
FEMA faces backlog of emergency aid requests as hurricane season nears
Early Thursday, the agency's daily operations briefing listed 19 pending declaration requests, the oldest from January. By Friday morning, amid pressure from governors and members of Congress, FEMA had processed 10 requests, denying two and approving eight. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), who had publicly complained about the pace of FEMA's decision-making, posted Friday on X: 'Following our discussion Wednesday, President Trump has approved multiple disaster declarations for Missouri.'
Eleven requests, the earliest filed April 1, are still pending, according to FEMA's early Friday operations briefing — a backlog that experts still consider unusual. Those pending requests include Missouri's application, filed Monday, for an emergency declaration to aid its recovery from deadly storms last week.
President Donald Trump is closely monitoring the situation in Missouri and is in contact with local officials, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said Thursday. 'The Trump administration remains committed to empowering and working with state and local governments to invest in their own resilience before disaster strikes,' she said.
A FEMA spokesperson said that the agency is working with state and local officials to conduct damage assessments in storm-affected areas and that decisions on emergency declaration requests are 'based on policy, not politics.'
But emergency-management experts said the backlog of unprocessed requests is abnormal and could signal that FEMA is dragging its feet. Applications for disaster declarations are made by governors to the president and, if granted, unlock a wide array of federal assistance — which can include help both responding to the initial emergency and making permanent repairs.
Slow-walking them risks leaving states in limbo, the experts said, and delays state officials from appealing denials or pursuing alternative recovery plans.
'The American people, they have an expectation that the federal government will be there for them on their worst day,' said Michael Coen, a former FEMA chief of staff in the Obama and Biden administrations. 'If that expectation needs to be adjusted, the federal government should explain what the new threshold is.'
The Trump administration has signaled that it wants states to take more responsibility for their own disaster recoveries, citing complaints that FEMA can be overly bureaucratic in responding to emergencies. An April memo from former acting FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton, obtained by The Post, recommended that the agency raise thresholds to declare fewer disasters by June 1, the start of what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has predicted could be a busy hurricane season.
'It's quite clear for us that the lack of interest in approving federal emergency declarations is [because] they're trying to force states to handle it,' said a FEMA analyst, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they fear retaliation from the agency.
FEMA's level of urgency came into question this week after powerful storms swept through Kentucky and Missouri, killing over 20 people and destroying thousands of structures. Missouri requested that FEMA authorize two types of disaster declarations: an emergency declaration, which is generally approved within days and releases up to $5 million of aid, and a major disaster declaration, which makes more money and types of federal aid available than an emergency declaration does. Kentucky also requested a major disaster declaration. All three requests are pending.
Caitlin Durkovich, a former deputy homeland security adviser at the White House under President Joe Biden, said she believed the recent storms in Missouri met the threshold for a major disaster declaration.
'We would do this in a matter of hours,' she said.
Missouri, which has faced a torrent of extreme weather in the past three months, has made three major disaster declaration requests in that span. The older two, from April, were approved only Friday.
Hawley said on Monday that 'FEMA needs to come in strong' after the storms. He has lobbied Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem and Trump to release federal funds.
Hawley's office, asked whether he supported proposals to reduce the aid FEMA disburses, said he voted for the March stopgap bill that funds FEMA through September.
Coen, the former FEMA chief of staff, said the agency's decision to quickly process 10 pending requests is unusual, given the past delays, and showed the agency still responds to pressure from lawmakers and governors.
He added that some requests for disaster aid can take time to process. Federal authorities often need days or weeks to conduct damage assessments to approve a major disaster declaration, he said, and certain requests have been delayed for procedural reasons under previous administrations.
Another FEMA disaster recovery official, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation from the agency, wrote to The Post that the agency has been hampered by staffing cuts and FEMA leadership has shown 'no sense of urgency whatsoever' in processing declaration requests.
'Even when [Hurricane] Helene hit, we didn't have 19 pending major disaster and emergency declarations,' the official said.
The agency's current backlog of 11 pending declaration requests is less unusual, the official said, though 'more typical of when a hurricane hits.'
Coen said that while FEMA scaling back its aid to states would be a significant setback for disaster recovery efforts, the agency should be clearer in its change of policy if it intends to tighten its purse.
'States have received no guidance, so states are going to continue to make requests,' Coen said.
And more extreme weather looms. As the United States headed into Memorial Day weekend, forecasters were warning that Missouri and other southern Plains states face significant storm and flooding risks over the holiday.
