logo
Concerns growing for hillwalker missing in Scottish mountains

Concerns growing for hillwalker missing in Scottish mountains

STV News21 hours ago
Concerns are growing for a hillwalker who did not return from a walk in the Scottish mountains on Saturday.
Richard Dawson was reported missing after he failed to return from a planned walk of the Five Sisters of Kintail.
Police confirmed the 61-year-old's car has been found in Glen Shiel, and he has not arrived at his booked hotel accommodation.
He is described as 6ft 1ins, of athletic build, with short brown hair, a goatee beard and wears glasses. He had a dark coloured rucksack and usually wears a baseball cap or a straw hat.
Inspector Graham Brown said: 'Richard's car has been found in Glen Shiel and our enquiries so far suggest he intended walking the Five Sisters range. He had booked hotel accommodation but did not arrive.
'Concerns are growing for his welfare and extensive enquiries are ongoing to trace him including assistance from mountain rescue.
'We are asking anyone who may have seen Richard to get in touch. Also, if anyone spoke to him and he mentioned his plans then let us know.'
Anyone who can help is asked to contact Police Scotland on 101, quoting incident number 1036 of Wednesday, 16 July, 2025.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detectives appealing for information after wilful fire-raising in Cumbernauld
Detectives appealing for information after wilful fire-raising in Cumbernauld

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Detectives appealing for information after wilful fire-raising in Cumbernauld

Around 3am on Sunday, July 27, a white Kia Sportage was deliberately set alight outside a property on Spruce Road. Detectives are appealing for information following a wilful fire-raising in Cumbernauld. ‌ Around 3am on Sunday, July 27, a white Kia Sportage was deliberately set alight outside a property on Spruce Road. ‌ The fire was extinguished by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, and no injuries were reported. ‌ Detective Constable David Williamson said: 'Our enquiries are ongoing into this incident, and I am asking anyone who might have been in the area and saw something to get in touch. ‌ 'Similarly, anyone in the area with private CCTV or dash-cam footage that might have captured anything that could be useful in our investigation is urged to contact us.' Anyone with information should contact Police Scotland on 101 quoting incident 0599 of 27 July. Alternatively, Crimestoppers can be contacted anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Man arrested and charged following after drugs recovery in East Kilbride
Man arrested and charged following after drugs recovery in East Kilbride

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Man arrested and charged following after drugs recovery in East Kilbride

Approximately 12kg of cocaine, with an estimated street value of up to £360,000 was recovered. A 34-year-old man has been arrested and charged following the recovery of drugs in East Kilbride. ‌ Officers executed a search warrant at a property on Owen Avenue around 10.30pm on Wednesday, July 23. ‌ Approximately 12kg of cocaine, with an estimated street value of up to £360,000 was recovered. ‌ The man appeared at Hamilton Sheriff Court on Friday. ‌ Detective Inspector Kevin Hughes said: 'This is a significant recovery and demonstrates our continued commitment to disrupting the supply and distribution of illegal drugs in our communities. 'We are dedicated to the country's Serious and Organised Crime Strategy and work closely with partners as part of the Serious and Organised Crime Taskforce to identify and target those involved in this type of criminality. 'Information from the public is crucial to our work and I would encourage anyone with concerns or information about drugs activity in their area to contact Police Scotland on 101, or report anonymously via Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.'

Appeal court decision has raised questions over liabilty claims
Appeal court decision has raised questions over liabilty claims

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Appeal court decision has raised questions over liabilty claims

Andrew Gilmour expects further guidance will follow as cases addressing the issues proceed Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Every day, members of the public enter offices, shops, supermarkets, restaurants and gyms. An issue that has arisen of late is how the Scottish courts deal with accidents caused by the condition of something in such premises that is defective. In the case of McCormack v Fitness Limited, the Sheriff Appeal Court provided guidance on how to analyse and determine whether an occupier of premises containing defective items should be liable for such an accident. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It has long been a feature of Scots Law that in certain circumstances, the maxim res ipsa loquitor could apply to an accident. The claimant should establish that the thing which caused damage was under the defender's management and control, and that the accident was of a type that does not ordinarily occur if proper care is taken. An inference of negligence is then accepted only if the defender can offer no explanation consistent with absence of fault on their part. Andrew Gilmour is a Partner, Horwich Farrelly In McCormack, the claimant was injured by a ragged edge on the outer rim of a weight plate in a gym that cut his hand when he tried to place it onto a shoulder press machine. How the damage to the plate occurred was unknown. At first instance, the court decided that res ipsa loquitor applied to the accident circumstances and found for the injured party. The view taken was that the gym owner could not provide a reasonable explanation for how the accident occurred without negligence. The court held the gym owner had exclusive management of the premises, controlling access by way of membership and subscriptions. The owner employed staff on reception and on the gym floor. Seeking to place a weight plate onto a machine should not ordinarily cause injury to a user. There was no evidence of any inspection of the plate on the morning of the accident and no faults were recorded. However, the appeal court decided the court had erred in focusing over the control exerted over the gym premises, rather than the weight plate itself. The court was bound to consider and decide the question in this way, as if there was no control over the thing that caused the accident, then res ipsa loquitor did not apply and liability would not be established. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The court had regard to the well-established observation that the principle only applied where the incident suggests negligence on someone's part and, because of exclusive management and control in the defenders at the time when the negligence occurred, it can be presumed it was the defenders who were negligent. In this case, the free weights and shoulder press machine were not in the exclusive control of the gym. The gym was open to members of the public who had a membership or subscription to use the premises. Those members had free use of the weight plates during the course of their exercise. Therefore, the appeal court overturned the decision and absolved the gym from any liability, as the exclusive management and control over the weight plate had not been established. The decision raises questions about exclusive management and control of items in premises. Does the presence of members of the public mean that few items in the premises could be under such control? When should a claimant seek to establish a case based on a failure to take reasonable care, rather than risking establishing that res ipsa loquitor applies? A number of cases are addressing this issue and no doubt further guidance will follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store