Central Empowered Committee to inspect Mohali villages over forest, wildlife violations
Acting on a complaint regarding violation of forest and wildlife laws in villages, such as Karoran, Nada, Masol, and adjoining areas in Mohali district, the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), constituted by the Supreme Court, is scheduled to visit the region on Monday at 9 am.
The CEC will assess the extent of damage caused to forest land, wildlife and the local environment. It will also evaluate the timely action taken by government departments, and based on its findings, will recommend appropriate measures.
The said villages under scrutiny fall within areas governed by the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900. These areas are also protected under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and the Supreme Court's orders.
Even during the process of delisting certain areas from protected status, the court had explicitly banned any commercial activity without prior approval from the Government of India.
Despite these restrictions, large-scale violations—particularly illegal hill-cutting—have allegedly continued unabated for several years. These activities have led to the degradation of ecologically sensitive and biodiversity-rich areas in the Shivalik Hills.
Environmentalists and local residents have accused the forest department, district administration and urban agencies like Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA), along with panchayati raj institutions, of failing to prevent these encroachments, raising concerns over the alleged influence of the land mafia in the region.
The Shivalik forests are known for their ecological significance, and are home to many endangered plant and animal species, several of which are listed as threatened under the (International Union for Conservation of Nature) IUCN Red List.
The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was constituted by the Supreme Court of India in 2002 (and reconstituted in 2008) to assist in matters related to forest, wildlife conservation and flag cases of official non-compliance with its orders related to conservation. It reports to the Union environment ministry.
The committee came into existence after a landmark Supreme Court judgment, dated December 12, 1996, in a 1995 case.
The apex court ruled that the term 'forest' should be interpreted in its dictionary sense, regardless of land ownership. This means any land that is forest in character on the ground must be treated as such and cannot be used for non-forest activities without prior approval from the Government of India, in accordance with the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and other applicable laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Showdown in court: Trump's bid to use 18th-century law for mass deportations faces crucial test
A federal appeals court will hear arguments today on whether President Trump can use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to justify mass deportations, a case likely headed to the Supreme Court read more A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments today on whether President Donald Trump can invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to justify mass deportations, a case likely headed to the Supreme Court. One of President Trump's most controversial claims of executive power came in March, when he issued a proclamation invoking an 18th-century law to justify rounding up and deporting dozens of immigrants he alleged were members of a Venezuelan street gang. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to a report by The New York Times, the Alien Enemies Act has been used only three times in US history, and only during wartime. Trump's use of the law has sparked serious questions about whether his actions align with the statute's actual text, added the report. For over three months, courts nationwide have struggled to answer whether President Trump overstepped legal boundaries in pursuing one of his key policy goals: mass deportation of immigrants. On Monday, the legal fight reaches a critical stage as the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans hears arguments over Trump's use of t he Alien Enemies Act. The case is expected to revisit legal points already raised in lower courts by both the Trump administration and attorneys representing the Venezuelan men targeted under the policy. However, this hearing could prove decisive, likely becoming the first case on the issue to reach the Supreme Court for a full review of whether Trump's use of the centuries-old law was lawful. About Alien Enemies Act Enacted in 1798 when United States faced potential war with France, the Alien Enemies Act grants the president broad authority to detain and expel nationals from hostile foreign powers, but only during a declared war, invasion, or what the law calls a 'predatory incursion.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD From the outset, the Trump administration has taken an unorthodox approach to the statute, using it to target dozens of Venezuelan men accused of ties to the Tren de Aragua street gang, which President Trump has labeled a foreign terrorist organisation. Trump and his advisers have argued that the men are not simply gang members, but operatives acting in coordination with the Venezuelan government. Their presence in the US, they claim, amounts to an invasion by a hostile state. According to the NYT report_,_ the American Civil Liberties Union, representing the Venezuelan men, has dismissed the administration's claims as baseless. ACLU lawyers argue that mass migration is not an invasion and say there's no clear evidence linking their clients, many with no criminal records, to the Venezuelan government. Most federal courts so far have agreed, ruling that Trump misused the Alien Enemies Act and that the migrants do not pose a military threat. However, two courts have backed the administration, citing the president's broad authority over foreign affairs, especially involving a group labeled a terrorist organisation, added the report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The ACLU faces tough odds in the Fifth Circuit, one of the most conservative appeals courts in the country. Regardless of Monday's outcome, the case is widely expected to head to the Supreme Court. Unusual path to Fifth Circuit The case reached the Fifth Circuit through an unusual route. In April, the ACLU filed an emergency lawsuit after learning the Trump administration planned to deport Venezuelans held at the Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Texas under the Alien Enemies Act. The ACLU argued it was a tactic to sidestep court orders in other states blocking similar deportations. When a district judge didn't act quickly, the ACLU appealed to the Fifth Circuit and then the Supreme Court, warning the men faced imminent removal to El Salvador. The Supreme Court temporarily halted the deportations, citing due process violations but avoiding the broader legal question. Last month, it upheld the freeze and sent the case back to the Fifth Circuit, instructing it to rule on two key issues: whether Trump's use of the Act was lawful and what notice immigrants must receive before removal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
