Fresh investment in Gaelic will propel Scottish pupils to success
Among these is the Scottish Languages Bill, which is progressing through parliament and, if passed by MSPs, will ensure there is a more robust legal framework for Gaelic's promotion, particularly in education and public life.
Adding to this is the overall trend of recent years in public finance, which reflects continued investment in the language and its culture. We've seen sustained funding increases that recognise Gaelic language as a valuable asset that strengthens our national identity.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie: Increased UK defence spending only makes war more likely
But to me, the most encouraging sign of Gaelic's growing cultural success is our booming Gaelic schools.
Being a recipient myself of Gaelic medium education (GME), I have first-hand experience of its value and effectiveness, having first learned the language while studying in GME in the Highlands. Learning through Gaelic undoubtedly instilled in me a deep appreciation for Scotland's rich culture, and the importance of preserving it for future generations.
It was a joy to further strengthen Gaelic medium education this week with an announcement of funding for a new Gaelic primary school. Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig a' Challtainn (Calton Gaelic Primary School) will become Glasgow's fourth Gaelic language primary school, following a £2 million investment from the Scottish Government.
The school will have space for 416 pupils and will meet growing demand for Gaelic primary education in the city. Census figures published last year show a 45% increase in the number of people with some Gaelic skills in Glasgow compared to 2011.
This school will build on the encouraging surge we have seen in the number of Gaelic speakers and learners in Glasgow and support the language's growth into the future. This exciting growth appears to be representative of the nationwide picture, with demand for places in Gaelic schools frequently outpacing supply – a problem we're delighted to have, as it demonstrates the genuine enthusiasm families have for bilingual education.
Data from the Scottish Government tells us that in 2009, there were 2206 pupils in GME, compared with 5417 for the year 2022-2023. This represents an increase of 145%! The national picture for GME uptake is one of steady and encouraging growth.
Perhaps this should be unsurprising, given the numerous and well-studied benefits of bilingualism in children. Evidence shows that bilingual children can demonstrate improved problem-solving, better attention and enhanced memory.
There are also huge personal and confidence benefits that come from the knowledge and respect gained for Gaelic culture. There is a beautiful richness to be discovered in Gaelic songs, stories, traditions and history.
It's not uncommon to hear concerns that Gaelic medium children will somehow be left behind compared to the majority who learn in English medium settings. But here, yet again, the evidence shows these fears to be unfounded. Children who go through Gaelic medium education match or exceed the levels of attainment of their monolingual contemporaries in English medium education.
Gaelic medium education enriches communities and offers good value for money, providing better grade averages across all qualification levels despite costs being no greater than average.
There are a multitude of reasons to embrace Gaelic medium education, and the evidence highlights that GME comes with a wealth of additional benefits for individuals and communities around the country.
The announcement of funding for Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig a' Challtainn in Glasgow came alongside a host of other projects set to benefit from the Gaelic Capital Fund, with initiatives around the country gaining an additional £5.7m this year.
Schools in locations such as Skye, Paisley, East Kilbride, Cumbernauld and Forfar will, among other things, receive new learning equipment, Gaelic signage and much sought-after upgrades to facilities.
There's never been a better time to believe in Gaelic medium education. As a representative of Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, a constituency where 12% of the population has skills in Gaelic, I've never been prouder of the SNP majority government that is investing in Gaelic language and culture.
It's my sincere hope that generations to come will look back with thankfulness on these definitive years for the Gaelic language, seeing them as a turning point. I'm convinced that for this to be the case, bolstering support for GME will play a crucial role.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: if we don't recognise and protect our national languages, nobody else will!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why is the SQA so quiet about students cheating with AI?
