logo
Bereaved father: Grenfell documentary must mark turning point in justice fight

Bereaved father: Grenfell documentary must mark turning point in justice fight

Grenfell: Uncovered, on Netflix from June 20, follows the final report of the inquiry into the fire which concluded each of the 72 deaths was avoidable and had been preceded by 'decades of failure' by government and the building industry to act on the dangers of flammable materials on high-rise buildings.
Grenfell Tower in west London (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
Bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed and the west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said last year.
Sir Martin called out 'deliberate and sustained' manipulation of fire safety testing, misrepresentation of test data and misleading of the market.
Mr Gomes, who said he lives with the devastating consequences of the fire every day, said the documentary sets out the failures of various organisations in the years leading up to the fire.
In an interview with the PA news agency ahead of the documentary's release, he said: 'Ultimately, I'm hoping that people understand that this was no accident. This was very much avoidable, and these companies had a huge role to play in what happened.
'And I think people, especially in Britain – but this is a global thing, it's not just in the UK – need to start shouting about these companies, need to hold them to account.
'Because these companies have a duty of care but they've ignored it completely.
'And I'm hoping that this documentary is a turning point that will then bring prosecutions and justice to the families.'
A number of companies are referred to in the documentary.
The inquiry report saw cladding firm Arconic and insulation firms Kingspan and Celotex come in for particularly heavy criticism.
Arconic was found to have 'deliberately concealed from the market the true extent of the danger' of using its cladding product, particularly on high-rise buildings.
Kingspan had, from 2005 and even after the inquiry began, 'knowingly created a false market in insulation' for use on buildings over 18 metres, the report said.
Celotex then, in an attempt to break into this market created by Kingspan, 'embarked on a dishonest scheme to mislead its customers and the wider market', Sir Martin concluded.
The Cabinet Office confirmed in February that seven companies were facing possible bans – Arconic, Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades.
Investigations were launched by the Government in March, assessing whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts.
Mr Gomes said he hoped the 100-minute documentary would see people back the bereaved and survivors' fight for justice, as it sets out how firms were 'prioritising profits ahead of people's lives'.
He said: 'Eight years on, we've had no prosecutions. And justice can't continue to wait, in my opinion, and if you live in Britain, as we do, this should matter to every single person.
'Knowing that these companies that greatly contributed to something that was avoidable, as the inquiry said, are still making record profits and still working globally is appalling, in my view.
'So seeing this and then comparing to how my life is, and comparing to how many people's lives have been destroyed, in many ways, is horrific.'
Mr Gomes said he hoped viewers might be moved to take some kind of action, from writing to their MPs to spreading the word on social media.
He said: 'I think if they can do whatever's in their power, and if that's writing a letter to the MPs about getting justice or removing the cladding (on other buildings), then that's what I'd love to see.
'It's whatever people can do – avoid their products, get the message out there. These companies need to feel some pain and that's not even close to what we've gone through.'
Bereaved and survivors gathered at the weekend to mark the eighth anniversary of the fire, which took place on June 14 2017.
Demolition work on the tower could begin in September, with the decision to remove the building met with criticism from some of the bereaved and survivors, who felt their views had not been considered.
Responding to the inquiry report last year, Arconic said it was its subsidiary, Arconic Architectural Products SAS (AAP), which had supplied the material used for cladding in the tower's refurbishment, and that it rejects 'any claim that AAP sold an unsafe product' and that it 'did not conceal information from or mislead any certification body, customer, or the public'.
Kingspan said it had 'long acknowledged the wholly unacceptable historical failings that occurred in part of our UK insulation business' but said these were 'in no way reflective of how we conduct ourselves as a group, then or now', while Celotex said it had 'reviewed and improved process controls, quality management and the approach to marketing within the Celotex business to meet industry best practice'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Triple killer's alarm went off at 1:10am as he had grim job to do
Triple killer's alarm went off at 1:10am as he had grim job to do

Daily Mirror

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Triple killer's alarm went off at 1:10am as he had grim job to do

