
A voice for the unheard: Miss SA Mia Le Roux joins National Dialogue to ‘ensure credibility'
Miss South Africa Mia le Roux said her participation at the National Dialogue is to ensure that there's credibility in the process. Picture: mialerouxx/Instagram
Miss South Africa Mia le Roux said her participation in the National Dialogue is to ensure that the process is credible and to serve as a voice for the voiceless, advocating for those who often go unheard.
'I'm here to ensure that there is credibility to the process. We all are here to drive that credibility and to ensure that this will be a success,' said Le Roux.
She was speaking at the inaugural meeting that President Cyril Ramaphosa had with members of the National Dialogue Eminent Persons Group at the Union Buildings in Tshwane on Friday.
The president announced the appointment of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) to guide and champion the National Dialogue, and Le Roux is among those invited.
ALSO READ: 'We said yes to forever': Miss South Africa Mia le Roux is engaged!
Le Roux, the advocate
Le Roux was diagnosed with hearing loss when she was a year old and received her cochlear implant shortly after.
She has since become an advocate for people living with disabilities, using her platform to raise awareness and promote inclusivity.
'I believe that this national dialogue is important because as someone who has always felt unheard, who never had a voice, this is an opportunity for you to have your voice,' Le Roux said.
The 29-year-old recently announced that she has become engaged to her partner, Luke Tenoever.
ALSO READ: More than 53 000 sign petition to remove Minnie Ntuli from radio and TV
Dr Kani's thrill
The EPG consists of prominent individuals in society with a proven commitment to the advancement of social cohesion and nation-building.
The selected individuals are drawn from across the country and from many fields of endeavour in public life, according to the government.
In the art and creative space, the president invited elders, including actor, playwright and director Dr John Kani and author and poet Gcina Mhlope.
'Since 1994, all of us had envisaged the future. All of us knew what was going to happen to our lives, what was going to be improved in our lives, and slowly that image gets blurred,' Kani said.
'And now, when the president said after the elections that we need a national dialogue, I was thrilled.'
He said his excitement about the dialogue stems from the opportunity to reflect on the country's journey since the dawn of democracy in 1994, particularly in terms of citizen reflection.
'Maybe even speak to ourselves in our communities and say 'what can I do to improve the situation, to improve the lives of our people…what are my responsibilities in dealing with crime in my street',' said the actor.
Kani highlighted other social ills the country faces, urging South Africans to reflect on their contributions to the country's welfare.
''Are you aware?' I'm asking myself, I'm not saying what the government is doing. I'm asking myself what am I doing. This then, for me, give us that push.'
Speaking to The Citizen just after Ramaphosa announced the long list of EPG, celebrated singer-songwriter Thandiswa Mazwai said she didn't receive an invitation from the president. and that she would've accepted the invitation had it come.
'There is much to be legislated in our industry and much to be done to protect artist rights, livelihoods and dignity,' shared Thandiswa.
Opinion on the National Dialogue is as divided as the country's election results last year.
While some have seen it as an opportunity for South Africans to air their grievances about the country's progress or the lack thereof over the last 30 years, others view it as a waste of state funds by the government.
NOW READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
24 minutes ago
- IOL News
Political parties support increased funding for Border Management Authority
Border Management Authority commissioner Michael Masiapato told MPs that they presence of health officials in 36 out of 71 ports of entry Image: Border Management Authority Political parties have thrown their weight for the Border Management Authority (BMA) to get more funding in order to carry out its mandate. The entity made a case before the parliamentary Committees on Appropriations about its underfunding since its establishment in 2023. Home Affairs portfolio committee chairperson, Mosa Chabane, said they have been grappling with the underfunding of the BMA over the last three financial years. 'We have grappled with calls for more funding given the task the BMA has been given and that it has to respond to the challenges that South Africans and all of us MPs have been raising around porous borders,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Chabane said the entity was saddled with capacity issues in terms of technology and the high vacancy rate. Home Affairs deputy minister, Njabulo Nzuza, said they have prepared business case for more funding to relevant platforms but were struggling with issues of funding. He said the funding to the BMA would yield returns. 'If we fund the BMA sufficiently and have control of the borders that will mean higher returns for SARS in terms of revenue collection and will result in economic growth. It is not just a plea for money, but a plea for resources to turn the situation around,' Nzuza said. BMA commissioner Michael Masiapato painted a picture of BMA in dire need for financial injection if it was to carry out its mandate. Masiapato said their mandate was to deal with border law enforcement and deal with movement of goods and persons. He said there were issues around staffing and financing. 'What is missing is the conventional law enforcement done by SAPS border police.' Masiapato explained that they required a staff complement of 4000 and R2.2 billion to man the borderline but they have only 600 border guards. He said the request for adequate funding has not yielded the result as they received far less than they requested. Masiapato also said they had required R2.9 billion but were promised R250 million which turned out to be for the maintenance of infrastructure when it was allocated. 'We remain grossly underfunded.' He added that although they had asked for R500m from the Criminal Asset Recovery Account, they were allocated R150m for tools of trade. The entity has made another request for R4.3 billion in additional resources and are waiting for a response. Masiapato told the MPs that their approved structure provided for 11 000 posts but only 2600 were filled. 'We say despite people who came from departments, we need some investment to build the baseline for staff,' he said, adding that they needed R500m at least. He told of staff shortages in ICT, finance, specialist in agriculture and health posts. 'We have presence in 36 ports of entry in terms of health officials,' he said. Masiapato also said in terms of law people entering the 71 ports of entry in the country, they should be assessed and screened for diseases. 'People enter without being assessed.' He told the MPs that the BMA has R4.3 billion overdraft. Parties from across the political divide pledged their support to increased funding of the BMA. Chairperson of the Appropriations Standing Committee, Mmusi Maimane, said they were guided by the Money Bills and that they will look at the budget of the Home affairs departments and other departments. He stated that any amendment they make to the budget was to be made on the basis of the fiscal framework that was tabled. Maimane also said since the budget for 2025/26 were due for approval next, the BMA case would be considered in the next Medium Term Expenditure Framework to be tabled later this year. 'The programmes of the BMA can't be understated,' he said, adding that things the BMA required adequate funding. He also said they will request the Parliamentary Budget Office to make a presentation and the National Treasury would be engaged on the matter.