'We have no further comment to make.' It's a statement that every journalist has received plenty of times. Over the years investigating and reporting on Scottish education, both during and well before my time at The Herald, I've had variations of that statement from all sorts of bodies including councils, regulators, private companies, public organisations, and the Scottish Government. The message between the lines is simple: we're not answering these questions unless you find a way to make us. Sometimes this is what you get in response to follow up questions after receiving an initial response to an enquiry; other times it comes when you try to challenge them for ignoring some or all of an initial query. The latest instance – at least at the time of writing – involves the soon-to-be rebranded SQA, Scotland's only exam board and the body responsible for issuing exam results to students in a couple of weeks. The topic? Students using AI to cheat in their coursework. Read more Lessons to Learn: Here's the background: a teacher and current SQA marker recently approached us with some pretty serious concerns, alleging that they and others had been discouraged from reporting all instances of suspected AI use by students, and suggesting that the issue was effectively being covered up. If true, this would undermine the fairness of this year's National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher results, and raise major questions for SQA leadership. So we approached SQA. We put the accusations to them to give them the opportunity to respond, and also asked for some specific and obviously relevant information: In total, how many scripts were flagged for potential use of AI by markers? (and what is this as a proportion of total scripts) How many of those were investigated and judged to show signs of AI use? What action was taken against those who were found to have cheated using AI? We also asked if the [[SQA]] would commit to an investigation of the claims being made, particularly given previous concerns about the [[SQA]]'s exam marking – remember the months-long Higher History debacle last year, for example? Here's the response we received, attributed to an SQA spokesperson: 'We provide principal assessors with guidance on the use of AI before marker meetings to help them prepare. Markers are told to raise all potential malpractice concerns during marking, including the use of AI, all of which are investigated.' So the exam board is disputing the accusation that markers were told not to report all concerns, but what about that other information? Well, when we asked if they would be responding to our other questions, we were told that they had 'no further comment to make'. So now we have to try to make this publicly-funded body answer these simple questions. One option would be to ask more specific questions, and give more information from markers, but this would risk revealing details of our sources. But teachers tend to be worried about being identified by the SQA and facing punitive actions for raising concerns, and to be honest that's a pretty reasonable concern on their part, so that's not a road we would go down. Which means that we need to use Freedom of Information requests. This – as the [[SQA]] knows – means it will be weeks before we might get the information we're asking for, and that's assuming they manage to answer on time (which isn't even remotely guaranteed) and don't try to withhold material using some of the clauses in FOI law. Crucially, the information is very unlikely to have been made available when exam results are released at the start of August. All of which is ironic, because just a couple of weeks ago the SQA was telling the press that the appointment of their new Chief Executive, Nick Page, 'marks the start of a new era of collaboration, transparency, and opportunity'. We have now submitted several FOI requests to the SQA, asking for the information they have so far refused to provide, as well as other material related to potential cheating through AI use. We will, as ever, let you know what we find, but it might be a while. We've also asked Mr Page to sit down for an interview with us, which would give him the chance to explain how he is going to deliver on promises of transparency and openness from an organisation that has historically pursued the opposite approach. We hope to bring you that soon as well.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Donald Trump: The highs and lows of his relationship with Scotland
Though Trump has said he "feels Scottish", his relationship with the country has had its ups and downs. Here are the highs and the lows. Read More: Trump's Scottish connection The President is connected to Scotland by blood, his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was from Stornoway. Born in the village of Tong in 1912 to Malcolm, a crofter and fisherman, and Mary Ann hers was a tough upbringing, the Hebrides at the time being described by historian James Hunter as "where I always considered human wretchedness to have reached its very acme" and by the President as "serious Scotland". She grew up speaking Gaelic, only learning English when she went to school, but Tong didn't have much to offer a young woman. Mary became one of the roughly half a million Scots who emigrated between 1919 and 1938, with over three-quarters of those heading to North America. The day before her 18th birthday, May 11 1930, she arrived in New York City under immigrant visa 2669191. As she arrived on the RMS Transylvania, Mary would have passed the Statue of Liberty on her way to the immigration centre on Ellis Island. Records show she had never visited the U.S before and was carrying the sum total of $50. Inscribed on the statue, the first thing new immigrants from Europe would see, is a poem which concludes: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free/the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me/I lift my lamp beside