Cambodia says immediate ceasefire purpose of talks; Thailand questions its sincerity, Asia News
Monday's talks to end the deadliest fighting in more than a decade between the Southeast Asian neighbours are being hosted by Malaysia, the chair of the regional Asean bloc. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said the talks were co-organised by the United States, and that China would also take part in them.
Both Thailand and Cambodia accuse the other of starting the hostilities last week and then escalating them. On Monday, officials from both countries said clashes along the disputed border were ongoing ahead of the talks later in the day.
"We are not confident in Cambodia, their actions so far have reflected insincerity in solving the problem," acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai told reporters ahead of his departure for Kuala Lumpur.
"Cambodia has violated international law, but everybody wants to see peace. Nobody wants to see violence that affects civilians."
Cambodia has strongly denied Thai accusations it has fired at civilian targets, and has instead said that Thailand has put innocent lives at risk. It has called for the international community to condemn Thailand's aggression against it.
"The purpose of this meeting is to achieve an immediate 'ceasefire', initiated by President Donald Trump and agreed to by the Prime Ministers of Cambodia and Thailand," Hun Manet said in a post on X as he departed for the talks.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said State Department officials would assist the peace efforts, after President Donald Trump had earlier said that he thought both leaders wanted to settle the conflict.
The tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have intensified since the killing in late May of a Cambodian soldier during a brief skirmish. Border troops on both sides were reinforced amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had proposed ceasefire talks soon after the border dispute erupted into conflict on Thursday, and China and the United States also offered to assist in negotiations.
Anwar said he expected to chair the negotiations after being asked by the two governments to try to find a peace settlement, state media agency Bernama reported on Sunday.
"So, I'm discussing the parameters, the conditions, but what is important is (an) immediate ceasefire," Anwar said.
Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over undemarcated points along their 817-km land border, with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples Ta Moan Thom and the 11th century Preah Vihear central to the disputes.
Preah Vihear was awarded to Cambodia by the International Court of Justice in 1962, but the situation worsened in 2008 after Cambodia attempted to list it as a Unesco World Heritage site. Skirmishes over several years brought at least a dozen deaths.
Cambodia said in June it had asked the court to resolve its disputes with Thailand. Bangkok says it has never recognised the court's jurisdiction and prefers a bilateral approach.
[[nid:720680]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US senator wants Musk to block use of Starlink by financial fraud groups in Southeast Asia
Find out what's new on ST website and app. U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) speaks during an event at NHTI Concord Community College in Concord, New Hampshire, U.S., October 22, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator on Monday urged SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to block transnational criminal groups in Southeast Asia from using Starlink satellite internet service to commit fraud against Americans. Senator Maggie Hassan cited recent reports that Starlink is being used to facilitate fraud against Americans by a broad range of transnational criminal organizations operating "scam compounds" in Southeast Asia. The U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network said these groups defrauded Americans out of billions of dollars, she added. "Scam networks in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos, however, have apparently continued to use Starlink despite service rules permitting SpaceX to terminate access for fraudulent activity," Hassan wrote in a letter to Musk seen by Reuters. "SpaceX has a responsibility to block criminals from using the service to target Americans." SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment. For years, criminal networks have trafficked hundreds of thousands of people to scam compounds across Southeast Asia, including many along the Thai-Myanmar border, where victims are forced to work in illegal online schemes, according to the United Nations. "While most people have probably noticed the increasing number of scam texts, calls, and emails they're receiving, they may not know that transnational criminals halfway across the world may be perpetrating these scams by using Starlink internet access," Hassan wrote. Since February, Thailand has halted electricity, internet, and fuel supplies to five Myanmar border areas, including Myawaddy, in a bid to disrupt the scam centers, which have become an escalating regional security concern. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: BCA to conduct independent probe, act against any non-compliance Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August-October period Business SIA's first-quarter profits fall by 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose International pressure to shut down the scam centers intensified following the abduction of Chinese actor Wang Xing, who was kidnapped after arriving in Thailand in January. He was later rescued by Thai police, who located him across the border in Myanmar. Criminal networks, mainly emanating from China, are known to run several of these scam centers, including those in the Myawaddy region, according to the United States Institute of Peace. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US-China relations: Between confrontation and transaction
