Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral has listing status upgraded to recognise ‘architectural brilliance'
The Metropolitan Cathedral of Christ the King in Liverpool, often referred to locally as a 'wigwam' due to its unique shape, has been awarded Grade I listed status by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, following advice from Historic England.
The listing recognises the building, previously graded as Grade II*, as 'of exceptional interest' and is a standard only awarded to about 2.5% of listed buildings.
Archbishop of Liverpool John Sherrington said: 'I welcome the announcement that Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral of Christ the King has been recognised as a Grade I listed building.
'It commands the Liverpool skyline and is visible for miles around. The building has been described as 'the soul of the city' and brings hope to thousands who visit each year.'
The Catholic cathedral, which sits at the opposite end of Hope Street to its Anglican counterpart, was designed by Sir Frederick Gibberd and built between 1962 and 1967.
The structure features a central lantern which was filled with coloured glass, using a technique designed specifically for the building.
Sarah Charlesworth, from Historic England, said: 'Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral transformed British cathedral design with its revolutionary centralised plan, representing a radical departure from traditional designs.'
Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson said the building was an 'instantly recognisable symbol of Liverpool'.
She said: 'This recognition rightly honours its architectural significance and the prominent place it holds in our skyline – a true jewel in Liverpool's crown.'
Mayor of the Liverpool City Region Steve Rotheram added: 'Liverpool is a city with a proud architectural and cultural heritage, and the Metropolitan Cathedral is one of its most iconic landmarks.
'The bold, modern design broke new ground and has become a beacon of faith, hope and innovation, not just for our region but across the world.'
The cathedral was built over a crypt, designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens, which was intended to be part of a grand classical-style building that began in the 1930s, before financial constraints and the outbreak of the Second World War led to construction being halted.
Historic England said the upgrade of listing status reflected a deeper understand of Sir Frederick's architectural vision and 'the cathedral's significance as an international example of progressive Roman Catholic architecture during the mid-20th century'.
Catherine Croft, director of The Twentieth Century Society, a charity which campaigns to save modern architectural and design heritage, said: 'The 'Wigwam' or 'The Mersey Funnel', as it's affectionately known among locals, is unique in world architecture and has long been a powerful homecoming beacon for Liverpudlians.
'Liverpool now rightly has two magnificent Grade I listed cathedrals which together demonstrate just how varied, exciting, and emotionally uplifting 20th century architecture can be.
'A great vessel of post-war glass, sculpture and design, the listing upgrade will help ensure the modernist cathedral's careful long-term conservation and appreciation by all who visit – to worship or just to marvel.'
Historic England has also enhanced the existing Grade II listing for Hopwood Hall Chapel in Middleton, Greater Manchester, which was built in 1964 to Sir Frederick's designs and shares features including the lantern tower of concrete and glass.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Families urged to take action if they see crows in garden this summer
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has confirmed that the number of carrion crows in the UK has dropped year on year, by as much as 4.8% across the UK British families are being encouraged to keep an eye out for crows this summer, as the RSPB reveals a worrying 4.8 per cent decline in the UK's carrion crow population. The society highlighted that these birds, known for their intelligence, have been dwindling in numbers alongside other species such as starlings and sparrows. In its latest findings, the RSPB has noted that the all-black carrion crow, which can be found nationwide, is one of the most adaptable and clever garden birds. The RSPB explains: "The all-black Carrion Crow is one of the cleverest, most adaptable of our birds. It's often quite fearless, although it can be wary of humans. READ MORE: Kickers' 'durable' Back to School shoe range that 'last all year' "They're fairly solitary, usually found alone or in pairs, although they may sometimes form flocks. The closely related Hooded Crow has recently been split as a separate species." It adds: "Carrion Crows will come to gardens for food and although often cautious initially, they soon learn when it's safe, and will return repeatedly to snack on whatever's on offer." Moreover, the RSPB describes how these opportunistic feeders have a varied diet, from urban scraps to natural offerings, and are known to frequent garden feeders for a quick bite, reports the Express. Bird populations in the UK are struggling for a multitude of