logo
Shop-bought health tests not fit for purpose, warn experts – as they present ‘significant risk' for wrong diagnosis

Shop-bought health tests not fit for purpose, warn experts – as they present ‘significant risk' for wrong diagnosis

The Sun7 days ago
SHOP-BOUGHT medical tests are unreliable and need tougher regulation, say scientists.
The kits are readily available from supermarkets for checking health factors like high cholesterol, vitamin deficiencies, fertility and prostate problems.
1
But experts warn 'evidence for their benefit is lacking'.
A study by the University of Birmingham found many cannot back up claims about their accuracy.
Testing found many have confusing or unreadable instructions, and customers often do not know what to do with their results.
Scientists said they should go through more stringent quality checks and be regulated like medical products.
Professor Jon Deeks said: 'Current regulations are not adequately protecting consumers.
'For matters of our health, it is important that the evidence upon which health decisions are made is available and can be scrutinised.'
Kits cost as little as £1.89
There is a booming market for the tests, which mostly work like Covid lateral flow tests, and the UK industry is set to be worth half a billion pounds by 2030.
Researchers bought 30 of the kits from shops around Birmingham, costing between £1.89 and £39.99, and evaluated them.
They found at least 18 had 'high risk' problems that might lead to a wrong result or decision.
Eleven had equipment quality issues, 10 did not have a proper sampling process and 15 had issues with the instructions or advice on what to do with the results.
Those with problems included tests for menopause hormones, kidney function, vitamin D and thyroid function.
In one example, Prof Deeks said the self-tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a marker of prostate health, were fixed at a certain concentration level.
However, 'if you're age 70 you need to have your PSA done at a very different level to when you're 20', he said.
False results could put strain on the NHS
Dr Clare Davenport said: 'A good test should be clear about who and when to use it.
'It should be easy to use and easy to interpret.
'We expect it to be accurate and we expect it to be evidence-based if it's going to be sold to the general public, with clear advice of what to do with next steps.
'Unfortunately, what we found is that actually many tests gave unclear or missing guidance.
'On one side, if you get a false positive result that might lead to unnecessary extra testing, unnecessary treatments or just anxiety to patients.
'And on the other side, you may have a false negative and you get this false reassurance, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnosis and delayed treatment with obviously worse outcomes for patients.
'All of this can have an impact on health care demand.
'The wrong test or result can then lead to unnecessary or additional appointments, investigations and treatments and a higher burden on the NHS.'
Dr Bernie Croal, president of the Royal College of Pathologists, said: 'There are significant risks to patients when poor quality tests are carried out inappropriately.'
However, the team said that in the future, home tests could have great potential for patient care.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which regulates medical products, said it would look at the findings.
It issued its own warning about the kits in June and said they must not be taken as real medical advice.
The MHRA said: 'Self-tests can provide helpful insights, but they're not a substitute for medical advice or a diagnosis.
'If you're unsure about a result, or have symptoms you're worried about, speak to a GP, pharmacist or other healthcare professional before making any decisions.'
The research was published in the British Medical Journal.
Body checks you can do now
Check your semen: It should be a white-grey colour. Red in semen or yellow-green should be assessed
Check your testicles: Roll each of them between your finger and thumb to gently feel their surfaces to look for swellling, hardness or lumps.
Check your breasts: Both men and women should be aware of the signs of breast cancer, which are lumps, inverted nipples, fluid oozing from the nipple, a sore or rash around the nipple, hard, red skin, swellings or lumps in the armpit.
Check your peeing habits: Going more often, straining to go, having a weak flow or feeling like you've not emptied? These could be signs of a prostate problem.
Check your blood pressure: You can check your blood pressure at home using an automated digital device, at the GP or pharmacy.
Check your heart: Your heart rate should be somewhere between 60 and 100 bpm. You can count using a clock and pressing lightly on the inside of your wrist.
Check down the loo: Look for signs of blood in stool or if you've had a persistent change in frequency or type of stool (e.g. diarrhoea or more difficulty). Pain when going should also be checked out.
Check your cholesterol: The best way to check your cholesterol levels is by visiting your pharmacist or GP but you can also check it at home with tests including Bupa's Be.Healthy at Home.
Check your nails: Ridges, dents, brittleness and clubbing of the nails can all indicate an underlying health issue.
Check your hair: Hair loss is seen in both men and women from middle age, but iron deficiency can also cause it.
Check your BMI: Your body mass index (BMI) is a simple way to check whether you're a healthy weight. Use an online calculator such as that on the NHS.
Check for lumps and bumps: Changes to the skin, including around the genitals, moles and marks must be checked.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Striking doctors have ‘squandered the goodwill' of government, health secretary says
Striking doctors have ‘squandered the goodwill' of government, health secretary says