THE return of Donald Trump to the White House in January has ushered in a new chapter of Sino-American relations marked by aggressive economic policies, strategic unpredictability and a pattern of escalation followed by tactical negotiations. Six months into his second presidency, Trump's approach to China has proved both more confrontational and more transactional than many observers anticipated. And there are now signs that his administration is starting to reassess its moves. Trump signalled a hard line on China with hawkish Cabinet picks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Michael Waltz. He also wasted little time in implementing his campaign promises on China trade policy. Within weeks of inauguration, the administration launched what many economists dub the most aggressive trade war in recent history. On Feb 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from China. Starting in April, Trump imposed a minimum 10 per cent tariff on nearly everything the US imports, although goods from China faced a higher tariff of 34 per cent. The administration's broader China strategy plans to fundamentally restructure economic ties between the two nations. Trump pledged to revoke China's preferential trade status and had threatened at least 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports during his campaign, signalling a departure from decades of economic engagement and the start of a process of decoupling. Beyond trade, the Trump administration is also expanding restrictions on Chinese ownership of American assets. The president has said he will pressure Chinese companies to sell holdings that threaten national security interests. This encompasses farm land, natural resources, technology companies and ports. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These moves represent a broader shift towards viewing the trade relationship through national security lenses, promoted by the China hawks in office. Economic competition is being framed as a matter of strategic rivalry rather than mere trade disputes. Despite the aggressive opening moves, Trump's second term has also demonstrated his willingness to pull back from maximum pressure when it serves his interests. In mid-May, Washington reached an agreement with Beijing to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35 per cent from 145 per cent – a historic level reached in April following retaliatory hikes. That dramatic reduction demonstrated Trump's transactional approach to international relations. The 90-day suspension of the heaviest tariffs has created space for ongoing negotiations, with both sides apparently recognising the economic costs of sustained pressure. US companies have faced particular challenges adapting to the volatile policy environment. The clash has also seen China retaliating through restrictions on critical minerals and magnets needed by US factories. Some sectors have received temporary relief, with the administration exempting certain technology products from the harshest tariffs, but many businesses report difficulties with long-term planning amid policy uncertainty. Trump's confrontational approach extended beyond China to traditional allies, potentially reshaping regional dynamics in Asia. By pressuring Canadian, Mexican and European partners, his administration has created opportunities for China to strengthen relations with countries seeking alternatives to US partnerships. The unpredictability of Trump's approach has forced some regional powers to recalculate their strategic positions, with some hedging their bets between the two superpowers rather than aligning clearly with the US. The rising costs of a growing confrontation with China has led to the reassessment of these policies in Washington. Most intriguingly, the Trump administration reversed its position on technology controls, notably allowing Nvidia to sell lower-level artificial intelligence chips, the H20, to China this month after banning such sales in April. Some suggest that this dramatic about-turn from the administration's initial hardline stance may reflect the eroding power of the China hawks in the administration, including personnel changes. Alex Wong, a known China hawk and former deputy national security advisor, has been reassigned to another role, and the State Department has shuttered the team involved in South China Sea security. These changes appear tied to Trump's broader diplomatic strategy. Some in Washington are speculating that he may be angling for a Chinese trip as he courts a more assertive China. But it is doubtful that the administration is planning to reset the relationship with China through direct engagement rather than continued confrontation. In a way, several patterns have emerged in Sino-American relationships under Trump. The administration appears committed to using economic pressure as its primary tool for reshaping the relationship, but remains willing to negotiate when faced with economic or political costs at home. The relationship is now defined by cycles of escalation followed by tactical compromises, reflecting Trump's preference for dramatic gestures and dealmaking. Still, neither side appears willing to accept a return to the pre-2016 status, suggesting that heightened tensions and economic competition will remain defining features of US-China relations.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Who buys the F-150s, and more Japan deal mysteries
