Students in debt from online gaming turn to ‘digital arrest' scam
The accused, all in their early twenties, allegedly supplied over 40 bank accounts to cyber fraudsters in exchange for commission, said an officer. 'They were approached by scammers on WhatsApp and agreed to assist in laundering funds after incurring losses in online betting,' said the officer.
Those arrested have been identified as K. Hemanth Reddy, 21, from Anumula in Nalgonda district, M. Yeswanth Reddy, 21, of Kambalapally village, and M. Tharun, 22, a resident of Karkhana, Secunderabad.
Their fraud came to light after a 57-year-old government employee from Dhoolpet received a phone call in January 2025 from someone claiming to be a Deputy Commissioner of Police. The caller falsely accused him of involvement in a ₹2 crore money laundering case, alleging that his Aadhaar number had been used to open a suspicious bank account.
Fake arrest warrants, RBI notices, and Supreme Court authorisations were sent to the victim over WhatsApp. Under pressure, the victim was instructed to disclose his banking details and transfer funds to prove his innocence. Believing he was facing imminent arrest, he ended up transferring ₹6.5 lakh. When communication ceased, he realised he had been conned.
Cybercrime police said the trio's bank accounts were used by the main fraudsters to receive money from victims via RTGS and NEFT transfers. They received a commission for each transaction.
'This type of fraud, known as a 'digital arrest' scam, typically involves fraudsters impersonating police officers and threatening targets with legal action. Video calls featuring people in police uniforms are used to pressure victims into compliance,' said the officer.
Citizens are urged to report cyber fraud by dialling 1930 or visiting www.cybercrime.gov.in.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
2006 Mumbai train blasts: Unpacking Bombay High Court's order
CHENNAI: In July 24, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an interim stay on a Bombay High Court judgment acquitting all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. The order, delivered by a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh, underscored that the high court's verdict would not serve as a judicial precedent for other cases, particularly those under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). However, the court emphasised that the accused, who had already been released from captivity, would not be re-arrested till further proceedings. The order came following an urgent appeal by the Maharashtra government, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The state argued that the high court's ruling could set a problematic precedent, potentially undermining trials under MCOCA, a stringent law to combat organised crime and terrorism in Maharashtra. Mehta stressed that certain legal findings in the high court's judgment could weaken the prosecution's ability to secure convictions in similar cases. The SC bench acknowledged the rarity of staying an acquittal, noting that such an action would be a 'rarest of rare' occurrence. The Maharashtra government's swift appeal was driven by political and legal pressures. Bombay High Court's acquittal On July 21, the Bombay High Court acquitted all accused, overturning a 2015 special court judgment that had sentenced five to death and seven to life imprisonment. The 671-page ruling by Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak cited the prosecution's 'utter failure' to prove guilt, citing unreliable evidence, coerced confessions, and systemic investigative lapses, including 'inhuman and barbaric' custodial torture. Within 24 hours, the Maharashtra government moved the Supreme Court, which, on July 24, stayed the order.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC refuses to stay HC order: Tardeo high-rise residents told to vacate illegal upper floors
MUMBAI: In a setback to dozens of families living in South Mumbai's upscale Tardeo neighbourhood, the Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay a Bombay High Court order directing residents of the upper floors of Willingdon View Co-operative Housing Society, constructed by Satellite Holdings, to vacate their homes for lack of an occupancy certificate (OC). Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025: View of Willingdon Heights at Tardeo area in south Mumbai. Mumbai, India. July 02, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/ HT Photo) (Raju Shinde) The residents, who have been living in flats from the 17th to 34th floor of the 34-storey building for over a decade, were earlier ordered by the Bombay High Court to vacate within two weeks. The court found the occupation illegal, citing grave violations of municipal and fire safety regulations. Rejecting the housing society's plea, the Supreme Court bench of justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan upheld the High Court's ruling. 'At the end of the day, the rule of law must prevail,' the judges said, calling the High Court's order 'very well considered, bold and lucid.' They also praised the court's 'courage and conviction' in tackling unauthorised constructions. Construction of the building commenced in 1990, and flat owners started occupying their respective premises from 2008. As of now, 50 of the 62 flats in the high-rise are occupied. The apex court observed that showing sympathy to such illegal occupants would be 'thoroughly misplaced' and stressed that legal norms must be respected to ensure public safety. The court dismissed the society's special leave petition and directed that the High Court's instructions be strictly followed. It also said appropriate legal action must be taken against any erring officials or wrongdoers. The Bombay High Court's order, passed on July 21 by justices G S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor, stemmed from a petition filed by Sunil B Zaveri, a resident of the same building. Zaveri flagged multiple irregularities in the construction, including the absence of a fire safety NOC and an OC for the upper floors. The court noted that the illegal flats pose a risk to human life and violate both the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act and the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. While some residents filed intervention pleas opposing the petition, the High Court held that such occupation was a 'brazen illegality'. 'Accepting such submissions would render the entire statutory regime meaningless,' the court said, warning that it would amount to legalising lawlessness in urban construction. The housing society had argued that it was taking steps to regularise not just the lower 16 floors — for which approvals are reportedly being pursued — but also the upper 18 floors. It urged the court to let the families continue staying on humanitarian grounds while applications for regularisation were processed. However, the High Court dismissed this plea, observing that residential occupancy without a valid OC cannot be justified, regardless of the number of years the flats have been in use. The court directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to initiate legal action if the residents failed to vacate within the stipulated time. The Supreme Court has allowed the society to approach the High Court to seek more time for vacating the flats. The High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the matter for August 6.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Retired banker from Kalina loses ₹4.6 crore to online investment fraud
MUMBAI: A 58-year-old woman from Santacruz East, who had retired from a leading multinational bank, was cheated to the tune of ₹4.6 crore by cyber fraudsters posing as executives of a wealth management company. The police said they befriended her in June via WhatsApp and phone calls, promising handsome returns. Retired banker from Kalina loses ₹ 4.6 crore to online investment fraud The complainant retired as a manager from the bank and lives with her husband in Kalina, Santacruz East, where the two survive on pensions. According to the police, one of the accused sent her a WhatsApp message on June 28, 2025, claiming to be the personal assistant of the founder of a leading wealth management firm in the city. The accused offered to facilitate her stock market investments and asked her to install a mobile application, then join a WhatsApp group. After seeing the 103-strong group chat flooding with screenshots and messages claiming to have profited from the tips given by the admins, the complainant was convinced. 'After analysing and seeing the profits, the complainant began to 'invest' from June 30 onwards,' said the officer. He added that every time she transferred money to the accused, the exact amount was reflected on the mobile application, so she did not suspect anything amiss. Spreading around 18 transactions from June 30 to July 22, the complainant sent around ₹4.6 crore under the impression that she was investing in stock markets and IPOs through a genuine wealth management firm. Her balance displayed on the application was ₹27 crore on 23 July, when she decided to withdraw money, and that is when her suspicions began, as she was not able to. When she put in a request for withdrawal on the app, another person called her, persuading her to purchase 15% more shares to qualify for withdrawal. The complainant then visited the office of the firm only to realise those who called her were not even a part of it. Realising she had been cheated, she approached the Western Region Cyber police station. 'We have registered the offence on Thursday under sections 340 (forged documents and electronic records), 338 (forgery of valuable security, will, etc.), 336 (forgery), 319 (cheating by personation) and 318 (cheating) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under various sections of the Information Technology Act,' said the police officer.
