar was in high demand, and gaining access to the trees required digging ditches to drain the swamp. By the 1950s, the last of the virgin timber in the Great Dismal Swamp was gone, according to a National Park Service story map.
On George Washington's birthday in 1973, about 50,000 acres of swamp land was donated to the Nature Conservancy and then handed over to the Fish & Wildlife Service, thus creating the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge.
'We have discovered that swamps actually play a vital role in our environment and that they are necessary,' said Warren. 'You know, they're not just places that we want to avoid because they have a lot of mosquitos or something like that. They're places that are useful to the environment.'
The Fish and Wildlife Service says the swamp serves as a permanent and migratory home for roughly 50 species of mammals, 200 types of birds and 100 species of butterflies. The diverse ecosystem ranges from bald cypress to red maple and Virginia's last historic refuge of native Atlantic white cedar.
In addition to the habitat the swamp provides to wildlife, it also prevents floods and improves water quality in nearby communities with a combined population of nearly 1 million people, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service.
A 2017 project to re-moisten the peat soils of the swamp served to benefit the surrounding population, including in Suffolk, by restoring a more natural water regime in the area. The Fish and Wildlife Service and its partners installed adjustable dams in key places to regulate the amount of water leaving the swamp, improving the environment's ability to provide its once inherent benefits.
The re-moistened peat is now able to absorb stormwater more efficiently, acting like a sponge to reduce flooding during severe weather such as the storms and hurricanes that are common in the region. Healthy peat also stores more carbon, a valuable tool in combating global climate change.
'This is a region that has already changed a lot,' said Warren. Creating a National Heritage Area 'may have some influence on that, or it may not.' Those decisions would be left to the local community and the chosen coordinating entity.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act
Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a lower-court ruling in a redistricting dispute in North Dakota that would gut a landmark federal civil rights law for millions of people. The justices indicated in an unsigned order that they are likely to take up a federal appeals court ruling that would eliminate the most common path people and civil rights groups use to sue under a key provision of the 60-year-old Voting Rights Act. The case could be argued as early as 2026 and decided by next summer. Three conservative justices, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, would have rejected the appeal. The court also has a separate redistricting case over a second majority Black congressional district in Louisiana. The justices heard arguments in March, but took the rare step of calling for a new round of arguments in their term that begins in October. They have yet to spell out what issues they want discussed. In the North Dakota case, the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, with reservations 60 miles apart, argued that the state's 2021 legislative map violated the act by diluting their voting strength and ability to elect their own candidates. The case went to trial in 2023, and a federal judge later ordered the use of a map of the area, including the reservations that led to the election last year of three Native Americans, all Democrats, to the Republican-supermajority Legislature. But in a 2-1 ruling issued in May, a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that only the Justice Department can bring such lawsuits under the law's Section 2. The 8th Circuit also had ruled in an Arkansas case in 2023 that private individuals can't sue under the same provision. More than 90 percent of Section 2 cases have been brought through private enforcement, UCLA law professor Richard Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog. The 8th Circuit rulings conflict with decades of decisions by appellate courts that have affirmed the rights of private individuals to sue under Section 2. The Supreme Court often will step in when appeals courts around the country come to different decisions on the same legal issue. In a statement, Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians Chairman Jamie Azure said, 'We are relieved that Native voters in North Dakota retain the ability to protect ourselves from discrimination at the polls. Our fight for the rights of our citizens continues. The map enacted by the North Dakota legislature unlawfully dilutes the votes of Native voters, and it cannot be allowed to stand.' The 8th Circuit covers seven states: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. In the wake of the Arkansas decision, Minnesota and other states moved to shore up voting rights with state-level protections. ___ Dura reported from Bismarck, North Dakota. Solve the daily Crossword

Independents are increasingly souring on Trump, new poll finds
Independents are increasingly souring on Trump, new poll finds

Politico

time10 minutes ago

  • Politico

Independents are increasingly souring on Trump, new poll finds

The poll, which was conducted just days after Congress passed Trump's megabill, showed that 73 percent of independents disapprove of the president's handling of the federal budget. Sixty-five percent of all adults surveyed said they disapprove of how Trump is handling the budget, an increase from 52 percent who said the same in March of this year. The decline in support could be a warning sign for Republican leaders as they look to maintain their slim control of the House and Senate ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump struggled to garner more than 40 percent approval from independent voters on several issues central to his 2024 campaign. Though Trump made fortifying the economy a central pillar of his campaign, 68 percent of independents said they disapprove of how he is handling the issue. Overall, 61 percent of adults said they disapprove of how the president is handling the economy — a steady increase from the 54 percent who said the same in February, and roughly even with the 59 percent who said so in March. Independent voters also remain largely displeased with his handling of immigration, even as it remains a cornerstone of Trump's agenda — framed as essential to national security and economic stability. Only 30 percent of independents approve of Trump's handling of immigration in the Gallup poll. Sixty percent of all adults said they disapprove of his handling of the issue, also an increase from February when 51 percent said the same. Democrats in the poll broadly disapprove of Trump's handling on most major issues. Only 2 percent of Democrats approve of Trump's handling of the economy, and only 3 percent approve of his handling of the federal budget. Four percent approve of his handling of immigration. Republicans largely still approve of Trump's presidency, with 89 percent overall approving. Eighty-four percent approve of his handling of the economy, while 81 percent approve of Trump's handling of the federal budget. Eighty-eight percent of Republicans approve of how Trump is handling immigration. The poll was conducted by telephone from July 7-21, 2025 with a random sample of 1,002 adults. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. Subgroups have a larger margin of error.

