Chaos erupts after daughter of detained Long Island bagel boss breaks down at Nassau legislature meeting
The chaos broke out Tuesday during a heated legislative session after Fernanda Mejia, the daughter of detained Port Washington bagel shop manager Fernando Mejia, appeared in front of the legislature with her grandfather, who did not share his name.
'My name is Fernanda Mejia — my dad was taken by ICE,' she said before Majority Leader Howard Kopel cut her off with a sharp string of no's.
Advertisement
4 Fernanda Mejia, daughter of Fernando Mejia, speaks to Majority Leader Howard Kopel and the Nassau County Full Legislature to ask for her father's release on July 28, 2025.
Nassau County
Fernanda was speaking in place for another woman who signed up to approach the legislators — which Kopel said is against the rules and recommended she fill out a card and they would 'be happy' to hear her out.
But after their constituents in the audience started to protest and demand they hear Fernanda out, the majority leader gave in and allowed her and her grandfather to have their time to speak.
Advertisement
'My dad was taken a month ago from the parking lot of his job — they weren't even looking for him, they were looking for someone else — and I'm heartbroken,' she said as she started to break down in tears.
She said her father is her favorite person, and has been treated 'horribly' since being detained about a month ago. Fernanda said her father suffers from cirrhosis of the liver, and since being in custody has been denied medical care, slept on concrete, and went prolonged periods of time where he was not allowed to shower or brush his teeth.
4 Fernando Mejia (center) pictured with fellow staff in a photo posted to Instagram on May 28, 2024.
Instagram/@schmearbagelcafe
During her speech, a few legislators appeared to have looked away from Fernanda — which angered the crowd, prompting residents to stand up and start shouting at the lawmakers that they're 'heartless,' and to 'look her in the face.'
Advertisement
'Just understand something — an officer will be happy to help you out if you can't sit down and behave yourself,' Kopel said over the crowd of yelling residents, who eventually calmed down and let Fernanda and her grandfather finish their time.
But after ending their speech asking the county to end their partnership with ICE, the GOP majority seemed unmoved by the pair's talk.
4 Schmear Bagel & Cafe at 83 Main St., Port Washington, NY.
Instagram/@schmearbagelcafe
'Good luck to you, I wish you and your family good luck — I hope it works out. Alright, next,' Kopel simply replied.
Advertisement
The county has continuously stood by its partnership with ICE, and previously insisted that it isn't going anywhere, and that unless someone is a danger to society, they have nothing to worry about.
'There is no reason to be afraid because they're only going after criminals –- people who have committed rapes and burglaries,' Blakeman told The Post last month.
4 During her speech, a few legislators appeared to have looked away from Fernanda.
Nassau County
But Fernando, who has no criminal record, was detained by ICE on June 12 as he was arriving at Schmear Bagel & Café in Port Washington for work.
He emigrated to the US from El Salvador two decades ago, but overstayed his visa and missed an immigration hearing in 2005, and as a result, an order for his removal was issued and he was sent to a facility in Newark, New Jersey as part of President Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants in the US.
His case has sparked national attention — inducing protests, rallies, a GoFundMe that quickly raised over $30,000, and a letter from Long Island Rep. Tom Suozzi demanding his release.
Fernando was recently granted a temporary reprieve last week, with the courts ruling that he cannot be deported for at least a month in early July, and is currently awaiting a decision on his motion to reopen the case over his immigration status.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Afghan US army interpreter detained by ICE is accused of being a national security risk. His lawyer said ICE hasn't disclosed why.
