Stand-off leaves Kosovo unable again to elect speaker
Opposition parties have, since mid-April, refused to vote for VV's candidate for the post of speaker, former justice minister Albulena Haxhiu.
Her appointment had been expected to be a formality but it has now turned into an impasse, with repeated votes -- and failures -- on the issue.
Several political leaders are now hinting at the possibility of fresh elections.
According to parliamentary rules, the parliament cannot be considered inaugurated without a speaker, and without its inauguration a new government cannot be formed.
'Hostage'
Several opposition parties now accuse VV of deliberately blocking progress by refusing to propose an alternative candidate.
"VV is keeping Kosovo in an institutional crisis at all costs," said Memli Krasniqi, president of the right-wing Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), whose party came second with 20.95 percent of the vote.
Krasniqi on Tuesday suggested that the VV consider another candidate, pointing to the last US election when the Democratic Party ditched then president Joe Biden for Kamala Harris.
"That wasn't considered anything extraordinary," he added.
The centre-right Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK), which finished third on 18.27 percent, said the current crisis was down to the "failure of the party that came first in the vote to create political partnerships for a new majority".
For Ramush Haradinaj, leader of the right-wing Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK), a potential solution could involve the intervention of President Vjosa Osmani.
She is seen as more pragmatic and diplomatic than her prime minister and could turn to the judiciary for an interpretation of the constitution.
Osmani's office on Tuesday said she was launching "a series of consultations" with political parties from Thursday.
University of Pristina sociology professor Fadil Maloku said he believed that the "crisis is the result of shameful hostilities between leaders".
"Kosovo has been their hostage for three months," he added.
Political analyst Arben Qirezi, writing for the online newspaper Koha Ditore, said the young country lacks a "culture of political compromise".
He believes that this is essential for maintaining the political system's stability, legitimacy, and democratic representation of the citizens.
Economic consequences
The current deadlock could be costly for Kosovo, which declared independence from Serbia in February 2008. Serbia refuses to recognise Kosovo's independence.
The parliamentary stand-off has delayed the ratification of agreements under the European Union's Growth Plan for the Western Balkans, depriving the country of access to 882.6 million euros ($981.5 million) in loans and grants.
"If ratification does not occur by June it could end into delays in fund disbursement and potentially a redistribution of funds," to other countries, warned Besar Gergi, from the Group for Legal and Political Studies, a Pristina-based think-tank.
Even if parties agree to new elections, the current legislature must still vote to ratify the Growth Plan agreement, added Blerina Istrefi, a researcher at the same think-tank.
The parliamentary session that began on April 15 can only be concluded with the election of a president, three vice-presidents and the formation of parliamentary groups.
However, the Constitution does not specify a strict deadline for this process, meaning it could, in theory, continue indefinitely.
