Now, TCP approves conversion of 1L sqm land under Sec 39A
Panaji:
The Town and Country Planning (TCP) department has approved the conversion of just over 1 lakh sqm of land that was earlier classified as orchard and natural cover.
The TCP board cleared the five applications for land conversion under Section 39A of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act after 'due consideration of the suggestions' received during a 30-day window, said Vertika Dagur, TCP's chief town planner (planning).
Dagur said the alteration and conversion of the five plots in the Regional Plan, 2021, will be subject to the outcome of the writ petitions pending before the high court.
The PIL, filed by Goa Foundation, challenges the provisions of Section 39A, alleging that they allow arbitrary and ad hoc conversions of privately owned plots within the Regional Plan and notified outline development plans, which could lead to unplanned and undesirable development in Goa.
Of the 1 lakh sqm that was put up for conversion, nearly 69,129sqm falls in Pernem's Parcem village. The entire tranche of land was converted for residential housing.
The TCP department said that it examined the five proposals along with scrutiny reports before placing the applications before the TCP board for its decision.
Dagur said govt has also approved the change of zone for the five plots.
'Therefore, in view of the recommendation of the Goa TCP board being approved by govt and in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 39A of the Goa TCP Act, the Regional Plan and the outline development plan is hereby altered and modified as specified,' Dagur said.
Section 39 of the TCP Act garnered attention after the HC read down Section 17(2) of the Goa Town and Country Planning (TCP) Act, which the department was using to facilitate land conversion in the Regional Plan and outline development plans.
The high court had observed that 'plot-by-plot conversion' under Section 17(2) 'virtually has the effect of mutilating the Regional Plan' and thus the scope of the law had to be narrowed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Trump plans to rescind scientific finding that allows US fund fight against climate change threats: Report
The Trump administration is preparing to eliminate the legal and scientific cornerstone of the federal government's climate change policy. A draft Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal, not yet public, would rescind the 2009 'endangerment finding' that identified greenhouse gas emissions as a threat to human health and welfare. Legal foundation of climate policy targeted As reported by The New York Times, two individuals familiar with the draft explained that the EPA intends to roll back the finding without directly challenging the scientific consensus that emissions from fossil fuels contribute to global warming. Instead, the administration reportedly plans to argue that the EPA exceeded its legal authority when it issued a sweeping declaration under the Clean Air Act. The endangerment finding, developed during the Obama administration in response to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling, provided the legal basis for federal rules limiting emissions from vehicles, power plants and industrial sources. If repealed, the decision would not only nullify existing environmental protections but also prevent future administrations from reinstating similar measures without starting over legally and scientifically. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tailpipe emission rules also in crosshairs The draft rule also includes a proposal to revoke federal limits on vehicle emissions that were designed to speed up the transition to electric cars. The transportation sector is currently the largest contributor of greenhouse gas emissions in the US. The EPA is expected to argue that such regulations, based on the endangerment finding, cause harm to consumers by limiting vehicle choice and increasing prices rather than improving public health. Reports described the EPA's framing as an economic one—suggesting that federal efforts to reduce carbon emissions come at too great a financial cost. Administrator Lee Zeldin, in earlier remarks reported by The Washington Post, emphasised the need to balance environmental goals with energy security and economic freedom, framing the review of the endangerment finding as part of the administration's broader deregulatory agenda. Environmental and legal experts cited by both newspapers have expressed deep concern over the proposed rollback. The New York Times noted that critics see this move as a direct challenge to the Supreme Court's Massachusetts vs EPA decision, which concluded that greenhouse gases are pollutants that must be regulated under the Clean Air Act. Legal analysts told The Washington Post that any attempt to withdraw the endangerment finding could unravel the EPA's authority to act on climate altogether. Some believe the rule is unlikely to survive in court but warn that even temporary setbacks could paralyse climate action. Political motives? Behind the scenes, the proposal appears to have been shaped by former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, according to The Washington Post. Clark, who was involved in legal opposition to greenhouse gas regulations during the Bush administration, is believed to be a principal architect of the repeal. His past criticisms of the endangerment finding, especially its alleged failure to weigh economic consequences, have reportedly informed the draft rule's legal strategy. Instead of contesting climate science outright, the rule reportedly focusses on legal technicalities—arguing that the EPA's authority should be limited to addressing specific pollutants in narrowly defined contexts. This approach is designed to bypass the robust scientific basis of the original finding while aiming to avoid direct confrontation with the broader consensus on climate change. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A coordinated deregulatory effort The attempt to repeal the endangerment finding is one of many efforts by the Trump administration to reverse environmental protections. As The New York Times reported, the administration has already rolled back rules targeting emissions from fossil fuels, discouraged electric vehicle development and withdrawn the US from international climate commitments. David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defence Council, speaking to The Washington Post, was one of several legal experts who characterised the move as a strategy to weaken the Clean Air Act by denying the well-documented risks of climate pollution. Others noted that this rule could become the centrepiece of the administration's climate legacy—one that seeks to neutralise not just current regulations, but future ones as well. While the draft rule has not yet been formally released, the EPA was submitted to the White House for review on June 30. Once published, it will undergo a period of public comment, and potentially litigation, before becoming final. The outcome of this regulatory shift could have lasting consequences not only for current efforts to reduce emissions but also for America's long-term ability to respond to the growing climate crisis.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