Hannah Natanson, Kevin Crowe and Marissa J. Lang contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump working on executive order intending to 'preserve' college sports from 'threat'
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A draft of the long-discussed presidential executive order intends to 'preserve' college athletics from 'unprecedented threat' and destruction, it says, by implementing new policies related to athlete compensation, antitrust protection, athlete employment, state law uniformity and Olympic sport participation. The draft, though not believed to be the final version, is expected to align closely with the order that President Donald Trump has long been exploring and offers a window into his thinking. It is not clear when, or even if, Trump will announce an executive order, which for four months has been discussed in the public sphere. The draft was provided to Yahoo Sports by three different congressional sources, all confirming that the document is believed to have originated from the White House. Attempts to reach White House staff were unsuccessful. The draft, seven pages long and titled 'SAVING COLLEGE SPORTS,' outlines directives from Trump to members of his Cabinet to create policy related to various aspects of college athletics. Those aspects primarily include directing the attorney general and Federal Trade Commission to: (1) provide college leaders with protection from antitrust law around the 'long-term availability' of scholarships and opportunities for athletes; (2) prevent 'unqualified and unscrupulous agents' from representing athletes; and (3) support uniformity by, presumably, preempting the varying NIL state laws. The draft also requests that the assistant to the president for domestic policy work with the U.S. Olympic team to provide 'safeguards' for NCAA Olympic sports; and directs the secretary of education and National Labor Relations Board to implement policy 'clarifying that status' of athletes, presumably as students and not employees. In its introduction, the order purports that such directives are necessary to preserve an industry in chaos and on the brink of destruction. 'It is no exaggeration to say that America's system of collegiate athletics plays an integral role in forging the leaders that drive our Nation's success,' the order says. 'Yet the future of college sports is under unprecedented threat.' Court rulings, the order says, have "eliminated limits on athlete compensation, recruiting inducements, and transfers between universities, unleashing a sea change that threatens the viability of college sports.' While some of these changes are 'long overdue,' the order says that the inability to maintain rules 'will destroy what Americans recognize today as college sport.' 'It is the policy of my Administration that college sports should be preserved,' the draft reads. The order says that the House settlement 'provides little assurance' in preserving the sport and expects it to be 'upended soon' by new litigation over increased compensation and fewer rules. The order describes a potential athlete-employment model as making the industry "financially untenable.' Steve Berman, one of the co-lead plaintiff attorneys in the House settlement, released a statement to Yahoo Sports calling a potential executive order as 'unwarranted' and describing it as flouting the president's "own philosophy on the supposed 'art of the deal.'" 'Plain and simple, college athletes don't need Trump's help, and he shouldn't be aiding the NCAA at the expense of athletes,' Berman, managing partner and co-founder of Hagens Berman, said in a statement to Yahoo Sports. 'Step back, Mr. President. These fabulous athletes don't need your help. Let them make their own deals. And the Supreme Court with your appointee, Justice Kavanaugh, condemned the NCAA's compensation rules as a violation of the antitrust laws. Why give them immunity, Mr. President, in light of that ruling?" The order gives the attorney general and Federal Trade Commission 60 days to make necessary revisions to new policy and gives the secretary of education and secretary of the treasury 120 days to develop financial education for athletes. Any timing on the release of the order — if it is released at all — remains a murky topic. Trump has been determined to get involved in college athletics. Most recently, he held a golf outing with two of the sport's most notable names, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua. Reports of an executive order surfaced in late April, as well as plans to form a presidential commission to study the industry. In fact, the executive order appears to create a commission (though it does not describe it as such) of 'individuals and organizations involved in collegiate athletics, including athletes, schools, conferences, governing bodies, and leaders with experience relating to college sports, as well as the Congress and State governments' to assure that college sports is being preserved. Trump's plans — both the order and commission — were 'paused' in May as congressional lawmakers urged White House leadership to give them more time to agree to college sports legislation. A congressional bill governing the sport is believed to be a more permanent solution than an executive order that is subject to legal challenges. The pause in White House action in May provided a runway for House and Senate negotiations over college sports legislation. More movement has taken place in the House, where a bipartisan bill, the SCORE Act, is expected to soon go before a full House committee for vote, at which point it could land on the House floor — the furthest that any all-encompassing college sports legislation has advanced since the NCAA's lobbying effort began five years ago. However, the bill faces steep odds in gaining enough Democrat support for passage in the Senate, where filibuster rules require a 60-vote minimum. There are 53 Republicans in the Senate. The Senate, though, has been working toward the introduction of its own legislation, led by Sen. Ted Cruz, who, much like Trump, has made college sports regulation a priority. He's been in negotiations now for months with several Democrats, most notably Chris Coons, Richard Blumenthal and Cory Booker. No agreement has been reached despite more than a year of intense talks. Though at first deemed to be a 'bipartisan issue,' college sports legislation has created significant enough differences among Democrats and Republicans that no single bill has reached the House or Senate floor despite the introduction of more than a dozen pieces of legislation over five years. Dividing the two parties is an array of issues, most notably the idea of preventing athletes from being deemed employees. Democrats are less inclined in such a provision because of their relationship with trial lawyers and labor unions, Cruz said during an interview in September of 2023. On the same day and at the same event, Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, and Rep. Lori Trahan, a Democrat from Massachusetts, pushed college leaders to examine a model to share revenue with athletes and collectively bargain with them. 