"The parties have locked themselves into their camps... the political schizophrenia continues," said Maloku.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
15-07-2025
- Euronews
European Commission takes no position on Kosovo-Telekom Serbia dispute
Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti has launched a renewed attack on Serbia's largest telecom operator, Telekom Serbia, accusing it of waging what he called 'a hybrid war' against Kosovo, with the company responding by saying it has been a frequent target for the authorities in Pristina. A false bomb alert triggered the evacuation of the Kosovo parliament in Pristina last week, prompting Kurti to share a Facebook post by Interior Minister Xhelal Sveçla, who claimed that the phone number behind the threat was registered in Serbia and belonged to Telekom Serbia's mobile operator MTS. Kurti praised the Kosovan authorities for their 'prompt response' in the investigation and repeated his past claims that the incident reaffirmed the existence of Serbia's ongoing hybrid war against Kosovo. The company's management stated that it has been subjected to repeated attacks and pressure from Kosovo leaders in recent times. Vladimir Lučić, CEO of Telekom Serbia, strongly rejected the bomb threat incident accusations in a statement to Euronews Serbia, describing them as 'an absurd and shameful attack on a company that has long been a thorn in the side of the Pristina authorities for two years." He said the attacks are taking place almost daily as a form of wider political pressure, including a failed attempt to shut down its presence in Kosovo two years ago, which was stopped after the international community's intervention. Lučić added that Telekom Serbia operates in accordance with the law and international agreements, including the Brussels Agreement, according to which the company has 28 base stations in areas where ethnic Serbs live in Kosovo, while its headquarters and technical infrastructure are located in Belgrade. Brussels chooses not to step in A former province of Serbia, Kosovo declared independence in 2008, which Belgrade has so far refused to recognise. More than 100 countries have recognised its independence — but not the likes of Russia, China and five EU member states. Since 2011, Brussels has facilitated a dialogue between the two countries designed to decrease tensions and resolve bilateral issues — which is also one of the requirements for both countries' progress along their path toward full-fledged EU membership. However, the two leaders — Kurti and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić — have failed to participate in trilateral meetings with EU representatives since May 2023, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the Brussels dialogue as a means to find solutions to outstanding issues. When asked by Euronews for a reaction to the Kosovo leader's statements on Telekom Serbia and the operator's claims of repeated attacks, the European Commission chose not to address the developing political implications but instead referred to the technical framework. "Compliance with the Kosovo regulatory framework is the responsibility of the independent regulatory authority for electronic and postal communications," the European Commission said in a statement to Euronews. Anouar El Anouni, a spokesperson for the European External Action Service (EEAS), said that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of Kosovo's national authorities and that telecommunications compliance is the exclusive responsibility of Kosovo's independent regulatory authority. El Anouni also recalled that under the EU-facilitated dialogue, agreements on telecommunications were reached in 2013 and 2015 to normalise operations. These agreements enabled MTS to operate legally in Kosovo. Big hopes from Washington Meanwhile, the CEO of Telekom Serbia is counting on US support to obtain a third 5G licence in Kosovo, which was agreed upon by Pristina as part of an international deal but was then repeatedly refused. Serbia has been hoping that US President Donald Trump can decrease regional friction by promoting economic cooperation and growth — something Serbian Foreign Minister Marko Đurić said last week officials in Pristina have failed to adopt. At the same time, Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani praised Trump for his role in de-escalating tensions between Kosovo and Serbia in recent times. "We have the continued support of the United States, and President Trump was very clear that he was the person who stopped Serbia from continuing its efforts," she said at a recent event at Johns Hopkins University in Washington. "I am very convinced that (war) has been stopped thanks to America's role and its direct involvement in preserving and protecting peace," Osmani added. Meanwhile, these and other similar statements have sparked a reaction from Richard Grenell, the former US special envoy for Serbia and Kosovo negotiations, who said Osmani was misinterpreting Trump's remarks, making it seem as though Serbia was about to go on an offensive against Kosovo. "Shame on Vjosa Osmani for manipulating President Donald Trump's words," Grenell said in a post on X.