Mail & Guardian
24 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
‘National Dialogue is no talk shop,' organisers say
Looking to the future: Nkosinathi Biko (left) heads the committee that will steer the National Dialogue. He and Samora Biko (right) are the sons of Steve Biko. Photo: GCIS But the Democratic Alliance has said it will boycott the dialogue that will take place over nine months, calling it a waste of time and money This content is restricted to subscribers only . Join the M&G Community Our commitment at the Mail & Guardian is to ensure every reader enjoys the finest experience. Join the M&G community and support us in delivering in-depth news to you consistently. Subscription enables: - M&G community membership - independent journalism - access to all premium articles & features - a digital version of the weekly newspaper - invites to subscriber-only events - the opportunity to test new online features first Already a subscriber?

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Why South Africans are losing trust in their security forces
Hundreds marched on the streets of Durban on Tuesday, calling for "Hands Off Mkhwanazi". Image: Doctor Ngcobo/ Independent Newspapers There is a quiet, growing disillusionment in South Africa. One that isn't expressed in protest or petitions, but in silence. People no longer expect the system to protect them — not from criminals, not from corrupt politicians, and indeed not if they decide to speak out. Confidence in the country's security cluster is in freefall, and the state's latest handling of Minister Senzo Mchunu's scandal has only deepened the sense that truth and accountability have no place in today's political landscape. On July 13, President Cyril Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave, following explosive allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The commissioner accused Mchunu of colluding with criminal syndicates, interfering in politically sensitive murder investigations, and using his authority to disband a task team probing over a hundred unsolved political killings. The accusations, if true, represent one of the most brazen breaches of public trust by a sitting minister in recent memory. Yet despite the severity of the claims, Mchunu has not been fired. He hasn't even been suspended without pay. Instead, he's been quietly placed on paid leave while a commission of inquiry is established. And just like that, a man accused of undermining the very foundations of justice is allowed to retreat — salary and benefits intact — while the public waits, once again, for answers that may never come. The optics of this decision are catastrophic. At a time when public trust in the police has dropped to an all-time low — a recent HSRC survey found only 22% of South Africans have confidence in SAPS — the president's response appears more like damage control than leadership. And for whistleblowers, it sends a devastating message: the system doesn't just fail to protect you; it may actively reward those who put you in danger. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ This isn't a theoretical issue. Whistleblowers in South Africa operate in one of the most hostile environments in the democratic world. Those who expose corruption or criminal wrongdoing often face threats, intimidation, legal harassment, or even death. Babita Deokaran's assassination in 2021 was not just a tragedy — it was a signal that speaking out in this country can be a death sentence. Since then, government promises to strengthen whistleblower protection laws have amounted to little more than lip service. Draft proposals to reform the Protected Disclosures Act have yet to materialise into action. Civil society groups have repeatedly called for a comprehensive system that includes safe housing, financial support, legal assistance, and psychological care for whistleblowers. But those calls continue to go unanswered. Now, in the wake of the Mchunu scandal, the stakes have never been clearer. If a police minister can be accused of sabotaging investigations and remain in office, even temporarily, what hope is there for those who come forward with information that implicates people in power? A judicial commission, led by acting deputy-chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, has been tasked with investigating the allegations. Its scope includes not just Mchunu's conduct, but broader issues of interference in the justice system by political actors. It is a necessary process, and if handled with urgency and transparency, it could restore some faith in the rule of law. But South Africans have seen this play before. Commissions that take months, sometimes years, to deliver findings. Recommendations that gather dust. Promises that fade into the next news cycle. The danger isn't just that whistleblowers will stop coming forward. It's that the public will stop caring. When accountability becomes a performance, people turn away. When justice is delayed indefinitely, it begins to resemble impunity. Ramaphosa came into office promising to clean up the state, rebuild trust, and restore integrity to public office. However, his leadership has often favoured caution over conviction. Political stability has come at the expense of moral clarity. At this moment, South Africans don't need another commission. They need a firm, unambiguous stand — a declaration that those who compromise justice will not be protected by proximity to power. It's not too late. The president can still act decisively. He can remove Mchunu from his position, demand expedited action from the inquiry, and push forward urgent reforms to protect whistleblowers. These are not radical demands — they are the minimum standard in any functioning democracy. The next whistleblower is out there. They might be a municipal clerk, a junior accountant, a medical officer, or a police officer with a conscience. They're watching the Mchunu case unfold. They're reading the silence. And they're asking themselves one very human question: is it worth it? Right now, the answer is uncertain. But if the president and his Cabinet fail to act swiftly and honestly, the silence that follows won't be peaceful — it will be the silence of a society giving up. *Mayalo is an independent writer and analyst. The views expressed are not necessarily those of IOL and Independent Media