More than two dozen critics of Pakistan government face YouTube ban
The channels that could be blocked in Pakistan include that of the main opposition party and also its leader, jailed former prime minister Imran Khan, as well as journalists critical of the government, according to the June 24 court order seen by Reuters.
The judicial magistrate court in Islamabad said it was seeking the ban after the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) criticised the channels in a June 2 report for "sharing highly intimidating, provocative and derogatory contents against state institutions and officials of the state of Pakistan".
Digital rights campaigners say that any ban would further undermine free speech in Pakistan, where the authorities are accused of stifling newspapers and television and social media is seen as one of the few outlets for dissent.
YouTube told the 27 content creators that their channels could be taken down if they did not comply with the court orders.
"If you fail to do so, as per our local law obligations, we may comply with the request without further notice," the popular video sharing platform said in emails this week to the channel owners, according to a notice seen by Reuters.
YouTube's regional communications manager did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for a comment. Pakistan's Information Minister Attaullah Tarar also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
One of the content creators, Asad Toor, who has more than 333,000 YouTube subscribers, said the move was aimed at undermining fundamental and constitutional rights of the people, political parties and other dissident groups.
"It is not about me. It is about these people who are on the left side of the state," he told Reuters. "I have dedicated my platform for these underdogs who have no place to go to and raise their voices against the state oppression."
MIGRATION TO YOUTUBE
After the government clamped down on traditional media, many independent-minded reporters migrated to YouTube, as did journalists and commentators sympathetic to Khan, who was removed from office in 2022.
"It's not only about anchors getting fired or YouTube channels getting banned. It's what they are not allowing to be told and the human rights abuse they are trying to hide from the world," said Zulfikar Bukhari, a spokesman for Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party.
Khan has said his party has faced a military-backed crackdown since his removal, a charge the army denies.
"In this day and age you can't suppress digital media," said Bukhari.
The order is the latest in a series of laws and regulations from Islamabad that have enabled the authorities to crack down on critics and dissidents. It has blocked social media platforms like X, Facebook and TikTok on several occasions.
In January, Pakistan's parliament introduced a new amendment in the Electronic Crimes Act to further regulate cyber content, which included a new social media regulatory authority with its own investigation agency and tribunals.
Such tribunals will be able to try and punish alleged offenders with prison sentences of as long as three years and fines of two million rupees ($7,200) for dissemination of information deemed "false or fake".
Similar laws to order the removal of disputed content have also been introduced in neighbouring India, which has had disagreements with X and Google over such directives.
In recent years, India has banned dozens of YouTube channels citing national security.
Digital rights activist Usama Khilji said the Pakistani court did not fulfil due process.
"What is jarring is the complete lack of legal process," he said.
Toor said neither the court nor the cyber crime agency gave him a chance to respond to the allegations, and that he would be taking legal action against the court order.
