IONQ CEO Says ‘The Era of Quantum Supremacy Is Just Around the Corner'
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
A Quick Look at Quantum Computing
IonQ is one of the leading players in the quantum computing space, competing for dominance with others, including Rigetti Computing (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), and Quantum Computing (QUBT). Notably, IonQ is on track to develop both quantum computers and quantum networking equipment. Quantum networking refers to highly secured communication networks that are critical in fields such as banking, government, and telecommunications.
Moreover, the CEO noted that IonQ is racing ahead of China in cracking current encryption methods like RSA, giving it a competitive edge and aligning with national security interests. Over the past year, IONQ stock has surged over 453% on the hope of this breakthrough.
Why Is Quantum Computing the Next Big Thing?
De Masi believes that quantum computing will soon provide a narrow commercial advantage, then progress to broader advantages, and ultimately achieve quantum supremacy. He highlighted that IonQ's systems operate at room temperature with high accuracy, scale rapidly, and have strong revenue growth.
Quantum technology holds promise for breakthroughs in applications like healthcare and pharmaceuticals, including drug discovery. IonQ has a partnership with Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon Web Services (AMZN), and AstraZeneca (AZN), which aims to explore molecules through a quantum lens.
To conclude, IonQ's CEO forecasts that quantum supremacy is imminent and will revolutionize applied science sectors by solving problems beyond classical computing's reach, with real-world applications emerging soon. There is growing interest in quantum computing from Wall Street and tech giants such as Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon, and IBM (IBM), as well as from the U.S. government, underscoring the commercial and scientific potential of this technology.
Is IONQ Stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell?
average IONQ price target of $43 implies 2.1% downside potential from current levels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other
Key Points Lucid closed a deal with Uber to power its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer is doubting the deal's long-term potential. Rivian may be a better buy due to a deal with VW. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) soared in value following the announcement of its partnership with Uber Technologies. According to the deal's terms, Uber will invest $300 million in the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Uber also committed to purchase 20,000 vehicles from Lucid to kick-start its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer recently weighted in on the deal, and his take was surprising to many. He compared Lucid's deal with Uber to a partnership Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN), another EV stock, made earlier this year. If you're invested in either Lucid or Rivian, you'll want to give Cramer's comments some consideration. How big is the Uber and Lucid partnership in reality? The details of Lucid's partnership with Uber are fairly straightforward. The latter says it is expecting to launch a robotaxi service later next year in a major U.S. city. To power this launch, Uber plans to order 20,000 Lucid Gravity SUVs over the next six years. According to a press release, the vehicles will be owned and operated by Uber or its third-party fleet partners and made available to riders exclusively via the Uber platform. To help Lucid scale up enough to produce this many vehicles, Uber also agreed to invest $300 million into the business. Around the same time, Lucid announced a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, but it's not clear how connected these two events are. While all of this looks promising on paper, there are two obvious problems. First, Uber's robotaxi division remains in its infancy. Whether it can actually grow big enough to acquire 20,000 Lucid vehicles remains a huge open question. Second, $300 million won't do much to keep Lucid financially viable over the next six years. While it ended 2024 with more than $6 billion in liquidity, the company also posted a net loss of $2.7 billion, roughly the same net loss it posted in 2023. A $300 million cash infusion is helpful, but it will hardly cure its ongoing financial challenges. Jim Cramer thinks Rivian's deal with Volkswagen is superior When Jim Cramer was asked about Lucid's partnership with Uber last week, he called the deal a "dalliance." In other words, he views it more as a short-term arrangement than a bona fide long-term partnership. "I think that you need a commitment, like the Volkswagen commitment to Rivian is extraordinary," Cramer said. "That's an open-ended check from one of the biggest car companies." He is referring to a joint venture between Volkswagen and Rivian that was announced in November 2024. The German automaker will receive crucial access to Rivian's software operating platform and technological back end. In exchange, Rivian receives up to $5.8 billion in funding. It's not hard to see the difference in commitments here. Uber is investing just $300 million into Lucid, with the promise of buying vehicles over the next six years. Rivian, meanwhile, is receiving up to $5.8 billion in funding by the end of 2027, starting with an immediate $1 billion convertible note. To be clear, Lucid's deal with Uber is still very exciting. ARK Investment CEO Cathie Wood eventually sees the robotaxi market being worth up to $10 trillion by 2030. But Rivian's deal with Volkswagen gives more credence to Rivian's tech stack and differentiation. If you're excited about the Uber-Lucid tie-up, be sure to dive into Rivian's and Volkswagen's partnership, as Cramer correctly points out. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030
