Carney faces pressure to retaliate against Trump's steel, aluminum tariffs
But even as he called the tariffs 'unlawful, unjustified and illogical,' Mr. Carney said Canada will take its time responding, citing broader talks with the U.S. that he said are progressing.
Mr. Trump initially imposed tariffs of 25 per cent on the metals in March but doubled them to 50 per cent as of Wednesday. The tariffs apply to all foreign suppliers, but they will disproportionately hit Canada, which is the largest supplier of steel and aluminum to the U.S.
Ottawa imposed retaliatory tariffs in March, but Mr. Carney lifted many of those in April over concerns that they would drive up prices for Canadian consumers.
Mr. Carney, who won the spring election on a campaign to fight against U.S. tariffs, including through retaliation, said Canada wouldn't hit back against the increased tariffs just yet.
'We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans and in parallel, preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed,' Mr. Carney said during Question Period on Wednesday.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford urged immediate retaliation. He told reporters he had spoken with Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who is leading the U.S.-Canada file, to make the case.
The Canadian Labour Congress, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities joined together to demand government action.
The three groups rarely share a stage, but did so Wednesday to make a point, said Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress.
'This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. We need to defend our jobs. We need to invest in our industries, and we need to protect our communities that built this country, labour, business, municipalities and government.'
She urged reprisal, but said she also wants the government to take other steps, including reforms to employment insurance to assist affected workers and legislated commitments to use Canadian steel in national projects.
Industry, billionaire tycoon Barry Zekelman urge government action on steel dumping
Ms. Bruske said there are 23,000 steel industry jobs in the country that could be affected 'within the next couple of days,' plus 9,500 aluminum jobs, and then all the spin-off jobs created by both industries.
The Prime Minister's hesitation on retaliation is a contrast with the approach of then-prime minister Justin Trudeau, who immediately imposed tariffs on the U.S., both earlier this year and in 2018, during Mr. Trump's previous trade war with Canada.
In March, Mr. Ford also moved quickly to levy a 25-per-cent surcharge on electricity that Ontario sends to 1.5 million homes in three U.S. states. He cancelled the measure within a day after Mr. Trump threatened to double steel and aluminum tariffs in response.
But Mr. Ford said his understanding is that a Canada-U.S. deal is close, and so for now he is not reinstating the surcharge.
Mr. Carney is pushing for a deal between the two countries covering both trade and national security, including the border and defence.
The CEO of Algoma Steel Group Inc., Michael Garcia, said Ottawa should immediately bring in tariffs on imports of foreign steel to address dumping in Canada from places such as Turkey, Vietnam and the Middle East.
Mr. Garcia said that unless the price of steel skyrockets, the company's U.S. business isn't viable anymore.
'I am advocating for Section 53 tariffs not as a retaliatory measure against the U.S., but as a prudent move to protect a vital strategic industry,' he said in an interview.
Under Canada's Customs Tariff law, Section 53 tariffs can be imposed by Ottawa in cases in which unfair trade practices are occurring that are harming domestic trade.
An estimate by Oxford Economics, a consultancy firm, found that more than half of U.S. steel imported into Canada is currently exempt from tariffs.
The Aluminium Association of Canada said the tariff increase would destroy demand across the continent, no matter whether the metal is made in Canada or the U.S., and disrupt key sectors, including defence, construction and automotive.
Steel prices in the U.S. have already risen by 16 per cent since Mr. Trump took office in January, and his higher tariffs risk causing inflation for American consumers by making products built with steel more expensive.
At a committee hearing on Wednesday, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the administration's goal is not to get other countries to simply lower trade barriers but to ensure that those countries stop exporting certain products to the U.S., a position that would appear to complicate Mr. Carney's efforts to land a deal that includes removing U.S. tariffs.
Mr. Lutnick said under questioning from Senator John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, that he did not know the name of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the legislation under which the U.S. has imposed steel, aluminum and auto tariffs. He also said he was not familiar with a principle called the 'major questions doctrine,' which was central to a legal decision overturning a different series of Mr. Trump's tariffs.