‘Not an actor, he's a brand': Hunter Biden blasts George Clooney over father's fall in politics
In a no-holds-barred interview, Hunter Biden, son of former US president Joe Biden lashed out at an actor and a well known Democratic supporter George Clooney, the man he blames for leading the end of his father Joe Biden's political career. In a raw exchange, the Biden junior accused Clooney of betrayal, slammed his political influence and defended the former president's decisions and legacy. Speaking to Channel 5 News, Hunter Biden condemned Clooney for his 2024 op-ed in The New York Times, which called on the Democratic Party to replace Joe Biden as its 2024 presidential nominee. Just days after the piece was published, Joe Biden dropped out of the race, ending a five decade long political career. 'Fu** him and everybody around him. I don't have to be f***ing nice… I agree with Quentin Tarantino. George Clooney is not a f***ing actor. He's a brand,' Hunter stated, referencing Clooney's influence. The op-ed, titled 'I Love Joe Biden. But We Need a New Nominee,' marked a turning point in the 2024 campaign season. Clooney, a longtime friend of former President Barack Obama cited Biden's poor debate performance against Donald Trump as reasons to step aside. But Hunter Biden, now emerging from years of public battles with addiction and legal scrutiny believes Clooney's motives were personal. According to Hunter, the Hollywood star was enraged over Biden's criticism of the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a move that had been promoted by Clooney's wife, human rights lawyer Amal Clooney. 'He was bitc***g to senior White House staff that he was angry the President didn't pay homage to her,' Hunter claimed. 'He was furious that my dad didn't bow down.' In another part of the interview as well as on a podcast with former Democratic National Committee chair Jaime Harrison, Hunter dismissed Clooney's political relevance and accused him of undermining a man who served the country for over half a century. 'Do you think a voter in Green Bay, Wisconsin, gives a sh** what George Clooney thinks about who she should vote for? He's a celebrity with a soapbox, not a public servant,' Hunter said, adding, 'What right do you have to step on a man who gave 52 years of his life to this country?' Hunter also addressed the first debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump widely considered the night the campaign unraveled. 'He was tired as sh**,' Hunter said. 'They give him Ambien to sleep, and he gets up on that stage like a deer in headlights. It played right into every story people wanted to tell.' Hunter also firmly denied that the small bag of cocaine discovered in a West Wing locker in 2023 belonged to him, a theory widely floated by conservative media and political opponents. 'Why would I bring cocaine into the White House and stick it in a cubby outside the Situation Room?' he asked, stressing on that he has been sober since June 2019. The FBI recently reopened its investigation into the incident following Donald Trump's return to office in January 2025. While no suspects were ever named, the case remains a favorite talking point in GOP circles. 'He gave everything to this country. And a celebrity decides he's no longer good enough? Fu** that,' Hunter said.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
‘Release Epstein files': Martin Luther King's family as 6,000 documents on him branded ‘distraction'
More than half a century after the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr, the US government has released over 6,000 documents – nearly a quarter-million pages – related to his killing. They were posted, without warning, to the National Archives website late Monday. The Trump administration heralded the move as a victory for transparency. But to many civil rights historians and King's surviving family, the release was something else entirely: a distraction. 'This is a desperate attempt to distract,' said civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton, pointing to the storm of public pressure on the Trump administration to release files related to the death of Jeffrey Epstein. Sharpton accused the White House of using the King files 'to draw attention away from the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unraveling of his credibility.' King's daughter, Bernice King, echoed that sentiment. Hours after the documents went live, she posted a photo of her father on X with a sharp caption: 'Now, do the Epstein files.' If the release was meant to be a political manoeuvre, its substance didn't match its fanfare. Despite the volume, there is little in the newly released trove that offers fresh insight into the 1968 assassination of America's most prominent civil rights leader. Most of the material, aging reports, FBI memos, clippings, and tips, has either been released before or adds little to what is already publicly known. 'I saw nothing that struck me as new,' David Garrow, the Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer of Dr. King and chronicler of the FBI's campaign against him told The New York Times. What the files do contain are fragments of an exhaustive manhunt: interviews with people who knew King's killer, James Earl Ray; documentation of Ray's bizarre personal life—his interest in locksmithing, dance classes, and Bond-style aliases; and accounts of tips phoned in by the public in the chaotic weeks after the shooting. The government has long maintained that James Earl Ray acted alone. Ray, a career criminal who escaped from Missouri State Penitentiary a year before the assassination, pleaded guilty in 1969 but soon recanted, claiming he was part of a broader conspiracy. Allegations of official complicity have persisted ever since, pointing to the FBI, Memphis police, and even foreign intelligence services. But the newly released material does little to address or settle those claims. Missing from this release are the FBI wiretap recordings of Dr King, part of the bureau's extensive surveillance campaign aimed at discrediting him. Those remain sealed under court order until 2027. In the 1960s, the FBI sought to expose King's personal life, especially his alleged extramarital affairs, in an attempt to destroy his credibility and halt the momentum of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King III and Bernice King issued a joint statement Monday, urging the public to consider the files in light of their father's legacy. 'He was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign,' they wrote. 'We ask those who engage with the release of these files to do so with empathy, restraint and respect for our family's continuing grief.'