Christian "Kit" Martin was a decorated military veteran and commercial pilot who murdered three of his neighbours - his sickening early morning plans shocked loved ones Wearing his PSA Airlines uniform, pilot Christian "Kit" Martin certainly made an impression as he marched towards the departure gate at Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport in Kentucky on 11 May 2019. The ex- army major, boasting a distinguished 30-year military career, was all set to captain a flight to Charlotte, North Carolina, for PSA, an affiliate of American Airlines. However, upon reaching the security checkpoint to board the early morning service, Martin's day took a dramatic turn – he was halted by police officers. ‌ Onlookers were shocked as Martin was handcuffed, arrested, and escorted away in full view of the public. His days in the cockpit were abruptly over. ‌ READ MORE: Disturbing text sent by former Olympic athlete before he strangled wife and hid body underwater He was accused of a horrific crime: the triple homicide of three neighbours. This marked a staggering descent from honour to infamy, and for Martin, things were about to get even grimmer as his history loomed large. Rewind four years, and Martin found himself in Pembroke, Kentucky, amidst personal chaos. Despite a celebrated career piloting helicopters for the army, his life was unravelling. His marriage to wife Joan had crumbled, leading to a venomous split. To add insult to injury, Martin uncovered that Joan had been legally tied to another man when they exchanged vows in 2004. Joan would later face charges of bigamy, resulting in a five-year "pretrial diversion" sentence, essentially a probationary period. In retaliation, Joan levelled accusations against Martin, painting him as domineering and abusive. Joan, leaving the family home with her son from a previous relationship, was assisted by neighbour Calvin Phillips, who lived opposite. Despite no evidence of an affair, Martin suspected Joan and Calvin were romantically involved, leading to heated accusations. During the move, Calvin and Joan stumbled upon a military computer and discs they believed held classified information, which they handed over to the police. ‌ Martin faced a court martial and potential army discharge, accused of mishandling classified data and sexual abuse charges. Calvin, aged 59, was set to testify at the court martial. Martin, vehemently denying all allegations, claimed his ex-wife fabricated the charges to "ruin him" following their split. On November 18, 2015, a burnt-out car was discovered in a Pembroke cornfield. The intense fire initially concealed the two bodies inside. ‌ The victims were identified as Calvin's wife Pamela, 58, and Edward Dansereau, 63, another neighbour. Their deaths were ruled homicides, with both suffering multiple gunshot wounds. The vehicle was traced back to Pamela's residence, where police were horrified to discover another gruesome crime scene. Pamela's husband Calvin was found dead in the basement, having suffered multiple gunshot wounds. The murderer had attempted to incinerate his body without success and had closed the cellar doors in an attempt to conceal the crime. A triple murder investigation was subsequently launched. Who could possibly want to kill these three neighbours? ‌ Investigators quickly unearthed that Calvin was scheduled to testify at Martin's court martial just a few weeks after his death. Was Calvin murdered to prevent him from testifying, and were the others killed to obscure the real target? By placing Pamela and Edward's bodies together, it could appear as though they were engaged in an affair. Did the murderer plan to move Calvin's body before it was found to frame him for the murders? However, despite thorough investigations, there was no evidence linking Martin to the murders and the case went cold. Martin faced his court martial as scheduled but without Calvin as a witness. Martin was found guilty of mishandling classified information and child assault. He received a 90-day prison sentence and was discharged from the army. Martin relocated to North Carolina and started anew. In early 2018, he secured employment with PSA Airlines. ‌ However, back in Pembroke, Calvin and Pamela's family remained resolute in their quest for justice for them and for Edward. The case was reopened after investigators were urged to do so and new evidence was presented. The Phillips family discovered a spent bullet shell casing near the cellar door on the back porch of Pamela and Calvin's home. ‌ They were puzzled as to how it had been overlooked years earlier when the police had thoroughly searched the crime scene, but they also found a set of Martin's dog tags on a shelf in the house. BULLET CASING The bullet casing was found to match a gun owned by Martin. Investigators could also now place Martin's mobile in the area where Pamela and Edward's bodies were discovered. ‌ Finally, there was sufficient evidence to charge him. In May 2019, Martin was apprehended at Louisville Airport, just moments before he was due to board a flight. Following his arrest, Martin was still dressed in his uniform when his mugshots were taken. Immediately, Martin denied any involvement in the deaths of his neighbours. He maintained that he was at home with his girlfriend - who is now his fiancée - at the time of the murders. She supported him and would testify that they were together at the time of the killings. As the trial neared, Martin's ex-wife Joan invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid giving testimony. In court this year, the prosecution alleged that Martin shot Calvin in his home on the morning of 18 November 2015, to prevent Calvin from testifying at his court martial. ‌ He disposed of the body in the cellar and attempted to burn it. When Pamela returned from her job at a bank, he also killed her by shooting her in the head. He also shot Edward in the head. Was Edward simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, or was his death a cover-up for the real target? Martin denied any involvement in the murders, leaving the question unanswered. Regardless, both Pamela and Edward became unintended victims. ‌ Following the murders, Martin set his alarm for 1.10am to transport Pamela and Edward's bodies to a field three miles away, where he torched their car. A neighbour heard the explosion, and the fire nearly reduced the car to ashes. In June 2021, following a two-week trial, Martin was convicted on all charges. He was found guilty of three counts of murder, along with charges of burglary, arson, and tampering with evidence. During the sentencing, the victims' family shared their memories. Matt Phillips, son of Calvin and Pamela, described his mum as warm-hearted and kind, while his dad was outgoing and full of energy. ‌ He referred to them as "direct opposites" but perfectly suited for each other. "They're just gone," he expressed. "And the concept of home, where you go for Thanksgiving or for Christmas, or just to go home, this concept of home has been taken. It's gone." ‌ Edward's daughter, Erin, informed the court that her father was a professional jazz pianist and a "passionate lover of life". "His spirit was infectious, and his spirit made everyone feel like they were loved," she said about her father. "If you were lucky enough to form any kind of relationship with him, it meant he loved you. There were no grey areas. You had a loyal friend for the rest of your life." The judge agreed with the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment without parole. Martin's legal team announced they would appeal. Despite his efforts, Martin couldn't salvage his reputation. And three innocent lives were lost.