Key Points Quantum Computing has emerged alongside other popular quantum stocks such as IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum over the last year. While the company's approach to building quantum applications is interesting, past ambitions in other markets and an inconsistent financial profile should make investors pause before blindly buying the hype narrative. Although Quantum Computing has interesting potential, the amount of unknowns surrounding the company's future are hard to ignore. 10 stocks we like better than Quantum Computing › One of the more curious companies that has piqued investor intrigue in the quantum computing market is a business called (wait for it!) Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT). With a name like that, I wonder how it landed on so many radars. Sarcasm aside, Quantum Computing (the business) deserves a look -- and not just because of its 2,400% share price gains over the last year. To me, the company's technological promises and its actual business just don't align. Let's explore how Quantum Computing is attempting to disrupt the artificial intelligence (AI) realm and then dig into whether or not the company has what it takes to fulfill its lofty ambitions. Is Quantum Computing the next multibagger AI stock? Read on to find out. Quantum Computing might look like an exciting company on the surface, but... Quantum-based applications have the potential to transform the computing industry thanks to their fundamentally differentiated architectures. In simple terms, classical computing is based on binary code, written through a series of bits expressed as 1 or 0. Quantum computing uses qubits, which means they can exist as both 1 and 0 at the same time -- a process known as superposition. This allows for more complex information processing compared to today's classical computers. There are multiple ways that companies are developing qubits. IonQ relies on a process called trapped-ion, which essentially uses lasers to trap atoms and use them as the foundation of a qubit. Meanwhile, other competitors such as Rigetti Computing and D-Wave Quantum use superconducting circuits and quantum annealing techniques to make qubits. Quantum Computing, on the other hand, is using light (photons) as opposed to Rigetti and D-Wave's electricity-based foundation or IonQ's trapped atom technology. In theory, photonic qubits may be more energy efficient and easier to scale than other approaches that are heavily reliant on sophisticated cooling systems. ... there are quite a few red flags to point out Before buying into the idea that Quantum Computing is on the verge of a technological breakthrough, consider the following: Quantum Computing was once known as Innovative Beverage Group Holdings (IBGH). Why did the company pivot from beverages to qubits? Well, consider that IBGH went out of business, and the leftover management team decided to acquire a small company called QPhoton and completely shift its focus to quantum computing. Over the last year, Quantum Computing has generated $385,000 in sales. While the idea of photonic qubits is interesting, Quantum Computing is far from building a competitive moat over its rivals. The company's nominal revenue base and unproven roadmap hint at possible liquidity crunches down the road. For now, Quantum Computing appears to be relying on issuing stock as a means to raise cash and fund the operation. Despite these red flags, Quantum Computing has seen its market value climb from $55 million to $2.4 billion in just one year. The company's valuation is far higher than what investors witnessed during prior stock market bubbles during the internet boom and the COVID-19 stock market euphoria. Where will Quantum Computing stock be in five years? Given the ideas explored above, it's clear that Quantum Computing has virtually nothing to show for its supposed innovative photonic processes. The lack of strategic partners and product-market fit has me thinking that Quantum Computing offers more along the lines of vaporware than anything groundbreaking at this time. With ongoing research and development (R&D) and capital expenditures (capex) required to explore quantum technology, Quantum Computing is likely going to continue tapping the capital markets for liquidity unless some transformative deals begin to take shape -- which I suspect is highly unlikely. In my eyes, Quantum Computing stock is benefiting for one reason above all else. The company's name isn't just associated with one of AI's hottest new themes -- it's literally the name of the actual trend. To me, this is a case study revolving around the idea of investors blindly chasing narratives over sound fundamentals. I think that Quantum Computing is headed toward insolvency and could wind up bankrupt by 2030 (if not sooner). Alternatively, regulators could begin to scrutinize the company more heavily, and Quantum Computing could end up as a delisted stock. Regardless of how things shake out, I think Quantum Computing's equity value will diminish significantly in the coming years. For this reason, I think the company will have little-to-no value by the end of the decade. Should you buy stock in Quantum Computing right now? Before you buy stock in Quantum Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Quantum Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Adam Spatacco has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030 was originally published by The Motley Fool