The long-awaited trade deal between the US and Japan has investors celebrating after months of uncertainty. But as the song goes, nagging questions always remain. Who is going to buy the 'cars, SUVs (sport utility vehicles) and trucks' that President Donald Trump has promised to sell? Who is going to purchase the 100 Boeing jets? And what possible structure could the US$550 billion fund, allegedly financed by Tokyo with 90 per cent of profits going to the US, actually take? Answers are sorely needed, not just because of an already growing comprehension gap between the countries over what was actually agreed, but to inform South Korea and other close US allies who are trying to wrap up similar deals before Aug 1. Let us start with autos, long the main source of Trump's dissatisfaction with Tokyo as well as the largest single cause of the trade deficit. The White House fact sheet (if indeed it can so be called) declared that 'longstanding restrictions on US cars and trucks will be lifted, granting US automakers access to the Japanese consumer market'. Of course, US carmakers have enjoyed unlimited access to the Japanese market for decades. As I noted in April, the problem is that US cars just are not good enough for the local consumer – and Detroit largely is not interested in trying to muscle its way into a hyper-competitive market dominated by domestic players. Tokyo can try making it a little easier to import US vehicles, such as simplifying inspection procedures, but it cannot rebuild cities to fit the bloated models US automakers favour. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Around 84 per cent of streets in Japan are municipal roads with an average width of just 3.7 m. Even if Tokyo gave everyone a Ford F-150 pickup, its 2.4 m width would prevent two from passing on narrow streets. Hence, cute minivans and kei cars – Japan's smallest expressway-legal 'light vehicles' – dominate while, as my colleague Liam Denning said this week, 'US automakers do not, in general, make an adorable little anything.' In any case, Japan's auto market has been shrinking for years, with new cars sold down about 20 per cent from a 1990s peak. Automakers constantly fret that young people are losing interest in learning to drive, while the growing numbers of elderly citizens are encouraged to return their licences. But more significant is what form the US$550 billion investment fund will take. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the 'innovative financing mechanism' was key to Tokyo getting a deal at all. But neither side seems to agree on what it looks like. The idea first surfaced in May when the Financial Times reported that SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son had suggested a joint sovereign wealth fund. The White House calls it an 'investment vehicle' that will 'rebuild and expand core American industries'. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, however, refers to a combination of equity, loans and guarantees that will be led by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and guarantees by Nippon Export and Investment Insurance. That sounds more like overseas development aid than a wealth fund – though few could argue American infrastructure might actually benefit from that. Trump now promises Japan will 'give us 90 per cent of US$550 billion'. Tokyo is saying that applies to projects where 90 per cent of investment is from the US – in other words, profits are proportional. Does the figure include funding already pledged, such as SoftBank's promised US$100 billion? Who knows? Indeed, a leaked photo from the talks shows what looks like a proposal from Japan for a US$400 billion fund, crossed out with US$500 billion handwritten on top. That proposal also suggested a 50 per cent profit share. Is this just repackaged existing spending into a simple PowerPoint slide? After all, Japan already invested US$783 billion in the US in 2023, and Ishiba pledged in January to boost that to US$1 trillion in the future. The problem is that at some stage, this needs to be worked into actual policies. And this is where Ishiba's rush to agreement might come back to bite, especially if he is no longer in the job when the talks get down to details – something that, despite his denials , still seems all but certain after the drubbing his Liberal Democratic Party took in recent upper house elections. There are plenty of parts of the deal that do make sense. The 100 Boeings can find a home at the country's airlines, though Japan has admitted the number includes at least some already-planned purchases. With Japan as the world's largest buyer of liquefied natural gas, Tokyo's participation in the Alaska project always seemed logical. Even if the two sides do not seem to agree on what they decided on defence, Japan needs to spend more and the US is the logical seller. Above all, it is encouraging to see the White House, after all these months of tense relations, again describe its ally as the 'cornerstone of peace in the Indo-Pacific'. But with all these questions – and Washington continuing to hold the threat over Japan's head with a quarterly evaluation of its compliance with the deal – the market's sigh of relief might still be premature. BLOOMBERG