Mr. Lutnick is the member of the President's cabinet with top authority on trade policy. Mr. Kennedy's grilling of Mr. Lutnick could indicate a fracture in Republican support for Mr. Trump's agenda. While the party traditionally supported free trade, it has largely fallen in line behind the President's protectionism since he returned to office.
Meanwhile, in Ottawa, the opposition Conservatives and the New Democrats all castigated Mr. Carney Wednesday for campaigning in the recent election on having a plan to push back against Mr. Trump, but still not having a deal to end the tariff dispute.
Mining giants Alcoa, Rio Tinto and Aluminerie Alouette operate nine plants in Canada, eight of them in Quebec. This amps up the political pressure on the minority Liberal government from the Bloc Québécois.
At a White House meeting last month, Mr. Trump said there was nothing Mr. Carney could say that would make him change his mind on tariffs, but the Prime Minister has remained insistent that such a deal would include the U.S. lifting its levies on Canada.
With reports from Niall McGee and Nicolas Van Praet
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
38 minutes ago
- CTV News
Rod Stewart shares his thoughts on '51st state' threat with Toronto crowd
Rod Stewart isn't a fan of U.S. President Donald Trump or his threats against Canada, and recently used a concert to amplify his sentiment on the matter. Video clips of Tuesday night's performance on Toronto's Budweiser Stage shows the 80-year-old rock legend sharing his thoughts on Trump's threats to make Canada the 51st state. Stewart's enthusiasm and support for Canada were dished out in the form of a tribute during his finale, where he brought out his dancers and musicians and projected a video above the stage, which he said he found on the internet. The clip in question was an altered version of Gloria Gaynor's 1978 hit 'I Will Survive,' with the lyrics changed to reflect Canada's strength in the face of Trumps threats of annexation, superimposed over images of Canadian landscapes and icons, like TTC streetcars and the Canadian flag. Some of the lyrics include the lines: 'We spent so many nights thinking how you did us wrong, we've banded all together, your tariff made us strong,' as well as, 'You know you're not so great, there's not a snowball's chance in hell we'll be your 51st state,' and 'We have all we really need, we will live without your greed, we will survive.' Stewart and his dancers shimmied on stage as the video played. After the clip was finished, Stewart addressed the audience with gusto. '51st state my f---ing ass,' he told the crowd as he pumped his fist. 'Go on Canada!' Tuesday's concert was part of Stewart's One Last Stop Tour, which featured opening act Cheap Trick. In June, the rock legend had to cancel several U.S. dates as a result of illness.
CTV News
38 minutes ago
- CTV News
All in on ETFs? Experts share how to diversify your portfolio — without overdoing it
TORONTO — Exchange-traded funds have exploded in popularity, and so have investment strategies based only on ETFs, but some investors might be wondering whether that could lead to their portfolio being too diversified. Financial experts say allocating an entire portfolio to ETFs can be a viable strategy, but it's important for investors to know what holdings are in the funds they're buying. When looking at portfolio diversification for ETF-focused investors, Jonathan Rivard, general principal at Edward Jones, said it's important to consider the individual's time horizon and risk appetite. 'You could absolutely be 100 per cent invested in ETFs. But you want to know what's in the ETF and what the allocation looks like. Some ETFs will be balanced; they'll have a mix of stocks and bonds in them. Some will be sector products,' Rivard said. 'The important thing comes down to understanding what does this basket hold? And if I own multiple ETFs, what does it look like across multiple ETFs in terms of asset allocation?' Prerna Mathews, Mackenzie Investments' vice-president of ETF product strategy, said there are a few key points to keep in mind regarding diversification, notably, it is important to think beyond just diversifying by geography. 'So (if) you're starting with the core Canadian, U.S., international exposure, don't stop there. Think about how fixed income plays a role in your portfolio, real assets, there are thematic products, and there are alternative ETFs. There are a lot of different drivers of return that can be added to a portfolio available in ETF form,' she said. Another consideration is buying ETFs with different investment styles, she said, which may include combining traditional index ETFs with others that are actively managed or have low volatility. Time horizon is also an important consideration, where those with a longer investment horizon may want to focus on growth, she said, taking on more risk with higher equity exposure. Regarding fixed income, Mathews said to be aware of the differences between short- and longer-term yields, adding that most investors will likely not have exposure to every duration of fixed income and should know the relevant trade-offs. 