Japan's aid agency, U.N. sign deal to expand mine action cooperation
JICA said the deal with the United Nations Mine Action Service, or UNMAS, aims to cement their collaborative ties in the field, particularly in Africa, one of the most heavily landmine-contaminated regions due to armed conflicts.
Under a memorandum of understanding signed in June between Naoki Ando, senior vice president of JICA, and Ilene Cohn, director of UNMAS, the two organizations agreed to regularly share information and hold events.
The memorandum makes their level of cooperation "more defined" and now offers "opportunities to broaden the target nations," a JICA official said.
Established in 1997, UNMAS engages in minesweeping and supports victims of landmines and other explosive remnants of war. It also disseminates information about the dangers of landmines in areas such as Africa and the Middle East.
The memorandum also says JICA and UNMAS will also cooperate with the Cambodian Mine Action Centre in conducting training and monitoring activities in African states.
The Cambodian center is a landmine-clearing organization that has removed thousands of domestic mines laid during a civil war that lasted for decades until the early 1990s. JICA has contributed to demining efforts in the Southeast Asian country since 1998.
JICA and UNMAS themselves have already been cooperating, having carried out workshops for field workers in Africa since 2023.
Japan has been focused on advancing landmine countermeasures, recently working together with Cambodia to help eliminate mines laid by Russian forces in Ukraine during their ongoing invasion.
It is set to chair the next meeting of state parties of the Ottawa Convention, an international agreement that prohibits the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of mines, slated for December in Geneva.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Lutovinov Appointed Ukrainian Ambassador to Japan
News from Japan World Jul 22, 2025 12:40 (JST) Tokyo, July 22 (Jiji Press)--Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has appointed Yuriy Lutovinov, former minister-counselor at the Ukrainian Embassy in Japan, as ambassador to Japan. The appointment was announced on Monday. Of the Group of Seven major powers, which have led assistance to Ukraine amid the Russian invasion of the East European country, Japan had been the only country with a vacant Ukrainian ambassador post. Former Ukrainian Ambassador to Japan Sergiy Korsunsky left his post this spring. Lutovinov, fluent in Japanese, may take up his new post as early as September. Korsunsky became Ukrainian ambassador to Japan in 2020. He worked to secure Japan's backing in Kyiv's fight with Moscow, and focused on spreading information through X, formerly Twitter. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
Yomiuri Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Russia Launches a Major Aerial Attack on Kyiv Hours before High-Level Talks on Support for Ukraine
Russia unleashed one of its largest aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months hours before Britain and Germany chaired a meeting Monday to discuss U.S. President Donald Trump's plans for NATO allies to provide Ukraine with weapons. The drone and missile attack on Kyiv, Ukraine's capital, killed two people and wounded 15, including a 12-year-old, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. The deadly assault underscored the urgency of Ukraine's need for further Western military aid, especially in air defense, a week after Trump said deliveries would arrive in Ukraine within days. A drone struck the entrance to a subway station in Kyiv's Shevchenkivskyi district where people had taken cover. Videos posted on social media showed the station platform engulfed by smoke, with dozens inside. The heaviest strikes hit the city's Darnytskyi district, where a kindergarten, supermarket and warehouse facilities caught fire. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, who arrived in Kyiv on Monday for talks with Zelenskyy, visited some of the damaged area. Zelenskyy and Barrot spoke about expanding defense cooperation, including a decision by French companies to start manufacturing drones in Ukraine, and advancing Ukraine's path toward European Union membership, the Ukrainian leader said on social media. Western defense chiefs meet on Ukraine The virtual meeting of high-level military officials was led by British Defense Secretary John Healey and his German counterpart Boris Pistorius. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and NATO leader Mark Rutte, as well as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, attended the so-called Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting. Moscow has intensified its long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities, and analysts say the barrages are likely to escalate as Russian drone production expands. Ukraine's new Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal urged allies to speed up deliveries of American air defense systems under the plan put forward by Trump. 'I request the U.S. to make these weapons available for purchase, and our European partners to extend all the needed financing for their procurement,' Shmyhal, who until recently served as prime minister, told the meeting. Trump's arms plan, announced a week ago, involves European nations sending American weapons, including Patriot air defense missile systems, to Ukraine via NATO — either from existing stockpiles or buying and donating new ones. In an shift of tone toward Russia, Trump last week gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face tougher sanctions. At Monday's meeting, Healey was expected to urge Ukraine's Western partners to launch a '50-day drive' to get Kyiv the weapons it needs to fight Russia's bigger army and force Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table, the U.K. government said in a statement. NATO's Grynkewich told The Associated Press on Thursday that 'preparations are underway' for weapons transfers to Ukraine while U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said he couldn't give a time frame. European Commissioner for Defense and Space Andrius Kubilius visited Washington on Monday ahead of talks with U.S. officials about European defense and support for Ukraine. Kubilius told reporters he welcomed Trump taking a harder line on Putin, calling it 'a new opening in how we can support Ukraine.' 'If you combine American economic power and European economic power we are something like 20 times Russia's power,' he said. 'We need political will.' Kyiv wants American-made Patriot missile systems Germany has said it offered to finance two new Patriot systems for Ukraine and raised the possibility of supplying systems it already owns and having them replaced by the U.S. But delivery could take time, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz suggested, because 'they have to be transported, they have to be set up; that is not a question of hours, it is a question of days, perhaps weeks.' Other Patriot systems could come thanks to Switzerland, whose defense ministry said Thursday it was informed by the U.S. Defense Department that it will 'reprioritize the delivery' of five previously ordered systems to support Ukraine. While Ukraine waits for Patriots, a senior NATO official said the alliance is still coordinating the delivery of other military aid — such as ammunition and artillery rounds — which includes aid from the U.S. that was briefly paused. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. In a video address, Zelenskyy said another round of talks between Ukrainian and Russian delegations was planned for Wednesday. He said he discussed the preparations with Rustem Umerov, who led the Ukrainian team in the previous two rounds, but didn't give further details. The previous negotiations were held in Istanbul, and Russian media reports said it would likely remain the host city. The talks in May and June led to a series of exchanges of prisoners of war but produced no other agreements. Ukraine fires drones at Moscow The overnight Russian barrage of Kyiv began shortly after midnight and continued until around 6 a.m. Residents were kept awake by machine-gun fire, buzzing drone engines and multiple loud explosions. It was the first major attack on Kyiv since Trump's special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, arrived in the city last Monday. Russia halted strikes during his visit. Russia's Ministry of Defense said its attack used drones and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles. It said the barrage successfully targeted airfield infrastructure and Ukraine's military-industrial complex. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 426 Shahed and decoy drones overnight and on Monday, as well as 24 missiles of various types. It said 200 drones were intercepted with 203 more jammed or lost from radars. Ukraine, meanwhile, continued to deploy its domestically produced long-range drones. Russia's Ministry of Defense said its forces shot down 74 Ukrainian drones overnight, almost a third of them destroyed close to the Russian capital. Twenty-three drones were shot down in the Moscow region, the ministry said, 15 of which were intercepted over the city itself.
