Out of sight, out of mind: Without federal support, brain injury survivors will be left behind
We can't see the cognitive struggles, the lost memories or the chronic pain. But for millions of Americans with brain injury, the impact is lifelong and profound. Every day is an exercise in rebuilding your life, your relationships and future.
Federal programs have made the journey of life with brain injury a bit more manageable. But now, that support is under serious threat.
Budget proposals and the Office of Management and Budget's leaked passback document outline catastrophic cuts to health programs across the board. Among them: the elimination of nearly every federal initiative supporting people with brain injuries.
Decades of investment in prevention and treatment could vanish with the stroke of a pen. These programs aren't wasteful spending. They are an important investment for people living with brain injury — now and in the future.
These proposed cuts would dismantle the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HEADS UP program, which trains coaches, parents and athletes to recognize concussions before they cause permanent damage. They would collapse the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems, the nation's gold standard for providing care and advancing recovery for survivors with moderate to severe brain injuries. We would also lose the National Concussion Surveillance System and end the collection of critical data showing where injuries are happening and how many lives are at risk.
Funding cuts for these programs put all of us at risk. Funding cuts mean a teenage football player sustains a preventable second concussion because his school had no access to proper return-to-play guidelines. A veteran with a blast injury loses access to a rehabilitation specialist trained to address cognitive impairments. Families already stretched thin by caregiving responsibilities lose the tiny but crucial grants that kept their loved ones living independently at home.
Brain injury does not just happen to 'other people.' More than 64 million Americans have sustained at least one traumatic brain injury (TBI) in their lifetime and millions have suffered from non-traumatic brain injuries like stroke, aneurysm or a lack of oxygen.
Federal investment in brain injury research and care is modest. In 2024, TBI research funding was an estimated $194 million, which is just $3.03 per person living with a TBI — barely the cost of a cup of coffee. That figure pales in comparison to the estimated $76.5 billion annual cost of TBI in the United States for emergency care, hospitalization, lost productivity, disability and social services.
Cutting these programs isn't fiscal responsibility. It's public health malpractice.
Eliminating programs like HEADS UP, the National Concussion Surveillance System and the Core State Injury Prevention Program will roll back decades of progress. These cuts will create a world where more people are suffering from the effects of brain injury, and we will have a lessened ability to identify and help those in need. It is not realistic to assume that states will be able to pick up the cost of these programs, so many will likely go away with no backup plan for continuity.
This should not be a political issue.
For decades, programs that support brain injury prevention, research and treatment have received bipartisan support because the need for them is undeniable. Brain injuries don't discriminate by party, race, income or geography. Brain injury can strike suddenly — a slip on the ice, a collision on the field, a car crash, a roadside bomb in combat — and alter lives forever.
Brain injury should be thought of as a chronic health condition. Many survivors struggle with persistent effects such as memory loss, depression, behavioral changes and physical disabilities, which can quietly erode their ability to work, study or maintain relationships. Worse, brain injury dramatically increases the risk of developing devastating conditions later in life, including Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and stroke.
Without continued research, education and community-based supports, many survivors will simply fall through the cracks. Eliminating federal brain injury programs would worsen these public health crises while stripping hope from those who need it most.
The Brain Injury Association of America calls on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to reverse course. We urge Congress to reject these devastating cuts to brain injury programs.
Investing in brain injury services and research saves lives, saves money and upholds America's promise to care for its most vulnerable citizens. America made that promise decades ago, when it began building the vital network of programs that exist today. That promise must not be broken now. Not when so many lives and futures depend on it.
