2025 local elections: Focus on Brackley
Like its neighbour North Northamptonshire, the council was created in 2021 following a local government reorganisation, replacing the old county council and and several district councils.
The historic market town of Brackley sits in the south of the county on the borders of both Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire.
It is 22 miles (35km) south-west of Northampton, where West Northamptonshire Council is based.
Voters will decide who fills the 76 seats on the authority, currently run by the Conservatives, including three councillors for Brackley.
The town currently has two Conservatives and one Labour councillor.
What issues are important to people living here?
Robert Nixon, 26, only moved to the town in the last year. He lives in a brand new home, but for the last eight months has been unable to get fixed-line broadband installed.
Mr Nixon, a teacher, says he has been quoted an estimated £100,000.
"It is an essential service that my home should have been connected to from day one," he says.
It is not the only connection Mr Nixon feels the town lacks.
"There is no bank in Brackley and nowhere to access council services in person without going to Towcester," he says.
Mr Nixon says he will be voting in the local elections but has yet to decide who for.
Kathryn Walker, 48, lives with her family in the village of King's Sutton and says the main issue for her is "accessibility".
She does not drive and says she can only get to Brackley if her husband drives, or by taxi.
"Our medical centre is in Brackley. I've got two young children. There used to be a bus route but they took it out quite a few years ago," she says.
Ms Walker's daughter has special educational needs.
"All the services that are offered by West Northamptonshire Council we can't easily access. We're just stuck, in a way. It makes you feel quite isolated," she says.
"We're paying our taxes towards Northamptonshire, but we can't access those services. There's just a real lack of provision in terms of transport."
James Newman, 44, runs Jem Stationers, just off the town's historic market square.
He took over the business from his father, who ran it from 1998.
For Mr Newman, the big issue is attracting people into the town.
"Footfall is down the past year and when customers come in, they apologise that they haven't been in as regularly because there's not as much to draw people into town," he says.
"Since the banks have closed in the town, people go to Banbury or Northampton.
"Getting a bank hub would help but [so would] finding the owners of the empty properties and attracting new businesses to make people want to come in."
Jenny Rose, 38, lives in the town with her husband and three children and says most of her family live nearby.
She grew up in Brackley before moving away and returning recently.
The town, she says, has changed a lot. "It felt like you walked down the street and knew everyone but it doesn't feel like that now," she says.
Her main concern, she says, is the town's expansion, with many new houses but a lack of supporting infrastructure.
Southfield Primary Academy in the town shut last July because there was not enough demand for places.
"Other schools in the area are going to be getting temporary classrooms because there aren't enough [school] places now, she says.
Local elections 2025: Who is standing in my area?
Who can vote in the May local elections?
Your Voice, Your Vote: Tell us the election issues that matter to you
Josh Beckett, 34, lives in Brackley and works in plastic injection moulding in nearby Banbury.
For him, the attitude to young people and the lack of facilities for them in the town is an issue.
But he says the skate park that opened last year is a good thing, and something that he and his friends pushed for when they were younger.
"We used to have a couple of youth clubs but they went and we need things for younger people," he says.
He says he will vote but has not decided which way.
Neil Bowmar-Scothern, 78, says things have changed a lot since he returned to live in the town in 2022.
"Brackley is like a lot of small market towns. Having grown exponentially, some of the facilities have expanded with it," he says.
The main issue he would like addressed is the poor state of roads and pavements.
"My little cul-de-sac where I live is poor. The road's got a very large rough bit in the middle, and the pavement's now got a lump in it from a tree root, and I tripped on it."
He says he has received his poll card and is likely to vote, but is not totally sure.
"Undecided, that's me," he says.
