The Benefits of Refusing
This is an edition of the Books Briefing, our editors' weekly guide to the best in books. Sign up for it here.
In the U.K., when people stop smoking, they say they 'gave it up,' Melissa Febos notes in her new book, The Dry Season. In the U.S., by contrast, it's more common to hear that they 'quit.' She observes that giving something up has a different connotation; to do so is 'to hand it over to some other, better keeper. To free one's hands for other holdings.' The phrasing matters: Giving up feels gentler, and also perhaps more generative.
First, here are four new stories from The Atlantic's books section:
Fast times and mean girls
The real message behind Les Misérables
How one animal divided Europe
Seven books for people figuring out their next move
The Dry Season is a memoir about the year Febos spent voluntarily celibate, and this week, she wrote for The Atlantic about six books that celebrate refusal and abstinence. The titles she chose opened her eyes to 'all the other kinds of reneging I've experienced, and how many of them led to unforeseen delights,' she writes. In her own book, Febos uses a striking metaphor to explain why she took a break from sex, dating, and even flirtation. Whenever she had a partner, she writes, 'it made sense to keep the channel of one's heart narrowed the width of a single person, to peer through the keyhole at a single room rather than turn to face the world.' Febos realized that she wanted, instead, to widen her aperture, and found that removing something from her life opened her up to all the other things that had escaped her notice. In essence, her book argues, saying no to one thing allows you to say yes to something else.
At a talk with the essayist and fellow memoirist Leslie Jamison earlier this week in New York, Febos said that her book is really about finding God, but she told the world that it was about sex because, she joked, it made for better marketing. Her description of discovering the sublime in daily things—such as the 'tang of fresh raspberries and the crispness of clean bedsheets,' as she writes in her recommendation list—moved me. It reminded me that spirituality can be less restrictive and more dynamic than I usually imagine it to be; that it can be found in smaller phenomena and stiller moments. My colleague Faith Hill, in her review of The Dry Season, came to much the same conclusion about the benefits of marshaling one's attention: 'Better to keep drawing it back, again and again, to the world around you: to the pinch in your shoe, to the buds in the trees, to the people—all the many, many people—who are right there beside you.' Febos's book made me wonder what narrow portals I'm looking through in my life, and what I might see if I turn away from them.
What to Read When You're Ready to Say No
By Melissa Febos
Purposeful refusal, far from depriving us, can make way for unexpected bounty.
Read the full article.
, by Bae Suah
The page-turning plot twists and thrills of a detective novel are often a very effective bulwark against boredom. The Korean writer Bae's novel offers those genre pleasures and more: It is, as Bae's longtime translator Deborah Smith explains in her note, a detective novel by way of a 'poetic fever dream.' Set over the course of one very hot summer night in Seoul, the book follows a woman named Ayami as she attempts to find a missing friend. As she searches, she bumps into Wolfi, a detective novelist visiting from Germany, and enlists him in her quest. Events take on a surreal quality, heightened by both an intense heat wave and the possibility that Ayami and Wolfi may have stumbled into another dimension. Summer's release from our usual timetables can quickly lead to seasonal doldrums. Untold Night and Day, set during the stretched hours of a sweaty, unceasing evening, shimmers at its edges, like midnight in July. — Rhian Sasseen
From our list: Five books that will redirect your attention
📚 UnWorld, by Jayson Greene
📚 The Möbius Book, by Catherine Lacey
📚 The Sisters, by Jonas Hassen Khemiri
What Trump Missed at the Kennedy Center
By Megan Garber
Little wonder that 'Do You Hear the People Sing?' [from Les Misérables] has become a protest song the world over, its words invoked as pleas for freedom. Crowds in Hong Kong, fighting for democracy, have sung it. So have crowds in the United States, fighting for the rights of unions. The story's tensions are the core tensions of politics too: the rights of the individual, colliding with the needs of the collective; the possibilities, and tragedies, that can come when human dignity is systematized. Les Mis, as a story, is pointedly specific—one country, one rebellion, one meaning of freedom. But Les Mis, as a broader phenomenon, is elastic. It is not one story but many, the product of endless interpretation and reiteration. With the novel, Hugo turned acts of history into a work of fiction. The musical turned the fiction into a show. And American politics, now, have turned the show into a piece of fan fic.