Rick Willis is president and CEO of the Brain Injury Association of America.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
15 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Big Beautiful BS: Trump Proposes UFC Fights On White House Lawn As Republicans Pass Worst Bill In History
Source: Eric Lee / Getty While Donald Trump prepared to sign what he's calling his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on July 4th—complete with fireworks, fawning MAGA acolytes, and a potential UFC fight on the White House lawn —the rest of us are trying to figure out how we're going to survive the devastating consequences of it. Behind all the confetti and chaos lies one of the most destructive legislative moves in modern history. One that guts healthcare, slashes food assistance, erodes education funding, and further widens the racial and economic divide in America. And yes, you read that correctly. Donald J. Trump is hosting a UFC match on the White House lawn in 2026. Because nothing screams 'MAGA presidential' like uncouth troglodytes complete with octagon cages and flying elbows on the South Lawn. The UFC confirmed plans to host a fight card on the White House grounds, with Trump noting that he would like the unprecedented event to be part of a celebration honoring America's 250th birthday on July 4, 2026. 'We're going to have a UFC fight on the grounds of the White House,' Trump said in Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday. 'We have a lot of land there.' While he's turning 1600 Pennsylvania Ave into a pay-per-view billboard for corporate sponsors, Black, Brown, and poor folks—are being left to fend for themselves under a bill that should've been shredded on sight. This 'historic win,' as Trump and GOP leaders are calling it, is truly a legislative massacre. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke for hours, breaking the record for the longest House floor speech in modern history, to stall the bill and call out its cruelty to no avail. Unfortunately, the GOP garnered just enough votes to pass it. So what's inside this Trojan horse of tax breaks and flag-waving rhetoric? Let's break down how our communities will be impacted. A Gift to the Wealthy, a Gut Punch to the Poor The bill permanently extends the 2017 Trump tax cuts, pouring more money into the pockets of corporations and the wealthiest Americans. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the richest households will enjoy an average tax break of $12,000, while the poorest Americans could lose up to $1,600 annually. For Black communities, who are overrepresented in lower-income brackets due to centuries of systemic discrimination and economic inequality, this is more than just a tax issue. It's economic warfare. It's a direct assault on any attempt at building generational wealth. Trump calls this a 'birthday present to America,' but for many in the Black and Brown community, it serves as an eviction notice from the American Dream. Healthcare Cuts That Kill The bill also takes a hacksaw to Medicaid, implementing the strictest work requirements we've ever seen and introducing new bureaucratic red tape that will likely push nearly 12 million Americans off of healthcare by 2034. For the Black community, where chronic conditions are more prevalent and access to care is already limited, this is a death sentence packaged as fiscal responsibility. Food Insecurity on the Rise As if taking healthcare away wasn't enough, the bill also slashes SNAP benefits by forcing states to pick up more of the tab and imposing stricter work requirements. Older adults, parents, veterans, people experiencing homelessness, and young people who have aged out of foster care would lose the assistance they need to afford groceries, with no improvement in their job prospects or income. More than 40 million low-income Americans rely on SNAP to feed their families, with many of them being Black and Brown, leading to food deserts becoming food famines. Attacking Education and Opportunity Education also took a hit after the eligibility for Pell Grants was raised along with the termination of subsidized loans. The bill would enforce a lifetime cap of borrowing $100,000 for graduate students as well as a $200,000 cap for medical and law school students. The legislation also reduces opportunities for deferments or forbearance and new limits on lending for part-time students; making higher education even more inaccessible and unaffordable for students of color. Mass Deportation & Militarization While gutting programs and services of importance under the guise of saving Americans money, Trump simultaneously threw a whopping $150 billion at ICE, making it the largest federal law enforcement agency. The earmarked funds will support mass deportations, finance the doubling of migrant detention capacity, and increase border enforcement; providing Customs and Border Patrol with $46.5 billion to build the border wall and associated infrastructure, like access roads, cameras, lights, and sensors. The package also includes $2 billion for the Department of Homeland Security and $29.9 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. A 'Golden Dome' and a Hollow Democracy Tucked inside the bill is $150 billion in military funding for projects like Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defense system, a vanity project disguised as national security that stole headlines as clean energy incentives were slashed, safety nets were ripped apart, and the national debt is projected to rise by $3.3 trillion over the next decade. And yet, Trump's priorities remain painfully clear: throw a spectacle, sell the presidency to the highest bidder, and make governing look more like WrestleMania than responsible leadership. Hosting cage matches on the White House lawn? Bragging about 'hating' Democrats while signing a bill that harms millions? This clearly isn't leadership, it's performance politics at its most dangerous level; where cruelty is policy and spectacle is strategy. The damage is happening in plain sight and if we don't call it out, fight it, and vote like our lives depend on it—they will continue to treat our democracy like it's just another reality show. SEE ALSO: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Will Destroy Medicare, Food Stamps Social Security Projected To 'Go-Broke' Earlier Than Expected SEE ALSO Big Beautiful BS: Trump Proposes UFC Fights On White House Lawn As Republicans Pass Worst Bill In History was originally published on
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Want more growth? Welcome more immigrants.