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
A guide to Northamptonshire's local elections 2025
Returning officer urges people to join council
West Northamptonshire Council
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: Top conservative leaders take the stage at Florida Freedom Forum
The Republican Party of Florida is hosting the annual event in Orlando, bringing together conservatives to outline their agenda and celebrate the state's conservative movement.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Blue-collar revenge: The things AI can't do are making a comeback
AI is supposed to displace millions of workers in the coming years — but when your toilet won't flush at 2 am, you're not going to call ChatGPT. Why it matters: The reshaping of the American economy promises to offer a kind of revenge for the blue-collar laborer, as white-collar workers become largely dispensable, but the need for skilled trades only grows. The big picture: Companies are already boasting of saving hundreds of millions of dollars a year by using AI instead of humans. The stock market rewards are too enticing for the C-suite to ignore. But ask those same executives who's going to run the wiring for their data centers, or who's putting the roof on the building, and just how well those skilled technicians are getting paid. It's become a key Trump administration economic talking point: Blue-collar wages are rising faster now than at the start of any other administration going back to Nixon. Driving the news: A recent Microsoft paper analyzing the most "AI-proof" jobs generated a list of the work most and least vulnerable to the rise of the LLM. The 40 most-vulnerable jobs (translators, historians, sales reps, etc), basically all office work, employ about 11 million people. The 40 least-vulnerable jobs (dredge operators, roofers, etc.), just about all manual labor, employ around 5.5 million. All those extra folks have to go somewhere. What they're saying: "We've been telling kids for 15 years to code. 'Learn to code!' we said. Yeah, well, AI's coming for the coders. They're not coming for the welders. They're not coming for the plumbers. They're not coming for the steamfitters or the pipe fitters or the HVACs. They're not coming for the electricians," Mike Rowe, the TV host and skilled-trades philanthropist, said at Sen. Dave McCormick's (R-Pa.) AI summit last month. "There is a clear and present freak-out going on right now," Rowe said, as everyone from politicians to CEOs recognizes just how bad they need tradespeople to keep the economy running. Yes, but: While the AI boom will create lots of jobs for skilled trades, eventually there'll be less demand to build more data centers, which may in turns sap demand for those tradespeople too. The intrigue: There's already a labor shortage in many of these blue-collar professions, one that AI will, ironically, only make worse (think the electricians for the data centers, for example). Factories alone are short about 450,000 people a month, per the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). "We're really talking about high-tech, 21st Century, rewarding, well-paying jobs," Jay Timmons, the CEO of the NAM, tells Axios. "Manufacturers are really embracing what's coming, and they accept the responsibility." Training is the answer, but that will require a large-scale, national effort —not just for up-and-coming students, but for mid-career folks forced into a pivot. "Everybody needs these roles, they're high-security roles," says Carolyn Lee, president of the NAM-affiliated Manufacturing Institute. She points, for example, to a program already in 16 states to train maintenance technicians to keep factories running — precisely the kind of job people like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have said are the future of the workforce. Students in an early cohort of that program, on average, were earning $95,000 a year within five years of graduating. One of the challenges, Timmons notes, is selling that to people who may not understand how lucrative these careers can be: "You have an economy-wide perception problem."


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
MIKE DAVIS: Confirmation of Emil Bove a triumph of new over old
The Senate's confirmation this week of President Trump's pick, Emil Bove, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with a razor-thin 50–49 vote was a huge win for conservatives, despite the cheap shots from Democrats and nominal Republican senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Bove isn't just qualified, he's exceptional. He clerked for top judges and made his name as a sharp, tough prosecutor in New York. Even the left-leaning American Bar Association gave him their highest rating: "Well Qualified." That's a big deal coming from an organization that rarely plays fair with conservative nominees. So why all the pushback? Simple. Bove stood up when it mattered. When President Trump was under constant legal attack, Bove was one of the few who fought back. He played a key role in keeping the radical left from throwing Trump in prison on bogus charges. That alone made him a target for Trump-haters across the spectrum: Democrats, Never Trumpers, and the establishment legal elite. As principal associate deputy attorney general, Bove also helped stop the politically motivated prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams. And he did it by standing up to out-of-control federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, the ones who like to pretend they run their own "sovereign district" separate from the rest of the country. Bove told them to follow orders or leave. They left. That's leadership. Some in the conservative legal world weren't thrilled with Bove's confirmation to a lifetime term, either. The Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece worrying that Bove's confirmation might make some Republican-appointed judges refuse to retire. Here's the truth: Those judges had their chance to retire during Trump's first term and didn't. That's on them, not Bove. Others breathlessly claimed Bove's confirmation marked the end of the conservative legal movement. That's nonsense. If Kamala Harris had won wthe presidency and stacked the courts with left-wing radicals, the damage would've been catastrophic. Instead, President Trump is putting solid, constitutionalist judges on the bench, judges like Emil Bove. Of course, the opposition resorted to the same tired smear tactics they always do. So-called "whistleblowers" came forward with flimsy claims. One former DOJ lawyer, Erez Reuveni, accused Bove of telling officials to ignore court orders, then turned around and signed legal documents confirming the orders were followed. On top of that, Reuveni undercut the Trump administration's immigration cases and violated attorney-client privilege. He was fired, and rightfully so. This is who the anti-Bove crowd chose as their star witness. Two more "whistleblowers" popped up just before the final vote — classic last-minute character assassination. One had no firsthand knowledge. The other's allegations were never made public by Senate Democrats. Sound familiar? It should. It's the same playbook they used against Justice Kavanaugh. Remember the ridiculous accusations, including the one about a gang-rape boat? All lies. All desperate. All failed. The Article III Project proudly fought for Bove's confirmation. This wasn't just about one seat. This was about pushing back against the old guard — the milquetoast Republicans and the liberal machine — and ushering in a new generation of bold, fearless constitutionalists. Tuesday's vote showed the old tricks don't work anymore. The left couldn't smear their way to a win. The establishment couldn't stall this one. Trump's nominee made it through. They'll keep trying to derail the president's agenda, especially when it comes to the courts. But we'll keep fighting. Because what's at stake isn't just the next judge. It's the future of the Constitution, the rule of law, and the rights of the American people. The old guard lost. America won. And this is only the beginning. Mike Davis is the founder and president of the Article III Project.