More than 200 NASA employees sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: Here's what it said
More than 200 NASA employees sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: Here's what it said

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

More than 200 NASA employees sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: Here's what it said

More than 200 current and former NASA employees have signed an open letter known as the Voyager Declaration that is pushing back on "harmful" proposed cuts to the world's largest space agency. The letter, which was made public Monday, July 21, was released at a time that NASA faces a historically steep budget reduction and has grappled with widespread layoffs and resignations. President Donald Trump in May put forth a proposed budget for the next fiscal year that would slash $6 billion from NASA's budget – equivalent to nearly a 25% cut. At the same time, the U.S. space agency has found itself without a full-time administrator since Bill Nelson stepped down Jan. 20, the day of Trump's inauguration. Trump appointed Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy as NASA's interim administrator earlier in July. Here's what to know about the letter NASA workers signed, as well as the agency's response. NASA budget cuts: Here's a look at 6 space missions that could be axed under Trump's proposal Workers sign letter opposing NASA budget cuts: 'Catastrophic' The letter, addressed to Duffy, included 287 signatures from both public and anonymous current and former NASA employees. Released on the day after Moon Day – an unofficial celebration of the 56th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing – the letter comes at a turbulent moment for NASA. Facing the agency is a potentially looming budget cut from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion, which includes a substantial hit to a significant portion of the agency's science missions and activities. "The last six months have seen rapid and wasteful changes which have undermined our mission and caused catastrophic impacts on NASA's workforce," the letter argued, pointing to "arbitrary" funding cuts that undermine programs that Congress had elected to fund. Washington D.C.-based nonprofit Stand Up for Science collected signatures for the letter. "Dismantling this American institution is a travesty," Colette Delawalla, founder and executive director of Stand Up for Science, said in a statement. "No one voted to willfully give our global dominance in science to other nations in exchange for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy." What is the NASA letter opposing? The letter specifically opposes budget cuts and management decisions that Stand Up for Science claims "interfere with the agency's mission." That includes: Changes to NASA's Technical Authority, a process that is a part of the agency's system of checks and balances to provide independent oversight of programs and projects to ensure safety and mission success Canceling active science missions or missions still in development that have Congressional funding "Indiscriminate cuts" to NASA science and aeronautics research Termination of NASA contracts and grants for reasons unrelated to performance Staffing reductions that would "jeopardize NASA's core mission" Is NASA based in Florida? What is Kennedy Space Center? While NASA's official headquarters is in D.C., most of the agency's space program has operations in Florida's Cape Canaveral area. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has also been vocal about his desire for NASA to move its headquarters to the Sunshine State, specifically the Kennedy Space Center near Cape Canaveral. Located on the east coast of Florida on Merritt Island in Brevard County, the Kennedy Space Center is NASA's primary spaceport where a majority of the space agency's missions get off the ground. The center manages the launches of both crewed and uncrewed spaceflights to the International Space Station and partners with commercial companies like SpaceX, which conduct their own rocket launches at the site. Most of the launches take place from the historic Launch Complex 39A – the site of NASA's Apollo moon mission launches. How did NASA respond to Voyager Declaration? In a statement to FLORIDA TODAY, NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said the agency will never compromise on safety, and "any reductions – including our current voluntary reduction – will be designed to protect safety-critical roles." "We must revisit what's working and what's not so that we can inspire the American people again and win the space race," Stevens said. "Despite the claims posted on a website that advances radical, discriminatory DEI principles, the reality is that President Trump has proposed billions of dollars for NASA science, demonstrating an ongoing commitment to communicating our scientific achievements." What other space orgs are speaking out against Trump's NASA policy? Among the most vocal opponents to Trump's proposed budget cuts has been the Planetary Society, a nonprofit organization co-founded by Carl Sagan in 1980 whose chief executive is now Bill Nye. The organization has widely condemned the White House's proposed 47% cuts to NASA science activities under the budget proposal, which it views as "an extinction-level event" for many cornerstone missions. "It will damage the agency's highly skilled workforce, abandon national priorities, and gut STEM education and outreach," the Planetary Society said in a May 30 statement when Trump's full proposal was made public. Earlier in July, the organization shared an open letter signed by all seven living former heads of NASA's Science Mission Directorate. In the letter, the leaders warned that Trump's proposal would 'walk away from dozens of current, extraordinarily successful and productive science missions' and halt nearly all future investments in exploration and innovation. Congress advances bill to restore NASA funding Meanwhile in Congress, U.S. Senate and House members approved appropriations bills that would rebuff proposed cuts and maintain NASA's annual budget at $24.9 billion. The Planetary Society lauded Congress in a statement for resisting "unprecedented, unstrategic, and wasteful cuts" at NASA. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: NASA workers sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: 'Catastrophic' Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store