the golden door." Those lofty sentiments clearly haven't rubbed off on the President who declared in October last year: "We're a dumping ground. We're like a garbage can for the world. Every time I come up and talk about what they've done to our country I get angry and angrier." A few years later Mary met property developer Fred Trump and the rest is history. Donald, who was born in 1946, may have been named after her maternal grandfather, who died at sea aged 34 but he's visited Lewis just twice in his life, once as a toddler and once for around 90 minutes on the way to one of his golf courses. Highs Donald Trump with The Wee Red Book at Turnberry (Image: Colin Templeton) While most of Trump's dealings with Scotland and in particular the Scottish Government have been adversarial, there have been some moments of harmony along the way. When the future President first purchased the land which would become Trump International Aberdeen, he was welcomed with open arms by First Minister Jack McConnell. The Scottish Labour leader invited Trump to become a 'Globalscot', a network of overseas Scots and friends of Scotland who served as business ambassadors. McConnell said: "Donald has shown me a real passion for Scotland. He is a globally recognised figure who can help us to promote Scotland. I am delighted that he has taken up my offer. This is a good bit of business for all concerned." Indeed, the First Minister wanted to go further by making him a 'platinum member' of the Globalscot club, a unique status which would have been reserved only for The Donald. Such was the love-in, Green MSP Patrick Harvie quipped: "It's beginning to look embarrassing that the leader of the government is behaving like a teenager with a crush." Things continued in much the same vein with McConnell's successor, Alex Salmond - at least initially. In 2007 Aberdeenshire Council rejected planning permission for Trump's golf course and, rather than submitting a new application, the Apprentice host announced he would look elsewhere. In an unprecedented move, the Scottish Government called in the proposal, saying it "raises issues of importance that require consideration at a national level". Trump had met with Salmond the day before. Holyrood eventually approved the proposal, with Trump saying: "I hardly know [[Alex Salmond]], but what I know is that he's an amazing man. "Alex Salmond and I have virtually never even talked about this job but I know for a fact that he - and anyone else who's representing Scotland, unless they're the enemy - wants billions of pounds to come into Aberdeenshire and Scotland." It was on the way to a public hearing about that golf course in Balmedie that Trump visited his mother's croft on Lewis - for a grand total of 97 seconds - and declared "I do feel Scottish". In 2010, Trump was given an honorary degree by Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen raising a chuckle when he was introduced as "the highest-paid speaker in the world" and replied "not today". Speaking of his mother he said: "She was very thrifty. The Scots have this reputation for watching the dollars, so she really had a natural business instinct. "She loved everything that this great place stood for and she'd be very proud today." Lows Donald Trump at Turnberry (Image: Colin Templeton) Trump would not have such an easy relationship with Scotland for long, indeed he was stripped of that degree in 2015. The process of building that first golf course in Aberdeenshire was long and controversial with one local farmer, Michael Forbes, refusing to sell his land to the billionaire. An exasperated Trump ultimately offered £450,000 and a £50k per year job for the small farm. The response? "He can take his money and shove it up his arse." Trump did, of course, finally get his course built but was soon on a collision course with the Scottish Government over one of his pet peeves - wind turbines. As well as objecting to them aesthetically, the President appears to genuinely believe that the noise made by the rotating blades causes cancer. When permission was granted for a wind farm off the coast of Aberdeenshire - in full view of his new course - the future leader of the free world was apoplectic. He wrote a furious letter to Salmond asking: "Do you want to be known for centuries to come as 'Mad Alex - the man who destroyed Scotland'?" So incensed was The Donald he appeared before the Scottish Parliament to give evidence, drawing laughs from the public gallery when asked for his evidence of the negative impact of turbines and responding: "I am the evidence." "He came, he saw, he blustered," said CBS News. Trump threatened to withdraw all investment in Scotland if the plans went ahead, but ultimately decided to expand his portfolio with the acquisition of the Turnberry course in South Ayrshire. He abandoned the Republican primary in 2016 to open the course, where he famously predicted that the UK would vote for Brexit, stunning the political pundit class with his foresight. As he told The Sun: "I predicted Brexit. I was cutting a ribbon for the opening of Turnberry - you know they did a whole renovation, it is beautiful - the day before the Brexit vote. 'I said, 'Brexit will happen'. The vote is going to be positive because people don't want to be faced with the horrible immigration problems that they are being faced with in other countries. I said Brexit will happen, and I was right.' The only slight flaw in this story is that Trump arrived in Ayrshire the day after the vote when the result had already been announced. He did not meet with Salmond's successor, Nicola Sturgeon, on that visit with the First Minister later telling ITV: "I expect the people of the United States will have the good sense not to elect him." The two may not share much in common, but it appears prognostication skill is one of them. Sturgeon was forced into something of a climbdown with what the White House described as "a short congratulatory call" and a letter, though the First Minister made clear she would "not maintain a diplomatic silence" in the face of "abhorrent comments". When Trump was defeated by Joe Biden in 2020, she offered a "cheerio" and "don't haste ye back", with the businessman commenting on the former First Minister's own travails on a trip to Turnberry in 2023 as he said "she has not been a great person for Scotland". John Swinney then caused a stooshie of his own when he urged American voters to back Kamala Harris in November's election, only for Trump to win in a landslide. Son Eric Trump said: "My father adores Scotland, and you have a First Minister coming out and just being fairly nasty in the days leading up. 