Read the full article.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
Sign up for The Wonder Reader, a Saturday newsletter in which our editors recommend stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight.
Explore all of our newsletters.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Samantha Barks welcomes second child
The Les Misérables actress and her husband, Alex Michael Stoll, announced the arrival of their daughter Felicity by sharing a black-and-white photo of Samantha pressing her lips against the newborn's forehead as they rest in a hospital bed. They simply captioned their joint Instagram post, "Hello Felicity," with a love heart emoji. Samantha, 34, met fellow stage actor Alex when they starred alongside each other in the Broadway musical adaptation of Pretty Woman in 2018. They got married in Italy in June 2022 and welcomed their first child, a son named Rafael, in October 2023.
Geek Tyrant
6 days ago
- Geek Tyrant
Amanda Seyfried Auditioned Six Times For WICKED Before Losing the Role - "I Worked My Ass Off For Years on That Music" — GeekTyrant
When the Wicked movie was announced, many people had opinions about who might be good to take on the lead roles. One name that made the rounds was Amanda Seyfried, who seemed like a perfect fit for the role of Glinda. She is a great actress, and she showed off her singing chops in the films Les Misérables and the Mamma Mia! franchise. As it turns out, Seyfried also thought she'd be great in the role, and she entered a long audition process in hopes to get it. Speaking on Backstage's In the Envelope podcast (via People), the Oscar nominee revealed: 'I auditioned like six times for 'Wicked.' Because that had to be really just right. And I like, I loved it. I was busy. I barely had time to do it, but I made it work. I worked my ass off for years and years and years on that music. I'm competitive… with myself in a really healthy way.' 'There's something really beautiful about auditioning,' she continued. 'If you really have the skill, you're going to show it no matter what. There's this weird fear when you walk in that you have to make an impression right away, which you do but the only impression that is helpful is to be yourself. The things that people do… the way they behave when they're nervous can be off-putting. Centering yourself and saying what you feel instead of a bunch of bullshit is helpful.' Ariana Grande ended up landing the role of Glinda, and earned an Oscar nomination for best supporting actress for the first flim. The Broadway musical was split into two movies, and the second, Wicked: For Good , arrives in theaters this November. Seyfried told People magazine last year that she was loved the 'fantastic' first movie even if she didn't get the role. 'It's an extravaganza, which is what she [Grande] does really well,' Seyfried said. 'And [my kids] have been playing the soundtrack nonstop. And everything is as it's meant to be for sure.'
Atlantic
6 days ago
- Atlantic
Toni Morrison's Definition of a Legacy
This is an edition of the Books Briefing, our editors' weekly guide to the best in books. Sign up for it here. In 2012, I visited the home of Toni Morrison, who was then 81, to discuss, among other things, her legacy. Morrison's Nobel Prize sat on her kitchen island. She had just published her penultimate novel, Home, and she was quietly but unabashedly engaged in making sure her work would be read as widely as possible. She recalled for me a recent visit to the University of Michigan, where 'my books were taught in classes in law, feminist studies, Black studies. Every place but the English department.' Even as a Nobel laureate, she worried that her work would be confined to courses on identity, shelved in a side room of the American literary pantheon. At the time, I found her efforts difficult to square with her lifelong insistence that she was ' writing for b lack people ' and no one else. Now, almost six years after her death, it makes more sense to me, especially after reading the essay that my colleague Clint Smith wrote about Toni at Random, a new book that tracks Morrison's parallel career as a book editor. First, here are five new stories from The Atlantic 's books section: The real reason men should read fiction ' Fools for Love,' a short story by Helen Schulman The perils of 'design thinking' Americans are tired of choice. The cure for guilty memories In the 1970s, before Morrison was world-famous for her fiction, she worked at Random House, publishing writers who were uncompromising in their vision and advocacy for Black people—but she also had to appeal to a mass audience. This wasn't easy; she was a rare Black editor in a publishing industry that was mostly run by white people for white people. 