NICOLA METHVEN 'New Netflix disaster documentary will make your blood boil'
NICOLA METHVEN 'New Netflix disaster documentary will make your blood boil'

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

NICOLA METHVEN 'New Netflix disaster documentary will make your blood boil'

I defy anyone to watch the Netflix documentary about the Grenfell disaster without feeling anguished at what the victims and their families went through, followed by an even stronger emotion - fury. There won't be many viewers who get to the end of the 90 minutes without their blood boiling as the multiple injustices suffered by those living in Grenfell Tower at that time are laid bare for all to see. It's a film that should be watched by everyone, so the full extent of the many failings that led to the fire are remembered, at a time when not a single person has been prosecuted. Grenfell: Uncovered was released on Friday, and many who've watched it have been left - like me - gasping in shock at the way in which those affected by the tragedy were treated both in the run-up, the aftermath and ever since. The stand-out moment, perhaps, is the unearthing of emails which prove beyond all doubt how cladding company Arconic absolutely knew that its flammable plastic product was unsuitable for a high rise building, or indeed any building over 12metres, but they sold it for Grenell anyway. The safety tests they'd carried out told them in no uncertain terms about the lethal 'flaming droplets' that would be created in the event of a fire. They knew human life would inevitably be put in danger. But in the dogged pursuit of profit they decided to bury the outrageously bad safety results, hiding behind the fact that the sale of the cladding was at least legal in the UK at the time (it wasn't in many other countries). The emails, especially those from technical manager Claude Werhle and others from senior Arconic executive Diana Perriah, show how the company's insistence that nothing was concealed from the public or customers or officials in terms of safety testing results is categorically untrue. In fact they had fire tested the ACM cladding several times and the results were that it was so bad it was deemed upgradeable. The comment to this discovery, sent in an email, was "oops". You've got to wonder how Mr Werhle sleeps at night.. 'This product was safe to use as a building material and permissible to sell in the UK,' Arconic insists in an infuriating statement shown at the end of the film. 'AAP [the company's French subsidiary which did the deal for Grenfell] did not conceal information from or mislead any certification body, customers or the public.' It's frankly astonishing, considering the inquiry found them to have "deliberately concealed" the true extent of the fire risk while displaying "systematic dishonesty". The documentary highlights many shock moments as the survivors and the families of the victims push for justice. These include: So the next big question is over whether the failings by the cladding companies, by the fire brigade or by the building's owner, the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, constitute criminal negligence. By next year, or perhaps 2027, this will be known, because the Met is carrying out its own investigation. That it could take a full decade for the culprits to be brought to justice - if that is indeed what happens - is yet another travesty, on top of the many that the survivors and bereaved have already endured. Anyone watching the documentary about the avoidable tragedy should prepare themselves for an extremely emotional ride. I do hope Lord Eric Pickles tunes in to see just how badly he comes across - there won't be many who witness his arrogance and aren't left staggered that he was made a life peer in 2018. And perhaps, just a thought, it's time to remove all flammable cladding from UK buildings? As fire-fighter Dave Badillo sighed in an interview with the Mirror earlier this month - 'just get it off!' - Grenfell: Uncovered is now streaming on Netflix

