"We're Going to Have Something Worse": What Dr. Lucy Jones Says Will Make L.A. More Fire Resilient
For decades, seismologist Lucy Jones was best known for coming on live TV after an earthquake to reassure a shaky Los Angeles—and remind Angelenos to prepare for the "big one." But in recent years, she's been broadening her area of expertise. In 2016, Jones founded the Dr. Lucy Jones Center for Science and Society, which works with governments and nonprofits on disaster resilience plans, and not just for earthquakes, she says. "I've been moving more into the climate space because what's coming from climate change is going to be worse than what earthquakes could do to us."
In January, one of the worst-case scenarios that Jones had been preparing for came to pass as the Palisades and Eaton Fires ripped through different corners of L.A. County. A Pasadena resident and longtime Caltech faculty member, Jones watched as at least 235 members of her scientific community lost their homes in the Eaton Fire, leading Caltech to sign a master lease of a newly built apartment building to house 80 families. Now, as L.A. moves from response to recovery, Jones remains a trusted resource for her own colleagues as well as local policymakers working to restructure a society that can more quickly bounce back after a disaster. It's a topic she explored in depth in her 2019 book, The Big Ones: How Disasters Have Shaped Us (and What We Can Do About Them).
On a rainy March morning, as debris flows coming out of burn areas triggered emergency alerts, I met Jones at her former workplace on the Caltech campus. A small exhibit in the entrance of the Seismology Laboratory provided haunting echoes of previous calamities the region had faced. "Food rushed to ruined cities" screams the front page of a 1933 issue of the Los Angeles Times after the Long Beach earthquake killed as many as 125 people. With the fire-scarred San Gabriel Mountains before us, Jones explains how we can better prepare for worsening climate disasters and why the best way to recover from them remains the same: by forming even stronger community ties.
Dr. Lucy Jones: I first really heard about climate change in 1992. I was put on something called the Board on Natural Disasters, which was part of the National Academy of Sciences, advising on research about disasters. So I was the seismologist, and an atmospheric scientist came and talked about climate issues. Even then, he said, the first sign is going to be an increase in extreme events. When you raise a degree centigrade, you don't notice it so much, but that degree is heat. Heat is energy. We've increased the amount of energy in the atmosphere, and that amount of energy to drive storms has gone up.
And that's really changed [Los Angeles]. We're starting to recognize the inevitability of wildfires, and our ecosystems are all experiencing a slightly different climate than they evolved for. The way ecosystems shift is, you have a big wildfire, it kills all the plants, and new plants come in. It is, in a sense, natural. But in California, as I learned while working with fire ecologists, we do not naturally have wildfires during the strong northeast Santa Ana winds. Natural wildfires start from lightning strikes, which happen at a different time of year. So we've really changed the nature of fires in Southern California by adding more human sources of ignition.
That said, I think people underestimate how much you can make your house stronger. I was talking to a structural engineer who works for the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, which is funded by insurance companies in Canada. He was saying that the 2008 building code in California, which we still use, is really good—that it's still way ahead of all the other states. And there's not a lot that they would recommend adding to it. He said one thing would be requiring a five-foot apron of noncombustible material around the house. After talking with him, my husband and I are actually pulling out some plants near our house and taking down a wooden fence.
"I think wildfires are going to be what gets us to finally act on climate change."
—Dr. Lucy Jones
I'm not in Altadena, but I was a mile from the evacuation zone. We have a gorgeous 1948 midcentury modern with these really big windows and molding underneath. The embers did come down here. There was another fire that started up by the Trader Joe's in San Gabriel, which is as close to us as the Eaton Fire was. The neighbor's tree came down on our house because of the winds. We were getting ready in case we got evacuated.
In 2009 we were the first block evacuated in the Station Fire, which is part of why we left La Cañada. That fire was not wind-driven; it was heat-driven. It was in August, and it was 110 degrees. Nobody lost their houses. The L.A. County Fire Department did an amazing job. They stopped it in our neighbor's backyard. We were out of the house for three days and when we finally got home, it smelled like an ashtray. And then there were debris flows. We were trapped one day where one had gone down the Angeles Crest Highway. It was so disruptive. We decided to move after our kids left for college. We thought about moving to Altadena, because everybody lives in Altadena, because you want to be by the mountains. We loved living by the mountains. But I couldn't do it. I didn't want to go through that again.
Immediately after a fire, everybody's thinking about it. The danger also fades really quickly. We recognize the need for fire departments—we don't always recognize the need for fire building codes. Disaster response has an emotional connection. Prevention doesn't, because it's abstract, in the future, and coming out of an analytical side of the brain. I saw one study that said we spend $8 on response for every dollar we spend on prevention and each dollar spent on prevention saves $6 for response. It would be way more cost-effective if we were willing to do the prevention.