reasons, prompting an urgent call from a charity for people to spring into action. During the last weekend of January, an impressive turnout of nearly 600,000 individuals participated in their annual bird-counting endeavour, dedicating an hour to monitor our feathered friends within their gardens or local parks, aiding conservationists in assessing the state of British aviary life. The charity expressed concern, stating: "The problems faced by birds are many and varied, which means we need to take action in all sorts of areas. From gardening for wildlife to the way we farm and manage our rivers, it all impacts on nature." They then added: "That's why we work tirelessly to save, protect and fight for nature. And when we come together for nature, it works. Birds that were almost lost from the UK have been brought back." In a bid to bolster at-risk species like the starlings, the charity is encouraging householders to adopt simple practices such as eschewing pesticides and maintaining natural lawns that support the foraging needs of birds, providing them access to insects like crane fly larvae, also known as leatherjackets.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
My next door neighbours have the biggest pile of rubbish in their garden people have ever seen & their dogs EAT from it
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN ANGRY homeowner has blasted his next-door-neighbour for the huge pile of rubbish that's taking over their garden. The frustrated man took to social media to show off his neighbour's patio, with the floor barely visible as a result of piles and piles of waste. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 A man has shared his disgust at the huge pile of rubbish in his neighbour's garden Credit: Reddit Irritated by the jaw-dropping eyesore, which he can see when looking out of his window, the anonymous man uploaded a picture of the shocking mess. Posting on Reddit on the r/BadNeighbors thread, the man wrote under the username @pigeonmanO_o and simply penned: 'This is my neighbours' garden. 'It's literally just trash.' Not only is this man's neighbour's garden full with endless black bin bags exploding with recycling, but there's even a broken chest of drawers, a swimming pool full of shopping bags, an old mattress and a broken fan. There's also takeaway boxes, McDonald's cups, beer cans, camp chairs and garden tools. And as well as being a total state, the Reddit poster then claimed: 'They refuse to clean it.' But if you thought that was bad, think again, as the man also acknowledged that his neighbour's dogs are eating from the endless bin bags of waste. He admitted: 'What's worse is that they have two dogs who are always eating from that heap of trash.' Eager to get the mess cleared up, the man confessed: 'They rent it so I called the owner and they should sort it out.' Reddit users were left totally stunned by the wasteland, which some described as resembling a 'landfill' site. Viral Neighbour Shows No Respect: Cutting Down a 10-Year-Old Tree Users raced to the comments to express their thoughts on the neglected space, with many labelling it a 'health violation' and 'fire hazard'. One person said: 'That's just disgusting, that will attract all kinds of rodents… call your state or county office on them. The Top Five Reasons Neighbours Squabble One study by Compare the Market revealed the top reason British neighbour's argue Broken fences - top of the board was broken fences and whose responsibility it was to fix it Parking: one of the leading drivers of neighbour disputes, with 54.1 per cent of people having issues with people parking in front of their house, parking bay or driveway Trees - complaints about a neighbour's tree cracking your garden path was also common with nearly half of participants finding it frustrating Bin wars - outdoor bin etiquette continues to ignite the most furious debates between neighbours Nosy Neighbours - some people have their eyes and ears at the ready to have a peek causing problems for others "Not sure where you live or in what country but still that's a health risk.' Another added: 'Holy mother of god this is probably the worst thing I've seen here.' A third commented: 'You've got yourself a hoarder next door. That sucks.' Meanwhile someone else gasped: 'Is this not a health violation? And I thought my neighbours were bad. This is crazy Reddit user "This much garbage attracts pests and can endanger neighbours. As well as being a fire hazard.' At the same time, another homeowner simply shared: 'Looks like landfill.' Whilst one user penned: 'And I thought my neighbours were bad. This is crazy.' Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
We should be outraged by Lily Allen's ‘four or five' abortions
