Rahul Gandhi's demand for digital voter list legally untenable: Experts
Election Commission of India insiders said an earlier Supreme Court verdict has already settled the matter in favour of the poll panel.
They suggest that LoP Rahul Gandhi's repeated attempts to rake up the demand for 'machine-readable digital copies' are nothing more than a publicity stunt, as the apex court has already ruled against such a demand.
Poll panel insiders shared excerpts of the Supreme Court's verdict on a writ petition filed in 2018 by Kamal Nath, the then president of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee, that said, 'The format in which the draft electoral roll is supplied to the petitioner fulfils the requirement contained in the Election Manual.'
'If the petitioner so wants, he can always convert it into searchable mode, which, of course, would require him to put his own efforts,' said the Supreme Court judgment.
Insiders in the ECI have shed light on the apex court judgment in the backdrop of LoP Rahul Gandhi's allegation of 'fixed election' in Maharashtra last November and the Election Commission's invitation to him to sit for a doubt-clearing session, an offer which he has not accepted yet.
'While it is factually correct that Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition, has been demanding a machine-readable, digital copy of the electoral roll for the last seven months, such a demand by the Congress is not new,' said an official source.
The demand, it seems, is part of a strategy by the Congress for well over eight years, a fact that appears to have been selectively obscured in the present representation, he said.
'The position historically maintained by the Indian National Congress is not tenable within the contours of the prevailing legal framework. It may be recalled that this very issue has already been agitated by the Congress before none other than the highest constitutional court of the country,' he said.
An ECI insider cited the Supreme Court decision on the matter, which said: 'We find force in the submission of ECI. Clause 11.2.2.2 of the Election Manual uses the expression 'text mode'. The draft electoral roll in that mode, i.e. text mode, has been supplied to the petitioner. The clause nowhere says that the draft electoral roll has to be put up on the Chief Electoral Officer's website in a 'searchable PDF'.'
'Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim, as a right, that the draft electoral roll should be placed on the website in a 'searchable mode'. It has only to be in 'text mode' and it is so provided,' said the SC verdict, quoted by the expert.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Polls being ‘stolen', will show ‘vote theft' with Karnataka LS seat example: Rahul
Amid protests by Opposition parties inside and outside Parliament against the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral roll in poll-bound Bihar, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi Wednesday alleged that elections are being 'stolen' and said that he was going to show it in 'black and white' with an example of a Lok Sabha constituency in Karnataka, which he claimed the party has studied. In Delhi, Gandhi told the reporters that: 'They cheated in Maharashtra. We asked questions and asked for the voters list. They didn't show it. We asked for videography, and they changed the law for videography. One crore voters were added in Maharashtra and they stole the election.' Alleging discrepancies in voters list of a constituency in Karnataka during the 2024 LS polls, Gandhi said: 'We have… caught huge theft in Karnataka. I will show you in black and white, and I will show the EC… They have understood what their game is… We chose one constituency and did a deep dive.' 'The problem is they give voters lists on paper, which can't be analysed. For one constituency, we took the voters list, and converted it into digital format. It took us six months, but we have figured out their system — how they do it, who votes, where the votes are cast, and how new voters are created… They are doing it under a new system in Bihar — they will delete voters. Elections are being stolen in India and that is the reality.' Congress sources said Gandhi was referring to Bangalore North constituency. Sharing a video of his remarks on X, Gandhi said, 'We showed everyone how match-fixing happened in Maharashtra. We investigated one Lok Sabha seat in Karnataka — large-scale vote theft was found, we will soon bring it before the public.' Gandhi said that in Bihar, votes of SC, ST and OBC communities and minorities are being stolen in the name of the electoral roll revision.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tejashwi leads Oppn attack in Bihar assembly: ‘Not against roll revision but the process'