It helps. What is going to get us to focus on the danger? If it's catastrophic, if it affects a lot of people or future generations, or if it's a particularly awful way to die. So earthquakes really check a lot of these boxes. With earthquakes, you have absolutely no notice, and you're being trapped in a downed building as a fire comes through. Floods kill as many people as earthquakes in the United States, but who's afraid of the rain? It's predicted. You can see it coming. You have an illusion of being more in control, and all of those things make it feel safer.
Fires are somewhere in between. There's a type of fire weather, so we know when they might come. But fires are now spreading so fast. These wind-driven ones like what happened in Santa Rosa, Lahaina, or here have a pattern of starting in wildlands and moving through an urban environment, because the winds have gotten so strong. These types of fires are going to become a lot more common, and it's changing our perception. People are more afraid of fires now than they were a decade ago, and there's more belief in the inevitability of climate change, because we've seen the evidence. I have been saying for a few years that I think wildfires are going to be what gets us to finally act on climate change.
Philosophically, Americans have a really hard time with this. We are very individualistic. We don't like the government telling us we can do with our property. The government steps in when something becomes a life safety issue, but the problem is that those mechanisms are 30 years old. We don't like to fund regulators. We have a lot of people who try to get around them, and this is what happens when you don't fund them well enough.
One thing about climate right now is there are not going to be federal initiatives for a while, and one could take that as a reason to despair. But, in fact, a lot of what has to happen has to happen locally, and we don't have to wait for the feds. A lot of the local action is around housing issues. Enforcement of building codes is still a local jurisdictional issue. There are a lot of local jurisdictions that do not have an engineer in their building departments, and the chief building official is a political appointment, a developer or someone who comes out of the construction industry. I want the building code department to be the strongest department.
Yes, I just didn't think it was going to be within the next year. The thing about climate change is that this is an exponential growth curve—when we think about how it's changing, we're underestimating how fast it's going to happen. How will we cope if the next fire that does this literally burns down to the 210 freeway and then the next one burns down to San Marino? How far into the city can it go? We're going to have something worse than this, and we're going to have a lot of bankrupted people because they won't be able to rebuild.
Southern California doesn't do community very well. We're famous for our freeway culture. But I've been really impressed at how communities have come together and how much people want to do—there was this huge outpouring. Now it's starting to fade. People are recognizing there needs to be more.
But that's the idea: you are surrounded by community hubs. It could be a faith- or church-based community, or other sorts of organizations where people come together for their neighborhood. That sort of community then connects you back to people, and makes you want to stay with it as you're trying to deal with all of this. And then it's easy to figure out who's helping who. A couple of years ago, I had been asked by the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles to help them develop a disaster preparedness program for churches as part of their climate response. On the night of the fires, I activated a disaster cohort from that program and stepped in and helped. I realized how much better I just felt that I'd done something.
One of the things that we like to say is that disasters don't break systems. Rather, they reveal what's already broken. I can imagine a future in which we do this, in which we survive here, and we figure out how to restructure into something more sustainable. I can also imagine a future in which we don't.
Top photo courtesy of Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Related Reading:
What We're Watching Burn
The Grassroots Race to Save Altadena's Historic Batchelder Tiles—Before the Bulldozers Move In
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
New remains bring California wildfire toll to 31
(KTLA) – The death toll from January's historic and devastating Southern California wildfires continues to rise. On Tuesday, the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner's Office announced that additional human remains were located at a home in Altadena. Crews responding to the area Monday quickly determined that the suspected remains were human and directly related to the Eaton Fire. The discovery marked the first new wildfire victim found since April 2. This yet-to-be-identified person has since been added to L.A. County's ongoing list of victims from January's wildfires. The current tally is 31 deaths, including 12 in the Palisades Fire and now 19 in the Eaton Fire. The Medical Examiner's Office relies on complex scientific methods to identify human remains which are typically in poor condition from the fires. Scientists utilize dental records, DNA comparisons, radiographs, prosthetic serial numbers and other techniques to identify any remains that come into their possession. The Medical Examiner's Office also works with local law enforcement to cross-reference missing persons reports to narrow the search. 'Due to the complexity of these methods and the process, it can take considerable time to confirm a decedent's identity in these types of cases,' officials said. There is no current timeline for when, or if, this latest victim will be identified. Of the 31 people confirmed dead in the blazes, only one other person has yet to be identified. That person's remains were recovered on Jan. 14, on the 600 block of Lomas Avenue in Pacific Palisades.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Is Earth's rotation speeding up? Why this July day may be shortest so far in 2025
