The World's Biggest Users of Cocaine Are in Australia
(Bloomberg) -- Australia and New Zealand are the world's biggest users of cocaine, as global consumption of the illicit drug reaches record highs, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime said in its latest report.
While more people use cocaine in the Americas than anywhere else, per-capita consumption is most prevalent in Australia and New Zealand, according to the World Drug Report 2025. Waste-water analysis suggests most people there are using cocaine only occasionally, the report said.
Some 3% of those aged 15 to 64 in Australia and New Zealand used cocaine in 2023, the report said. That's almost double the proportion in the Americas, and nearly triple the percentage in Europe — the next-biggest consumers of the drug, the report said.
The report painted a bleak picture of the worldwide battle against illegal drugs and the criminals behind them, and said a new era of global instability has intensified the challenge. Production volumes, seizures and use of cocaine all hit records in 2023, making it the world's fastest-growing illegal drug market, the UN said. In total, an estimated 316 million people used illicit drugs in the period.
'Organized drug trafficking groups continue to adapt, exploit global crises and target vulnerable populations,' Ghada Waly, executive director of the UNODC, said in a statement. 'We must invest in prevention and address the root causes of the drug trade at every point of the illicit supply chain.'
Cocaine traffickers are breaking into new regions of Asia and Africa, the report said. But the relative wealth of Australia, and the price that users in the country are willing to pay for drugs, has long made it an attractive market for criminals. The country's vast seaboard also makes it hard for border authorities to intercept illegal shipments.
Subscribe to The Bloomberg Australia Podcast on Apple, Spotify, on YouTube, or wherever you listen.
Australian Federal Police pulled off a record cocaine seizure in December when they uncovered an attempt to import 2.34 tons of the drug into the country by sea. The cocaine had a street value of A$760 million ($496 million) with the potential to equate to 11.7 million street deals, authorities said. Thirteen people were charged.
The UN report said cannabis remains the world's most widely used drug with 244 million users, representing 4.6% of the global population aged between 15 and 64. In Australia and New Zealand, prevalence of cannabis use was recorded at more than 12%, the report said.
The use of ecstasy — also known as molly or MDMA — in Australia and New Zealand remained by far the highest worldwide, the report said.
(Adds metrics in third paragraph, chart.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 hours ago
- Mint
You Should Be Able to Tell Who's an ICE Agent
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Back in March, when masked, hoodie-clad federal immigration agents were caught on camera grabbing a Tufts University student off a sidewalk and forcing her into an unmarked vehicle, it was shocking. 'Why are you hiding your faces?' a bystander can be heard asking. It hasn't taken long for such aggressive tactics to become the norm in many US cities. But perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in and around Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has decided to focus his administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, going so far as to bring in the National Guard and Marines over the objections of California officials. LA is full of agents, from Border Patrol and Immigration to Customs Enforcement to Homeland Security Investigations, many of whom aren't easy to identify. In the resulting confusion, police officers are getting mistaken for those agents. The trust that's so critical for local law enforcement to persuade people to report crimes, regardless of their immigration status, is eroding. And fear and paranoia are high that some of the masked people walking around with guns and chasing people aren't federal agents at all, but criminals pretending to be law enforcement. There's a real worry about the overall impact on public safety. California state Senator Sasha Renee Perez, who is sponsoring a bill to make federal agents display identification, told me police chiefs recognize the 'very dangerous' situation the Trump administration has created with its raids. She says she introduced her bill because she didn't know what to tell constituents after masked agents caused a panic in her district by pulling a high-powered rifle from the trunk of a car in a busy parking lot. 'They were asking, 'How will we be able to identify whether or not somebody's actually an ICE agent?' And 'I'm just supposed to get in a car with any masked person with a gun who claims that they're ICE?'' Numerous elected officials have been asking the same questions, given that criminals have been known to impersonate ICE agents. Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger is convinced that a staffer's Latino godson was approached by two impersonators in an unmarked car. They told him he had a 'nice truck for someone with that surname' and tried to open the door. Lately, not a day seems to pass without a new viral video showing armed men in ski masks or neck gaiters climbing out of unmarked vehicles with out-of-state plates. Sometimes they wear tactical vests that say 'POLICE,' but almost never with name tags or badge numbers. And when bystanders ask whether they are federal agents, which agency they work for and whether they have a warrant, the men – and it's mostly men – typically refuse to answer. There are many reasons these tactics are problematic, including the basic affront to civil liberties. Americans, after all, are accustomed to seeing the faces of law enforcement and being able to demand identification. That transparency goes a long way