'A salesman at a conference once told Morrison, 'We can't sell books on both sides of the street,'' Smith writes: 'There was an audience of white readers and, maybe, an audience of Black readers, he meant, but those literary worlds didn't merge.' Yet Morrison didn't believe Black writers had to cater to white audiences. They, too, could create 'something that everybody loves,' she said. Morrison's writers were not middle-of-the-road types: They included Angela Davis, Huey P. Newton, Gayl Jones, and Muhammad Ali. But she protected their integrity while raising them to the highest standards, putting the same level of rigor into editing them that she brought to her own novels. She interrogated gauzy concepts and clarified ideas. She made their work unimpeachable. And she resisted efforts to make their memoirs more relatable. (After one reader asked for more 'humanness,' she wrote to her boss that that was 'a word white people use when they want to alter an 'uppity' or 'fearless'' Black person.) She believed that a book didn't have to be written for the broadest possible audience to be widely read. In one interview with The Guardian, while explaining her insistence on writing for a Black audience, she noted that Leo Tolstoy hadn't written his classic novels for her, 'a 14-year-old coloured girl from Lorain, Ohio.' Nonetheless, she recognized his brilliance, and white readers could recognize hers. In her way, Morrison was offering a definition of a legacy: That a work reaches beyond not just the writer's lifespan, but her intended audience as well. In both her writing and her editing, Morrison was recording the experiences of Black Americans without looking over her shoulder at white readers or critics. She revealed that there was a market for Black literature on both sides of the street—but she also left an even more important mark. She succeeded, in the long term, not by carefully calibrating the work or by selling the 'humanness' of her characters and her writers, but by putting humanity plainly on the page, where it would outlast her and her critics alike. How Toni Morrison Changed Publishing By Clint Smith At night, she worked on her novels. By day, as an editor at Random House, she championed a new generation of writers. What to Read Sex and the City, by Candace Bushnell Before they became the show of the same name, Bushnell's columns in the pink pages of The New York Observer documented, with light fictionalizations, the sex and social lives of New York's ambitious and powerful—and her own, though she frequently disguised her run-ins as the affairs of her 'friend,' the character Carrie Bradshaw. In this volume of collected Observer columns, most of them focused on Carrie, Bushnell reveals herself to be a sage of power and social capital, an expert on relationships and how they can be used to build careers, accumulate social clout, and stomp on feelings. For anyone with a sense of ambition, whether you're moving somewhere new or settling down where you already are, her work is both an entertaining read and an instruction manual for how even the most casual acquaintanceships can transform your life. Cultivating them intentionally, Bushnell implicitly argues, can turn even the biggest metropolis into a small town where your next opportunity (or at the very least a good party) is just a conversation or two away. — Xochitl Gonzalez Out Next Week 📚 I Want to Burn This Place Down, by Maris Kreizman 📚 Oddbody, by Rose Keating 📚 Angelica: For Love of Country in a Time of Revolution, by Molly Beer Your Weekend Read The Blockbuster That Captured a Growing American Rift By Tyler Austin Harper In a cramped, $50-a-month room above a New Jersey furnace-supply company, Peter Benchley set to work on what he once said, half-jokingly, might be 'a Ulysses for the 1970s.' A novel resulted from these efforts, one Benchley considered titling The Edge of Gloom or Infinite Evil before deciding on the less dramatic but more fitting Jaws. Its plot is exquisite in its simplicity. A shark menaces Amity, a fictional, gentrifying East Coast fishing village. Chaos ensues: People are eaten. Working-class residents battle with an upper-class outsider regarding the best way to kill the shark. The fish eventually dies in an orgy of blood. And the political sympathies of the novel are clear—it sides with the townspeople, and against the arrogant, credentialed expert who tries to solve Amity's shark problem.