Does it feel like there's not enough time in the day for everything? Well, that could be because some upcoming days are actually getting shorter. In fact, today might just be the shortest day you'll ever experience. Ok, maybe it won't be short enough for anyone to actually notice, but every millisecond counts, right? As much as a millisecond or more could be shaved off the clock on Wednesday, July 9, on account of how the moon's position relative to Earth is influencing our planet's rotation. Here's what to know about why Earth's rotation is speeding up, and how it will shorten three days this summer. Is Earth's rotation speeding up? Earth takes 24 hours to complete a full rotation in a standard day, equal to exactly 86,400 seconds. If a standard day is shortened or lengthened by a number of milliseconds, that added or detracted time is referred to as "length of day," according to the website TimeAndDate. Until 2020, the shortest "length of day" ever recorded by atomic clocks was -1.05 ms, meaning that Earth completed one daily rotation in 1.05 milliseconds less than 86,400 seconds. "Since then, however, Earth has managed to shatter this old record every year by around half a millisecond," astrophysicist Graham Jones wrote for TimeAndDate. That culminated on July 5, 2023 with the shortest day of all time, with a "length of day" of -1.66 ms, according to Jones. While the variations are expected, recent research suggests that human activity is also contributing to Earth's changing rotation. Researchers at NASA calculated that dwindling ice and groundwater and rising seas has actually increased the length of our days since 2000 by 1.33 milliseconds per century. Will the Earth spin faster July 9? Is July 9 the shortest day? Scientists anticipate that Earth's rotation will quicken enough to create three shorter days between July and August. The first is Wednesday, July 9, which will have a predicted -1.30 ms "length of day," according to TimeAndDate. The next two shortened days, though, will be be even more truncated. Scientists predicted a -1.38 ms "length of day" July 22, and a -1.51 ms "length of day" Aug. 5. On these days, the moon will be at its furthest from the Earth's equator, changing its gravitational pull and causing our planet to spin just a tiny bit faster on its axis, according to science news website LiveScience. Will the sped-up day be noticeable? Of course, you're unlikely to notice such a miniscule difference in your standard 24-hour day. But scientists who track and operate atomic clocks may be facing a bit of a predicament. First introduced in the 1950s, atomic clocks replaced how scientists previously measured the length of a day by tracking the Earth's rotation and position of the sun. The clocks are also capable of measuring in billionths of a second, or nanoseconds, which are synchronized globally to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC.) If the clocks are thrown off even a tiny amount, it could also throw off computers, servers, GPS signals and other networks that rely on accurate times, David Gozzard, an experimental physicis at the University of Western Australia, told the Guardian. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is Earth spinning faster? July 9, 2 other days may be shortest of 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
New network of air pollution monitors launches near Palisades fire
LOS ANGELES — UCLA researchers have launched 20 new air pollution monitors across northwest Los Angeles County to better understand how much fine ash and coarse dust are being kicked up in the Palisades fire burn area as reconstruction advances. The network stretches from Topanga State Park through Brentwood and Santa Monica, updating every five to ten minutes on an online map. 'We heard clear community needs — real-time data, user-friendly design, and granular neighborhood coverage,' said Yifang Zhu, a professor in the UCLA Department of Environmental Health Sciences and director of the project. Zhu had seen that Caltech had put up a similar network for areas affected by the Eaton fire. The new sensors track airborne particulate matter — a complex mix of substances such as soil, dust, and metals — in two main sizes: fine, PM 2.5, no larger than 2.5 microns, or roughly 1/30 the width of a human hair, and coarser particles, PM 10, roughly the size of a cotton fiber. All are small enough to be inhaled into the nose, throat, and upper airways and can cause a wide range of health issues. PM 2.5 is linked to asthma attacks, premature death as well as acute and chronic bronchitis. Although less studied, PM 10 has been tied to adverse health effects, especially among infants, children, and older people who have lung or heart conditions. The public already can see real-time air pollution levels on several websites, including those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Purple Air and IQAir. The problem, researchers say, is that these often do not track the larger PM 10 particles, the kind more likely to be kicked up into the air by construction. 'The January wildfires were massive and they highlighted gaps that we in the air pollution science community knew about, but the larger community wasn't necessarily aware of,' said Rima Habre, an associate professor of environmental health sciences at USC and collaborator on the project. After the fires, people were looking at air quality readings from the existing network, and couldn't tell how much of the dirty air was due to the larger particles. The new network, known as CAP AIR, was designed to provide hyperlocal and real-time data. The dashboard is color coded from green for good air to dark red for hazardous air to help residents quickly interpret the risk. 'You can see PM 10 levels spike if trucks are hauling debris nearby, and wait until they drop again to go out and jog along the road,' Habre said. Bill Magavern, policy director of the Coalition for Clean Air, pointed out that California has the worst air in the country. 'It's important for people to know how much particle pollution they're being exposed to. So we strongly support expanded monitoring and making the information available as widely as possible so people can make informed decisions about when and if they spend a long time outside, when they're doing strenuous activities like exercising, when they might want to not have their children be outside playing.' Residents can also sign up for email updates when sensors near their home show particle levels surge. 'Sometimes people are anxious or scared about what's going on — it's just because of a lack of information,' Zhu said. 'Now, this network can provide that information.'
