Southern Water boss should refuse ‘outrageous' pay rise
It is understood that he has only received half of this payment this year, taking his total pay to more than £1 million.
Asked on Sunday about Mr Gosden's pay, Environment Secretary Steve Reed told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg it was 'outrageous' and implored Southern to 'think about how this looks to their customers'.
He said: 'Trust between the customers and the water companies is at the lowest point probably ever, and by paying their senior executives rises of that kind, what message are they sending to their customers?'
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said Southern Water's performance meant a large payout to its chief executive was not 'merited' (Jonathan Brady/PA)
Asked whether Mr Gosden should turn down the pay rise, Mr Reed said: 'I think it would be right if he did.'
He added: 'I don't think Southern Water has performed well enough for that kind of pay increase to be merited.'
Southern Water was banned from paying bonuses last month over a so-called 'category 1' sewage spill in the New Forest, Hampshire, in August 2024.
Under new rules, companies are banned from paying bonuses if they do not meet environmental, consumer or financial standards, or are convicted of a criminal offence.
Southern Water has insisted the payment to Mr Gosden is not a bonus but part of a long-term incentive plan set up in 2023 and linked to a two-year effort to improve the company's performance.
It is also paid directly by shareholders rather than out of consumers' bills.
A Southern Water spokesperson said its chief executive's pay and benefits were decided by a remuneration committee 'following protocols and rules set out by Ofwat and in accordance with the law'.
They added: 'Lawrence Gosden's 2025 package includes a relocation allowance, and long-term incentive plan paid by shareholders which marks improvements made during the delivery of our turnaround plan. Both of these payments represent common industry practice.'
Mr Reed's criticism of Mr Gosden's pay package came before the publication of a landmark review of the water industry, which is expected to recommend sweeping reforms to how the sector is regulated, including the abolition of regulator Ofwat.
The review follows widespread criticism of water companies for awarding executives large bonuses and paying significant dividends to shareholders while missing targets for investing in infrastructure and overseeing a rise in sewage pollution in England's rivers.
Earlier this month, Southern Water itself was forced to ask its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion to help boost its struggling finances.
The company, which supplies 4.7 million people across the south and south-east of England, has amassed nearly £9 billion of debt – making it one of the most heavily indebted water firms in the UK behind Thames Water, previously also owned by Macquarie.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Spotify CEO bankrolls AI military warfare while musicians walk away
Spotify, despite its ubiquity, has never been looked upon kindly by artists. The music streaming giant has spent years paying musicians by the fraction of a penny, covertly adding AI-generated and in-house commissioned songs to its playlists, and writing the rules as it sees fit on how its royalty system pays out. But now, CEO Daniel Ek has given the music world yet another reason to ditch the platform – this time, by pouring millions into playing business with high-tech war. Last week, Australian psych-rockers King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard yanked their entire catalog off Spotify, posting a blunt message on Instagram: 'We can't support a platform that profits from destruction'. They're not alone. A growing number of artists are cutting ties with Spotify after learning that Ek's investment firm, Prima Materia, is bankrolling Helsing, a German tech startup building AI systems for military drones and warfare. Read more: This extreme metal album blew up over a weekend – now it's accused of being AI Ek's investment firm first started their bankroll of Helsing in 2021, and recent reports from the Financial Times reveal they've just pumped in another €600 million. The musicians scraping by, and seeing paltry returns from their popularity on Spotify, are probably wondering what it's all for, other than fuelling the terrifying next generation of warfare. Truthfully, it will take a Taylor Swift or a Drake pulling out of the platform to cause any movement. Swift had previously taken her music off Spotify between 2014 to 2017, enraged by the bum deal offered to her through its royalty system. But in those years, Spotify was not quite the omnipresent juggernaut it is now – its huge gain in popularity in those years highlighted where music consumption was heading, but the total enmeshment between the major digital streaming services and the music industry was not quite yet complete. The idea of Swift removing her music from the platform would be much more radical now, but also much less likely. Many artists and projects removing themselves from Spotify are independent musicians, with sizeable enough audiences, but independent all the same. King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard are the biggest, averaging 1.5 million listeners a month on the platform, but the vast structure of such a space means their exclusion is negligible in the long run. Same could be said for the other artists leading the charge against Spotify. Acclaimed indie acts like Xiu Xiu and Deerhoof have joined the boycott, but their influence on the trajectory the platform takes shakes out to even less. Read more: The internet was my favourite thing in the world – now it just fills me with dread Still, musicians are boycotting Spotify, knowing all the risks to their own careers that it brings. The risk is simply worth it for them when trying to sleep soundly at night. Deerhoof made a scathing statement, equating their streaming revenue profits directly to the death toll of war. ''Daniel Ek uses $700 million of his Spotify fortune to become chairman of AI battle tech company' was not a headline we enjoyed reading this week,' read their statement. 'We don't want our music killing people. We don't want our success being tied to AI battle tech.' These artists know their boycotts won't touch Spotify financially, but the moral grace of taking a stand outweighs any financial loss. If musicians are squeezing for pennies in the streaming economy, then at least they might as well not be blood pennies. Spotify came onto the scene touting itself as a champion of artists, that the ease and use of streaming would inevitably democratise the process of music distribution. It once positioned its public image on this basis. But that has never been the case. Its business model has always prioritised growth and returns over dealing with anything close to fair artistic compensation. And with its CEO diverting hundreds of millions into advanced military AI technology, the disconnect between its image and its financial incentives has become too hard to ignore, too much of an ethical red line for any silence. Read more: Can we pass a law banning the sale of Highland cow AI art? For now, the boycott remains symbolic. Without major label artists with industry clout joining in, Spotify's bottom line will remain steady. But the growing discontent highlights the deeper issue of the music industry's reliance on these platforms, how they are now the only game in town worth playing, and how artists can be held at mercy over any basic ethical concerns they might have. For those musicians staying, the dilemma remains. Can they justify supporting a platform that funnels money into military AI, even if leaving means opting out of the biggest platform for their music? Either way, the conversation has begun, and it's a snowballing that the music industry will eventually not be able to ignore.