If we want to understand why thousands of women a year in England and Wales have an abortion – 251,377 in 2022, so probably way more now – we could do worse than consider the musings of the singer Lily Allen on the subject. In a podcast chat with her friend Miquita, this took a musical turn. She began singing to the tune of Frank Sinatra's 'My Way': 'Abortions I've had a few… but then again… I can't remember exactly how many'. Giggling, she continued: 'I can't remember. I think maybe like, I want to say four or five.' Miqiuta – a woman of whom I'd never heard – observed that, whaddya know, she'd had about five too: 'I'm so happy I can say that and you can say it and no one came to shoot us down, no judgement. We've had about the same amount of abortions.' As far as Lily is concerned, she used to 'get pregnant all the time'. Belatedly she had an IUD coil fitted, which sorted out the problem, but you have to wonder, might she have thought of that earlier? Whatever; she's fine about her abortions and rather impatient with the sort of people who feel they have to justify them. For her it's 'Just: 'I don't want a f***ing baby right now.' Literally: ''Don't want a baby' is enough reason.' And there you have it, folks. I don't think I've ever heard the terms of the Abortion Act 1967 so thoroughly trashed. Sir David Steel, if you're reading, how does it make you feel? Because under the actual legislation, according to the government, 'a pregnancy may be lawfully terminated by a registered medical practitioner, in approved premises, if two medical practitioners are of the opinion, formed in good faith, that the abortion is justified under one or more grounds.' Of the grounds it mentions, all but 2 per cent are justified under the following criterion: 'That the pregnancy has not exceeded its 24th week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.' So, two practitioners, likely justified each of Lily's five abortions on the basis that continuing with the pregnancy would have risked injury to her physical or mental health. And in all but a very few cases we're talking about mental health. And now here's proof, if anyone needed it, that absolutely anything, but anything, qualifies. If Lily says she doesn't want to be pregnant, end of. Literally. Sometimes, you have to wonder if the sex education to which young people are subjected in British schools is a bit deficient. Actually scrap that – I think the problem may be with the biology classes. Because the bit of the textbook that describes the foetal journey from zygote to looking like a kidney bean – but with discernibly human characteristics – right up to the curled-up baby that is about to make its way into the world may not have made sufficiently clear that it's a process without any obvious breaks. There isn't a point where the foetus all of a sudden has an existential moment and finds it is human. That, as Peter Jones pointed out in this magazine, was an Aristotle thing; he thought that the foetus sprang into full humanity at 40 days (90 for girls). Perhaps Lily has a similar approach, whereby she feels that the foetus is only human if she says it is. That is, if the pregnancy is wanted. Otherwise, it's an inconvenience. It's this caprice that drives me nuts. A foetus is simply a human being in the process of development and growth. It doesn't become human if it's a wanted pregnancy; it just is. And if you kill it – because, I am afraid, that is what abortion entails – then you're committing a kind of pre-natal homicide. Many people think that it's justifiable in 'crisis' pregnancies, but there's no getting away from it; abortion is a morally weighty act. Obviously abortion is more distressing and more unpleasant to all concerned, including the foetus, if the later pregnancy is advanced, and most abortions happen by ten-weeks' gestation – though over 500 happen after 22 weeks in case of disability. But terminating the life of a prenatal human being is serious; it's not something to do lightly. And it's not something for a bloody girly podcast where neither party seems to understand what's entailed. Miquita described her abortion as her 'contraceptive journey' which makes you wonder whether all that sex education was wasted. After the Antoniazzi amendment was passed the other week, whereby MPs gave women a free pass to do absolutely anything in terms of her own pregnancy right up to birth ('these women should be treated with care and compassion'), I was on a radio programme with a woman journalist who'd had an abortion at over five weeks and declared that she was really troubled by the fact that abortion wasn't decriminalised under the Abortion Act; rather it was allowed in only exceptional circumstances. This, she felt, was a stigma which bothered her. But what this podcast makes clear is that the stigma is illusory, as illusory as the terms of the Abortion Act. Lily doesn't care; she minds that there are weird people out there who think she should. And so this female Moloch went on to see off her 'four or five' pregnancies before finally having two delightful girls, Ethel and Marnie, with her ex-husband. She doesn't see that it's a problem. And that, folks, is why there are up to a quarter of a million abortions a year, and counting, even at a time when contraception is practically forced on teenagers. Lots and lots and lots of people don't think it matters. But it does. PS. The really interesting feature of the report on this on Mail online is that it involves no censure of anyone involved. The Antoniazzi amendment is written up in the article as a liberating development. Readers affected by the issues are invited to get in touch with BPAS, the abortion provider. Once, the Mail would have been outraged. That it apparently isn't, tells us everything.
