
DWP outlines major £725 Universal Credit changes from next year
Nearly four million households could receive an annual income boost from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) of £725. This increase could come following the progression of a bill aimed at reforming the welfare system set to go through Parliament on Wednesday, officials say.
As reported by the Daily Record, the Universal Credit Bill proposes changes intended to adjust the primary payment and health supplement in Universal Credit. Officials say the bill would result in the Universal Credit standard allowance permanently rising above inflation, equating to £725 by 2029/30 in cash terms for a single individual aged 25 or over.
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), this represents the most significant permanent real-terms rise to the main rate of out-of-work support since 1980.
The Universal Credit Bill
The DWP said it is rebalancing Universal Credit health and standard elements. It wants to address what it sees as the fundamental imbalance in the system - which it says creates perverse incentives that drive people into dependency through:
Increasing the Universal Credit standard allowance above inflation for the next four years - worth an estimated £725 by 2029/30 for a single adult aged 25 or over
Reducing the health top-up for new claims to £50 per week from April 2026
Ensuring that all existing recipients of the Universal Credit health element - and any new claimant meeting the Severe Conditions Criteria and/or that has their claims considered under the Special Rules for End of Life (SREL) - will receive the higher Universal Credit health payment after April 2026
Exemptions from reassessment for those with the most severe, lifelong conditions
The DWP said the reforms will address the 'fundamental imbalance in the system which creates perverse incentives that drive people into dependency'. The Bill has passed through the House of Commons, with MPs voting 336 to 242.
It will now proceed to the House of Lords for further scrutiny before receiving Royal Assent. In addition to these changes, the DWP has introduced significant new measures, granting individuals receiving health and disability benefits the right to attempt work without fear of reassessment, officials say.
They say this new 'Right to Try Guarantee' includes individuals with a disability or health condition - such as those recovering from illness - who wish to return to work now their health has improved. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: "Our reforms are built on the principle of fairness, fixing a system that for too long has left people trapped in a cycle of dependence.
"We are giving extra support to millions of households across the country, while offering disabled people the chance to work without fear of the repercussions if things don't work out.
"These reforms will change the lives of people across the country, so they have a real chance for a better future."
'Safeguards' in Universal Credit changes
The legislation also introduces what is says are safeguards for the most vulnerable and severely disabled individuals. This is said to include 200,000 members of the Severe Conditions Criteria group – those with the gravest, lifelong conditions who are unlikely to see an improvement in their health – who will be exempt from Universal Credit reassessment.
All current recipients of the Universal Credit health component and new claimants with no more than 12 months to live or who satisfy the Severe Conditions Criteria will witness their standard allowance merge with their Universal Credit health element, with a guarantee of an increase at least in line with inflation annually from 2026/27 to 2029/30 - says the DWP.
The DWP stated: "This means they can live with dignity and security, knowing the reforms to the welfare system mean it will always be there to support them."
DWP statement on changes
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) says it is placing disabled individuals at the forefront of a ministerial examination of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments, steered by Disability Minister Sir Stephen Timms. The review is being co-produced with disabled people, their representative organisations, experts, MPs, and other stakeholders to ensure it is equitable and suitable for the future, says the DWP.
The DWP said: "We will be engaging widely over the summer to design the process for the review and consider how it can best be co-produced to ensure that expertise from a range of different perspectives is drawn upon.
"These reforms are underpinned by a major investment in employment support for sick and disabled people - worth £3.8 billion over the Parliament. Funding will be brought forward for tailored employment, health and skills support to help disabled people and those with health conditions get into work as part of our Pathways to Work guarantee."
Additionally, the DWP noted: "This investment will accelerate the pace of new investments in employment support programmes, building on and learning from successes such as the Connect to Work programme, which are already rolling out to provide disabled people and people with health conditions with one-to-one support at the point when they feel ready to work."
Nevertheless, charities have voiced apprehensions regarding the broader consequences of the new Bill.
Thomas Lawson, CEO of Turn2us, said: "MPs voted to reduce support for people unable to work by over £200 a month. Halving the health element of Universal Credit for anyone who becomes sick from April 2026 will increase hardship and mean even more people are going without essentials.