toward creating the conditions for public safety. What's required is not just trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve, but also some level of communication and coordination among government agencies. Little of the latter is happening though, California Democrats continue to say. The Trump administration would likely blame the state's 'sanctuary' law for that. But nothing prohibits notifications to city or state officials about upcoming operations. Nevertheless, in that vacuum of information, tension and confusion have been allowed to build between the public and federal immigration agents. In suburban Pasadena, for example, elected officials have been left to guess about the identity of a man in a 'POLICE' vest who aimed a gun at a group of pedestrians. They assume he was a federal agent because he turned on the car's red and blue emergency lights before driving away. But local police weren't told of any operations. 'One question is this a law enforcement agent or someone pretending to be a law enforcement agent, and there is no good answer here,' Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo told the Los Angeles Times. Elsewhere, protesters have confronted undercover police detectives, thinking they were federal agents. 'It is not safe for our officers, or for others involved in any active police operations if misrepresentations or misunderstandings lead to inappropriate engagement,' Michael Dorsey, police chief of the city of Fontana, wrote on Facebook. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department reported that its fleet of unmarked vehicles has been targeted, too. 'All white vehicles are NOT ICE,' it posted -- and then deleted – on X. And the mayor of Huntington Park has gone so far as to propose directing his city's police to make federal agents identify themselves before raids, which he called 'state-sanctioned intimidation.' California state Senator Scott Wiener, who has introduced a bill to prohibit federal agents from covering their faces, called the situation 'combustible.' (If enacted, such a bill, much like Perez's, would probably be impossible to enforce.) Why the secrecy? Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, insists it's not about 'intimidation.' It's 'because they've been doxxed by the thousands,' he recently told the New York Times podcast The Daily. 'Their families have been doxxed. ICE officers' pictures have shown up on trees and telephone poles. Death threats are sky high.' That is probably true, and if so, it's a problem. Nevertheless, letting law enforcement operate in masked secrecy, chasing down people without having to provide warrants or identification, is not a viable solution. 'Who are these people?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass asked at a recent press conference. 'And frankly, the vests that they have on look like they ordered them from Amazon. Are they bounty hunters? Are they vigilantes? If they're federal officials, why is it that they do not identify themselves?' These are questions that deserve answers. That there are none forthcoming from the Trump administration is just further evidence that despite what Trump says about upholding 'law and order,' the administration's deportations of random dishwashers, day laborers and landscapers has nothing to do with public safety. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Erika D. Smith is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. She is a former Los Angeles Times columnist and Sacramento Bee editorial board member. More stories like this are available on
Mint
2 days ago
- Mint
Worldline's Woes Deepen as Belgium Opens Probe Into Payment Firm
(Bloomberg) -- Worldline SA has long claimed to have cleaned up its payments business. Now, regulators and investors are testing that narrative after fresh allegations it overlooked fraud among high-risk clients. The Brussels Public Prosecutor's Office on Friday said it has opened a probe into Worldline's Belgian unit following a series of media reports claiming the French firm ignored warnings and continued doing business with prohibited and high-risk clients, allowing some fraudulent transactions to persist. Sweden's Financial Supervisory Authority said it called the company to a meeting. Such attention deepens the crisis at a company that serves 1.4 million businesses around the world and says it's Europe's biggest payments provider. Chief Executive Officer Pierre-Antoine Vacheron, who has decried the reports as an orchestrated 'attack' on the company, has also said that they have negatively affected the firm's reputation among clients. The company's market value, which peaked at about €24 billion ($28.1 billion) less than four years ago, is now below €900 million after shares dropped as much as 11% on Friday. That pares some of Thursday's 20% rebound, which itself followed a 38% drop on Wednesday. Its struggles are the latest example of a European payments firm seemingly unable to decouple from the murky corners of the Internet that are typically shunned by large banks. And it will do little to help the payments industry shake off the stigma of Wirecard's failure in 2020 after an accounting scandal that led to the arrest of its chief executive officer and left the German firm unable to find more than $2 billion missing from its balance sheet. Bernstein analysts have said this week's articles contained little substantially new since reports in 2023, when the German financial watchdog Bafin imposed restrictions on Wordline's Payone subsidiary. But they raise significant reputational risks and could damage Worldline's business relationships. The company works with payment networks Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. and many European lenders including UniCredit SpA and BNP Paribas SA. Its ties to Credit Agricole SA are particularly close. The French lender announced a joint venture in 2023 and subsequently acquired a 7% stake in 2024 to help stabilize its struggling payments partner. That prompted staff this week to question management about the decision. Earlier this week, several media outlets coordinated by the European Investigative Collaborations network published reports alleging the firm moved high-risk customers — including pornographers and dating websites — across jurisdictions rather than losing their business despite warnings they were defrauding customers. A report by Dutch newspaper NRC alleged that Worldline in 'recent years' didn't ban lucrative customers with high fraud rates even as its risk management department pressed for stricter checks. Swedish paper Dagens Nyheter said that Worldline moved multiple high-risk clients from Worldline Belgium to its Swedish subsidiary to hide them there after credit-card provider Visa Inc. raised alarms. 