Which means the only way to ensure the population base needed to keep the economy growing is to increase the number of immigrants entering the United States. Much of the public supports President Trump's ferocious crackdown on illegal immigration. The administration is obsessed with rounding up and deporting foreigners who have been living in the country without proper documents. Whatever the wisdom of that policy, it ignores the fact that the vast majority of unlawful migrants who enter the country come here to work in peace. The US economy in recent decades has fueled an unprecedented demand for labor, but there aren't nearly enough legal channels to accommodate that demand. The result has been an influx of migrants crossing the border unlawfully. And that in turn eventually triggered the political backlash that helped send Trump to the White House. Advertisement All the while, however, millions of jobs are going unfilled in this country, because there aren't enough working-age Americans to fill them all. Clearly the best way to solve the problem of illegal immigration is to make it easier for foreigners to immigrate to America legally . That, in turn, is the only way the United States can have the expanding labor force necessary to achieve economic growth and higher living standards in the decades ahead. In The authors show that nearly half of the net growth in the US labor force over the past decade has come from immigrants. That might seem surprising since only about 1 in 7 Americans are foreign born. But immigrants are more likely to work than native-born Americans of working age. In 2023, just under 60 percent of US-born natives age 16 and older were working. Among immigrants, the percentage was almost 65 percent. 'Over the past decade, immigrants have filled nearly 40 percent of the new jobs in America,' Vedder, Moore, and Denhart write. And for most of that time, the unemployment rate has remained at historically low levels — evidence that immigrants are not displacing US-born citizens from jobs that would otherwise have gone to them. With roughly Advertisement But what makes immigrants so valuable to the US economy goes beyond their propensity to work. There is also their extraordinary performance as innovators and entrepreneurs. More than 45 percent of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or their children, and immigrants are more than twice as likely as US natives to start a business. In 2023, according to Such statistics are striking, but they also stand to reason. Almost by definition, immigrants have a higher than normal willingness to take chances, to relinquish the familiar, and to try new things. It shouldn't come as a surprise that newcomers from abroad are fired with a passion to dream the American Dream, or that Immigration increases both the labor supply and labor demand, which helps explain why states with the highest immigration inflows, such as Texas and Florida, are associated with lower unemployment than other states. Because immigrants are more likely to work and to start businesses, their presence leads to higher rates of economic growth. 'The parts of the United States with the highest proportion of population coming from other nations have higher levels of total output per capita,' the Unleash Prosperity authors show. Thus, in the 10 states with the highest percentage of immigrants, output per capita is nearly 40 percent higher than in the 10 least immigrant-intensive states. To be sure, correlation may not prove causation, and immigration is not the only factor affecting economic output. But it is hard to dispute that immigration and growth go together. Advertisement What is true nationally is true locally. At a presentation I attended in 2012, Boston's then-mayor Thomas Menino rattled off a slew of numbers that underscored how much foreigners added to the city's prosperity. There were 8,800 immigrant-owned small businesses in Boston, Menino said, producing nearly $3.7 billion in annual sales and employing more than 18,000 people. At the time, immigrants living in Boston were spending $4 billion per year, generating $1.3 billion in state and federal taxes. Since 2012, the To fully understand why robust immigration boosts American prosperity, it is crucial to take into account the contributions of their children . The United States would never have become the world's foremost economic powerhouse if not for the innovations of first-generation Americans — men and women whose parents were immigrants. Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, was the son of an immigrant from Syria. Larry Ellison, creator of the software firm Oracle, was born to a single mother from Ukraine. Jeff Bezos was raised by Miguel Bezos, who immigrated from Cuba. Henry Ford's father came to America from Ireland. Advertisement Needless to say, millions of other first-generation Americans, though not as famous or as rich as the megabillionaires, have contributed to every American industry and field of endeavor. And in the process they have typically risen to greater heights than their foreign-born parents. 'Since immigrants arriving in America are typically poor (particularly these days because of the large recent inflow of relatively unskilled illegal aliens), immigrant poverty rates are higher than that of native-born Americans,' the three authors observe. 'But poverty among their adult children is typically below that of the native born. Moreover, while immigrants themselves are more likely than native-born Americans to receive graduate or professional degrees, their education is modest relative to their own children, who exceed native-born Americans in terms of high-level educational attainment.' In short, without immigrants and their children, the United States would be a poorer, duller, less influential, less desirable nation. That is especially true given the crisis of America's 'birth dearth,' since immigrants tend, on average, to be younger and to have more children than natives. According to Census Bureau calculations, the number of working-age US-born Americans is projected to fall by 5.3 million between now and 2040. Over the same span, the population of working-age immigrants is expected to grow by 1.9 million. Immigration has always been the great growth hormone of American history. More immigrants have always meant more economic development, more innovation, more cultural richness. That is as true today as it has ever been — and it is compounded by the fact that the US economy desperately needs more workers. Border control is not incompatible with a policy of welcoming immigrants with open arms. And the surest way to dissuade illegal immigration is to create more opportunities for would-be Americans to immigrate lawfully. Advertisement Anti-immigrant demagoguery may excite some in the MAGA camp; there has always been an appetite for Expanding legal immigration is a pro-growth, pro-worker, and pro-sovereignty agenda. It is the best way to strengthen the rule of law, suppress mayhem at the border, and maintain America's role as a safe haven for the oppressed — all while attracting the young and dynamic workforce on which US growth depends. We have always needed more immigrants. Now, as the United States is about to enter its second quarter-millennium, we need them more than ever. To open our gates to striving would-be Americans is to turbocharge the economy and enrich the American way of life. Much has changed since This is adapted from the current , Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit . Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security email says policy bill eliminates tax on benefits. Does it?
