logo
Ensure reforms, policy coherence in revamped 13MP, urge trade groups

Ensure reforms, policy coherence in revamped 13MP, urge trade groups

Finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan has taken on the duties of the economy minister following the resignation of Rafizi Ramli, and will lead the 13MP revamp.
PETALING JAYA : Two business groups want Putrajaya to uphold policy continuity and preserve key structural reforms in the revised 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), following the recent resignation of economy minister Rafizi Ramli.
The Small and Medium Enterprises Association of Malaysia (Samenta) urged the government to uphold clarity and transparency in the 13MP overhaul, stressing that both domestic and foreign investor confidence hinges on it.
Samenta president William Ng said business confidence would improve if the revamped 13MP delivers a sharper focus, substantive structural reforms, and clear long-term direction.
However, he cautioned that a rushed process and excessive politicisation of reforms could undermine investor confidence.
'We want to see policy coherence, commitment to talent development, and a shift toward a more competitive and innovation-led economy. What we don't want is another round of short-termism or populism,' he told FMT.
Ng said his biggest concern was whether the input of industry players over the past one year would hold the same weight since finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan, tasked with leading the overhaul, was not fully involved in consultations.
'While Rafizi may have strong views that may not be fully appreciated by other ministers, these views are backed by extensive industry consultation.
'The timing of the revamp is certainly abrupt, but not necessarily unwelcome,' he said. 'Any changes at this stage will not erode investors' confidence as long as there is clarity and consistency in the final document.'
Meanwhile, the Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) expressed support for the review, citing recent global developments, including US tariffs and the Iran-Israel conflict.
However, it expressed concern over the timing of the revamp, noting that the plan is scheduled to be tabled in Parliament at the end of July.
MEF president Syed Hussain Syed Husman said the group was concerned about policy continuity and predictability as employers need stability for long-term planning especially as regards investment, expansion and hiring decisions.
'Abrupt shifts in policy direction may erode investor confidence and disrupt strategic business planning.
'Investors may be concerned that such last-minute changes could lead to the abandonment of previous strategic initiatives, especially those related to digital transformation, ESG, and talent development, unless clear continuity is demonstrated,' he said.
Syed Hussain said it was unclear whether the overhaul process would be inclusive and consultative.
'MEF is concerned that without structured stakeholder engagement, the revamped 13MP may fall short in addressing ground level challenges,' he said.
Syed Hussain also expressed concern that, with the finance minister II leading the overhaul, the 13MP revamp may be skewed towards fiscal and budgetary considerations while omitting to address structural issues faced by employers.
He added that there were concerns that with a new economy minister expected to take office, key initiatives championed by the former minister might be sidelined without explanation.
These include digital economy initiatives, innovation ecosystems, and green economy aspirations, which he said may lose traction without firm ministerial commitment.
Syed Hussain expressed hope of a transparent, inclusive and balanced approach to finalising the revamped 13MP.
'It is essential that the revamped 13MP reflects the actual needs of the business community, supports productivity-led growth and addresses labour market challenges.
'Frequent shifts in national direction without broad stakeholder consultation may be perceived as policy volatility, undermining Malaysia's reputation as a stable investment destination.'
On Friday, the government announced that Amir had taken on the duties of the economy minister and would lead the 13MP revamp.
He said the revamp had become necessary following feedback from Cabinet colleagues.
Rafizi, however, questioned the last-minute decision to revamp the plan, although he acknowledged that it contained 'bold and radical' policies that may not have sat well with certain ministries.
The PKR leader said he had presented the plan to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on multiple occasions, as well as twice to the Cabinet, in order to achieve a consensus.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'No constitutional crisis', AGC dismisses call for RCI on judicial appointments
'No constitutional crisis', AGC dismisses call for RCI on judicial appointments

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

'No constitutional crisis', AGC dismisses call for RCI on judicial appointments

PETALING JAYA: There is no need for a royal commision of inquiry (RCI) nor an investigation by a parliamentary select committee on the alleged irregularities in judicial appointments, says the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) as the situation does not constitute a constitutional crisis. In a statement on Tuesday (July 8), the AGC confirmed that the process is proceeding in accordance with the Federal Constitution. More to come Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative
[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative

KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed allegations of irregularities and delays in judicial appointments, saying that such claims must be assessed within the framework of the Federal Constitution. Responding to public statements made by Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and several other PKR members of Parliament yesterday (July 7), the AGC said the prime minister cannot be viewed merely as a conduit for recommendations from any party, as he holds a constitutional responsibility to advise the King on judicial appointments. This duty, the statement said, is essential to safeguard the independence, credibility and integrity of the judiciary. The AGC added that the King had consented to the appointment of several High Court and Court of Appeal judges last month, but that these appointments were still undergoing necessary formalities. "Such appointments must be conducted with proper order and decorum," it said. Addressing claims that a Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) meeting had been convened without sufficient notice, the AGC said that under Section 13(2) of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 (Act 695), the JAC is empowered to regulate its own procedures. In urgent circumstances, meetings can proceed with short notice if all members agree. "Procedural matters should not invalidate the JAC's deliberations unless there is clear evidence of mala fide intent or prejudice," it added. The AGC also addressed a serious allegation involving a Federal Court judge allegedly influencing judicial decisions and judge reassignments. It said deliberations within the JAC are legally protected and remain confidential, and such claims cannot be equated with proven misconduct or taken as a threat to judicial independence. "These remain premature and purely speculative allegations," it said. The AGC added that comparisons with the 2007 VK Lingam case were unwarranted, as that case involved clear evidence of interference, which led to the formation of a royal commission of inquiry (RCI). "In contrast, the current situation is based merely on unsubstantiated claims," the AGC said. Yesterday (July 7), nine PKR MPs called for an RCI to investigate what they claimed were alleged irregularities in the appointment of senior judges, including the Chief Justice. He claimed that nominations for the positions of Chief Justice and President of the Court of Appeal had already been decided by the JAC before the retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and submitted to the prime minister, but the appointments were not made, resulting in the current vacancies. He also claimed a JAC meeting was called last Friday without adhering to the required 10-day notice period, allegedly to renominate candidates for the vacant positions. Led by Pandan MP and former PKR deputy president Rafizi, the group said they would formally request that proceedings and an inquiry be conducted by the Parliamentary Special Select Committee on Human Rights, Elections and Institutional Reform, including top government officials to testify. "The Parliament, as an independent legislative body, must play a key role in safeguarding the independence of the judiciary," he said in a special press conference. Rafizi outlined four issues surrounding the judicial appointment controversy which are now circulating in the public domain that require clarification from the government. This includes that in the appointment of new judges (whether to the High Court, Court of Appeal, or Federal Court), nominations submitted by the JAC to the government were not acted upon in a timely manner, leading to urgent vacancies.

No judicial crisis in Malaysia, says AGC amid calls for RCI over top court vacancies
No judicial crisis in Malaysia, says AGC amid calls for RCI over top court vacancies

Malay Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

No judicial crisis in Malaysia, says AGC amid calls for RCI over top court vacancies

KUALA LUMPUR, July 8 — The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed claims that Malaysia is facing a judicial crisis, rejecting calls for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) or a parliamentary select committee to investigate judicial appointments. In a statement today, the AGC said the current situation does not constitute a constitutional crisis, and that the appointment process is proceeding in accordance with the Federal Constitution, according to a report published today in Free Malaysia Today. 'Discrepancies in timing or procedure related to appointments do not automatically amount to a constitutional crisis,' the AGC said. Citing Article 122B, the AGC explained that superior court judges are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the prime minister, following consultation with the Conference of Rulers. While Parliament may review governance issues, the AGC warned against politicising the roles of the prime minister or the King, saying such matters must be handled in line with constitutional principles. The statement follows demands by Pandan MP Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and several PKR lawmakers for an RCI amid delays in naming new top judicial figures, including the chief justice. Responding to claims of procedural flaws, including alleged short-notice meetings by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the AGC said such meetings are valid if members agree and no clear evidence of misconduct is present. The AGC also rejected 'speculative' accusations that a Federal Court judge influenced judicial decisions or postings, adding that JAC deliberations are legally protected and should not be misinterpreted as wrongdoing. It further said comparisons to the VK Lingam case in 2007, which resulted in an RCI, were 'unwarranted' due to the lack of solid evidence in the current situation. The AGC urged all parties to respect the separation of powers and avoid public pressure or political rhetoric that could compromise institutional credibility. Concerns over a judicial crisis arose ahead of the mandatory retirement of then Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim last week. Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim is now acting chief justice, while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof is serving as acting Court of Appeal president. Sarawak PKR information chief Abun Sui Anyit also said calls for an RCI were unnecessary, pointing to Article 131A of the constitution, which allows a Federal Court judge to assume interim duties to maintain judicial continuity. He stressed that judicial appointments involve four key institutions — the JAC, the prime minister, the Conference of Rulers, and the King — and are not solely decided by the executive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store