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
MCP Connects, SDP Delivers: The Missing Half of AI Memory is Here
Prescott, Arizona / Syndication Cloud / July 22, 2025 / David Bynon Key Takeaways Model Context Protocol (MCP) creates AI connections to external tools but doesn't define structured memory content Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) provides trust-scored, fragment-level memory objects for reliable AI operations Multi-agent systems typically fail due to missing shared, verifiable context rather than communication issues MCP and SDP together form a complete memory architecture that stops hallucinations and contextual drift MedicareWire will implement SDP in 2025 as the first major deployment of AI-readable, trust-verified memory in a regulated domain AI's Memory Crisis: Why Today's Systems Can't Remember What Matters Today's AI systems face a critical problem: they process vast information but struggle with reliable memory. This isn't merely a technical issue — it's what causes hallucinations, inconsistency, and unreliability in advanced AI deployments. This problem becomes obvious in multi-agent systems. When specialized AI agents work together, they don't typically fail from poor communication. They fail because they lack shared, scoped, and verifiable context. Without standardized memory architecture, agents lose alignment, reference inconsistent information, and produce unreliable results. David Bynon, founder at MedicareWire, identified this issue early on. In regulated areas like Medicare, incorrect information can seriously impact consumers making healthcare decisions. The solution needs two protocols working together to create a complete memory system for AI. The first protocol, Model Context Protocol (MCP), addresses the connection problem. But it's just half of what's needed for truly reliable AI memory. Understanding Model Context Protocol (MCP) IBM recently recognized the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as core infrastructure for AI systems, describing it as 'USB-C for AI' — a universal connector standard allowing AI models to connect with external tools, data sources, and memory systems. This recognition confirmed what many AI engineers already understood: standardized connections between AI models and external resources build reliable systems at scale. IBM's Recognition: The 'USB-C for AI' Breakthrough The USB-C comparison makes sense. Before USB standardization, connecting devices to computers required numerous proprietary ports and cables. Before MCP, every AI tool integration needed custom code, fragile connections, and ongoing maintenance. IBM's official support of MCP acknowledged that AI's future requires standardized interfaces. Just as USB-C connects any compatible device to any compatible port, MCP creates a standard protocol for AI systems to interact with external tools and data sources. What MCP Solves: The Transport Problem MCP handles the transport problem in AI systems. It standardizes how an AI agent: Negotiates with external systems about needed information Creates secure, reliable connections to tools and data sources Exchanges information in predictable, consistent formats Maintains state across interactions with various resources This standardization allows developers to build tools once for use with any MCP-compliant AI system. Custom integrations for each new model or tool become unnecessary — just consistent connectivity across platforms. The Critical Gap: Missing Content Definition Despite its value, MCP has a major limitation: it defines how AI systems connect, but not what the content should look like. This resembles standardizing a USB port without defining the data format flowing through it. This creates a significant gap in AI memory architecture. While MCP handles connections, it doesn't address: How to structure memory for machine understanding How to encode and verify trust and provenance How to scope and contextualize content How information fragments should relate to each other This explains why AI systems with excellent tool integration still struggle with reliable memory — they have connections but lack content structure for trustworthy recall. Semantic Digest Protocol: The Memory Layer MCP Needs This is where the Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) fits — built to work with MCP while solving what it leaves unaddressed: defining what memory should actually look like. Trust-Scored Fragment-Level Memory Architecture SDP organizes memory at the fragment level, instead of treating entire documents as single information units. Each fragment — a fact, definition, statistic, or constraint — exists as an independent memory object with its own metadata. These memory objects contain: The actual information content A trust score based on source credibility Complete provenance data showing information origin Scope parameters showing where and when the information applies Contextual relationships