In a celebratory email sent to Americans across the country, the Social Security Administration praised the Trump administration's sprawling budget and tax bill and said it eliminated federal income taxes on most retirees' benefits. But that's not exactly what it does. Many retirees quickly took notice, with several writing The New York Times to question some of the agency's statements, while pointing out what felt to them like unusually partisan language. The agency's embrace of the legislation, which was signed into law by President Donald Trump on Friday, was also at odds with the effect it is expected to have on the program's financial health. The law is projected to further weaken Social Security's revenues at a time when it is already facing a financing shortfall. Eliminating taxes on Social Security, along with taxes on tips and overtime, was one of Trump's often-repeated campaign promises. The email, which went out Thursday, said the new law 'includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries,' and, 'additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older.' But the enhanced deduction will help reduce households' tax bills on their overall income, including Social Security income. 'The SSA statement implies there is a direct tax cut on Social Security benefits,' said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, 'which there is not.' Instead, older single filers will get the extra $6,000 deduction ($12,000 for couples), as long as their income falls under a certain ceiling (below $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married joint filers). Above those income levels, the deduction begins to decrease, and it goes away once single taxpayers' income reaches $175,000 ($250,000 for couples). Nor will the extra deduction benefit all Social Security recipients. Retirees who are 62 through 64 are ineligible. And since the income of more than half of Social Security recipients is too low to be taxed anyway, lower-income people won't be helped much. The new break is expected to benefit middle- and upper-middle-class households, tax policy experts said. (Recipients who earn less than $63,300 owe an average of 1% of their Social Security benefits in taxes, according to an analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.) 'It is discouraging to see such misrepresentation by the administration and the Social Security Administration,' said Martha Shedden, president of the National Association of Registered Social Security Analysts, a group that offers guidance to consumers and financial professionals on making Social Security decisions. The Tax Policy Center estimates that less than half of older adults, most of whom earn about $50,000 to $200,000, will get some benefit from the new deduction, though most of them will still owe some tax, Gleckman added. Under current law, an estimated 64% of beneficiaries did not owe taxes on their Social Security benefit, and the new deduction would boost that number to 88%, according to an analysis in June from the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Frank Bisignano, the commissioner of the Social Security agency said in the email, 'By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned.' The email also says that 'nearly 90% of beneficiaries will no longer pay federal taxes on their benefits.' That, too, is misleading because the deduction is temporary, only in effect for tax years 2025 through 2028. The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. The change will also weaken the program's finances. Besides the payroll tax, the program's lifeblood, the taxation of Social Security benefits adds revenue to the program's trust funds. The taxation of benefits began in 1983, in an effort to stabilize Social Security's finances, and is the type of measure that some policymakers say is needed again now. Social Security's retirement trust fund already faced a financing shortfall that, if left unaddressed, would cut millions of retirees' crucial monthly benefits by 23% in 2033. The Trump administration's bill is expected to pull that date into 2032 and deepen benefit cuts by roughly 1 percentage point, according to a recent analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Budget, a nonpartisan group that calls for lower deficits. That's because the new law reduces the amount of revenue deposited in Social Security's trust fund by decreasing the number of older Americans paying taxes on their benefits and cutting the rates at which some of their benefits are taxed. (The law also reduces revenue deposited to Medicare's trust fund.) 'The bill won't end taxation of benefits, but it will cut those taxes and as a result, accelerate the looming insolvency of Social Security and Medicare,' said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Budget. The year '2032 is just around the corner, and we are not ready.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