"To build a system we can all trust, the government now needs to review the whole system and really listen to disabled people and organisations like ours. In a country as wealthy as ours, sickness should never mean hunger or eviction."
James Watson-O'Neill, chief executive of national disability charity Sense, voiced his disapproval, saying: "The government's decision to press ahead with its welfare reform Bill and make cruel cuts to Universal Credit payments is causing deep fear and distress among young disabled people with the most complex needs and their families.
"Significant concessions on previous proposals to slash PIP benefits made headlines only last week. But MPs have still voted to cut support for disabled people who are assessed as having the greatest barriers to work and apply for benefits after 2026, making them £47 a week poorer.
"Almost half of disabled people with complex needs are already in debt because their benefit payments don't cover the essentials. This proposal will create an unfair, two-tier system, where still more disabled people are pushed into poverty simply because they started claiming benefits later.
"We are calling on the government to reconsider these proposals and rule out plans to cut support even further for disabled people aged under 22. Disabled people should be included fully and from the start in any efforts to reform the welfare system."
Criticism of 'appalling' Universal Credit changes
Juliet Tizzard, director of external relations at Parkinson's UK, said: "The government's decision to cut Universal Credit costs is appalling. We believe that, despite the government's claims, savings are being made by effectively making people with Parkinson's ineligible for the higher rate health element.
"The Bill clearly states that someone must be constantly unable to do certain tasks to qualify. This will penalise people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms come and go. Until we can be certain that people with fluctuating conditions will not be penalised, we'll continue campaigning for a fair system.
"We're thankful to the MPs who tried to stop the changes to Universal Credit, and for every campaigner who raised their voice. We stopped the cuts to PIP, and while we're disappointed by the result today, this setback won't stop us. We'll keep fighting for better support, care and treatment for the Parkinson's community."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
42 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures
The changes from the act apply across the UK and include age checks on pornography websites, as well as other platforms like Reddit, X and Bluesky. The Act was passed into law on October 26, 2023, and was implemented on July 25, 2025, with platforms now requiring users to prove their age by ID verification. Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act! Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. — Jess Asato MP (@Jess4Lowestoft) July 25, 2025 The measures, as part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, require online platforms to have age checks – using facial age estimation or credit card checks. Since the act was implemented, a petition has been launched and has surpassed more than 340,000 signatures. Calls for the Online Safety Act to be repealed in viral petition Sharing why the petition was made, the creator behind it Alex Baynham, wrote: "We believe that the scope of the Online Safety act is far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society. "For instance, the definitions in Part 2 covers online hobby forums, which we think do not have the resource to comply with the act and so are shutting down instead. "We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters because it can't deal with individual bad faith actors." At the time of writing, the petition had surpassed the needed 100,000 signatures for Parliament to consider debating the petition. On TikTok, the Act has received a large amount of debate. Recommended Reading Content creator Thomas Pearson branded the act "pointless", sharing that he believes the act "is a fundamental betrayal of one of the core principles of British democracy; governing and policing by consent." Previously discussing the Act, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News: "I have very high expectations of the change that children will experience. "And let me just say this to parents and children, you will experience a different internet really, for the first time in from today, moving forward than you've had in the past. And that is a big step forward."