‘Bagina politics': Farmers allege KRS honoured but Kabini ignored
The tradition of offering 'Bagina' to Kabini and the Krishnaraja Sagar on the same day was ignored this year which has irked a section of farmers who have criticised the government. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah offered Bagina, the traditional thanksgiving to the river, consequent to the reservoir attaining the full level at the KRS on Monday. All these years, the practice was to visit the Kabini first, make the offerings, and then visit the KRS to complete the rituals on the same day. Irked by the Chief Minister offering Bagina only at the KRS, the Karnataka State Sugarcane Growers' Association president H. Bhagyaraj and others staged a demonstration in Mysuru to voice their protest. Angered by the CM's move, Mr. Bhagyaraj said Bagina has been offered hastily at the KRS for political spectacle. But when the water is released to Tamil Nadu during distress years and when Karnataka has to comply with the Supreme Court's directives, it is the farmers from the Kabini command area whose interests are sacrificed by the government, Mr. Bhagyaraj added. The farmers also alleged that several illegal resorts have been built along the Kabini backwaters, though none of the development works previously announced by the government have materialised so far. The farmers also criticised the government for its alleged move to privatise the power sector and said that the installation of smart meters was a step in that direction. In due course, the installation will be extended to the agriculture sector as well, pushing farmers out of agriculture and facilitating the entry of the corporates to the agricultural sector, said Mr. Bhagyaraj. Opposing the compulsory installation of smart meters, the farmers urged the government to withdraw the notification failing which the association threatened to launch an agitation. They urged the government to fix the Fair and Remunerative Price for sugarcane at ₹4,000 a tonne for the current season. Other demands included putting an end to 'forced land acquisition' for development, ensuring reparation works of canals and channels in the rural hinterland, and filling up the waterbodies.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rubio's State Department in turmoil: Staff overworked, morale plummets amid layoff fears
Massive Layoffs Looming Over a Strained Workforce Live Events A Call for Cheer Amid Chaos Supreme Court Ruling Holds Workers in Limbo FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Tension is boiling inside the US State Department as staffers face long hours and mounting uncertainty, all while bracing for sweeping layoffs pushed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and morale, according to those working in the department, has reached a breaking point, as per a who took over the department under US president Donald Trump's second term, has called the agency 'bloated' and in April announced his intent to slash 15% of its more than 2,000-person workforce, according to Daily while tensions of layoffs are looming, employees are still being asked to volunteer to work overtime to manage rising crises, particularly the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, as reported by the Washington Post.A State Department official told the Washington Post that the department 'either doesn't appreciate or just doesn't care' about its employees, as reported by the Daily Beast. The official also added, 'Doing extra shifts while this ax is swinging above our heads is just devastating to morale,' as quoted in the contradiction of the situation is of asking staff to take on more responsibility even as their jobs hang in the balance, has left many feeling both overworked and undervalued, according to the Daily Beast READ: Jerome Powell accused of lying to Congress over $2.5B lavish Fed HQ renovation — calls for punishment grow The tensions within the department increased even more when the workers were sent a message requesting that they share joyous photos of July 4 celebrations at embassies and consulates around the world, according to the workers were asked to 'collect a high-quality set of visuals'—including 'candid shots of attendees enjoying the event' and 'smiling children, families, and diplomats,' as quoted by Daily State Department staffer told the Washington Post that, 'To me, the irony of asking for happy photos of smiling children, happy families, and guests celebrating while threatening to fire thousands is peak Trumpism,' as quoted in the threat of layoff has intensified as Rubio initially gave a July 1 deadline for the job cuts, as per Daily Beats. However, now the Supreme Court is assessing the permissibility of layoffs across the federal government under the Trump administration, as reported by the Daily READ: Brace yourself: Why this could be the summer of economic hell for millions of Americans The president of the union that represents America's diplomats, Tom Yazdgerdi highlighted that the job cuts 'show serious disregard for members of the Foreign Service managing multiple conflicts and assisting American citizens in the Middle East and other crisis zones,' as quoted in the said, 'Despite the stress of not knowing when they or their colleagues might face layoff notices,' adding, 'our members tell us they want nothing more than to remain on the front lines and continue to serve the American people,' as quoted by Daily being asked to work long hours during global crises while facing the threat of losing their jobs. It's left many feeling both exhausted and layoffs were set for July 1, but they now depend on a Supreme Court ruling.