'The company allegedly processed payments for companies engaged in illegal activities and for which money-laundering regulations were allegedly not respected,' the Brussels Public Prosecutor's Office said in a statement on Friday. The probe focuses on the Belgian entity of the Worldline group, and has been entrusted to the Federal Judicial Police, officials added. Meanwhile Sweden's Financial Supervisory Authority on Wednesday called the company to a meeting to ask 'questions about the information described' and 'how the company works to ensure that their services cannot be exploited for criminal purposes,' FSA spokesperson Karin Franck said in emailed comments to Bloomberg. Worldline said in an emailed statement that it 'acknowledges the initiation of an investigation for money laundering' in Belgium and 'will cooperate with the authorities.' The opening of a probe doesn't imply the company is guilty of any wrongdoing. While Worldline's activities in the payment sector can be traced back to the 1970s, the firm's modern incarnation was created as the electronic payment unit of French computer services firm Atos Plc in the 2000s. It was listed in 2014 and spent the following years consolidating the sector with a string of acquisitions, including a purchase of SIX Group's payment business for €2.3 billion in 2018. --With assistance from Steven Arons, Charles Daly and Abhinav Ramnarayan. (Updates with comment in fifth paragraph) More stories like this are available on
Mint
2 days ago
- Mint
Ex-CEO of Ocean Parks Fined $10,000 a Day in Spat With Lenders
(Bloomberg) -- The former chief executive officer of a string of bankrupt, dolphin-themed animal parks is facing a $10,000-a-day fine, after he was accused of using credit-card readers he bought at Costco to divert ticket revenue away from his company's Mexican locations. A federal judge in Delaware imposed the sanctions on Eduardo Albor, who has been fighting US-based lenders for control of The Dolphin Company, which has theme parks in Latin America, the US and Europe. Judge Laurie Silverstein ordered him to stop interfering in the company's operations and give new management access to bank accounts and other financial records. The months-long dispute between Albor and lender-backed new management has disrupted the company's operations and has threatened the welfare of hundreds of dolphins, sea lions and other animals. The newly appointed independent directors have raised concern about animal welfare at the company's theme parks, as a number of dolphins have died in recent months. Regulators have also tightened scrutiny of the company. The animals are both the main attractions at the parks and valuable collateral for more than $100 million in debt. Albor spent decades building the Dolphin Company into a multinational corporation, but lost control of his empire earlier this year after the company defaulted on about $100 million of debt owed to Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, according to a May court filing. The lenders had been trying to remove Albor since the default last year. In April, Albor installed new credit-card terminals at the Mexican parks, after lenders took control of the parent company and stripped him of his corporate authority, lenders alleged in court filings. The terminals allegedly allowed Albor to divert ticket-sale proceeds away from The Dolphin Company's bank accounts, which had been taken over by the new, US-based management team, they said. The cash, collected just as peak tourist season hit, was instead put into new accounts set up by Albor and used, in part, to pay his legal bills in Mexico, according to court filings. The judge's sanctions did not mention the new credit-card terminals, but focused on Albor's efforts to file court challenges in Mexico claiming to still be in charge of The Dolphin Company. Albor has used court cases in Mexico to try to block lenders from taking over the company and to remove their representatives from the headquarters in Cancun. During a court hearing this week, Albor's attorney defended the former executive, arguing that Albor has been cooperating with the new managers. The new payment machines were installed in the parks and new bank accounts opened because The Dolphin Company's main accounts had been frozen, said attorney James C. Moon. The new accounts allowed Albor to pay employees at the parks in Mexico and feed the animals, Moon told the judge. The two sides have been fighting over company records, computer systems and access to employees who are needed to operate the Mexican businesses. In April, Albor, with help from state police officers, took back control of The Dolphin Company's headquarters building, which the executive owns. After putting the corporation into bankruptcy in the US, lenders had temporarily changed the locks on the building, including on Albor's personal office. The case is Leisure Investments Holdings LLC, number 25-10606, in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. More stories like this are available on
