This Weber Flat Top Grill Is so Cheap for Prime Day (Save $170), I Thought It Was a Mistake
Flat-top griddles, popularized by brands like Blackstone and Weber, have made big waves in the outdoor cooking space. They're loved by owners for their versatility and convenience. Griddles may require a smidge of maintenance to avoid rusting, but day-to-day use doesn't require scrubbing grates or picking food out from the grill's basin.
Read more: Griddle vs. Grill: Can a Versatile Flat Top Overtake Traditional Grates?
Another check in the advantages column for flat top grills is the ability to cook certain foods that you can't on a normal grill. I'm talkin' breakfast fare like scrambled eggs, pancakes and bacon, as well as flaky fish that tends to break apart when sizzled over grates.
Yep, now you can even make bacon on the grill like you've always dreamed.
Weber
Why this deal matters
I personally tested Weber's flat-top griddle, and, per the brand's high standards, this unit was well built and outperformed others in its price class. The ignition system worked every time, and the three burners distributed heat evenly across the flat-top griddle. Assembly took about 45 minutes, and the grill sports two handy prep shelves and rolls around on wheels if you need to move it.
Ace Hardware is selling Weber's premium griddle for just $279 -- A cool $170 off the normal price. Take a look at other retailers, and you'll see that this is a seriously good bargain on a seriously good griddle.
Shipping is not included, but you can pick it up for free if you're near an Ace with this grill in stock.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump accuses Schiff of mortgage fraud, which Schiff calls false 'political retaliation'
President Trump on Tuesday accused Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) of committing mortgage fraud by intentionally misleading lenders about his primary residence being in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., rather than California, in order to "get a cheaper mortgage and rip off America." Schiff, who led a House impeachment of Trump during the president's first term and has remained one of his most vocal and forceful political adversaries since joining the Senate, dismissed the president's claims as a "baseless attempt at political retribution." A spokesperson for Schiff said he has always been transparent about owning two homes, in part to be able to raise his children near him in Washington, and has always followed the law — and advice from House counsel — in arranging his mortgages. In making his claims, Trump cited an investigation by the Fannie Mae "Financial Crimes Division" as his source. A memorandum reviewed by The Times from Fannie Mae investigators to William J. Pulte, the Trump-appointed director of the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, does not accuse Schiff of mortgage fraud. It noted that investigators had been asked by the FHFA inspector general's office for loan files and "any related investigative or quality control documentation" for Schiff's homes. Investigators said they found that Schiff at various points identified both his home in Potomac, Md., and a Burbank unit he also owns as his primary residence. As a result, they concluded that Schiff and his wife, Eve, "engaged in a sustained pattern of possible occupancy misrepresentation" on their home loans between 2009 and 2020. The investigators did not say they had concluded that a crime had been committed, nor did they mention the word "fraud" in the memo. The memo was partially redacted to remove Schiff's addresses and information about his wife. Fannie Mae did not respond to a request for comment. Read more: Fannie Mae memo on Sen. Adam Schiff's residences In addition to denying any wrongdoing, Schiff also suggested that Trump's accusation was an effort to distract from a growing controversy — important to many in the president's MAGA base — over the administration's failure to disclose more investigative records into child sex abuse by the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, a former acquaintance of Trump's. There has long been rumors of a "client list" of Epstein's that could expose other powerful men as predators. Trump promised to release such a list as a candidate, and at one point Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi appeared to say such a list was on her desk. However, the administration has since said no such list exists, and Trump has begged his followers to move on. Schiff drew a direct line between that controversy and Trump's accusations against him Tuesday. "This is just Donald Trump's latest attempt at political retaliation against his perceived enemies. So it is not a surprise, only how weak this false allegation turns out to be," Schiff wrote on X. "And much as Trump may hope, this smear will not distract from his Epstein files problem." A spokesperson for Schiff echoed the senator's denial of any wrongdoing. According to the spokesperson, Schiff made a decision routine for Congress members from states far from Washington to buy a home in Maryland so he could raise his children nearby. He also maintained a home in California, living there when not in Washington. The spokesperson said all of Schiff's lenders were aware that he intended to live in both as he traveled back and forth from Washington to his district — making neither a vacation home. Read more: Schiff vs. Trump: The real head-to-head battle defining California's