'I mean, who did that benefit? Did that benefit Scotland?" The First Minister is expected to meet with Trump on his short visit to Scotland - things may be a little frosty.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Let trans women into women's shelters, say SNP ministers
But the suggestion drew strong criticism from campaigners, who said the Scottish Government was misrepresenting the law. 'Services are either single-sex or open to everyone, and there are no circumstances where it is legally possible to provide a service for 'biological women and trans women',' Trina Budge of For Women Scotland told The Herald. READ MORE Three months ago, the UK's highest court ruled that 'women' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 referred to biological sex rather than gender identity. The court case was brought by FWS after they challenged the Scottish Government's guidance on the definition of 'woman' in the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018. Following the Supreme Court ruling, the commission issued draft guidance on a range of topics, including how single-sex services can be lawfully provided, when trans people can be excluded, and when organisations might request a birth certificate or Gender Recognition Certificate. The draft said any service offered to 'women and trans women' is not a single-sex service under the Equality Act and could amount to unlawful discrimination against those of the opposite sex. The EHRC later opened a consultation on the draft to help formulate an updated Code of Practice. The commission said it received more than 50,000 responses. Final guidance had been expected before Parliament broke for summer earlier this week, but the EHRC said last week it would be published later in the year. For Women Scotland won the Supreme Court in April (Image: PA) The Scottish Government quietly published its response to the consultation on Friday afternoon. Ministers raised concerns that the commission's draft code placed too much emphasis on when trans people can be excluded from services, and not enough on how services can remain inclusive within the law. 'We consider that it would be helpful to provide illustrative examples within the Code of Practice to provide guidance on how a service provider may lawfully implement an inclusive approach,' the Government said. 'This would be particularly helpful in situations where a service provider has identified a need that exists for both biological women and trans women, for example in relation to those who have experienced domestic abuse, homelessness or trafficking. 'Without this clarity, providers may simply stop offering any services to trans people due to concerns about legal risk.' They also warned that, following the judgment, some trans people had chosen to 'remove themselves from public life' out of fear of being turned away from services. In its submission, the Scottish Government also said it was also concerned about what it described as 'social policing' of someone's sex. 'We note that the impact of the guidance may lead to situations where some members of the public will take it upon themselves to judge appearances and assume someone's sex based on their perception of that person's sex or gender identity. 'This sense of distrust in others and social policing of bodies is detrimental not only for trans and non-binary people, but for those who are born male or female who may not fit into society's current expectations of what a man or woman looks like, which change over time, and in different contexts and places.' The response also called for advice on how to apply the updated definition of legal sex to workplace facilities, and for consideration of the impact of the code on intersex people. Ms Budge said: 'The Scottish Government still woefully misunderstands the Supreme Court judgment on how the Equality Act works. "Services are either single-sex or open to everyone, and there are no circumstances where it is legally possible to provide a service for 'biological women and trans women'. 'We note that in pushing for this option, the Government has dropped its previous legal argument that a man needs a GRC to access a women's service and reverted to, once again, looking for ways to include men in women's services on a self-ID basis. 'Women who have suffered domestic abuse or trafficking do not wish to be put in sleeping accommodation with males for very good reasons of privacy and safety, and it is beyond our understanding why the Government keeps trying to insist otherwise." Lucy Hunter Blackburn from the MBM policy collective said: 'The response suggests that the Scottish Government has learnt little from the past few years. "It remains fundamentally unsympathetic to the rights and needs of women as a sex, and strongly wedded to defining 'women' as a group that must include some men. 'As a result, it appears to misunderstand both the judgment and the role of the EHRC. It still seems to believe, wrongly, that managing single-sex services and spaces must involve 'balancing' the rights of women against those of a sub-set of men. 'It is resisting clarity in favour of complication, and in doing so providing poor leadership to all Scottish public bodies who now just need to make the law work on the ground.'