'In some cases, you can get a very attractive yield at the short end of the curve without taking on significant risk as you would on the long end,' she said. 'Really understanding the trade-off there and likely having some short-term fixed income in the portfolio would be viable. But aggregate bonds over a 30-year time period are generally a good place to be.' Mathews said there is also a growing number of investors opting for an asset allocation ETF. She said this type of ETF is essentially eight to 12 ETFs 'all packaged up in one,' and has served as a core holding for those looking for a 'set it and forget it' investment. Despite the benefits of diversification, Mathews said there are dangers to being overly diversified. This might occur for someone investing in Canadian equities through an ETF but also buying into an asset allocation ETF, Mathews said. In that case, the investor may end up with more Canadian equity exposure than anticipated. Similarly, with the TSX financials sector representing around 30 per cent of the overall index, an investor with a TSX-focused ETF and a Canadian banks-focused ETF could end up with too much exposure to Canadian bank stocks. 'There is a risk of having too much product in your portfolio. Sometimes that can creep up on us when we're not doing a full look through to what each ETF might be investing in,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Daniel Johnson, The Canadian Press
CBC
38 minutes ago
- CBC
Digby affordable housing project on hold as federal funding dries up
A plan by a Digby, N.S., non-profit to build affordable housing on the site of a former downtown motel is at a standstill as the group awaits word on federal funding. The Digby & Area Housing Coalition Society purchased the former Siesta Motel in 2022 with an aim to turn the existing building into affordable housing, coalition chair Nancy Robinson said. Subsequently, it was decided that it would be more cost efficient to demolish the motel and build 34 units on the site. The units would serve seniors and other vulnerable people facing Digby's severe housing shortage. Robinson said the units would be genuinely affordable, with tenants spending no more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, including utilities. She said they already have many applicants for the units. After securing $300,000 in funding including provincial grants for design work and municipal approvals, the $11.2-million project was construction-ready this spring and awaiting the release of federal funds. After waiting for the outcome of the federal election, Robinson said the group was told the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's affordable housing fund, their expected funding source, had been depleted. 'That's a lot of money' CMHC said in an email to CBC that it's affordable housing fund "has attracted significant interest and success, resulting in numerous high-quality applications," but did not indicate if and when it will be replenished. Robinson said the devastating news has left the project in limbo. "That's a lot of money and it's very difficult to make that up," she said. "It's nerve-racking, not just because of the number of people that are waiting for housing, desperately waiting for housing, and Digby where there's really basically nothing available and certainly nothing affordable." Robinson said the delay leaves the volunteer organization having to cover significant costs, including the $2,600-monthly mortgage payment on the vacant property. The delay couldn't come at worse time for Digby, she said. The community's housing shortage has reached emergency levels. She said the funding issue appears linked to broader changes in federal housing policy. While Ottawa works to implement its new housing plan, she said existing programs like the affordable housing fund have been allowed to lapse. Robinson said she understands the need for systemic reform, but immediate action is needed to help people in desperate need of appropriate housing. The coalition has launched a local fundraising campaign and is exploring alternative financing options. Chris D'Entremont, the Conservative MP for Acadie-Annapolis, which includes Digby, said it was strange the program was still taking applications even though it said its funds have been depleted. He said billions of dollars have gone into the fund, which has existed since 2018. "We're hoping that as the fall rolls around, of course, there's going to be a budget coming," he told CBC Radio's Information Morning Nova Scotia. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne "has said that there will be a program coming, that there should be funding. So we're hoping it will be topping this off." With demolition delayed from its planned May 2025 start, Robinson said completion could now slip to late 2026. Meanwhile, for the applicants the wait continues with no clear resolution in sight. "They are desperate. It's palpable. It's tragic, really," Robinson said.