Euronews
09-06-2025
- Euronews
Four Japanese soldiers injured in explosion at US base in Okinawa
Four Japanese soldiers sustained non-life-threatening injuries following an explosion at a storage facility for unexploded wartime ordnance on a US military base in Okinawa, local authorities confirmed on Monday. The incident occurred as the soldiers were working at a site managed by Okinawa prefecture to store old ordnance discovered across the island — the site of one of the fiercest battles of World War II. According to officials, the servicemen suffered injuries to their fingers during the blast. No further information regarding the nature of the explosion or the condition of the facility was immediately available. Japan's Self-Defence Forces said they were investigating the explosion, which reportedly happened at or near Kadena Air Base. A unit specialising in the disposal of unexploded bombs had been operating in the area at the time. The SDF added that efforts were under way to determine both the cause and precise location of the incident. Large quantities of unexploded ordnance remain buried across Japan, especially in Okinawa, where intense US bombing took place during the final months of WWII. These remnants are frequently discovered during construction or excavation works. Last October, a wartime US bomb detonated at a commercial airport in southern Japan, creating a substantial crater and forcing the cancellation of dozens of flights. US President Donald Trump's sweeping ban on travel to the US by citizens of 12 countries took effect on Monday amid rising tensions over immigration. The 12 countries targeted include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela are partially restricted. On Wednesday, Trump warned in a video that new countries could be added to the list as "threats emerge around the world." The ban comes more than eight years after his first travel ban in 2017, which denied entry to citizens from mainly Muslim-majority countries, sparking chaos at numerous airports and prompting months of legal battles. Unlike Trump's first ban, no such disruption was immediately discernible at airports and other entry points. Experts expect the new proclamation, which is broader and more carefully crafted, to withstand legal challenges partly due to its focus on the visa application process. The ban does not revoke visas issued to citizens of countries included on the list. However, unless the applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, their application will be rejected from Monday. Travellers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the US even after the ban takes effect. The announcement that the ban would take effect on Monday was overshadowed by other immigration battles, including widespread protests in Los Angeles against Trump's deportation raids. The demonstrations prompted the deployment of the National Guard, despite objections from California's governor. The policy targets explicitly citizens of Haiti and Afghanistan, though it makes exceptions for individuals who collaborated closely with the US government during the two-decade war. It also imposes stricter measures on Venezuelan nationals, who have faced increased pressure under the Trump administration in recent months, including abrupt deportations to a detention facility in El Salvador, which have ignited a legal battle. The measure has been denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, said. Trump has justified the ban by claiming that some countries had "deficient' screening for passports and other public documents or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. The nationals in the countries included on the list impose "terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also tied the ban to a hate crime attack in Colorado, which wounded a dozen people, saying it underscored the dangers posed by visitors who overstay visas in the US. The man charged in the incident is from Egypt, a country not included in Trump's list.
Euronews
13-05-2025
- Euronews
Pope Leo XIV faces expectations to bridge divisions in the Church
European Council President António Costa visited Sarajevo on Tuesday as part of his Balkans tour. He was given a warm reception upon his arrival prior to his meetings with members of the presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In a statement, the European Council chief announced that the EU 'remains committed' to European future of the country. He also praised Željka Cvijanović, Denis Bećirović and Željko Komšić and Borjana Krišto – all members of the presidency – for their role in maintaining stability and security in the country and the region. Recently, tensions have been brewing domestically over the leader of Republika Srpska – Milorad Dodik – actions, which the government has denounced for undermining the country's constitutional order. Western powers and the EU have condemned Dodik for his provocations after he had suggested that the Dayton Agreement, the peace agreement that formally ended the Bosnian War in 1995, have outlived their purpose. In his statement, Costa underlined the importance of the Dayton accords, set to mark its 30th anniversary this year. 'And this year, on the 30th anniversary of Srebrenica genocide and the Dayton/Paris agreement, I believe that it is an important message to remember,' said Costa. Costa also outlined that some reforms are needed to ensure Bosnia remains on the path to EU membership. 'We need the approval of two judiciary laws, the appointment of a chief negotiator, and the adoption of the reform agenda to move towards on the Bosnia and Herzegovina in the European path.' Bosnia and Herzegovina is the only country that does not benefit from the EU's Growth Plan for the Western Balkans. Costa stressed that the implementation of these reforms are of paramount importance to ensure the citizens of Bosnia benefit from the EU plan. ] 'The people of Bosnia and Herzegovina are the only ones in the region who do not benefit from the Growth Plan yet.' 