The Diplomat
9 hours ago
- The Diplomat
The Philippines-US Relationship Is Tested as President Marcos Visits Washington
A shift in the policy mix between economic and security components would be beneficial to U.S. interests and regional stability. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is currently on a three-day visit to Washington D.C., which began with his arrival on July 20. The trip comes during a time of churn in the U.S. relationship with the Philippines, as with other Southeast Asian states. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies have caused much concern in Manila, even as the Philippines, with China on its mind, continues to deepen its security cooperation with United States. A sound, long-term relationship between these two allies will be difficult to maintain unless the alliance gets its security and economic mix right. This week's meetings are critical for the two sides to close their gap. The slew of tariffs unleashed by the Trump administration against its allies and partners did not spare the Philippines. In fact, the initial tariff of 17 percent announced in April was recently raised to 20 percent. Manila is more than concerned, especially as its fellow ASEAN states Indonesia and Vietnam succeeded in lowering their initial tariffs significantly (albeit to similar levels as the Philippines – 19 percent and 20 percent, respectively) in deals with Washington. Meanwhile the Luzon Economic Corridor, a major U.S.-backed project of new investments in connectivity and infrastructure in the Philippines, has made little progress despite being announced more than a year ago. Soon after being elected, Marcos made a major U-turn in Philippine foreign policy, turning away from his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte's antipathy toward the United States. Manila is justifiably mystified as to why it should face the same tariff wrath as its non-aligned ASEAN neighbors, when it has done much more to align with U.S. strategies to counter China. Meanwhile, China's expansive claims in the South China Sea (ruled illegal in 2016 by an international tribunal) and coercive maritime behavior remain a challenge for the alliance. China's intrusive behavior has seen a sharp uptick since late 2023, and has continued essentially unabated this year. Moreover, Marcos himself is politically weaker today than he was a year ago after his fallout with the powerful Duterte dynasty and setbacks in the recent mid-term elections. The return of the Dutertes is a distinct possibility in the 2028 election, with the former president's daughter and current Vice President Sara Duterte, topping early polls. An economic win will help bolster Marcus politically at home and help improve the prospects for a more U.S.-friendly successor in 2028. The Trump administration correctly aims to shift some of the burden of mutual defense to its Asian allies, including the Philippines, to save money and keep direct exposure of U.S. troops at a lower level in the South China Sea. This implies greater defense spending by Manila, but also more U.S. support for Philippine capabilities to counter Chinese gray zone tactics in the South China Sea. Some of this is indeed happening – including help for Philippine base upgrades and projects such as the recently announced boat repair facility in Palawan, located near the flashpoint of Second Thomas Shoal. However, some U.S. actions are escalatory. The most dangerous development is the alliance creep toward the Taiwan theater. New U.S. military sites have mostly been located close to the Bashi Channel that separates the main Philippine island of Luzon from Taiwan, and far from the South China Sea. Washington has also deployed major war-fighting missile systems to Luzon that can strike at targets deep in the Chinese mainland. Countering China's gray zone tactics in the escalatory war-fighting plane, and especially as part of a plan for a Taiwan contingency, is a bad idea. As a recent Quincy Institute Brief argued, defending, not provoking, ought to be the guiding principle for Washington. Dropping the ball on the bilateral economic relationship only makes matters worse. An ideal policy mix would involve strong U.S. support for enhancing Manila's capacities to counter Chinese tactics in the South China Sea, a high degree of caution on any Philippine involvement in a Taiwan conflict, and energizing, rather than damaging, trade and investment ties between the two allies. Thus, the United States should continue to support the Philippines diplomatically and aim to bolster its maritime capacities and maritime domain awareness. It should also actualize economic initiatives such as the Luzon Economic Corridor as soon as possible. A strategy of non-escalatory balancing by mainly strengthening Philippine capacities in all dimensions is far safer than accelerating bloc formation and expanding U.S. military deployments. A focus along these lines in this week's meetings could strengthen the alliance for the long haul. Ultimately the rise of economically capable and autonomous middle powers in Asia is the surest way to both reduce a frontal U.S. military role and achieve a stable and sustainable region. Such a nuanced strategy can help check Beijing's worst tendencies – but also limit risk-taking by Washington and other Asian states. The Philippines-U.S. alliance could be an exemplar of this approach if both allies want it to be so.