Netflix's devastating Grenfell documentary leaves viewers in tears
Netflix's devastating Grenfell documentary leaves viewers in tears

Daily Mirror

time5 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Netflix's devastating Grenfell documentary leaves viewers in tears

Viewers are re-living the 2017 inferno and the devastating aftermath in Grenfell: Uncovered as Netflix shines a light on the struggle for justice eight year on from the blaze As new Netflix documentary Grenfell: Uncovered lays bare the full horror of the tower block fire, viewers took just moments to be left completely overcome with emotion. The film delves into the lead-up to the notorious west London tower blaze on June 14, 2017, and the harrowing events of that night. Featuring interviews with survivors, experts, and a detailed look at the subsequent investigation, the programme is stirring deep emotions with justice still not served. ‌ Netflix describes Grenfell: Uncovered as: "Survivors, witnesses and experts tell the story of the tragic fire that engulfed a residential tower block in London - and the investigation that ensued." Days after its release, those who have already watched the heartbreaking opening show didn't take long to break down. ‌ In the documentary, which launched on Friday, new evidence is unearthed which suggests the president of the company that made the cladding knew it was dangerous two years before the fire that claimed 72 lives. Many have taken to X to give their reaction. One posted: "NetflixUK Grenfell uncovered is truly heartbreaking and had me in tears. The survivors are so brave telling their stories from such a traumatising event." Another took to the platform to tell their followers: "Not a comfortable watch but such an eye opener." Meanwhile, a third person gave their assessment, writing: "Powerful doco. To say I enjoyed it isn't really correct, but to dig into why it happened and how damning the evidence makes it essential viewing I hope the victims and their loved ones get the justice they deserve." Viewers see how arconic executive Diana Perreiah was warned by French colleagues - who sold the product to the UK - that the type of flammable cladding chosen for cost-cutting reasons on Grenfell was not suitable over 12 metres and caused excess smoke and 'flaming droplets'. In 2015, Perreiah had asked for details of cladding types and their burn times during negotiations for the Grenfell contract but failed to stop the deal, despite the clear warning. This new information comes after the public inquiry found that Arconic had "deliberately and dishonestly" concealed 2005 test data that showed its cladding burnt in "an extremely dangerous way" and had issued safety statements which "it knew to be false'. ‌ Arconic's statement issued to the Netflix film-makers, Rogan Productions, is that the product was 'safe to use as a building material and permissible to sell in the UK'. It also insisted that Arconic's French subsidiary AAP 'did not conceal information from or mislead any certification body, customers or the public'. Grenfell Tower was 67 metres tall. Its 129 homes were covered in PE cladding towards the end of 2015 with the panels later found to be the main cause for the rapid spread of the fire that killed 72 people, including 18 children, on June 14, 2017. The documentary highlights that using the fire retardant version of the panels would have cost around £2 per square metre more, which works out at around £40 per flat, or £5,000. Grenfell survivor Eddie Daffarn, told The Sunday Times: "It is bad enough to know that they knew about the danger this product posed to tall buildings, but to learn that they specifically knew it was sold for use on Grenfell Tower and did nothing to stop it just proves what a callous and uncaring company they are, and how they simply put profit above human lives." Grenfell Uncovered is available for streaming on Netflix now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store