'I would like to see Bosnia and Herzegovina joining the other Western Balkans partners in profiting from all that the European Union has to offer,' noted the Council president. Costa will next travel to Montenegro and Albania on Wednesday where he will meet with President Milatović in Podgorica and President Osmani in Tirana. He'll conclude his tour with a visit to Skopje in North Macedonia where he will be meeting with Prime Minister Mickoski. Although less than a week has passed since Pope Leo XIV was elected at the conclave of cardinals, gathered to elect the next leader of the Catholic Church, much has already been said about the new pontiff and what is expected from his papacy. While he is widely seen as someone capable of uniting a divided Church, he is expected to continue Pope Francis' legacy. However, some conservatives hope the new pontiff will embrace a more traditionalist approach. His relationship with the United States will also be one to watch, especially given that some factions within the American Catholic Church align with US President Donald Trump's policies. 'He is largely unknown — that's the big question," Father Patrick Mary Briscoe, the editor of Our Sunday Visitor, told Euronews. "Some bloggers and others have reacted quite strongly. They're nervous about some of the pope's political views. For example, we've seen tweets responding in particular to Vice President (JD) Vance, so there's a bit of concern from the right side of the political spectrum," Father Briscoe explained. "But overall, we just don't know much - this pope hadn't said a lot before being elected, and we're only just getting to know him. I think it's too early to tell, and we'll see how things go." Some hardliners have even suggested that the new pontiff may end up clashing with Trump on a number of issues. They argue that he doesn't appear to be supportive enough of the US president's MAGA ("Make America Great Again") political agenda. However, others say the supreme pontiff cannot take sides. 'If the pope were too aligned with American politics it would impinge his mission. The pope has to lead the Church and that means leading the universal Church, the whole of the Catholic Church," Father Briscoe said. "So if the pope's main concern were a particular view on American politics, it would harm his mission and role, which is to be (the heir to Saint) Peter.' The Trump administration wants to hear this week how NATO's European member countries and Canada plan to boost defence spending to 5% of GDP, new US envoy Matthew Whitaker has said. Briefing reporters ahead of a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Turkey, US Ambassador Matthew Whitaker insisted that "5% is our number. We're asking our allies to invest in their defence like they mean it." "Make no mistake, this ministerial is going to be different,' Whitaker said, adding that "5% is not just a number, it is a necessity for our security. The alliance is facing significant threats." He did elaborate on what those threats were. In 2023, as Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defence budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so and leaders will set a new goal at a summit in The Hague on 25 June. Trump, who has cast doubt over whether the US would defend allies that spend too little, insists NATO members should commit to spending at least 5%, but that would require investment at an unprecedented scale. NATO leaders insisted at a summit last year that "Russia remains the most significant and direct threat to Allies' security," but some countries have grown uneasy about Trump's links to President Vladimir Putin. Last week, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said that NATO's chief expects the leaders "to aim for 3.5% hard military spending by 2032," and to "1.5% related spending such as infrastructure, cybersecurity and things like that. Also achievable by 2032." While the two figures do add up to 5%, factoring in infrastructure and cybersecurity would change the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. Asked about his demand, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte did not deny it, but he said: "I'm not going to confirm the figures." He said that "there are many rumours floating around" as envoys discuss the new spending goal. Whitaker appeared to confirm the "defence investment" plan, saying that it "also includes things like mobility, necessary infrastructure, cyber security. It is definitely more than just missiles, tanks and howitzers." "But at the same time, it's got to be defence-related. It's not a grab bag for everything that you could possibly imagine," Whitaker added. It remains difficult to see how many allies might reach even 3.5% of GDP on defence investment. NATO's most recent estimates show that 22 allies would reach the 2% goal last year, compared to a previous forecast of 23. Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain would not, although Spain does expect to reach the 2% goal in 2025, a year too late. Even the United States was estimated to have spent 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago, when all members vowed to increase spending after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped. Whitaker also said that any European investments in "defence industry capabilities must also include the fair treatment for American defence technology firms." He said that excluding the US and others "would undermine NATO interoperability, slow Europe's rearming, raise costs and stifle innovation." Last month, the European Union announced a new drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defence equipment in Europe.