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support
I once believed that being disabled was something to be ashamed of, often hiding the fact that I had disabilities. When I did disclose I was disabled, I would often face misunderstanding from others and looking back now, bullying over it. Even when I got to a point when I had to face that I had a disability and use a power chair to get around, I still felt ashamed. But looking back, I had no reason. This is me, this is who I am, like it or not. I am proud of myself, disability and all, and I think it has come from being in a community that accepts itself, which has helped me accept myself too. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all. (Newsquest) (Image: Newsquest) July is Disability Pride month. It is a whole month for people with disabilities to celebrate diversity and their achievements. It's a month to celebrate inclusivity and promote equality for the disabled community. However, whilst we celebrate, we do this in the face of adversity. We do this whilst we are up against people who just do not understand. But the problem is, some of the people who do not understand are the people who have our lives in their hands. Is that right? The recent 'Welfare Reform Bill' showed us just how little understanding there is amongst lawmakers in this country. I watched Parliament session after session, as it was implied multiple times that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was an out-of-work benefit. Whether these MPs intended to suggest this, I cannot comment. However, the fact that it was said, for those who did not know, will now assume that it is. Therefore, they may end up voting on something that is factually untrue. Whilst there have been amendments to the bill and consultations are happening with disabled people and charities, it got me thinking. Is it right that the lawmakers of this land make these rules, having no idea of the facts or the implications that surround them? Yes, consultations are supposed to happen, but often they don't. A committee meeting just days ago, in which Liz Kendell and Steve Darling discussed the fact that the reform for PIP was consulted on, in Parliament only. Had it not been for the 120 rebels, a consultation with disabled people would not be happening. Disability Pride should be a month of celebration, and I, for one, won't let anyone stop me from celebrating my achievements or how far I have come. But when our own government makes us feel like we are not good enough or worthy, how long before people start to break? I would love to sit down with all MPs to find out exactly how much they understood about the bill and what they were voting for. Did they understand the impact, or did they just go by the figures? The impact report, the amount of savings, or just the information being fed by their leaders. I hope that people out there, before they judge, get behind and find out the facts. Look into the true findings, and yes, there are reports out there that are factually untrue. Which is why it needs to come from the source. The people who know about it first-hand. The disabled community, their carers, and charities. Why are we not standing up in Parliament and answering the questions these MPs have? I, for one, would be willing and open to any MP or any member of the public who wants to know more to simply ask. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Disability Pride Month: Why MPs need to do more to support
I once believed that being disabled was something to be ashamed of, often hiding the fact that I had disabilities. When I did disclose I was disabled, I would often face misunderstanding from others and looking back now, bullying over it. Even when I got to a point when I had to face that I had a disability and use a power chair to get around, I still felt ashamed. But looking back, I had no reason. This is me, this is who I am, like it or not. I am proud of myself, disability and all, and I think it has come from being in a community that accepts itself, which has helped me accept myself too. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all. (Newsquest) (Image: Newsquest) What is Disability Pride Month? July is Disability Pride month. It is a whole month for people with disabilities to celebrate diversity and their achievements. It's a month to celebrate inclusivity and promote equality for the disabled community. However, whilst we celebrate, we do this in the face of adversity. We do this whilst we are up against people who just do not understand. But the problem is, some of the people who do not understand are the people who have our lives in their hands. Is that right? Welfare Reform Bill exposed the 'little understanding' of disability benefits The recent 'Welfare Reform Bill' showed us just how little understanding there is amongst lawmakers in this country. I watched Parliament session after session, as it was implied multiple times that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was an out-of-work benefit. Whether these MPs intended to suggest this, I cannot comment. However, the fact that it was said, for those who did not know, will now assume that it is. Therefore, they may end up voting on something that is factually untrue. Whilst there have been amendments to the bill and consultations are happening with disabled people and charities, it got me thinking. Is it right that the lawmakers of this land make these rules, having no idea of the facts or the implications that surround them? Yes, consultations are supposed to happen, but often they don't. A committee meeting just days ago, in which Liz Kendell and Steve Darling discussed the fact that the reform for PIP was consulted on, in Parliament only. Had it not been for the 120 rebels, a consultation with disabled people would not be happening. MPs need to understand the Disability bills they vote on Disability Pride should be a month of celebration, and I, for one, won't let anyone stop me from celebrating my achievements or how far I have come. But when our own government makes us feel like we are not good enough or worthy, how long before people start to break? I would love to sit down with all MPs to find out exactly how much they understood about the bill and what they were voting for. Did they understand the impact, or did they just go by the figures? The impact report, the amount of savings, or just the information being fed by their leaders. I hope that people out there, before they judge, get behind and find out the facts. Look into the true findings, and yes, there are reports out there that are factually untrue. Which is why it needs to come from the source. The people who know about it first-hand. The disabled community, their carers, and charities. Why are we not standing up in Parliament and answering the questions these MPs have? I, for one, would be willing and open to any MP or any member of the public who wants to know more to simply ask. So this Disability Pride month, I ask you to join us in celebrating our achievements, inclusivity and help to promote equality for all.