'That circumvents all due process, all hearings, all opportunity to say 'Hey, this is a mistake,'' Keating said. Advertisement Zia's detainment is the latest case of an immigrant who was in the country legally being detained by ICE. In March, immigration agents surrounded Tufts PhD student Peterson filed a petition in the US District Court of Massachusetts to nullify the expedited removal order, as well as filed a claim for asylum on behalf of Zia. A judge ordered DHS on July 18 to notify the court at least 72 hours before Zia is transferred to a different facility or deported. Advertisement Peterson said the decision gives them 'breathing room' to work on his case. 'Although the government hasn't in all cases followed judicial orders in recent months, this is a much better and more secure position to be in than we were right after my client was apprehended,' she said. Zia worked as an interpreter for US troops from 2006 to 2007, according to court filings and a copy of his special immigrant visa application. He fled across the border into Pakistan when the Taliban In a letter of recommendation for Zia's visa application, a sergeant who directly supervised him said Zia was instrumental to the success of the unit's mission and 'presents no danger' to the US. 'I would invite him into my own home with my children and not be worried anything would happen,' the sergeant wrote. 'I trust in him completely.' Zia was on track for permanent residency when he was detained by ICE for unclear reasons. 'Everything is completely legal,' Peterson said. Keating considers the army interpreter's arrest an attempt by the federal government to 'This is about the Trump administration and ICE finding one more way to push the numbers to 3,000 [arrests] a day,' the congressman said. A senior Department of Homeland Security official said in an email to the Globe that Zia was 'paroled by the Biden administration.' Advertisement 'He is currently under investigation for a serious criminal allegation,' the official wrote. 'All of his claims will be heard by a judge. Any Afghan who fears persecution is able to request relief.' An attorney for ICE officials wrote in a response to Zia's petition that ICE terminated his parole after the FBI indicated he is 'a risk to the national security of the United States' and lacks 'valid entry documents.' But his attorney said she has received no formal communication from the Department of Homeland Security about an investigation. 'It was only after media reached out to ICE or to DHS that we heard anything about that at all,' Peterson said. 'As his attorney, I don't believe there's anything to this.' She noted that other Afghan clients of hers have been called for formal interviews with the Federal Bureau of Investigation or received knocks on their doors from agents, who ask them a few questions before leaving. Zia received no such request, she said. Peterson is now crossing her fingers for an interview with an immigration officer, where Zia can prove he has reason to fear persecution if he is deported. Shawn VanDiver, the founder and president of AfghanEvac, an advocacy organization for Afghans contracted by the US military, said Zia is one of his 'priority cases' among 'well over 100″ instances of Afghans arrested by ICE. 'He is yet another person who followed all of the rules,' said VanDiver, who served in Iraq in the US Navy. He added that he wants to show Afghan allies that veterans have their backs. He has signed up more than 110 people who will be trained in the next week on how to support Afghan immigrants at their court appointments, including wearing veteran gear to sit in the courtrooms. To VanDiver, it's the least Americans can do. Advertisement 'We told them they can be Americans,' he said. 'We're making it very hard for them.' Jade Lozada can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas' proposed congressional map dismantles districts flagged by DOJ
In early July, as President Donald Trump was pushing Texas to redraw its congressional map to better favor Republicans, the Department of Justice sent state leaders a letter. Four of Texas' congressional districts were unconstitutional, the department warned. Three, the 9th, 18th and 33rd, were unconstitutional 'coalition districts,' where Black and Hispanic voters combine to form a majority. The 29th, while majority Hispanic, was also unconstitutional, the letter said, because it was created by its two neighbors being coalition districts. 'It is well-established that so-called 'coalition districts' run afoul of the Voting Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment,' assistant attorney general Harmeet Dhillon wrote, threatening legal action if Texas didn't bring the districts into compliance. On Wednesday, Texas House Republicans released their first draft of a redrawn map designed to give the GOP five new seats in next year's midterms. As for the four districts that troubled Dhillon? In the Houston area, the 9th and the 18th districts, where no one race currently constitutes a majority of eligible voters, would be redrawn as just over half Hispanic and half Black, respectively. But as a result, the nearby 29th District — a fixture of east Houston's Latino community — would lose its Hispanic majority, becoming 43% Hispanic, 33% Black and 18% white. The 33rd District in North Texas, although entirely redrawn, would still have no single racial or ethnic group that constitutes a majority. Texas has long maintained that it drew these maps without an eye toward race. But tinkering with the lines now that these racial concerns have been raised risks triggering a Voting Rights Act complaint, legal experts said. States generally cannot redraw districts based on race without a compelling argument that it's necessary to protect voters' ability to elect their candidates of choice, said Justin Levitt, a redistricting expert at Loyola Law School. 