U.S. Senate race Trump's own post about Schiff, on his social media platform, was thin on details and heavy on insults, calling Schiff "a scam artist" and "crook." Trump alleged that Schiff reported his primary residence being in Maryland, when "he must LIVE in CALIFORNIA" as a congressman from the state. Schiff, a former federal prosecutor, has for years laid out detailed arguments against the president — and for why his actions violated the law and warranted his permanent removal from office. Those have included Trump's first presidential campaign's interactions with Russian assets, his pressuring Ukraine to investigate his rival Joe Biden while U.S. military aid was being withheld from the country, and his incitement of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and storming of the U.S. Capitol to prevent the certification of Biden's 2020 electoral win over him. Schiff also has criticized the president — and his businesses, family members and political appointees — for their own financial actions. He recently sponsored legislation that would restrict the ability of politicians and their family members from getting rich off of digital currencies of their own creation, as Trump and his family have done. He also has repeatedly demanded greater financial transparency from various Trump appointees, accusing them of breaking the law by not filing disclosures of their assets within required time frames. Others have accused Trump for years of financial fraud. Last year, a judge in New York ordered Trump to pay $355 million in penalties in a civil fraud case after finding that the president and others in his business empire inflated his wealth to trick banks and insurers. Trump denied any wrongdoing and has appealed the decision. All along the way, Trump has attacked Schiff personally, accusing him of peddling hoaxes for political gain and repeatedly suggesting that he should be charged with treason. During a presidential campaign stop in California last year — when Schiff was running for Senate — Trump called Schiff "one of the sleaziest politicians in history." Schiff made mention of Trump's treason claims in his response to the new allegation of mortgage fraud Tuesday, writing, "Since I led his first impeachment, Trump has repeatedly called for me to be arrested for treason. So in a way, I guess this is a bit of a letdown." Before leaving office, President Biden preemptively pardoned Schiff and the other members of the committee that investigated Trump's role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, anticipating that Trump would seek to retaliate against them for their work. Schiff said at the time that he did not want a pardon. He later dismissed an assertion from Trump that the pardons were "void" as another attempt at intimidation. Schiff was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000. He now splits his time between a two-story home in Potomac, Md., which he bought in 2003, according to property records, and a one-bedroom condo in a shopping area in downtown Burbank, which he bought in 2009. In 2023, amid a bruising primary race for his Senate seat, CNN reported on Schiff's two mortgages, citing experts who said the arrangement did not put Schiff in legal jeopardy — even if it could raise tough political questions. CNN reported that deed records showed Schiff had designated his Maryland home as his primary residence, including while refinancing his mortgage over the years. In 2020, the outlet reported, Schiff again refinanced his mortgage and indicated that the Maryland home was his second. CNN also reported that Schiff for years has taken a California homeowner's tax exemption for his Burbank home, also designating it as his primary address. CNN said that exemption amounted to "roughly $70 in annual savings." Schiff's spokesperson confirmed that estimate in annual savings in California, and noted that Schiff did not claim such an exemption in Maryland. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump launches probe into Brazil's 'unfair' trade practices
The Trump administration says it has launched an investigation into Brazil's "unfair" trading practices. It will include the Brazilian government's policies "related to digital trade and electronic payment services; unfair, preferential tariffs; anti-corruption interference", a statement from the US Trade Representative said. The investigation seeks to determine whether they are "unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict US commerce." Last week, US President Donald Trump urged Brazilian authorities to end their prosecution of the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing them of carrying out a "WITCH HUNT". Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer said that the probe was being launched at Trump's direction "into Brazil's attacks on American social media companies as well as other unfair trading practices that harm American companies, workers, farmers, and technology innovators". Trump first flagged the investigation in a letter to Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, last week. In the same letter, Trump announced a 50% tariff on Brazil starting on 1 August. Lula said in response that Brazil would match any increase in tariffs. Last year, trade between the two countries was worth $90bn, with the US selling more goods to Brazil. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts. Why is Trump targeting Brazil - and will it backfire for Bolsonaro?