'You might disagree,' Murphy said, 'but I think it feels and smells a lot like employment at the highest level of the sport.' But there are other problematic concepts. For instance, the oversight and enforcement of the college athletics industry (should the NCAA or College Sports Commission be granted such authority or a federal entity, something that many Democrats support); guarantees around long-term athlete healthcare for lower-resourced Division I schools that cannot afford such (will the power conference schools subside?); and how limited is the liability or antitrust protection for the leadership of college sports? Meanwhile, as lawmakers continue negotiations, college administrators are mired in legal negotiations of their own related to the new House settlement and revenue-sharing concept. The settlement's primary goal — to shift athlete pay from NIL booster collectives to the schools — is at risk of crumbling as House plaintiff attorneys contend that college leaders are violating terms of the settlement by denying certain collective contracts.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Law To Cut US Clean Energy Installs 41%, BNEF Says
(Bloomberg) -- US annual clean-energy installations will plunge 41% after 2027, due to the rapid phase-out of wind and solar tax credits in President Donald Trump's sweeping economic legislation. The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life Advocates Fear US Agents Are Using 'Wellness Checks' on Children as a Prelude to Arrests LA Homelessness Drops for Second Year Manhattan, Chicago Murder Rates Drop in 2025, Officials Say Deployments will fall to 48 gigawatts in 2028 when wind and solar projects will lose eligibility for the tax incentives, according to a report Thursday from BloombergNEF. That's compared to 81 gigawatts the prior year as developers race to complete projects before the cutoff date. 'A short path still exists for wind and solar projects to access these credits, but it will not be an easy road ahead for most developers,' analysts with BloombergNEF wrote in the report. While renewables are often the cheapest source of electricity, the forecast underscores the reliance clean energy still has on subsidies. Eliminating federal incentives threatens to upend the US energy industry by hampering the roll out of wind and solar, which have become the biggest sources of new electricity generation. The decline will come at a critical moment, as the power industry scrambles to deliver additional capacity to meet an expected jump in demand from data centers running artificial intelligence. New wind, solar and energy storage additions through 2030 will drop 23% compared to an earlier BNEF forecast as a result of the new legislation. Onshore wind will see a 50% cut compared to the prior outlook with solar and energy storage experiencing a 23% and 7% drop, respectively. The shift will be especially hard on the solar industry. Once developers lose tax credits, only 30% of planned solar projects will be able to deliver competitive prices and are 'expected to survive,' according to the research company Enverus. About 57% of wind farms will be competitive without credits, according to an Enverus report issued this week. (Updates with comment from analysts in third paragraph) How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy Forget DOGE. Musk Is Suddenly All In on AI The Quest for a Hangover-Free Buzz How Hims Became the King of Knockoff Weight-Loss Drugs ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Maurene Comey, fired by Trump, says ‘fear is the tool of the tyrant'
Maurene Comey, a federal prosecutor and the daughter of former FBI director James Comey, told her former colleagues in an email that her sudden firing should 'fuel the fire' of their work fighting abuses of power. Comey, who worked on the Jeffrey Epstein and Sean 'Diddy' Combs criminal cases, was fired Wednesday by the Justice Department. 'If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain,' she wrote in a message to her former colleagues, which was obtained by CNN. 'Do not let that happen.' She continued: 'Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought. Instead of fear, let this moment fuel the fire that already burns at the heart of this place. A fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power. Of commitment to seek justice for victims. Of dedication to truth above all else.' Yesterday was unexpectedly my last day in the Office. I was summarily fired via memo from Main Justice that did not give a reason for my termination. Every person lucky enough to work in this office constantly hears four words to describe our ethos: Without Fear or Favor. Do the right thing, the right way, for the right reasons without fear of retribution and without favor to the powerful. For the majority of my nearly ten years in SDNY, fear was never really conceivable. We don't fear bad press; we have the luxury of exceptional security keeping us physically safe; and, so long as we did our work with integrity, we would get to keep serving the public in this office. Our focus was really on acting 'without favor.' That is, making sure people with access, money, and power were not treated differently than anyone else; and making sure this office remained separate from politics and focused only on the facts and the law. But we have entered a new phase where 'without fear' may be the challenge. If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain. Do not let that happen. Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought. Instead of fear, let this moment fuel the fire that already burns at the heart of this place. A fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power. Of commitment to seek justice for victims. Of dedication to truth above all else. It has been an honor to fight for those principles by your side. Maurene