Fashion United
8 hours ago
- Fashion United
Fast fashion faces a reckoning as tariff loophole closes
For years, fast fashion has thrived on a global supply chain built for speed, scale and, most crucially, exemptions. But with the stroke of a pen, the US has redrawn the rules. President Donald Trump's latest executive order, coming into effect on August 29, ends the de minimis tariff exemption for goods under 800 dollars, a loophole that enabled brands like Shein and Temu to ship low-cost clothing to American consumers free of import duties, reported the BBC. Once confined to China and Hong Kong, the policy now spans the globe, and with it, a new chapter begins for the business of ultra-cheap fashion. The de minimis threshold effectively allowed online retailers to bypass traditional tariffs, using volume and velocity to flood the US market with disposable apparel at prices domestic brands could never match. Now, with those same parcels facing the full weight of country-of-origin duties, the economics shift dramatically. The White House points to concerns over opioid trafficking and customs evasion, the BBC said, but the implications will be most acutely felt in fashion's lower rungs: the 5 dollar T-shirt, the 10 dollar dress, the two-week trend cycle that fuels an industry addicted to newness and price. For American consumers, who have grown used to restocking wardrobes at the click of a button, price hikes may be inevitable. For platforms built on razor-thin margins and cross-border arbitrage, operations could change dramatically. What happens next? Some brands may try to absorb costs or reroute supply chains; others will raise prices or perhaps rethink the model entirely. Hopefully, an ideological shift is underway: after decades of deregulated consumption, the end of the de minimis era is more than a policy change. It could be a signal that fast fashion's free pass may be over.
Scottish Sun
10 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major fast food chain ‘better than Taco Bell' set to open first ever Scottish restaurant
The chain has gained popularity for its customisable burritos and bowls GRUBS UP Major fast food chain 'better than Taco Bell' set to open first ever Scottish restaurant Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR fast-food chain is set to open its first-ever Scottish restaurant as part of huge expansion plans. Zambrero is a popular Australian franchise famous for its customisable burritos and bowls, and many fans have hailed it as being "better than Taco Bell". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Zambrero has announced huge expansion plans across the UK Credit: Sportsfile 3 And it includes opening up its first-ever Scottish restaurant Credit: HANDOUT The Mexican-inspired chain now has 13 restaurants across the country after entering the UK market back in 2021. Bosses launched at their first branch in London, and the other 12 quickly followed. However, Zambrero has over 300 restaurants spanning across Australia, New Zealand, the US, Ireland and England. And the firm is now planning to open 100 more restaurants across Britain by 2030. This would create around 1,500 jobs in the process. But even sooner than that, an undisclosed number of other sites are planned to open across the UK over the next year. We've had a lot of interest in the brand during the last couple of years. And now is the right time for us to expand Emily Teh This includes plans for Zambrero to open its first-ever Scottish location. Although it is currently unclear where exactly in Scotland the new restaurant will be based. Emily Teh, CEO of Zambrero UK, told The Caterer: 'We've had a lot of interest in the brand during the last couple of years. "And now is the right time for us to expand through our franchise partners and work towards opening 100 restaurants by 2030." McDonald's Spices Up Breakfast: Spicy McMuffin, New Sweets & Summer Meal Deals She added that the business is on the lookout for more area developers and franchise partners to support its expansion goals. Aussie philanthropist Dr Sam Prince founded Zambrero 25 years ago when he was a 21-year-old medical student. At the time, he had less than £12,000 in savings, according to the chain's website. And while it has taken longer to make its mark in the UK, it is already the largest Mexican restaurant franchise in Ireland. The fast food chain also has a "Plate 4 Plate" initiative, whereby a meal is donated to someone in need for every burrito or bowl bought. So far, Zambrero has donated over 93 million meals - a sum expected to reach 100 million later this year. It comes as the business secured a £141m investment from Metric Capital Partners in February 2023. In recent years, people on social media have lined up to taste-test Zambrero against Taco Bell and Wahaca.