The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls continued to cause stormy scenes at the monsoon session of the Bihar Legislative Assembly for the third day in a row, with the Speaker allowing discussion on the subject after three days of Opposition protest. Speaker Nand Kishor Yadav's decision to allow the discussion came despite Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's objections to it. During the debate, Bihar's Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav questioned the timing, transparency, and documentation requirements for SIR – the Election Commission's contentious exercise to update electoral rolls. 'The Constitution grants the right to vote to every person above 18 years, regardless of wealth or status. This equality must not be infringed,' he said. The Opposition, he insisted, 'wasn't against the SIR itself' but opposed the process. Referring to complaints cited by the Election Commission about non-resident and 'external' voters. 'The Election Commission should work honestly and transparently, but it is not doing so. We strongly oppose and deny this in the House,' he said. 'It is shameful that such a significant drive is going on and yet the Election Commissioner has not addressed the press to clarify their position; instead, information emerges only through unnamed sources.' He also wondered at the 'urgency' of conducting the exercise, pointing out that the last such revision in 2003 took two years to complete. 'If the process is so important, why not start after the Lok Sabha elections? Why was it initiated now, during the monsoon season?' he asked. 'Bihar is at the bottom in terms of essential documents, whether it's a birth or death certificate. Only 2.3% of people have the necessary documents. Now, 11 documents are being demanded which most poor people don't possess. Why aren't Aadhaar, ration cards, or MNREGA cards being accepted, despite Supreme Court suggestions?' This figure includes both 3.5 crore registered workers and around 1 crore unregistered voters who, despite their tenure outside, 'return to Bihar to vote'. 'There is now a risk their names may be deleted from the rolls,' the LOP argued. Addressing allegations about foreign nationals on the rolls, he said: 'The matter is pending before the Supreme Court. In the 780-page affidavit filed by the Election Commission, there is no mention of any Bangladeshi, Nepali, or Myanmar national. Even BJP's over 52,000 Booth Level Agents have never raised such complaints with the Election Commission.' In response, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar accused the Opposition of making electoral rolls revision 'an issue because of their lack of work and upcoming elections'. The RJD too had been in power once, he went on to say. 'Why are you raising these issues now? Your father was chief minister for seven years, then your mother for another seven years, and then you were also deputy chief minister,' Kumar said. 'Look at what your budget used to be earlier, and how much more we've done for everyone now. Today, it's more than Rs 3 lakh crore and the central government is providing a lot of support too… we surveyed Bihar to identify where anything was lacking. Wherever there were gaps, we've addressed them… Whenever there was a need, we made sure the work got done,' he said. He then said: 'Ab mamla hai ki chunav ladna hai to bhai chunav ladiye aur uske band jitna bolna hai bolte rahiye (But now it's about contesting elections. So go contest and then you can say as much as you like).' The situation began to heat up when a comment made by RJD MLA Bhai Virendra caused uproar and led to the house being adjourned until the afternoon session.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
BC Quota Ordinance: BJP hits out at Cong, flags legal loopholes and ‘political gimmickry'
1 2 3 Hyderabad: The Congress govt's push for 42% reservation for Backward Classes is drawing sharp criticism from the BJP, which is accusing the ruling party of bypassing due legislative process and indulging in political theatrics. While the Congress aims to elevate the BC quota issue into a nationwide campaign, BJP leaders are cautioning that the move could trigger significant legal challenges, particularly as the proposal threatens to breach the Supreme Court-mandated 50% cap on reservations. BJP state chief N Ramchander Rao has alleged that the Congress govt is intentionally avoiding a direct amendment to the Panchayat Raj Act in the current assembly session. Instead, it has chosen to route the proposal through an ordinance sent to the governor, a move Rao claims is a calculated attempt to dodge legislative scrutiny. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Anticipating that the Congress may try to blame the Centre for any obstacles in the implementation of reservations, the BJP has sharpened its position. "We are not opposed to the 42% BC reservation," Rao clarified, "but we strongly object to the inclusion of 10% political representation for Muslims under the BC quota. Any increased reservation must benefit only the BC communities." Within party circles, leaders have been asked to question the Congress's sincerity, especially as the ruling party continues to make lofty promises without addressing the legal complexities involved. "If they try to pin this on us, we will respond firmly. We supported the bill in the assembly, despite our reservations on Muslim inclusion," BJP leaders reiterated. As the reservation debate heats up, the BJP appears poised to frame the Congress's move as symbolic and legally untenable, while reaffirming its support for genuine, constitutionally valid BC representation, sources said. The BJP is now closely tracking the Congress govt's next steps and the governor's decision on the ordinance. Party sources have raised concerns over the lack of clarity in the ordinance, pointing out that it fails to mention specific reservation percentages. "If they were truly committed to this issue, they would have amended the Panchayat Raj Act directly through the assembly instead of taking a vague, roundabout route," a senior BJP source said.