"It is a dictatorial move. It can't silence me," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
Yoon returns to jail as martial law investigation accelerates
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was back in a solitary jail cell with basic food and a khaki prison uniform after prosecutors secured a new detention warrant over his bid to impose martial law last year. The Seoul Central District Court's decision to approve the warrant bolstered the special counsel investigation into allegations that Yoon's move in December represented obstruction of justice and abuse of power. The court said in a statement it granted the request because of concerns Yoon could seek to destroy evidence, returning him to confinement at the Seoul Detention Center where he spent 52 days earlier in the year before being released four months ago on technical grounds. He moved back with his wife and his 11 dogs and cats to their 164 square metre (1,765 square feet) apartment in an upscale district of Seoul. The couple's net worth is estimated at 7.5 billion won ($5.47 million), according to a government filing. But Yoon will now be housed in a 10 square-metre solitary cell, have to wear a two-piece khaki-coloured uniform and sleep on a foldable mattress on the floor without an air conditioner, an official at the detention centre and media reports said. With a heat wave gripping the country, Yoon will have to rely on a small electric fan that switches off at night, Park Jie-won, an opposition lawmaker who had been incarcerated there, said on a YouTube talk show. The detention facility served a breakfast of steamed potatoes and mini cheese breads for inmates on Thursday, another official said. The conservative politician faces criminal charges of insurrection over his martial law decree, which could carry a sentence of life in prison or death. Hours after he ended up in jail, the court held a hearing on Thursday morning for his insurrection trial, but Yoon did not attend. His lawyers told the court that he was unable to go to the hearing due to health issues, the Yonhap News Agency reported. The Constitutional Court ousted Yoon as president in April, upholding parliament's impeachment for the martial law bid, which shocked South Koreans and triggered months of political turmoil. The special prosecution team launched its investigation after new leader Lee Jae Myung was elected in June, and has been looking into additional charges against Yoon. The special counsel team, made up of more than 200 prosecutors and investigators, is now expected to speed up its probe into allegations, including whether Yoon hurt South Korea's interests by intentionally inflaming tensions with North Korea. The team plans to question Yoon on Friday, informing his wife and lawyers about his detention via letters, Park Ji-young, a deputy to the special counsel, told reporters on Thursday. National Assembly speaker Woo Won-shik said Yoon's detention should help in the mission to determine the truth behind the martial law crisis and restore democracy. "No one is above the law," Woo said in a Facebook post. Yoon attended the court hearing on Wednesday on the detention warrant, wearing a dark navy suit and a red tie, but did not answer questions from reporters. His lawyers have denied the allegations against him and called the detention request an unreasonable move in a hasty investigation. More than 1,000 supporters rallied near the court on Wednesday, local media reported, waving flags and signs and chanting Yoon's name in searing 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit) heat. In their warrant request, prosecutors said Yoon poses a flight risk, local media reported. Reuters
Khaleej Times
a day ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE condemns terrorist attack on buses in Pakistan
Authorities retrieved bullet-ridden bodies of nine passengers kidnapped by armed men in a spate of bus attacks The United Arab Emirates has condemned in the strongest terms the terrorist attack targeting buses in Balochistan, southwest of Pakistan, which resulted in a number of deaths to innocent people. Authorities retrieved from Pakistan's mountains the bullet-ridden bodies of nine passengers kidnapped by armed men in a spate of bus attacks in the troubled southwestern province of Balochistan, officials said on Friday. In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) affirmed that the UAE expresses its strong condemnation of these criminal acts and its permanent rejection of all forms of violence and terrorism aimed at undermining security and stability. The Ministry expressed its sincere condolences and sympathy to the families of the victims, and to the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan over this deplorable crime.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
Pakistan court suspends order seeking YouTube ban on government critics
A Pakistani court on Friday suspended an order seeking to ban the YouTube channels of more than two dozen critics of the government including former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a defence lawyer said. Alphabet-owned YouTube this week told 27 content creators that it could block their channels - including those of journalists and Khan and his opposition party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf - if they failed to comply with a judicial magistrate court order seeking to ban them. A regional communication manager for YouTube did not respond to a Reuters request for a comment. The judicial magistrate court in Islamabad had said it was seeking the ban after the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency criticised the channels in a June 2 report for "sharing highly intimidating, provocative and derogatory contents against state institutions and officials of the state of Pakistan." The decision to suspend the order was taken by an additional sessions judge, said Imaan Mazari, the lawyer for two of the YouTube content creators. In Pakistan, an additional sessions judge is a judicial officer who presides over a sessions court, handling both civil and criminal cases. "Our submission is that the order has no legal basis. It was a one-sided decision without giving defence a chance to be heard," Mazari said. She also said the magistrate court had no jurisdiction over the matter. The next hearing in the sessions court is on July 21. In Pakistan's judicial system, cases start at civil and judicial magistrate courts and appeals are heard in high courts and the Supreme Court. Digital rights campaigners say that any ban would further undermine free speech in Pakistan, where the authorities are accused of stifling newspapers and television, and social media is seen as one of the few outlets for dissent. (Editing by Timothy Heritage)