to other memory fragments This detailed approach fixes a basic problem: AI systems must know not just what a fact is, but how much to trust it, where it came from, when it applies, and how it connects to other information. Using the 'USB-C for AI' analogy, SDP is a universal, USB-C thumb drive for the Model Context Protocol. It provides data, across multiple surfaces, in a format MCP recognizes and understands Machine-Ingestible Templates in Multiple Formats SDP creates a complete trust payload system with templates in multiple formats: JSON-LD for structured data interchange TTL (Turtle) for RDF graph representations Markdown for lightweight documentation HTML templates for web publication Invented by David Bynon as a solution for MedicareWire, the format flexibility makes SDP work immediately with existing systems while adding the necessary trust layer. For regulated sectors like healthcare, where MedicareWire operates, this trust layer changes AI interactions from educated guesses to verified responses. The Complete AI Memory Loop: MCP + SDP in Action When MCP and SDP work together, they form a complete memory architecture for AI systems. Here's the workflow: From User Query to Trust-Verified Response The process starts with a user query. Example: 'What's the Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this Medicare Advantage plan in Los Angeles?' The AI model uses MCP to negotiate context with external resources. It identifies what specific plan information it needs and establishes connections to retrieve that data. The external resource sends back an SDP-formatted response with the requested information. This includes the MOOP value, geographic scope (Los Angeles County), temporal validity (2025), and provenance (directly from CMS data), all with appropriate trust scores. With trust-verified information, the model answers accurately: 'The 2025 Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this plan in Los Angeles County is $4,200, according to CMS data.' No hallucination. No vague references. No outdated information. Just verified, scoped, trust-scored memory through standardized connections. Eliminating Hallucinations Through Verified Memory This method addresses what causes hallucinations in AI systems. Rather than relying on statistical patterns from training, the AI retrieves specific, verified information with full context about reliability and applicability. When information changes, there's no need to retrain the model. The external memory layer updates, and the AI immediately accesses new information—complete with trust scoring and provenance tracking. Real-World Implementation: MedicareWire 2025 This isn't theoretical — SDP launches on in August 2025, marking the first major implementation of AI-readable, trust-scored memory in a regulated domain. 1. First Large-Scale Deployment in a Regulated Domain The healthcare industry, especially Medicare, offers an ideal testing ground for trust-verified AI memory. Incorrect information has serious consequences, regulations are complex, and consumers need reliable guidance through a confusing system. MedicareWire's implementation will give AI systems unprecedented accuracy when accessing Medicare plan information. Instead of using potentially outdated training data, AI systems can query MedicareWire's SDP-enabled content for current, verified information about Medicare plans, benefits, and regulations. 2. Solving Healthcare's Critical Information Accuracy Problem Consumers using AI assistants for Medicare options will get consistent, accurate information regardless of which system they use. The SDP implementation ensures any AI agent can retrieve precise details about: Plan coverage specifications Geographic availability Cost structures and limitations Enrollment periods and deadlines Regulatory requirements and exceptions All come with proper attribution, scope, and trust scoring. 3. Creating the Foundation for Multi-Agent Trust Infrastructure Beyond immediate benefits for Medicare consumers, this implementation creates a blueprint for trust infrastructure in other regulated fields. Multi-agent systems will have shared, verifiable context — eliminating drift and hallucination problems that affect complex AI deployments. The combination of MCP's standardized connections and SDP's trust-verified memory builds the foundation for reliable AI systems that can safely operate in highly regulated environments. From Connection to Memory: The Future of Reliable AI Is Here David Bynon, founder of Trust Publishing and architect of SDP, states: 'We didn't just create a format. We created the trust language AI systems can finally understand — and remember.' As AI shapes important decisions in healthcare, finance, legal, and other critical fields, reliable, verifiable memory becomes essential. The MCP+SDP combination shifts from probabilistic guessing to trust-verified information retrieval — defining the next generation of AI applications. SDP will be available as an open protocol for non-directory systems, supporting broad adoption and continued development across the AI ecosystem. As the first major implementation, MedicareWire's deployment marks the beginning of a new phase in trustworthy artificial intelligence. MedicareWire is leading development of trustworthy AI memory systems that help consumers access accurate healthcare information when they need it most. David Bynon 101 W Goodwin St # 2487 Prescott Arizona 86303 United States