'It sure seems like they have actually done what the DOJ, without any basis, accused them of,' Levitt said, noting that he had not done sufficient analysis to say for sure. Legal experts say the DOJ's interpretation of the law around coalition districts, and thus its legal threats to Texas, are based on faulty logic that could be backing the state into a discrimination lawsuit. 'Nothing in this decision suggests, much less holds, that the VRA prohibits the very existence of coalition districts,' Ellen Katz, a redistricting expert at the University of Michigan Law School, told the House redistricting committee at its first hearing last week. 'There are hundreds of these districts nationwide in which jurisdictions relying on traditional principles create these districts.' Coalition districts Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 says states cannot engage in election or voting practices that dilute the electoral power of voters of color, including by packing them into a single district or diffusing them throughout multiple. For decades, courts held that states can satisfy the requirements of Section 2 by creating districts where multiple politically cohesive racial voting groups constitute a majority. Currently, Texas has nine districts where no one racial or ethnic group has a majority; in eight of them, Black, Hispanic and Asian voters combined create a majority. In 2024, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears Texas-based cases, reversed a prior ruling and said coalitions of different racial or ethnic groups within one district cannot claim their rights have been violated under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Citing this ruling, Dhillon told Texas that its coalition districts were 'nothing more than vestiges of an unconstitutionally racially based gerrymandering past, which must be abandoned, and must now be corrected by Texas.' But this reflects a misunderstanding of this case, legal experts say. Under this ruling, the Voting Rights Act can't require states to create coalition districts, but that doesn't mean coalition districts are inherently unconstitutional. 'All it says is that you don't have the affirmative obligation to purposely create [a coalition district] at the outset,' said Mark Gaber, a lawyer with the Campaign Legal Center who is representing a group of plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit against the current maps. 'It certainly doesn't say, go through the map and eliminate all of the ones you drew.' Texas leaders have contradicted themselves and each other on the question of whether the state has coalition districts and what should be done about them. Gov. Greg Abbott, days after receiving Dhillon's letter, included redistricting on his agenda for the Legislature's special session, citing 'constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice.' He later told Dallas' Fox 4 News that redistricting was necessary because of the 5th Circuit's ruling. 'We want to make sure that we have maps that don't impose coalition districts while at the very same time ensuring that we will maximize the ability of Texans to be able to vote for the candidate of their choice,' he said. At a House committee hearing Friday, GOP Rep. David Spiller of Jacksboro asked Rep. Todd Hunter, who carried the 2021 maps in the lower chamber, whether Texas currently has coalition districts. Hunter said 'the law was different then.' 'You had coalition districts being interpreted differently,' he said. 'Today, you have a 2024 5th Circuit case absolutely changing the law.' But in court, Texas has long argued it has not drawn coalition districts to address racial disparities, because it draws 'race blind' maps. Attorney General Ken Paxton doubled down on this argument in response to the Dhillon letter. 'The Texas Legislature has led the Nation in rejecting race-based decision-making in its redistricting process — it has drawn its current maps in conformance with traditional, non-racial redistricting criteria to ensure Texas continues to adopt policies that will truly Make America Great Again,' Paxton wrote. At the request of Democrats, the House and Senate redistricting committees have invited Dhillon to testify on the letter and her allegations against Texas, but neither she nor any representative from the DOJ has responded to the request. The Senate panel this week voted not to subpoena her. What happened to the Houston DOJ districts Three of the districts Dhillon cited in her letter are neighbors in the Houston area. All three would be radically redrawn by the House's proposed map. The 9th Congressional District is a multiracial district made up of 45% Black voters, 25% Hispanic voters, 18% white voters and 9% Asian voters. The district, which covers parts of southwest Houston and outlying suburbs, voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 by 44 points, and has reliably reelected Democratic Rep. Al Green since 2004. Under the House's proposed map, the 9th District has been redrawn around an entirely new part of Houston, retaining just 2% of Green's current district and scooping up conservative swaths of east Harris County. The Hispanic population would climb to just over 50% and the white population would almost double to 34%. Black voters would drop to 12% and Asian voters to 2%. In 2024, this new district would have voted for Trump by 15 points. Green, who is essentially drawn out of his district, condemned the proposal as racist, saying 'the DOJ demanded that the race card be played, and the governor dealt the people of Texas a racist hand.' Republicans pointed to the changing preferences of Latino voters, who swung sharply for Trump and other GOP candidates in 2024, to defend these new lines. 