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Russia hawks face new dilemma over Trump's 50-day Putin deadline
The Russia hawks' initial reaction to President Donald Trump's tougher stance on Vladimir Putin was positive. That included a Monday joint statement from Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal calling Trump's threat of ramped-up economic penalties if Russia doesn't cut a peace deal in next 50 days 'a real executive hammer to drive the parties to the negotiating table.' But a day later, a real sense of skepticism about Trump's threats has crept in. The Russians have basically shrugged it off and even treated it as a green light to take what they can in the next several weeks. Ukrainians and foreign leaders have expressed fears about what happens over the next 50 days. And even some Trump allies in Congress and elsewhere are wondering: Why the delay? Why not pass the sanctions legislation that more than 80 senators already support today? Trump by Tuesday afternoon rejected criticisms of that timetable. 'Oh, I don't think 50 days is very long, and it could be sooner than that,' he said. 'I don't think 50 days is very long. ' The president has often pushed off major decisions and announcements by giving himself a future deadline that he might or might not abide by (often 'two weeks'). He did recently strike Iran right after a 60-day window he had given it to cut a nuclear deal that never arrived. But there seems to be a growing fear that this is just more kicking the can down the road or a pointless intermission. Perhaps most striking Tuesday were the comments of a pair of Republican senators. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida praised Trump for his desire to bring Putin to the table. But he said the Russian leader is 'not going to change.' 'I don't know why he gave him that many days. From my standpoint, I think Trump's being very generous,' Scott told CNN's Manu Raju. 'I would love there to be sanctions now. I'd love there to be tariffs now.' Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said the 50-day timetable 'worries' him. Tillis said Putin could use the time to ramp up efforts to win the war quickly or try to gain power 'after having murdered and potentially collected more ground as a basis for negotiation.' As CNN's Matthew Chance noted, officials in Moscow were breathing a sigh of relief about an announcement that could have been much worse for them – and may now view it as license to do what they can over the next 50 days. While Russia has called Trump's threats and the weapons he said he's funneling to Ukraine 'very serious,' Russian officials like Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev – a key Putin ally – also publicly downplayed the 50-day timeline. 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin,' Medvedev posted on X. 'The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.' The markets in Russia also appear to have shrugged. The New York Times reported Tuesday that Moscow's stock index jumped up 2.5 points on Tuesday, potentially because secondary sanctions appear more distant now – if they ever arrive. Fears that Trump is giving Russia too long a leash were also prominent in Europe. Officials including European Union foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas praised the tougher stance but cast the timeframe as a very long one. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has often allied with Trump, praised him for 'turning up the heat on Putin.' 'But why wait? Putin is butchering innocent people every day. Let's get this thing over,' Johnson posted on X, adding: 'Let's sanction the Putin enablers now.' The dilemma for Russia hawks is readily apparent. On the one hand, Trump is saying tougher things about Putin than he ever has before, and they want to give him credit for that – however belated they might think that pivot is. But given Trump's unpredictability and the fact that he's treated Putin with kid gloves plenty before, they might also view this as a smokescreen and not tough enough. So now that Trump appears to have soured on his Russian counterpart, they might want to gently push him toward more urgent action. What seems clear is that the concerns about the 50-day deadline have registered. Trump grew testy Tuesday when pressed on the matter. 'You should've asked that same question to Biden,' Trump said, repeating one of his frequent refrains that it's really his predecessor who is responsible for Putin's unprovoked invasion of its neighbor. 'Why did he get us into this war? You should ask that question.' Graham also seemed to respond to critics of the 50-day timeline, saying Trump very recently demonstrated how serious such deadlines can be – on Iran. 'If Putin and others are wondering what happens on day 51, I would suggest they call the Ayatollah,' Graham posted on X. 'If I were a country buying cheap Russian oil, propping up Putin's war machine, I would take President Trump at his word.' The comparison isn't perfect. Trump didn't threaten to bomb Moscow. And the option to get tougher on Russia is a lot easier for Trump to make; it basically just involves telling Congress to pass a bill it appears poised to pass whenever called upon. We'll see if Trump feels compelled to get tougher, quicker.