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Striking doctors have ‘squandered the goodwill' of government, health secretary says

Resident doctors have squandered the 'considerable goodwill' they had with government after staging five days of strikes across England, the Health Secretary has said. Wes Streeting said he 'never left' the negotiating table, and that he is willing to meet with the resident doctors committee of the British Medical Association (BMA) to resume talks in their ongoing dispute over pay and working conditions. The Cabinet minister said following previous talks, he had outlined a package that 'could bring an end to this dispute', but he accused the union of 'rushing' to strike. In a letter to BMA resident doctors committee co-chairs Dr Ross Nieuwoudt and Dr Melissa Ryan, Mr Streeting said: 'Thank you for your letter of 29 July inviting me to get back to the negotiation table, which is ironic because I never left. 'I am ready to continue the conversation from where you left it. 'As I made clear last week, the decision taken by your committee to proceed with strike action over the past five days was deeply disappointing and entirely unnecessary given the seemingly promising discussions we had to explore areas where we could make substantive improvements to doctors' working lives. 'My letter to your committee, drafted following extensive engagement with you both, outlined a path to agreeing a package that could bring an end to this dispute. 'Had you and your committee not rushed to strike, we would be in the second of the 3 weeks I asked for to work intensively together to improve the working lives of your members.' Mr Streeting acknowledged a second dispute raised by the BMA about a lack of training places for doctors, but said this could have been 'avoided'. He went on: 'The consequences of your strike action have been a detrimental impact on patients, your members, your colleagues and the NHS, which might have been worse were it not for the considerable efforts of NHS leaders and front-line staff who stepped up. 'Your action has also been self-defeating, because you have squandered the considerable goodwill you had with me and this government. 'I cannot in good conscience let patients, or other NHS staff, pay the price for the costs of your decision.' He reiterated that the government 'cannot move on pay', but is 'prepared to negotiate on areas related to your conditions at work, career progression and tangible measures which would put money in your members' pockets'. Mr Streeting added: 'My door remains open to the hope that we can still build the partnership with resident doctors I aspired to when I came in a year ago and, in that spirit, I am happy to meet with you early next week.' In a statement, the co-chairs of the committee said: 'Resident doctors want this to have been their last strike. We are asking Mr Streeting to leave the political rhetoric behind and put the future of the NHS first. 'He could have prevented strike action if he had made a credible offer last week, instead of what we got: the offer of more talks. Now is the time to get serious. 'We're glad to hear Mr Streeting is open to new talks. Let's make them count.' Details on the number of appointments, procedures and operations postponed as a result are expected to be published later this week. It is expected that fewer patients were affected compared to previous strikes after hospitals were ordered to press ahead with as much pre-planned care as possible during the walkout across England, which ended at 7am on Wednesday. In previous walkouts, the majority of non-urgent care was postponed. Strikes across various NHS staff groups between 2022 and 2024 led to 1.5 million cancellations. And hospital leaders said that fewer resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, took to picket lines in the latest walkout compared to those which took place previously. NHS officials have said cancelled bookings would be rescheduled within two weeks, but warned of knock-on impacts for other patients.

Nottingham maternity families 'cross' after meeting with NHS leaders
Nottingham maternity families 'cross' after meeting with NHS leaders

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Nottingham maternity families 'cross' after meeting with NHS leaders

Families involved in the biggest independent inquiry into NHS maternity services say they still want answers after meeting with local leaders. On Wednesday, parents of children who were harmed or died following failings in care at two hospitals in Nottingham met with officials from the Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) for the first said they were "very surprised" to have had to request to meet a statement after the meeting, the ICB said it was "humbled and saddened by the experiences shared by the families". Hundreds of babies have died or been injured while under the care of Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, which runs the departments at City Hospital and Queen's Medical 2,500 cases are currently being examined in a review chaired by senior midwife Donna Ockenden, who also presided over Wednesday's were created in July 2022, taking over the role of managing budgets and local services from clinical commissioning groups, which were established in and Dr Jack Hawkins, whose daughter Harriet was stillborn in 2016 following maternity failings at Nottingham City Hospital, were among those at the meeting."We are very surprised that they have not reached out to us before - in fact we asked for this meeting," said Dr Hawkins added: "This meeting has demonstrated basically how horrific it is, their lack of awareness."Families have left the meeting cross, and questioning their competency."ICB chief executive Amanda Sullivan said the board has "committed to supporting and challenging the trust to drive improvements to maternity care"."We welcome the questions the families raised and commit to answering these at a follow-up meeting soon," she said.

Brother of woman who refused chemotherapy says mother ‘sacrificed' her daughter
Brother of woman who refused chemotherapy says mother ‘sacrificed' her daughter

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Brother of woman who refused chemotherapy says mother ‘sacrificed' her daughter

The brother of a woman who died after refusing chemotherapy told an inquest his conspiracy theorist mother 'sacrificed' his sister 'for her own principles' by advising her not to seek treatment. Paloma Shemirani, 23, died at Royal Sussex County Hospital on July 24 last year after declining the treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani – who rose to prominence on social media while sharing Covid-19 conspiracy theories, is alleged to have been 'abusive' to her children and was involved in Paloma's alternative 'treatment programme'. Paloma's twin brother, Gabriel Shemirani, told the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroners Court, in Maidstone: 'I blame my mother entirely for my sister's death', by 'obstructing' his sister from receiving treatment. 'In short I believe that she sacrificed Paloma's life for her own principles, I believe that she should be held accountable for Paloma's death,' said Mr Shemirani. Ms Shemirani was struck off as a nurse in 2021, and a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) committee found she had spread Covid-19 misinformation that 'put the public at a significant risk of harm'. Mr Shemirani's parents split in 2014 after a relationship which had involved domestic abuse 'both ways', he told the court. He alleged that he and his siblings 'felt unsafe' around their mother and that she had been 'emotionally distant' and physically abusive to them as children. He further alleged during his evidence that his father, Doctor Faramarz Shemirani, was also physically abusive to him and his brother. At the time of Paloma's cancer diagnosis in autumn 2023, she was estranged from her mother, who then advised her against conventional medicine, the court heard. Mr Shemirani said: 'Paloma had a complicated relationship with our mother, maybe it is because she had a complicated relationship that she decided to rekindle that relationship when she became ill. 'In my opinion, Kay Shemirani directed her resentment that she held towards my other siblings and I towards Paloma.' Mr Shemirani brought a High Court case to assess his sister's ability to exert her capacity to take medical decisions while living with her mother in April 2024. He claimed that when Paloma was first diagnosed, she was considering chemotherapy, before their parents started to pressure her against it. Her father sent a message to his daughter saying 'don't consent to anything from the doctors they try and kill you' and that Ms Shemirani had said 'I'm the only one that can help you, don't bite the hand that feeds', the inquest heard. 'There was no disagreement from her that this was cancer, she never expressed that to me and she never expressed it to doctors either,' said Mr Shemirani. His parents asked questions as interested persons which alleged that Mr Shemirani was influenced and funded by others to bring the High Court case and that his actions were a factor in Paloma's death during his evidence. 'My sister didn't die from stress from the court case, my sister died from cancer and I think that's clear,' said Mr Shemirani. Before the High Court case, Mr Shemirani also referred the situation to social services but he felt they were 'slow moving', the court heard. He added that his younger sister had been taken away from their mother when she was 16 and that the case was 'only driven by my love and concern for my twin sister'. Dr Shemirani claimed his son was an 'irrational' and 'unreliable witness', and that his actions had been a 'major contributing' factor to her death. 'This is not a public forum to air grievances,' Coroner Catherine Wood said. 'I don't have any aggrievances, I don't have any aggrievances,' Dr Shemirani said. 'Sounds like it,' Mr Shemirani responded. When his questions concluded, Dr Shemirani said: 'Finally may our lord almighty exercise you from the demons that possess you amen.' Previously, Dr Ali Ajaz, a forensic psychiatrist, provided an assessment of Paloma during High Court proceedings which read: 'I have no concerns that Ms Shemirani has been coerced or unduly influenced by any individual when making a decision about her own medical treatment.' Mr Shemirani asserted that Dr Ajaz's sessions with his sister were 'coloured by my mother's control', which the doctor said was speculation. On Wednesday afternoon, Mr Shemirani told the court that his sister was terrified of cancer, but used gallows humour as a defence mechanism. 'Are you a psychologist Gabriel?' his mother asked him. 'Are you a nurse?' he replied. The inquest continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store