'Each of these newly-drawn districts now trend Republican in political performance,' Hunter said. 'it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Some of Green's existing district has been pushed into the newly drawn 18th Congressional District. While this was previously a seat with no single racial majority, its electorate would become 50.8% Black, while cutting the Hispanic and white populations. It would also tilt even further to the left; Harris carried the district by 40 percentage points in 2024 and would have won it by a 54-point spread under the new lines. Next door, Rep. Sylvia Garcia's 29th Congressional District would also be reconfigured, with Hispanic residents making up 43% of its new eligible voting population — down 20 percentage points from the current makeup. The district's Black and white populations would increase to create a district without a single racial group dominating. It would become more strongly Democratic. In challenging Texas' maps, plaintiffs have contended that Houston's population justifies two majority Hispanic districts. Instead, the one strong majority Hispanic district has been eliminated, and replaced with a district that is almost exactly half Hispanic, alongside one that is almost exactly half Black. '50.5% is unlikely to perform for Latino preferred candidates, or Black preferred candidates,' Gaber said. 'And they know that. It's a mirage.' What happened to the North Texas DOJ district In her letter, Dhillon also said the 33rd Congressional District ran afoul of the Constitution through its coalition status. The district is currently anchored in Fort Worth, with an electorate that is 44% Hispanic, 25% Black, 23% white and 6% Asian. The district went for Harris by 34 percentage points and has consistently reelected Rep. Marc Veasey, a Black Democrat. A decade ago, Texas, and the federal courts, asserted that the 33rd was not a coalition district. 'District 33 is not a 'minority coalition opportunity district' in which two different minority groups 'band together' to form an electoral majority,' the state and plaintiffs said in a joint advisory to the court. A district court judge agreed, saying it was 'not intentionally drawn as a minority coalition district.' The revised 33rd Congressional District maintains about a third of Veasey's old district, moving out of his Fort Worth base. The proposed new lines would reduce the Hispanic and Black population and increase the white population, while maintaining about the same Democratic lean. Just like in the current map, the proposed 33rd district does not have a single racial group that dominates. Legal experts say that is not inherently a problem, despite what the DOJ letter alleged, as long as voters of color have sufficient power to elect their candidate of choice. At a House committee hearing last week, Nina Perales, the vice president of litigation at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, one of the groups suing over Texas' current maps, testified that the Dallas-Fort Worth area, like Houston, should have an additional Hispanic-majority district on top of Veasey's Hispanic-plurality seat. 'In light of the growth of the population over the past two decades, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act does require the creation of additional districts,' Perales said. 'If the committee and the legislature decides to take up redistricting, it is certainly true that you cannot subtract from the current level of representation that we have.' Few districts in the Dallas-Fort Worth area went without major changes in the new draft map. In the reshaped downtown Dallas district of Rep. Jasmine Crockett, 50.2% of the voting population would be Black, not unlike the two new Houston districts to inch just past the majority threshold. If Hispanic or Black voters were electing their candidate of choice, there is no legal reason to move more voters of one group into the district to hit a perfunctory benchmark of 50%, Levitt said. 'It tells me you're trying really hard to hit a particular target, such that the target itself was the predominant reason for moving people in or out of the district,' Levitt said. 'That's exactly what the courts have said you can't do.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
'WHAT THE HELL IS THAT': Bill Melugin Reacts to Activist Judge Ruling to Block Trump Immigration Order
Bill Melugin, an Los Angeles-based correspondent for FOX News Channel, joined The Guy Benson Show today to break down the latest on immigration enforcement, including how Democrats continue to undermine Trump's ICE policies. Melugin detailed the staggering lack of attention from the left on violent crimes committed by criminal illegal immigrants, as many US congressman on the left continue to fight for alleged criminals like Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Bill also addressed activist judges blocking the administration's efforts to end temporary protections, and he also highlighted the reckless and partisan push from Democrats to ban ICE agents from wearing masks. Listen to the full interview below! Listen to the full interview below: Listen to the full podcast below:
