
‘Servants of RCB': What Karnataka government told court on Bengaluru stampede
Appearing for the state, senior counsel PS Rajagopal said Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) had submitted a proposal for their victory celebrations even before the final IPL match was played.
Instead of seeking mandatory authorisation for such a massive public event, the officers began arranging security without consulting their seniors or securing the required permissions, he added.
'The most obvious response from the IPS officer should have been: You haven't taken permission,' PTI quoted Rajagopal as saying in the court.
'Then, RCB would have had to approach the high court, and the law would have taken its own course,' he added.
He argued that the failure to question the event's legality and the lack of senior-level consultation amounted to a serious dereliction of duty. 'No senior-level consultation took place, and the officers were merely placed under interim suspension to prevent further damage,' Rajagopal said.
Referring to the logistical impracticality of handling such a large crowd in less than 12 hours, he questioned what proactive steps the suspended officer had taken during that period.
He then cited Section 35 of the Karnataka State Police Act to point out that police had sufficient powers to act but failed to do so.
When the Bench of Justices SG Pundit and TM Nadaf asked who oversaw security inside the stadium, Rajagopal said it was the state police and admitted that arrangements were 'clearly inadequate.'
Rajagopal also criticised the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) for quashing the suspension. He took issue with the Tribunal's sympathetic remarks about the police's limitations, reading from its order: 'Police personnel are also human beings, not God or magicians.' Rajagopal dismissed it as 'an inappropriate narrative more suited for storytelling by grandparents,' adding, 'This is not what litigants expect from a judicial forum.'
The state's submissions were made in a petition challenging the CAT's July 1 order reinstating Vikash with full pay and allowances. The Tribunal had found no convincing evidence of negligence and said the police had little time to act after RCB made a sudden announcement on social media.
It also observed that managing a crowd of 3 to 5 lakh people required far more planning than was possible in the available time.
Despite acknowledging that RCB's announcement triggered the crowd, the Tribunal concluded that the police 'could not be expected to perform miracles.'
On July 2, advocate general Shashi Kiran Shetty told the High Court that Vikash had resumed duty in uniform. The court refused to stay the CAT's order and listed the matter for further hearing the next day.
On July 3, the division bench orally questioned the necessity of suspension and suggested that a departmental shift might have sufficed. The AG defended the suspension as being backed by records and pressed for a stay.
Vikash's counsel, senior advocate Dhyan Chinnappa, assured the court that no contempt proceedings would be initiated. The Bench, in turn, urged both sides to avoid precipitative action until the issue is resolved.
Vikash is the only one among five suspended officers to challenge the action before the Tribunal. The others include Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda, DCP Shekar H Tekkannavar, ACP C Balakrishna, and inspector AK Girish.
With PTI inputs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why has N Jagadeesan been picked as Rishabh Pant's replacement during the England Tests?
With Rishabh Pant out, N Jagadeesan has been called up as his replacement. But does Jagadeesan have the credentials to earn a spot in the playing XI for the Oval Test? And did he edge out Ishan Kishan for the role? read more A toe fracture on Day 1 of the 4th Test meant that Rishabh Pant's series is done, and a contingency substitute will join the squad for the Oval Test. As the 4th Test has concluded, and the batters have done an immaculate job to keep India in the hunt to evade a series defeat, the BCCI has entrusted faith in the talents of N Jagadeesan and picked him as the replacement for Pant. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Jagadeesan's call-up has come rather surprising to the keen observers of Indian cricket, as wicketkeepers like Ishan Kishan and KS Bharat were seemingly above in the pecking order. Given that Kishan has been a regular feature in the IPL for many years, the Jharkhand cricketer comes as an alluring option, and reportedly, BCCI was interested in picking him for the 5th Test. So, why did the board zero in on Jagadeesan eventually? As per reports, Ishan Kishan is nursing an injury on his left ankle and thus had no other option but to say no to chief selector Ajit Agarkar. As for KS Bharat, he was not approached by the board. Jagadeesan's record backs his selection The Chennai cricketer came into the fray at the back of a stellar domestic season, particularly in red-ball cricket. In 52 First-Class games, the wicketkeeper-batsman has stockpiled 3,373 runs at a handsome average of 47.50. He has 14 half-centuries and 10 centuries to his name in the domestic circuit. He emerged as a standout player in the previous Ranji season, where he racked up 674 runs in eight matches at a brilliant average of 56.16, notching two hundreds and five fifties in the process. He ended up being the leading run-scorer for his state in the competition. While he has been brought in as an emergency replacement, it will be interesting to note whether he will make it to the playing XI or not for the Oval Test. Dhruv Jurel, who has carried out duties as a substitute keeper in the last two tests, will be in the reckoning as well. Moreover, the team can fall back on KL Rahul, as he has spent time behind the wickets for India in the past.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Stampede: Karnataka govt revokes suspension of four police officers
Bengaluru, Karnataka government on Monday revoked the suspension of four police officers, including the then Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda, who were suspended in connection with the June 4 stampede outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium here, which left 11 people dead. Stampede: Karnataka govt revokes suspension of four police officers However, the suspension of Vikash Kumar Vikash - Inspector General of Police, stands as proceedings related to his case are currently underway in the Karnataka High Court, official sources said. According to the government order, the suspension has been revoked as both the Judicial Commission and Magisterial committee have completed their inquiry into the stampede incident and submitted their reports to the government, and the officers have also submitted representations requesting to revoke their suspension. The officials whose suspensions have been revoked are IPS officers: B Dayananda - Additional Director General of Police and Shekar H Tekkannavar - Superintendent of Police. Also, two Karnataka State Police Service officers: C Balakrishna - Deputy SP and A K Girish - Police Inspector. On July 1, the central administrative tribunal Bengaluru bench quashed the suspension of Vikash, challenging which, the state government had moved the High Court. "In view of the facts and circumstances explained in the preamble, the Government of Karnataka, in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule3 of All India Services Rules 1969, hereby revokes the order of suspension of B Dayananda, IPS and Shekar H Tekkannavar, IPS and reinstates into service with immediate effect, pending the initiation of Disciplinary proceedings under Rule 8 of All India Services Rules 1969," an official order said. It said, "Further, Government of Karnataka in exercise of the powers conferred under rule 5 of Karnataka State Police rule 1965, hereby revokes the order of suspension of C Balakrishna, and Ð K Girish, Police Inspector and reinstates into service with immediate effect, pending the initiation of Disciplinary proceedings as per Rules." The stampede occurred on June 4 evening outside the Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on June 5 had ordered the suspension of five officers. "...it is found that there has been on the face of it substantial dereliction of duty by these officers," their suspension order had said. The order revoking the suspension issued on Monday says the government had ordered a magisterial inquiry by Jagadish G, IAS, Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate, Bengaluru Urban District into the stampede incident. Further, the government had also constituted an one man Judicial Commission under chairmanship of Retired Justice of High Court of Karnataka John Michael Cunha to inquire into the same incident. Since, both the Judicial Commission and Magisterial committee have completed their enquiry into the stampede incident and submitted their reports to the government on July 10 and July 11 respectively and further the officers also have submitted representations requesting to revoke their suspension, the order of suspension of the officers have been reconsidered by the government, it said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Washington Sundar's father slams selection policy: My son doesn't get regular chances
Washington Sundar's father, M. Sundar, has launched a scathing attack on the Indian selectors, expressing deep disappointment over the lack of consistent opportunities for his son in the national team. His comments come in the wake of Washington's heroic performance in the fourth Test against England at Old Trafford, where the all-rounder scored his maiden Test century and played a crucial role in India's great has been doing very well consistently. However, people tend to avoid and forget his performances. Other players get regular chances, only my son doesn't get them," M. Sundar told The Times of India. "Washington should consistently bat at number five like he did in the second innings of the fourth Test and get five to ten straight chances. My son was surprisingly not picked for the first Test against England. The selectors should watch his performances," he who made his international debut in 2017 and Test debut only in 2021 under unforeseen circumstances, has featured in just 11 Test matches. Yet, he boasts an impressive batting average of 44.86 and a bowling average of 27.87 - numbers that speak to his utility as a genuine all-rounder. His father recalled how Washington was unceremoniously dropped from the Test setup in 2021, despite standout performances with the bat against England - including an unbeaten 85 in Chennai and a fluent 96 in Ahmedabad, both on challenging surfaces. "My son gets dropped even if he fails in just one or two matches. It is not fair. Washington scored an unbeaten 85 on a rank turner in Chennai against England back in 2021 and 96* against the same opposition in Ahmedabad during the same year," he took nearly three years for Washington to return to the Test side, earning a place in the XI for the fourth Test of the ongoing England series, where he grabbed the opportunity with both hands - a fact that, according to his father, should have long silenced the doubters. The criticism wasn't limited to the national team selectors. M. Sundar also took aim at Washington's IPL franchise, the Gujarat Titans, accusing them of underutilising his son despite his evident match-winning abilities."Even his current team (GT) doesn't give him regular chances. He showcased his calibre in the IPL 2025 Eliminator against Mumbai Indians, smashing 48 off 24 balls. Look at the way Yashasvi Jaiswal has been backed by RR. Washington hasn't been able to enjoy a consistent run even in domestic cricket," he remarked.- EndsYou May Also Like